ML14071A068: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562]]
| number = ML14071A068
| issue date = 02/20/2014
| title = Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562
| author name =
| author affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000348
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = NL-14-0249
| document type = Report, Technical
| page count = 37
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Fp-5iSheet I of 3Status: ]ND UI-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QINI1HV3369A Equip. Class,Equipment Description MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVELocation:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El, 121 Room, Area , _ _ __/Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Nof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
YQI NO Url NIAPTYOI NO UD]NA-,4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YO ND UF N/A] '5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
YD1 ND UD N/AvY6ND- U0I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 197 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F/-57 (Sw4Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3Status: Y N-] u0i]Equipment ID No. QINI1HV3369A Equip, Class, 7Equipment Description MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVEInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y1;NO UO N/A-YfNNO UD N/A010. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YVN- UOof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 'NDU0adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Dee &_.v,,,ieV1 t O IUt/1S/33q9i (Af/e,,-
Fl -
z,-5ý*,V A4L.-,DAAJ Evaluated byDate: '. 2 3. _o-,0,an4/d~J-/Page 198 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-nUtPage 199 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Shet/i of lStatus: Nn Ut]Seismi -WSASeismic Wulkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QINIIHV3370A Equip. Class' 7Equipment Description MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLA TION VALVELocation:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2 1Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
YEYE NE UO N/AteYO NE UE NiAo,-NIAEI("4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YE NE UE5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NE UEYe/Nil3 UEEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 200 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheep ofd40Status: Y[n N[] u[]Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QINIIHV3370A Equip. Class' 7Equipment Description MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLATION VALVEInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and 'masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y9-fD- UO N/A]Y2/N UO N/AQlI&NLJ UE3 N/AD--Y~i/NO UEIOther Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NE U0adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) e,/o AJEvaluated by:-- FPage 201 of 562
----7ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0NPage 202 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 203 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Fl.- 5Sheet 1 of 3'Status: YI NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, QINI1PT0476 Equip. Class' 18Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR IA DISCHARGE PRESSURELocation:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El .155 Room, AreaManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraze
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
YOI NO UCY"N/AOYOJ NO U[TN/AO3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YQ"l NO Uff N/AQ5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
YED NEI UO N/A[3'YO NO UCTIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 204 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QINIIPT0476 Equip. Class, 18Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 1A DISCHARGE PRESSURESheet2 of4 qStatus: YE] NE U[3rInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y2"N- U" N/ADYEM2'NO UD N/ADYO ND U2YN/ADYEi NO UDOther Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[f ND UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evahisatpedb hir PM! 1V0 Yfob )I / t., 9- 1 &#xfd; &#xfd;(fU,2Date: <Page 205 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 206 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 207 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 208 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0-t -Imo... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...... ......F,NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 209 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 210 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 211 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Shee.'of.&056 Status: I N[] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QINIIPV3371C Equip. Class' LEquipment Description MAIN STEAM ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVELocation:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2:4/Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YIQ N[D 11of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
YO NO UO/,4 -/- IA e3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
YO NO UO N/Al-74. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YO NE UO N/A&/5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% fbrwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NO UO N/Aa/-YNOU'UOIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 212 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet: o 3-f D[Status: U0[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QgINPV3,371C Equip. Class' 7Equipment Description MAIN STEAM ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVEInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y[U0 UD N/ADVIO UO-I N/ADIY94[ UE-] N!AO10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yff/NO ULDof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO -ND UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
()1U1V33(
26 (11-Evaluated by: " 4z6,2A ~~Date: ;-zf Z 3. Zo/,?"Y6,~ b/ -O2Page 213 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 214 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0=-Page 215 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 216 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet i ofw Z-Status: YZN-] U0ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QINIISV3369BC Equip. ClasswEquipment Description SOLENOID VALVELocation:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area -2 4Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorane
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
/ A. -,U9C&#xfd;.4 .f --3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
YOYO NO UrlJNAmYOJ NEI Un N/AE[-'YO- NO UE= N/AJ /YO NO U" N/A[I-7I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 217 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Status 31z:Status: NCI UMSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O1NIISV3369BC Equip. Class'Equipment Description SOLENOID VALVEInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets fl-ce from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y1Z /N UO NIAOY NO UO N/AOUD N/ADOther Adverse Conditions X11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NfNO UDadversely affect the safety fiuctions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:'It'-~ (dJelaa6 5Date: 9; 3. -3 &0/2-IPage 218 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 219 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 220 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of 4Status: YE NEI- U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment lID No. QlN23FIS3229CB, Equip. Class' 18Pkq F1-56Equipment Description FEEDWA TER INTAKE FLOW INDICATION Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 190Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. 'Ihe space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[I] NZof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y[ NEI UE N/AE]YZ NEI UE' N/AE3YZ NEI UE- N/AQ-YE NE UE- N/AZYN NEI UE-IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 221 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 4Status: YN NO U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIN23FIS3229CB, Equip. Class, 18Pkg Fl-56Equipment Description FEEDWA TER INTAKE FLOW INDICATION Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NEI Ut] N/At]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NE] Ut] N/At]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NtI Ut] N/At]Y NO- U-]Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nt] Ut]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No comments.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Cabinet adjacent (N-42) per D- 175069 is <3/4" away, but adequately stiff to pose no adverse seismicI/A concern.This package was originally signed on 8-22-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-15-12.
#,4 .11A "Mikfip,I'f/I zEvaluated byY a.. .. IDate: 8/22/128/22/12Page 222 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 223 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 224 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0r Sheejof 3Status: N-] Uf-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1N23FT3229A Equip. Class, 18Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER FLOW TRANSMITTER Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area I 9&Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of tl&#xfd; following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage,
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] Nof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
Y$3 NF- UE N/A[-two Url N/A[l4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
Yt<Nr] UFD N/AD5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
YE] NEI UE] N/Ab'-Y/N0]UE]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 225 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIN23FT3229A Equip. Class, 18Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER FLOW TRANSMITTER Sheet 2 of 3Status: NQ6 N EUoInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YV4 UI-3 N/A[]Yb,] UD N/ACYWNN0 U" NIAQOther Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y040 UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
/VoV.Kr WAIA ZaJ1 .J 24{2iiL ate:Evaluated by:,A.dZI 12-01JJPage 226 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0a1'~(ylIC-Page 227 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Fl-StSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1N23HV3227A Equip.Sheet of 3Status: Y[W N[- U"Equipment Description MOTOR DRIVEN AUX FEEDWA TER TO STEAM GENERA TOR IALocation:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area , "fiManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorate
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YQof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
YDI NEI UE N/AZI--^/,4/ -4'W4 g-&#xfd;3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
YEI NEI ULD N/Ag---YOI NO UE] N/LIDYDI NO UM N/A&"Y2/N LIDIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 228 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3Status: YVNR'] U[Z]Equipment ID No. QlN23HV3227A Equip. Class, 7Equipment Description MOTOR DRIVEN AUX FEEDWA TER TO STEAM GENERA TOR 1AInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO/NC U0 N/AC4KC UEJ N/ACY040/ UC N/ACYYVO UOOther Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NO U[-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
A/ 0JIVarEvaluated by: nfgjDate: K' 3. 2/2-Page 229 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 230 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)St hees of 3Status: Ur0Equipment ID) No. QIN23M0V3209A Equip. Class, 8Equipment Description SERWCX WATER ISOLA TION VALVE TO AUX FEED WA TERLocation:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area /I/Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
YEN-[I UM N/A r/I PJ -L / /v 6 4,-o A4 po ,.j 4,ix/ r3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
YE NE UD N/AE /YE NE UE N/AY[4 UniEI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 231 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0FI:-VIFi- SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet f3Status: Y[N{1 U[0Equipment ID No, Q1N23MOV3209A Equip. Class' 8Equipment Description SERVICE WA TER ISOLA TION VALVE TO AUX FEEDWA TERInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y&Ni' UF-C N/Ar-Y4'N[ Url N/AO'Yy&#xfd; UD N/AD4/(NO UQOther Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could V NO UOadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
NVOAIk-Evaluated by-.&#xfd;/AL'Do%'/
On IA/ /jDLA0(11CL
-1411a: Date: ~1,27. 2012,1Z%&#xfd; ~~6/C -7/ lcPage 232 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 233 of 562}}

Revision as of 22:03, 9 July 2018

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A068&oldid=877019"