ML11360A045

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:35, 31 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2011/12/16 Davis-Besse Lr - DB Draft RAI B.2.39-13 on Shield Building Cracks
ML11360A045
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 12/16/2011
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML11360A045 (3)


Text

1 Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 1:56 PM To: custerc@firstenergycorp.com

dorts@firstenergycorp.com Cc
Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource

Subject:

DB Draft RAI B.2.39-13 on Shield Building Cracks Attachments:

DB B.2.39-13 Containment Crack RAI.docx Importance:

HighCliff and Steve, Attached is LR new RAI on the Shield Building Cracks. I'll try to issue this one in the same letter with the RAIs on Operating Experience and SG tube to tubesheet.

Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov

Hearing Identifier: Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number: 2788 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0806FB4109D)

Subject:

DB Draft RAI B.2.39-13 on Shield Building Cracks Sent Date: 12/16/2011 1:55:58 PM Received Date: 12/16/2011 1:56:00 PM From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Created By: Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov Recipients: "Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource" <Davis-BesseHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "custerc@firstenergycorp.com" <custerc@firstenergycorp.com> Tracking Status: None "dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com> Tracking Status: None

Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 459 12/16/2011 1:56:00 PM DB B.2.39-13 Containment Crack RAI.docx 20456

Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

RAI B.2.39-13

Background:

In order to perform a scheduled reactor head replacement, a construction opening was made in the concrete shield building. During hydro-demolition of the concrete shield building, cracks were identified in the 'architectural shoulders' of the shield building. While investigating the extent of the cracking, additional cracks were identified around the shield building. These additional cracks were identified using an Impulse Response (IR) technique and core bores were used to verify the IR results.

Issue: Extensive cracking in the shield building could affect the structural integrity of the shield building and may impact its ability to perform its intended function during the period of extended operation.

Request: 1. Summarize the shield building degradation, the root cause, and the expected corrective actions.

2. Explain how the recent plant-specific operating experience impacts the Shield Building's ability to perform its intended functions during the period of extended operation. Include a list of any additional aging effects that may require management based on this operating experience.
3. Explain how the recent plant-specific operating experience will be incorporated into the Structures Monitoring Program AMP, and whether the current program will be adequate to manage aging of the shield building during the period of extended operation, based on this operating experience. Specifically address the following:
i. Details of tests planned to determine the long term effect of the concrete cracks on the ability of the rebars to carry design loads. ii. Plans, if any, to repair the crack or reinforce the shield building concrete.

iii. Detailed plans to monitor the extent and thickness of cracks, and corrosion of the rebars over the long term.

iv. Plans, if any, to perform detailed structural analysis, with explicit modeling of rebars, cracks, and concrete, to demonstrate that the shield building will perform its intended design function over the long term. This analysis should also consider the effect of shrinkage and environment on the concrete and rebar during the period of extended operation.

4. Identify and explain any changes to the license renewal application based on the recent plant specific operating experience.