ML18025B121: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:Northwest Medical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Overview Panel) | ||
*January 23, 2018 Panelists | |||
*Michele Evans | |||
-Deputy Director for Reactor Safety Programs and Mission Support, NRR | |||
*MaryJane Ross | |||
-Lee-Deputy Director, NRR/DLP | |||
*Joseph Donoghue | |||
-Deputy Director, NRR/DMLR | |||
*Brian Smith | |||
-Deputy Director, NMSS/FCSE 2 | |||
99Mo Overview | |||
*99Mo decays to 99mTc-Effective diagnosis | |||
-Minimal exposure | |||
*50,000 procedures daily | |||
*No domestically | |||
-produced supply3 Establishing a Domestic Supply of 99Mo*NRC supports U.S. policy objectives to establish domestic 99Mo production | |||
*First construction permit for domestic 99Mo production issued to SHINE Medical Technologies in 2016 | |||
*Northwest Medical Isotopes would produce 99Mo by processing irradiated low enriched uranium targets 4 | |||
Conducting the NWMI Review | |||
*Review of NWMI application supported by procedural efficiencies and previous licensing experience | |||
-Two-part application submission | |||
-Document templates | |||
-Permit condition supporting quality assurance implementation | |||
*Staff and contractors spent ~12,000 hours reviewing NWMI application 5 | |||
Authorizing Construction | |||
*NWMI seeks authorization to construct 10 CFR Part 50 production facility*Staff review based on preliminary design and analysis of facility | |||
-Design details may be left for operating license application | |||
-Target fabrication activities to be considered under a 10 CFR Part 70 application 6 | |||
Conducting the Safety Review 7Environmental ReviewACRS ReviewMandatory HearingApplication Submitted to NRCCommission Decision on PermitSafetyReview Tailoring Review Methodology | |||
*Review accommodated unique aspects of the NWMI application | |||
*Staff adapted existing guidance for research reactors, production facilities, and fuel cycle facilities | |||
*Review focused on whether there was reasonable assurance that the final design would conform to design bases 8 | |||
Additional Information | |||
*In response to staff requests, NWMI provided additional information | |||
*In some cases, permit conditions were necessary to support findings | |||
*Regulatory commitments track items for resolution in Final Safety Analysis Report9 Environmental Requirements | |||
*National Environmental PolicyAct-Informs Federal decision making-Publicdisclosure | |||
*NRC environmentalregulations in 10 CFR Part 51 | |||
-NRC regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act 10 Environmental ReviewProcessEnvironmentalSiteAuditDraft Environmental Impact StatementScoping*Comment Period**Opportunity for Public InvolvementFinal Environmental Impact Statement EnvironmentalReportRequestforAdditional Information11 Proposed Discovery Ridge Site12*Agriculturalland*Previouslydisturbed | |||
*No surface water features*No threatened or endangeredspecies*No historical or culturalresources Statutory and Regulatory Basis for Construction Permit Issuance | |||
*Commission authorized to issue permits by Atomic Energy Act, Section 103 | |||
*Applicable requirements in 10 CFR Parts 20, 50, and 51 | |||
*Performance requirements in 10 CFR Part 70 also considered 13 Construction Permit Findings | |||
*Preliminary facility design described | |||
*Further technical or design information may be left for FSAR | |||
*Ongoing research and development identified | |||
*Facility can be constructed and operated without undue risk 14 Construction Permit Considerations | |||
*Construction will not endanger public health and safety | |||
*NWMI is technically and financially qualified | |||
*Environmental requirements have been satisfied 15 Introducing the Review Panels 16PanelNumberDiscussion Topics Evaluation AreasSafety Panel 1Licensing ConsiderationsSafetyEvaluation ReportChapters1, 4, and 12Safety Panel 2Accident Analysis MethodologySafety Evaluation ReportChapter13Environmental Panel | |||
*Final EnvironmentalImpact Statement Process*Scope and Connected Actions | |||
*Analysis of AlternativesFinal Environmental Impact Statement Acronyms*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
*DLP -Division of Licensing Projects | |||
*DMLR-Division of Materials and License Renewal | |||
*NMSS-Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | |||
*FCSE-Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Review17 Acronyms*99Mo-molybdenum | |||
-99*99mTc-technetium | |||
-99m*NRC-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
*NWMI-Northwest Medical Isotopes | |||
*CFR-Code of Federal Regulations | |||
*ACRS-Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards | |||
*FSAR-final safety analysis report 18}} | |||
Revision as of 03:59, 29 June 2018
| ML18025B121 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Northwest Medical Isotopes |
| Issue date: | 01/16/2018 |
| From: | NRC/OGC |
| To: | NRC/OCM |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-609-CP, Construction Permit Mndtry Hrg, RAS 54173 | |
| Download: ML18025B121 (18) | |
Text
Northwest Medical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Overview Panel)
- January 23, 2018 Panelists
- Michele Evans
-Deputy Director for Reactor Safety Programs and Mission Support, NRR
- MaryJane Ross
-Lee-Deputy Director, NRR/DLP
- Joseph Donoghue
-Deputy Director, NRR/DMLR
- Brian Smith
-Deputy Director, NMSS/FCSE 2
99Mo Overview
- 99Mo decays to 99mTc-Effective diagnosis
-Minimal exposure
- 50,000 procedures daily
- No domestically
-produced supply3 Establishing a Domestic Supply of 99Mo*NRC supports U.S. policy objectives to establish domestic 99Mo production
- First construction permit for domestic 99Mo production issued to SHINE Medical Technologies in 2016
- Northwest Medical Isotopes would produce 99Mo by processing irradiated low enriched uranium targets 4
Conducting the NWMI Review
- Review of NWMI application supported by procedural efficiencies and previous licensing experience
-Two-part application submission
-Document templates
-Permit condition supporting quality assurance implementation
- Staff and contractors spent ~12,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> reviewing NWMI application 5
Authorizing Construction
- NWMI seeks authorization to construct 10 CFR Part 50 production facility*Staff review based on preliminary design and analysis of facility
-Design details may be left for operating license application
-Target fabrication activities to be considered under a 10 CFR Part 70 application 6
Conducting the Safety Review 7Environmental ReviewACRS ReviewMandatory HearingApplication Submitted to NRCCommission Decision on PermitSafetyReview Tailoring Review Methodology
- Review accommodated unique aspects of the NWMI application
- Staff adapted existing guidance for research reactors, production facilities, and fuel cycle facilities
- Review focused on whether there was reasonable assurance that the final design would conform to design bases 8
Additional Information
- In response to staff requests, NWMI provided additional information
- In some cases, permit conditions were necessary to support findings
- Regulatory commitments track items for resolution in Final Safety Analysis Report9 Environmental Requirements
- National Environmental PolicyAct-Informs Federal decision making-Publicdisclosure
- NRC environmentalregulations in 10 CFR Part 51
-NRC regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act 10 Environmental ReviewProcessEnvironmentalSiteAuditDraft Environmental Impact StatementScoping*Comment Period**Opportunity for Public InvolvementFinal Environmental Impact Statement EnvironmentalReportRequestforAdditional Information11 Proposed Discovery Ridge Site12*Agriculturalland*Previouslydisturbed
- No surface water features*No threatened or endangeredspecies*No historical or culturalresources Statutory and Regulatory Basis for Construction Permit Issuance
- Commission authorized to issue permits by Atomic Energy Act, Section 103
- Applicable requirements in 10 CFR Parts 20, 50, and 51
- Performance requirements in 10 CFR Part 70 also considered 13 Construction Permit Findings
- Preliminary facility design described
- Further technical or design information may be left for FSAR
- Ongoing research and development identified
- Facility can be constructed and operated without undue risk 14 Construction Permit Considerations
- Construction will not endanger public health and safety
- NWMI is technically and financially qualified
- Environmental requirements have been satisfied 15 Introducing the Review Panels 16PanelNumberDiscussion Topics Evaluation AreasSafety Panel 1Licensing ConsiderationsSafetyEvaluation ReportChapters1, 4, and 12Safety Panel 2Accident Analysis MethodologySafety Evaluation ReportChapter13Environmental Panel
- Final EnvironmentalImpact Statement Process*Scope and Connected Actions
- Analysis of AlternativesFinal Environmental Impact Statement Acronyms*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
- DLP -Division of Licensing Projects
- DMLR-Division of Materials and License Renewal
- NMSS-Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
- FCSE-Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Review17 Acronyms*99Mo-molybdenum
-99*99mTc-technetium
-99m*NRC-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- NWMI-Northwest Medical Isotopes
- CFR-Code of Federal Regulations
- ACRS-Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
- FSAR-final safety analysis report 18