05000387/LER-1982-003, Revised LER 82-003/01T-2:on 820811,during Initial Fuel Loading,Sprinkler Sys Did Not Exist in Area Designated by Tech Specs & Fire Protection Review Rept.Caused by Discrepancies in as-built Conditions.Mods Initiated: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[05000387/LER-1982-003, Forwards LER 82-003/01T-1]]
| number = ML20028B046
| issue date = 11/12/1982
| title = Revised LER 82-003/01T-2:on 820811,during Initial Fuel Loading,Sprinkler Sys Did Not Exist in Area Designated by Tech Specs & Fire Protection Review Rept.Caused by Discrepancies in as-built Conditions.Mods Initiated
| author name = Mitchell D
| author affiliation = PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| docket = 05000387
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = LER-82-003-01T, LER-82-3-1T, NUDOCS 8211290400
| package number = ML20028B038
| document type = LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (SEE ALSO AO RO), TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
| page count = 2
}}
{{LER
| Title = Revised LER 82-003/01T-2:on 820811,during Initial Fuel Loading,Sprinkler Sys Did Not Exist in Area Designated by Tech Specs & Fire Protection Review Rept.Caused by Discrepancies in as-built Conditions.Mods Initiated
| Plant =
| Reporting criterion =
| Power level =
| Mode =
| Docket = 05000387
| LER year = 1982
| LER number = 3
| LER revision = 0
| Event date =
| Report date =
| ENS =
| abstract =
}}
 
=text=
{{#Wiki_filter:f.
1 s
N#C F# ELM WJJ U.S. NUllCAD OXULATdQY CYMMIS$8IN
#.PPR AV T3 t,(Y E M J LICENSEE EVENT REPORT s'2rNN'4a o-e n 1
CONTROL BLOCK: l l
l l
l l
l@
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION)
I OI1 l l Pl A lS l E l S l 1l@l0 l0 [- l 0 l 0l 0[0 l 0 l -l0 l 0 l@l 4 l 1[ 1l 1l1 [@l l
lg LIC EN.E E CODE 1.
8.
LIC EN.E NU M B E R 3.
3.
LICE N.E TY PE 3.
., C A T..
CON'T M
"!OU l L l@l 0l 5l0 l0 l 0 l 3l 8l 7l@l 0 l 8 l 1l1 l 8 l 2 l@l ll 1 l1 l 218 l2 l@
y g
.9 DOCKET NUMB ER E V E NT D A T E R EPORT D ATE EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES h o2 ] During initial fuel loading, it was determined that a sprinkler system did l
1 o l 3 j l not exist in an area where both the Technical Specifications (T.S.) and the j
l Fire Protection Review Report (FPRR) listed a system.
This event is l
o 4 1015 I I determined reportable per Operatine Licensinz Condition 2.G (a).
_j l 016 l l 1
l0l7ll l
lois ;l l
""I'E c ^"'I
.3:"':
.:Cl4E." n:E E
C M.NENT Co.E 10l9l l Al BlO W O l C l@ l ZlZ lZ lZ l ZlZ l@ lZ l@ W@
:=," :'.'
c c """:""
" n,' ' ~
E,EN,,E..
@ @,""', 18 12 I l-l 1010131 l/l 1011 l IT I l-l L2j 2,
82 33 3.
a.
3, 2.
3.
3.
31 33
. :=.. " =. = " -
M::::,=.@
@:==@:
lN l@ lA l@
lZ l9 l9 l9 l m':~==
::=,
* = = ~
N....
h,, j@l F l @ lZ@
lZ l@
l010l010l l
l Yl o
o o
CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h l 1 l o l l Rnvision 1 to this IIR stated a review between "as-built" conditions and the I
[ 111 l l T.S. and the FPRR would be performed to check for further discrepancies.
l l 112 l l This review was completed and several additional inconsistencies have been l
1113ll found.
The necessary plant modification and/or T.S. and FPRR change requests l
1 i I 4 I l have been initiated.
l
~
'h::
@ l=l=l@l
......E..E.C.,.,,.N
,..NE.
.,NE..,A,..
l t l s l M. @l010l0l@l n/a observation l
n n
u RELE
.EO RELE ASE AMOUNT OF ACTivtTY LOC ATION OF RELE A.E Iil61 W @ W 61 n/a l
I n/a l
1 i.
n u
o NUMBER TYPE D E.C R,PT,0N l il 71 lo l o l O l@d@l n/a l
1 n
u n
PE R.ONN EL QNJURlE.
[ il s l l 0 l 0 l 0 l@l n/a l
8211290400 821112 Lo..or..A..A.ETo,AC,ury@
PDR ADOCK 05000387
"'=
= = " c a '"'o "
l1l9I(Z_j@l n/a S
PDR l
...uBI"'.'CainioN@
NRC USE ONLY l 210 l I N l@l n/a l lllllllllllll i.
D.G. Mitchell psone (717) 542-2181 X524 NAME OF PREPARER
 
f.
v.,-
Attachment Licenseo Event Report 82-003/0lT-2 LER 82-003/01T-0 was submitted upon discovery that a sprinkler system for Fire Zone 1-6A was.not installed. Both the Technical Specifications and the Fire Protection Review Report listed a sprinkler system for that zone. A review of cable runs in the area showed that no redundant Unit 1 cables were present. Therefore, a sprinkler system is not required for Unit 1 operation.
An hourly fire watch was established and will remain in effect until an amendment to the T.S. is issued.
Further, a commitment was made to review plant "as-built" conditions and compare them to the T.S. and the FPRR.
Following is a listing of the inconsistencies found which are less con-servative than the minimum allowed per the T.S., the immediate actions taken, and the proposed long term corrective actions:
1.
Zone 1-7A does not have two photoelectric detectors, as stated.
However, this zone has 15 ionization detectors, whereas the T.S.
states 9.
An hourly fire watch was established and a T.S. change will be submitted to correct the number of detectors.
2.
Zone 1-7B does not have two ionization detectors as stated in the T.S.
An hourly fire watch was established and a T.S. change initiated to correct the number of detectors.
3.
Fire Zone 1-3C shows 13 ionization detectors in the T.S.
There are 13 photoelectric detectors present. A T.S. change will be submitted to correct the error.
4.
Raceway D1K-125 was found to have its fireproofing removed to perform work in the raceway. An hourly fire watch was initiated.
The fireproofing was replaced, and the watch discontinued.
5.
Raceway EIK1R4 was not fireproofed as required by the FPRR. An hourly fire watch was established.
ESW modifications necessitated this raceway be firewrapped, and the work is to be done as part of the nodification package.
6.
T.S. Table 3.3.7.9-1 reversed fire zones 0-25A and 0-25E.
A T.S.
change will be submitted to correct this error and have the T.S. and the FPRR match.
Completion of the above listed actions will resolve all identified fire pro-tection concerns.
DQt/cw
}}
 
{{LER-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 12:22, 26 May 2025