ML042800541: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:hRfCERIJUCEEAK SALEM UNITS I AND 2 FULL AST IMPLEMENTATION SEPTEMBER 9, 2004 Jack Grant - Project Manager ateven Mannan -.Lcunsng Suparvtart Jesus (Jay) Arias - Project U.censing Barry Barkley - Project Engineer
{{#Wiki_filter:hRfCERIJUCEEAK SALEM UNITS I AND 2 FULL AST IMPLEMENTATION SEPTEMBER 9, 2004 Jack Grant - Project Manager ateven Mannan -.Lcunsng Suparvtart Jesus (Jay) Arias - Project U.censing Barry Barkley - Project Engineer
                      ;copai rotei - Nucore AGENDA Introduction .........         ...... Steve Mannon Overview ......             ......... Jack Grant Licensing Submittal .............. Jay Arias Dose Analysis ...............           Gopal Patel Additional Evaluations .......... Barry Barkley Summary .......             ........ Jack Grant Action Items ..........           ..... Jay Arias Overview Project Summary Project Team
;copai rotei - Nucore AGENDA Introduction.........  
.
...... Steve Mannon Overview......  
* Schedule Enclosure 2 I
......... Jack Grant Licensing Submittal.............. Jay Arias Dose Analysis...............
Gopal Patel Additional Evaluations.......... Barry Barkley Summary.......  
........ Jack Grant Action Items..........  
..... Jay Arias Overview Project Summary Project Team Schedule I


. Licensing Submittal
Licensing Submittal
* LCR S03-05 submitted 4126/2004
* LCR S03-05 submitted 4126/2004
* Licensing Basis Changes
* Licensing Basis Changes knplementaUonofAltemant Sourue Term Claw iRG 1.183)
    . knplementaUonofAltemant     Sourue Term ClawiRG 1.183)
* ESF Leakage
* ESF Leakage
* Control Room In4eekage
* Control Room In4eekage
* AuxiNaryBnitding Filtraton - no crediltakn
* AuxiNary Bnitding Filtraton - no credil takn
* AuoitiaryBuL.fdnpVengilatn - expanded   LCO eppliblity
* Auoitiary BuL.fdnp Vengilatn - expanded LCO eppliblity
* Industry AST Submittals
* Industry AST Submittals
* Addressed RAtsin our submittal
* Addressed RAts in our submittal
    . Atended pubitc meeting DBA Dose Analysis
. Atended pubitc meeting DBA Dose Analysis
* Control Room In-Leakage
* Control Room In-Leakage
* Atmospheric Dispersion
* Atmospheric Dispersion
* DBA Dose Calculations DBA Dose Analysis Control Room In-leakage
* DBA Dose Calculations DBA Dose Analysis Control Room In-leakage
  -Control Room Habitability Model
-Control Room Habitability Model
* CLB Analysis: 60 dcm unfiltered inleakage
* CLB Analysis: 60 dcm unfiltered inleakage
* AST Analysis: Assumed 150 dim unfiltered in-leakage
* AST Analysis: Assumed 150 dim unfiltered in-leakage
Line 42: Line 44:
2
2


- DBA Dose Analysis Atmospheric Dispersion
DBA Dose Analysis Atmospheric Dispersion
    *1996 Combined Control Room Design Change: Modified version of ARCON95
*1996 Combined Control Room Design Change: Modified version of ARCON95
* 2002 Amendments 251 and 232:
* 2002 Amendments 251 and 232:
ARCON96 & DG-11l1 (for selective AST Implementation for FHAs)
ARCON96 & DG-11l1 (for selective AST Implementation for FHAs)
* Current submittal: ARCON9G & RG 1.194 (for full Implementation of the AST)
* Current submittal: ARCON9G & RG 1.194 (for full Implementation of the AST)
DBA Dose Calculations LOCA: ESF Leakage Model Based on -1 gpm leakage 40% of core iodine inventory in sump Only a fraction of iodine In recirculated sump water Is available for release to the environment (0.4 x 4.85 x 3
DBA Dose Calculations LOCA: ESF Leakage Model Based on -1 gpm leakage 40% of core iodine inventory in sump Only a fraction of iodine In recirculated sump water Is available for release to the environment (0.4 x 4.85 x 3
  - 6% of core Inventory) 10% flash fraction No ABV filtration credited 3
- 6% of core Inventory) 10% flash fraction No ABV filtration credited 3
:'-    DBA Dose Calculations LOCA: Containment SDrav Model
 
DBA Dose Calculations LOCA: Containment SDrav Model
* 75% coverage
* 75% coverage
* Injection and recirculation sprays are credited
* Injection and recirculation sprays are credited
* 10 minute gap Is modeled between the             Injection and recirculation phases I... ..........
* 10 minute gap Is modeled between the Injection and recirculation phases I.............
DBA Dose Calculations LOCA
DBA Dose Calculations LOCA
* Assumptions
* Assumptions
* Evaluations
* Evaluations
* Results:
* Results:
3.83 rem Control Room 3.47 rem EAB 1.21 rem LPZ Da DBA Dose Calculations SGTR
3.83 rem Control Room 3.47 rem EAB 1.21 rem LPZ D a DBA Dose Calculations SGTR
* AssumptIons
* AssumptIons
* Evaluations
* Evaluations
Line 67: Line 70:
* Evaluations
* Evaluations
* Results (Concurrent Iodine Case):
* Results (Concurrent Iodine Case):
0.85 rem Control Room 0.54 rem EAB 0.19 rem LPZ I-   DBA Dose Calculations Locked Rotor
0.85 rem Control Room 0.54 rem EAB 0.19 rem LPZ I-DBA Dose Calculations Locked Rotor
* Assumptions
* Assumptions
* Evaluations
* Evaluations
* Results:
* Results:
1.30 rem Control Room 1.26 rem EAB 0.51 rem LPZ 71- DBA Dose CalculatIons Control Rod   MEUifon
1.30 rem Control Room 1.26 rem EAB 0.51 rem LPZ 71-DBA Dose CalculatIons Control Rod MEUifon
* Assumptions
* Assumptions
* Evaluations
* Evaluations
Line 77: Line 80:
1.37 rem Control Room 0.25 rem EAB 0.13 rem LPZ 5
1.37 rem Control Room 0.25 rem EAB 0.13 rem LPZ 5


=   DBA Dose Calculations Dose Results
= DBA Dose Calculations Dose Results
* LOCA           3.83 rem Control Room 3.47 rem EAB 1.21 rem LPZ
* LOCA 3.83 rem Control Room 3.47 rem EAB 1.21 rem LPZ
* SGTR             0.58 rem Control Room
* SGTR 0.58 rem Control Room
* MSLB             0.85 rem Control Room
* MSLB 0.85 rem Control Room
* Locked Rotor     1.30 rem Control Room
* Locked Rotor 1.30 rem Control Room
* CRE             1.37 rem Control Room DBA Dose Calculations Dose Comrarlsons CLE CR thyroid dose       AST CR TEDE dose margins (TID):             margins:
* CRE 1.37 rem Control Room DBA Dose Calculations Dose Comrarlsons CLE CR thyroid dose AST CR TEDE dose margins (TID):
LOCA-5%                   LOCA - 23%
margins:
SGTR-90%                   SGTR - 88%
LOCA-5%
MSLB-80%                   MSLB - 83%
LOCA - 23%
LRA - 75%                 LRA - 74%
SGTR-90%
CRE-56%                   CRE -73%
SGTR - 88%
MSLB-80%
MSLB - 83%
LRA - 75%
LRA - 74%
CRE-56%
CRE -73%
Additional Evaluations
Additional Evaluations
* Hope Creek control room habitability
* Hope Creek control room habitability
Line 98: Line 107:


Additional Evaluations RH Analysis
Additional Evaluations RH Analysis
* Current Licensing Basis - Sump pH Is >7 Radoltysis of cable Incontainment was not part Ofonginal Westinghouse Calculation
* Current Licensing Basis - Sump pH Is >7 Radoltysis of cable In containment was not part Of onginal Westinghouse Calculation
* Effects of cable radiolysis and other factors known to be minor
* Effects of cable radiolysis and other factors known to be minor
* Salem confirmation evaluabon was done with bounding Hypalon vatues (8.4 to 7.4)
* Salem confirmation evaluabon was done with bounding Hypalon vatues (8.4 to 7.4)
* Results pH remains above 7
* Results pH remains above 7
* Salem has a T.S. Limit on NaOH. Spray Additive Tank
* Salem has a T.S. Limit on NaOH. Spray Additive Tank Summary
-    Summary
* Conservative Approach (assumptions)
* Conservative Approach (assumptions)
* Operational Flexibility
* Operational Flexibility
* Dose Margins
* Dose Margins
* Schedule 7}}
* Schedule 7}}

Latest revision as of 00:52, 16 January 2025

Meeting Handouts on Salem Units 1 & 2 Full AST Implementation
ML042800541
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/2004
From:
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML042800541 (7)


Text

hRfCERIJUCEEAK SALEM UNITS I AND 2 FULL AST IMPLEMENTATION SEPTEMBER 9, 2004 Jack Grant - Project Manager ateven Mannan -.Lcunsng Suparvtart Jesus (Jay) Arias - Project U.censing Barry Barkley - Project Engineer

copai rotei - Nucore AGENDA Introduction.........

...... Steve Mannon Overview......

......... Jack Grant Licensing Submittal.............. Jay Arias Dose Analysis...............

Gopal Patel Additional Evaluations.......... Barry Barkley Summary.......

........ Jack Grant Action Items..........

..... Jay Arias Overview Project Summary Project Team Schedule I

Licensing Submittal

  • LCR S03-05 submitted 4126/2004
  • Licensing Basis Changes knplementaUonofAltemant Sourue Term Claw iRG 1.183)
  • Control Room In4eekage
  • AuxiNary Bnitding Filtraton - no credil takn
  • Auoitiary BuL.fdnp Vengilatn - expanded LCO eppliblity
  • Industry AST Submittals
  • Addressed RAts in our submittal

. Atended pubitc meeting DBA Dose Analysis

  • Control Room In-Leakage
  • Atmospheric Dispersion
  • DBA Dose Calculations DBA Dose Analysis Control Room In-leakage

-Control Room Habitability Model

  • CLB Analysis: 60 dcm unfiltered inleakage
  • AST Analysis: Assumed 150 dim unfiltered in-leakage
  • Tracer Gas Test Results
  • 96 cdm or less measured by NCSILagus. completed 6103

2

DBA Dose Analysis Atmospheric Dispersion

  • 1996 Combined Control Room Design Change: Modified version of ARCON95
  • 2002 Amendments 251 and 232:

ARCON96 & DG-11l1 (for selective AST Implementation for FHAs)

  • Current submittal: ARCON9G & RG 1.194 (for full Implementation of the AST)

DBA Dose Calculations LOCA: ESF Leakage Model Based on -1 gpm leakage 40% of core iodine inventory in sump Only a fraction of iodine In recirculated sump water Is available for release to the environment (0.4 x 4.85 x 3

- 6% of core Inventory) 10% flash fraction No ABV filtration credited 3

DBA Dose Calculations LOCA: Containment SDrav Model

  • 75% coverage
  • Injection and recirculation sprays are credited
  • 10 minute gap Is modeled between the Injection and recirculation phases I.............

DBA Dose Calculations LOCA

  • Assumptions
  • Evaluations
  • Results:

3.83 rem Control Room 3.47 rem EAB 1.21 rem LPZ D a DBA Dose Calculations SGTR

  • AssumptIons
  • Evaluations
  • Results:

(Largest of the Concurrent & Preaccident Iodine Case) 0.59 rem Control Room 0.22 rem EAS 0.33 rem LPZ 4

DBA Dose Calculations MSLB

  • Assumptions
  • Evaluations
  • Results (Concurrent Iodine Case):

0.85 rem Control Room 0.54 rem EAB 0.19 rem LPZ I-DBA Dose Calculations Locked Rotor

  • Assumptions
  • Evaluations
  • Results:

1.30 rem Control Room 1.26 rem EAB 0.51 rem LPZ 71-DBA Dose CalculatIons Control Rod MEUifon

  • Assumptions
  • Evaluations
  • Results:

1.37 rem Control Room 0.25 rem EAB 0.13 rem LPZ 5

= DBA Dose Calculations Dose Results

  • Locked Rotor 1.30 rem Control Room
  • CRE 1.37 rem Control Room DBA Dose Calculations Dose Comrarlsons CLE CR thyroid dose AST CR TEDE dose margins (TID):

margins:

LOCA-5%

LOCA - 23%

SGTR-90%

SGTR - 88%

MSLB-80%

MSLB - 83%

LRA - 75%

LRA - 74%

CRE-56%

CRE -73%

Additional Evaluations

  • TSC habitability
  • EQ Program Impact
  • Vial area access mission doses
  • SumppH
  • Waste Gas Decay Tank and Volume Control Tank Ruptures
  • Letdown Line Break Accident 6

Additional Evaluations RH Analysis

  • Current Licensing Basis - Sump pH Is >7 Radoltysis of cable In containment was not part Of onginal Westinghouse Calculation
  • Effects of cable radiolysis and other factors known to be minor
  • Salem confirmation evaluabon was done with bounding Hypalon vatues (8.4 to 7.4)
  • Results pH remains above 7
  • Salem has a T.S. Limit on NaOH. Spray Additive Tank Summary
  • Conservative Approach (assumptions)
  • Operational Flexibility
  • Dose Margins
  • Schedule 7