ML21319A176

ITAAC Closure Verification Evaluation Form (Vef) for ITAAC Number C.2.6.09.03b (Index No. 661) for Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License (VOG3)

ML21319A176
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	11/15/2021
From:	Michael Webb NRC/NRR/VPOB
To:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Mike Webb, VPO
References
ITAAC C.2.6.09.03b
Download: ML21319A176 (3)

Text

ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)

The Lead Reviewer in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to an ITAAC closure review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.

Docket No: 5200025 Plant Name: Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License Licensee Name: Southern Nuclear Operating Combined NPF-91 Company, Inc. License No:

ITAAC ID No: C.2.6.09.03b ITAAC Type: Targeted

ITAAC Family Designation or 17A enter N/A:

ITAAC Closure Notification (ICN) ADAMS ML No: ML21281A159

Name of Lead Reviewer: Webb, Michael

Name of Technical Reviewer assigned to ITAAC Closure Review bas ed on an affirmative response to statement j below:

Name of the Technical Reviewer: Simonian, Niry

Enter Yes in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, No if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and N/ A if the statement is not applicable.

a. Yes The ICN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plan t site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plants docket number.

b. Yes The ITAAC as stated in the ICN matches the ITAAC as stated in t he combined license.

c. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Determination Basis (IDB) of the ICN contains sufficient information including a summary of the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the l icensee has successfully performed the inspection, test, and/or analysi s stated in the ITAAC. The methodology described in the IDB of the ICN eit her was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sou nd scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported re sult.

d. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the IDB of the ICN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC.

e. N/A For ITAAC specified as being performed on as-built structures, systems, or components (SSCs): If the licensee performed the inspectio ns, tests,

Page 1 of 3 ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)

and/or analyses of the ITAAC at location(s) other than the fina l installed location, the licensee has based on the guidance in NEI 08-01 e ither summarized a technical justification or provided a reference to a generic technical justification in the IDB of the ICN that establishes why it was acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the f inal installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC was not performed a t a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as as-built.]

f. N/A If ITAAC is a Reference ITAAC, all the ITAAC it references ha ve been verified as successfully completed. (Enter N/A if ITAAC is n ot a reference ITAAC.)

g. Yes All planned inspections for this ITAAC (if any) have been compl eted as indicated in the Construction Inspection Program Management Sys tem (CIPIMS). Either NRC inspectors found no ITAAC findings for th is ITAAC or any ITAAC findings are closed as indicated in CIPIMS and the ICN for this ITAAC.

h. Yes The ICN indicates that the licensee completed the ITAAC as affi rmed by the signature of a licensee representative.

i. No During concurrence review, a potential problem was identified w hich prevents verifying the completion of the ITAAC

j. Yes An additional reviewer was assigned to the ITAAC closure review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page base d on his or her expertise being required.

If the reviewers have verified that the licensee successfully c ompleted the inspections, tests, and analyses prescribed for this ITAAC, and that the acceptance criteria have been met then this determination is based on information available at the tim e and is subject to the licensees ability to maintain the condition that the acceptance criteria are met. If the staff receives new information suggesting that the staffs determination on this I TAAC is incorrect, then the staff will determine whether this ITAAC should be reopened by the licensee. An affirmative NRC staff determination on this ITAAC will be used to support a subsequen t finding, pursuant to 10 CFR 52.103(g), at the end of construction that all acceptance crite ria in the combined license are met. The ITAAC closure verification process is not finalized f or this ITAAC until the NRC makes an affirmative finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g).

Lead Reviewer: Webb, Michael Date: 11/12/2021

Lead Approver: Welch, Christopher Date: 11/15/2021

Licensing PM: Patel, Chandu

Date: 11/3/2021 Technical Reviewer: Simonian, Niry Date: 11/9/2021 Technical Approver: Bowers, Anthony

Page 2 of 3 ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)

Page 3 of 3