ML18141A393

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:51, 12 September 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRR Perspectives on Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Calculations
ML18141A393
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/21/2018
From: Stephen Cumblidge
Piping and NDE Branch
To:
Rezai A, NRR-DMLR 415-1328
References
Download: ML18141A393 (8)


Text

NRR Perspectives on Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics CalculationsStephenCumblidgeMaterialsEngineerNRR/DE/EPNBUnitedStatesNuclearRegulatoryCommission(U.S.NRC)Tel:+1 301 415 2823 Email:stephen.cumblidge@nrc.govRockville,MDMay212018 NRCUseofPFMCalculations TheNRChasbeenusingprobabilisticriskassessmentstoguideregulatorydecisionmakinginseveralareasfordecades TheNRChasusedtheprobabilisticfracturemechanics(PFM)codeFAVORtodevelopthealternatePressurizedThermalShockRule(10CFR50.61a)

TheNRCiscooperativelydevelopingthe"ExtremelyLowProbabilityofRupture"(xLPR)ProbabilisticfracturemechanicscodetoevaluatetheleakbeforebreakmethodologyinsystemswithactivePrimaryWaterStressCorrosionCracking TheNRCisopentoevaluatingandusingnewPFMcodesinthefuturetoassistinregulatorydecisionmaking,andrecognizesthepowerfulinsightsprovidedbyPFM 2 BenefitsofPFMCalculations PFMCalculationscanprovideanoverviewoftheprobabilitiesofcrackdepths,leaks,orfailure OnecandecideonaprobabilityofaneventasopposedtothebinarycriteriaofadeterministiccalculationPFMandDeterministicCalculationscanbeeffectiveindependentlyormaybecomplementary X or vs.Deterministic PFM 3 ConfirmatoryCalculations WhentheNRCstaffperformsatechnicalreview,wechecktheimportantcalculationsperformedinthesubmittal TheNRChasexpertsinavarietyoffields,includingPFM,toallowforthistypeofconfirmatorywork PFMcalculationspresentuniquedifficultiesforperformingconfirmatorycalculations 4

NovelPFMCodes WithoutaccesstothecodeorindependentreviewofthecodeitcanbeverychallengingtodetermineifthePFMcalculationsareadequate 5 NRCReviewofaPFMPossiblemethodsforverifyingthecode-HavingthecodedirectlyevaluatedbyNRCstaff(TopicalReport)-Benchmarkingthecodeagainstacodewehavein house(xLPR,FAVOR)-Benchmarkingthecodeagainstdeterministiccalculations

-Independentpeerreviewbyabodywithnoconflictofinterest 6 IssuesWithPreviousPFMCodes Unusualassumptions(e.g.extremelylowpossibilityofacircumferentialflawinapipingweld)PFMdidnotaccountfordegradationmechanismsseeninoperationalexperienceCorrectionfactorswithlittletonotechnicaljustification 7

PathForward TheNRCisdevelopingguidanceontheuseofPFMcalculationsinregulatorysubmittals ThisguidancewillhelptomakesubmittalsusingPFMcalculationsmorerobust,willallowformoretimelyandpredictablereviews,andmakeacceptanceofPFMsubmittalseasier 8