ML20237G306: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:-,----,-,---------,----w OM i k+
'Y' is n s. y' =s;
.y.
a
.g
,,Q
*'pg.g M j
.t S
? ye *,,,,0
.1.Es
;,$ 4 la..
*''.,,5 IRit.'D Bi
. b:
: t. : "
u,
,f D ".,
"* TI }}t,
M 33,,, c.:', g g 4
.l t ' '
SO j.
2 '
* jl'y%
,*s' y!.
'}-
y
=.%
gf'' ; q ?l {'~ ~
1A8t h f ;'.
.. < a l
'I e
4
.I.'
4,.
,g ' p ts)
~
V, y ';, -j,
li e 8W 96 7;,,1JFidSIM,IW T @ h' D I *:t e... q y
l..
i wa
.5 McATE/T ME:,.
W '.' ' ', '
: t. '
. 'l s n.m.
4n o n.. cp [ @: c S A C; gs4,,pk, ;.,@(0.; y ;; An...,.
r
,7
- +,.
c*
y -
.q?,
L
'Q[q.
7 3%
jc i
<M F
,n j 4
a.
,JW w ?
,.' Or.,Q vr, y,.., 3..,
$? a.
#c ''..
: 1., L..
" p.+l y:
,)L
. ~..> *;.
h
' *g.s
. [&
.... -?'.[ ::sy :\\
t
.(.
[,
~
[, f jpM, __. '
['t:q [., A y,..,
'3, j
,o
.~.
-\\
t y
. =.
m
.. N Cg,,.
f s,l Ij.: 1 64gd g~$
]
- T..ng.
[
s.
4 4
r.'
, ;, =
,'.g
.e 4..
,a j?
t-g e., t e g
e p
g
,14; g
i
[p I e.
],j- 'j k,. g et
' geh' d, W.ll}.,,
s- '
y' i
n
".3
,, N.y
''Sf' L ' t
. _m4..:r- -
- - - - ---~~~ u..p w v.
m
. ;.. a...
;# ( d2Q u.y
.. o p.
h
$ 51 o
[~[
&f$(...
9 ay f
M a
n.
~
i '
i
: s. '
jt ']
.s 3
~"
Dd:d, '
,q e }/
f,
(*,l'.
}
l 1-
{' \\ \\
c.
.i. :-
, - r, l
fj.-
u,,.
g,
~ ~ ~ -
y
.. ' '.'...M,.-.,',,,*^,7,
,','..,'.'_3... y..., w
.t p
\\
',1, Ih., &
y I*,T,s" h,';f S / T,
/f;;
^
g.
t,
- p' 'T
.-l'y
.,V gp,-
e
. )' -
.[ [).
I, y
,, y
[b c'
a p
;g 4,
a W
J.7 r w
4 8' '
g, B709020193 b70820
*^
'A' PDR FOIA CORDON 87-377 PDR
 
m' TO 7hul 808C(Mob) mom BALE Poujers(gf i.
l
.wie c OTFDt D'ENT!, t/> !.WF.N r.S*
i i
The folleving itee $s described helov becauec it may smulbly be perceived by the public to be cf public health sir.nif f espee. The ites did not invnive a maior reduction in the level nf protectinn provided for public health or Safety; therefore, it is not reportable as en abnormal occutrence.
I.
1.0 Construction Probless at Comanche Peak I
%e Comanche Peak Steam riectric Station (crsts) Unitu ! nad 2. at111 e Westinghouse. designed prcar.urir.ed vnter recctors and are located near Clen Rose, Texas. They are owned by 'Iaxas lit 111tles Flectric Cougany
'j*
On t'sy ?,1986. the'NRC Director of Tnspection and 1;nforceaeet A
(TVEC).
, ~
trensaitted to TURC two separate Noricas nf viols 51oe and Pryposed -
d imposition of Civil Penaltica in the@ int of $_250,000gs result of woltip1e failures on TUF.C's part to seen requiressenTs pertaining to the 8''
construcci ed ouality assurance pror.rer: et Clasts Nits 1 and 7 and in the __ nt of $120_De the result of T1'it's failure in three instances to aseurs quauty conttyl inspectors the orga.nirational freedom to identify
~ * -
l problems.
l s
I 4
~
Construction Fnd Quality Assurance' l
e The NRC has devoted substantial resoutees to evolusting the adequacy of j
consernetion at the CPSES 1acility. Tn addition to the routine and
,;'s special inspections conducted by WRC Region IV, a Construction Appraisal Tes, tuepection was conducted by t.be Office of Tnspection and Enforcement on January 24 - February 4.1983, and Febtvar7 14 - March 3,1963. From i
i f
April 13 - 18, 1984, a review by the Special Review Tasa (SRT) was h*
conducted by representative of RRC Region TT.
Subsequently, the NRC f
btP rechufem1 Review Tesa (TET) was assembled which consisted of approximately
, I f* '
50 specialists from NRC headquarters, 3rRC regional offices, and l
UAS censultsnts tu evaluste and resofwe techniemi issuea and iesues N'' '
identified r, a ce.ault of silegations. The results of the review of the l
,I 0' iseve.s by the TNT are documented f u. Safety Evaluation kaport ($fR)
:1.
FU]tEC-4709. Supplements 7. 8,10. and 1l r ' These -ismen incinde failure te ensure t.htt quality control inspectnra were properly qualified and
{[U-No certified. ' ineffective interactions betwsen the various engineering and f
I-conettvetion groups. deficienete's in the ' quality. control anspection program, and failure to properly : implement the site's corrective accice Ir response to these 1seves TURCihas a " Comanche Feak,.
program.
i Plan" to dencribe,
ls. I;I ne.sponse Team Program Flan and issge-Specific Ac g
},.
planned corrective actinnaf -
TW eeparate. special i'sP*ctimes ' vere conducted on November I A -
;I l k-,,C.
December 18.' 391%, and January'1 -- March 4.1986. respectively, by j
I
. Ld Region TV. con'estning the TUF.C Unit 1 es4 milt cable tray inspection l
9 0.,
=
r h
s l.
i L----
 
4 7N.
' i,
'I.
'5 nter, ram and f.he procu rement ce lusts 11sttuu ut elect:Jeal contafrsest.
e nt penetration s aca.h eu turw!whed by the I;unker llamo Corpora t ion. These two inspeersons identified Isiluren ta p rope r1:.
inspect the l'ait I cable trave and deficiencies in the procurement and installetinn of ciectrical containment penetration muscab13ce;.
g 6
On June 25, 1986 TTIC was granted an ezLeucion in respnadiu to'the T9fT
!ssuei~a65 Rey. on IV ciel innper'etonn. 7''/z. Tc/fdgy.mgh M.A
. "& W A 2[
^
5 Organisa tional Freedom As a result of the numerosis allegt:ticinn of intimidation, l'arassment, and discrimination, and the relevance of thin innue to the content 1 ope in the
)
evngning operating liceuse...aring. the NRC underf.od, a comprehensive review and evaluatico of the allegations of intimidation, harasynent, and discrimination at CPSES. A report. prepared by an NRC.comenche Peak Lutistdation Psmel (Parm sided by a Study Teams of conputtanta van 1ssued o d _E_ ember 4 198
('' Report of the Review and Evaluation c1 Allegations of intimidation and Ilarar.ument of Employees at Comanche Peak steam T.lectric Station tJnits 1 and 2,'' octobet 1985.) The NRC staff has reviewed the Fanel report. the r.ompleted Department of 1.ahnr discriminatloc l
cases regarding CPSP.S, the Offica of. Investigation reports, and the TUI;C responses regarding. intimidation at CPSES. Three 'incidenta were identified as violations by the MRC staff se a result. cf this ter*ew.
k Oc une 2.198M TUEC responded to the vioIntious concerning intimidation,
~
harassowne and discrimination and requested f urther WitC staf f j
consideration with regard to te of the violations. The rvsponse la
?
,.:' ?
g.ader review by the MRC staff.
A ?;, A ;,..
.x m X,
.n 1
' k C.$ $
, Q' l
3,J 1
:..u.
,l
' a 'l'.
~ *,
9 9
WT::.
4,h 2 "j.
.g;;
- /.
L i-g
.w v.
l
~
. y.}
k' A
1
.d. -
e 4 s.
*9-
_. V., g ' g e.
5 f,,
e l
y
,+
M' F$
9 Y
9 b.I
[
: f... y..pb ;
g'+.[ 3,j -'
3 pi. - ;.-
p,y
...y i
N
;r,....
. N' '4
[N k -
.5
- l,
+
o h., @
'Nh ['k,,,
,,;r w
l l
 
I Mf
* Jw
/-
M. T
.dwc&u, sinc y ud L
& ; c W. c;.
\\
u
?^W T&
/
k %
Cf.eediu da e
/V 4 t/M a-l A
/
j S&,
A
.co-W E/4Ws, ec.
/h A, /784. #
EA %-09}
,.i-2A&l~jw M.7b~,
a'Aank, A A c g2r.
/
f.Mj
%"j' 7
Un pg,
g Wb v' Gu a.
UW nd..fydSp&o AIS W a..lfi6i /,-
ETA 86 - C 3 A&c4tfinfa.'
g
- vvr/m, hy 2, na.
* Y NW {w k, S&, Alkddic~ f E; W-
\\
P k m,
Mec
??a h.2C, RA.J w
g b W G.
M, g4 if h TW,
@ " N Ge % 6@f Al=.. SO ~ 6t45~//s -i9,f<
Pp 2 absk Ne. 50 - V'f 5, h e /L 2. E(, ~/9F r. #
: 5. dW E //.
An
&c.?fu, &&D d n.
0 ~ ' ', ',
/VK C
/d 1E
(
19 y
ksakhu sLw P A,re w.c,.c A,s-Q q,
/
e 9 ate A.
so - e.y 4 -o/
.R 50 - 444 /94 o3,~ d&~ Alw. So - 44C/f44, M
27
/9# t.
* 3
: 6. M s
- gw+~p.
7' fer.gs, pse c.
%J a f w'uos4 2,-
a o u,c s e, s p e e m v a.a.
. c;.
c
. f, Y<,u.u ?lnW T4.cK'u
/&c.Ad-Ns.
ro - res/vrs, p z s, n
: 7. A G
< ~
bd.G. % el L j 6p% &.
Udu-(fmehat, 7 p-kg W
%p.,
.K Sw&
M. - 7~ L, dko.Gv, ec 1
h Aw.
S~
0 - ~p, aa,< s an,,
Mac
: 9. 45L (d.4. Cm c L
&~k 1%
faaide.at, q w 7s r.; C & s u,: % ~ -
f8=
L x.$r
.senc M4c;r X.- pn of,W~vvyyd,Le., a &s..
S
~N-fa V.'d22% ~ V M r.J O,
0much (t%L Pg-ct; /Rc: Qb Al,a.eduv, &&
lej&, && w. c,9%g:c Aj ffeL.6Ln V.sa Pm.Ub.A, T& % My L A % p M e < p o c. p A w a; = y.,
#.~
q.L R M L M L, s %,. w w
%d?h&W?
nA NMj#h@2%.gf6&K,L e,s A e&#m ia ve,"a 1......
.s
.. s...:..
x,a..
o gs '
.s e,'
/lf& 41 '1Wy/S.%
: kii, RQ.%
]?W)l'* 9: "..
,P.-
'y31
. en...
Whei c "- ~,? 4
~
'b'';;:g. N'M@&);b '
E
, ' sie s ' ~ 3 r.
* 2&, *<;;.f 3.~: @, f. 4 Q'y _
r
 
l
~
l
+.
j 3.
N-Q 0rwcN$y s< Nt.
Vict nisdef l
r+ % he
%~?, Ax vA.~e 1
S. N~,
.ahks, A
1%jecX, ARC
,1/ h O & t. &
s%,
a Q
( %us BuA nE
-u f Y S y *'
l Y
/ d 2y
&a.a e i
4 Tw,/
\\
P& J M -p.f--~ del Pw, a3 "b AM "
s/~,
27
/1 V6.
9 l
l 4
4 l
4 l
d d
*Available in NRC Public Document Room,171/ H Street., W,'Wishingtono 0C 20555,.
for inspectiuti and copying (for a fee).
O. -
l g
.w
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - _}}

Latest revision as of 19:51, 22 May 2025

Submits marked-up Writeup Re Events of Interest for AO Rept to Congress Followed by Addl Hand Written Notes
ML20237G306
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Comanche Peak
Issue date: 08/18/1986
From: Powers D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Bobe P
NRC OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AEOD)
Shared Package
ML20237F649 List:
References
FOIA-87-377, RTR-NUREG-0090, RTR-NUREG-90 NUDOCS 8709020193
Download: ML20237G306 (6)


Text

-,----,-,---------,----w OM i k+

'Y' is n s. y' =s;

.y.

a

.g

,,Q

  • 'pg.g M j

.t S

? ye *,,,,0

.1.Es

,$ 4 la..
  • .,,5 IRit.'D Bi

. b:

t. : "

u,

,f D ".,

"* TIt, M 33,,, c.:', g g 4 .l t ' ' SO j. 2 '

  • jl'y%

,*s' y!. '}- y =.% gf ; q ?l {'~ ~ 1A8t h f ;'. .. < a l 'I e 4 .I.' 4,. ,g ' p ts) ~ V, y ';, -j, li e 8W 96 7;,,1JFidSIM,IW T @ h' D I *:t e... q y l.. i wa .5 McATE/T ME:,. W '.' ' ', '

t. '

. 'l s n.m. 4n o n.. cp [ @: c S A C; gs4,,pk, ;.,@(0.; y ;; An...,. r ,7 - +,. c* y - .q?, L 'Q[q. 7 3% jc i <M F ,n j 4 a. ,JW w ? ,.' Or.,Q vr, y,.., 3.., $? a.

  1. c ..
1., L..

" p.+l y: ,)L . ~..> *;. h ' *g.s . [& .... -?'.[ ::sy :\\ t .(. [, ~ [, f jpM, __. ' ['t:q [., A y,.., '3, j ,o .~. -\\ t y . =. m .. N Cg,,. f s,l Ij.: 1 64gd g~$ ] - T..ng. [ s. 4 4 r.' , ;, = ,'.g .e 4.. ,a j? t-g e., t e g e p g ,14; g i [p I e. ],j- 'j k,. g et ' geh' d, W.ll}.,, s- ' y' i n ".3 ,, N.y Sf' L ' t . _m4..:r- - - - - - ---~~~ u..p w v. m . ;.. a...

  1. ( d2Q u.y

.. o p. h $ 51 o [~[ &f$(... 9 ay f M a n. ~ i ' i

s. '

jt '] .s 3 ~" Dd:d, ' ,q e }/ f, (*,l'. } l 1- {' \\ \\ c. .i. :- , - r, l fj.- u,,. g, ~ ~ ~ - y .. ' '.'...M,.-.,',,,*^,7, ,','..,'.'_3... y..., w .t p \\ ',1, Ih., & y I*,T,s" h,';f S / T, /f;; ^ g. t, - p' 'T .-l'y .,V gp,- e . )' - .[ [). I, y ,, y [b c' a p

g 4,

a W J.7 r w 4 8' ' g, B709020193 b70820

  • ^

'A' PDR FOIA CORDON 87-377 PDR

m' TO 7hul 808C(Mob) mom BALE Poujers(gf i. l .wie c OTFDt D'ENT!, t/> !.WF.N r.S* i i The folleving itee $s described helov becauec it may smulbly be perceived by the public to be cf public health sir.nif f espee. The ites did not invnive a maior reduction in the level nf protectinn provided for public health or Safety; therefore, it is not reportable as en abnormal occutrence. I. 1.0 Construction Probless at Comanche Peak I %e Comanche Peak Steam riectric Station (crsts) Unitu ! nad 2. at111 e Westinghouse. designed prcar.urir.ed vnter recctors and are located near Clen Rose, Texas. They are owned by 'Iaxas lit 111tles Flectric Cougany 'j* On t'sy ?,1986. the'NRC Director of Tnspection and 1;nforceaeet A (TVEC). , ~ trensaitted to TURC two separate Noricas nf viols 51oe and Pryposed - d imposition of Civil Penaltica in the@ int of $_250,000gs result of woltip1e failures on TUF.C's part to seen requiressenTs pertaining to the 8 construcci ed ouality assurance pror.rer: et Clasts Nits 1 and 7 and in the __ nt of $120_De the result of T1'it's failure in three instances to aseurs quauty conttyl inspectors the orga.nirational freedom to identify ~ * - l problems. l s I 4 ~ Construction Fnd Quality Assurance' l e The NRC has devoted substantial resoutees to evolusting the adequacy of j consernetion at the CPSES 1acility. Tn addition to the routine and ,;'s special inspections conducted by WRC Region IV, a Construction Appraisal Tes, tuepection was conducted by t.be Office of Tnspection and Enforcement on January 24 - February 4.1983, and Febtvar7 14 - March 3,1963. From i i f April 13 - 18, 1984, a review by the Special Review Tasa (SRT) was h* conducted by representative of RRC Region TT. Subsequently, the NRC f btP rechufem1 Review Tesa (TET) was assembled which consisted of approximately , I f* ' 50 specialists from NRC headquarters, 3rRC regional offices, and l UAS censultsnts tu evaluste and resofwe techniemi issuea and iesues N ' identified r, a ce.ault of silegations. The results of the review of the l ,I 0' iseve.s by the TNT are documented f u. Safety Evaluation kaport ($fR)

1.

FU]tEC-4709. Supplements 7. 8,10. and 1l r ' These -ismen incinde failure te ensure t.htt quality control inspectnra were properly qualified and {[U-No certified. ' ineffective interactions betwsen the various engineering and f I-conettvetion groups. deficienete's in the ' quality. control anspection program, and failure to properly : implement the site's corrective accice Ir response to these 1seves TURCihas a " Comanche Feak,. program. i Plan" to dencribe, ls. I;I ne.sponse Team Program Flan and issge-Specific Ac g },. planned corrective actinnaf - TW eeparate. special i'sP*ctimes ' vere conducted on November I A -

I l k-,,C.

December 18.' 391%, and January'1 -- March 4.1986. respectively, by j I . Ld Region TV. con'estning the TUF.C Unit 1 es4 milt cable tray inspection l 9 0., = r h s l. i L----

4 7N. ' i, 'I. '5 nter, ram and f.he procu rement ce lusts 11sttuu ut elect:Jeal contafrsest. e nt penetration s aca.h eu turw!whed by the I;unker llamo Corpora t ion. These two inspeersons identified Isiluren ta p rope r1:. inspect the l'ait I cable trave and deficiencies in the procurement and installetinn of ciectrical containment penetration muscab13ce;. g 6 On June 25, 1986 TTIC was granted an ezLeucion in respnadiu to'the T9fT !ssuei~a65 Rey. on IV ciel innper'etonn. 7/z. Tc/fdgy.mgh M.A . "& W A 2[ ^ 5 Organisa tional Freedom As a result of the numerosis allegt:ticinn of intimidation, l'arassment, and discrimination, and the relevance of thin innue to the content 1 ope in the ) evngning operating liceuse...aring. the NRC underf.od, a comprehensive review and evaluatico of the allegations of intimidation, harasynent, and discrimination at CPSES. A report. prepared by an NRC.comenche Peak Lutistdation Psmel (Parm sided by a Study Teams of conputtanta van 1ssued o d _E_ ember 4 198 ( Report of the Review and Evaluation c1 Allegations of intimidation and Ilarar.ument of Employees at Comanche Peak steam T.lectric Station tJnits 1 and 2, octobet 1985.) The NRC staff has reviewed the Fanel report. the r.ompleted Department of 1.ahnr discriminatloc l cases regarding CPSP.S, the Offica of. Investigation reports, and the TUI;C responses regarding. intimidation at CPSES. Three 'incidenta were identified as violations by the MRC staff se a result. cf this ter*ew. k Oc une 2.198M TUEC responded to the vioIntious concerning intimidation, ~ harassowne and discrimination and requested f urther WitC staf f j consideration with regard to te of the violations. The rvsponse la ? ,.:' ? g.ader review by the MRC staff. A ?;, A ;,.. .x m X, .n 1 ' k C.$ $ , Q' l 3,J 1

..u.

,l ' a 'l'. ~ *, 9 9 WT::. 4,h 2 "j. .g;; - /. L i-g .w v. l ~ . y.} k' A 1 .d. - e 4 s.

  • 9-

_. V., g ' g e. 5 f,, e l y ,+ M' F$ 9 Y 9 b.I [

f... y..pb ;

g'+.[ 3,j -' 3 pi. - ;.- p,y ...y i N

r,....

. N' '4 [N k - .5 - l, + o h., @ 'Nh ['k,,, ,,;r w l l

I Mf

  • Jw

/- M. T .dwc&u, sinc y ud L & ; c W. c;. \\ u ?^W T& / k % Cf.eediu da e /V 4 t/M a-l A / j S&, A .co-W E/4Ws, ec. /h A, /784. # EA %-09} ,.i-2A&l~jw M.7b~, a'Aank, A A c g2r. / f.Mj %"j' 7 Un pg, g Wb v' Gu a. UW nd..fydSp&o AIS W a..lfi6i /,- ETA 86 - C 3 A&c4tfinfa.' g - vvr/m, hy 2, na.

  • Y NW {w k, S&, Alkddic~ f E; W-

\\ P k m, Mec ??a h.2C, RA.J w g b W G. M, g4 if h TW, @ " N Ge % 6@f Al=.. SO ~ 6t45~//s -i9,f< Pp 2 absk Ne. 50 - V'f 5, h e /L 2. E(, ~/9F r. #

5. dW E //.

An &c.?fu, &&D d n. 0 ~ ' ', ', /VK C /d 1E ( 19 y ksakhu sLw P A,re w.c,.c A,s-Q q, / e 9 ate A. so - e.y 4 -o/ .R 50 - 444 /94 o3,~ d&~ Alw. So - 44C/f44, M 27 /9# t.

  • 3
6. M s

- gw+~p. 7' fer.gs, pse c. %J a f w'uos4 2,- a o u,c s e, s p e e m v a.a. . c;. c . f, Y<,u.u ?lnW T4.cK'u /&c.Ad-Ns. ro - res/vrs, p z s, n

7. A G

< ~ bd.G. % el L j 6p% &. Udu-(fmehat, 7 p-kg W %p., .K Sw& M. - 7~ L, dko.Gv, ec 1 h Aw. S~ 0 - ~p, aa,< s an,, Mac

9. 45L (d.4. Cm c L

&~k 1% faaide.at, q w 7s r.; C & s u,: % ~ - f8= L x.$r .senc M4c;r X.- pn of,W~vvyyd,Le., a &s.. S ~N-fa V.'d22% ~ V M r.J O, 0much (t%L Pg-ct; /Rc: Qb Al,a.eduv, && lej&, && w. c,9%g:c Aj ffeL.6Ln V.sa Pm.Ub.A, T& % My L A % p M e < p o c. p A w a; = y.,

  1. .~

q.L R M L M L, s %,. w w %d?h&W? nA NMj#h@2%.gf6&K,L e,s A e&#m ia ve,"a 1...... .s .. s...:.. x,a.. o gs ' .s e,' /lf& 41 '1Wy/S.%

kii, RQ.%

]?W)l'* 9: ".. ,P.- 'y31 . en... Whei c "- ~,? 4 ~ 'b;;:g. N'M@&);b ' E , ' sie s ' ~ 3 r.

  • 2&, *<;;.f 3.~: @, f. 4 Q'y _

r

l ~ l +. j 3. N-Q 0rwcN$y s< Nt. Vict nisdef l r+ % he %~?, Ax vA.~e 1 S. N~, .ahks, A 1%jecX, ARC ,1/ h O & t. & s%, a Q ( %us BuA nE -u f Y S y *' l Y / d 2y &a.a e i 4 Tw,/ \\ P& J M -p.f--~ del Pw, a3 "b AM " s/~, 27 /1 V6. 9 l l 4 4 l 4 l d d

  • Available in NRC Public Document Room,171/ H Street., W,'Wishingtono 0C 20555,.

for inspectiuti and copying (for a fee). O. - l g .w _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - _}}