ML092450624: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:September 3, 2009 | {{#Wiki_filter:September 3, 2009 | ||
EA-09-167 | EA-09-167 | ||
Mr. Mark A. Schimmel | Mr. Mark A. Schimmel | ||
Acting Site Vice President | Acting Site Vice President | ||
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant | Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant | ||
Northern States Power Company - Minnesota | Northern States Power Company - Minnesota | ||
1717 Wakonade Drive East | 1717 Wakonade Drive East | ||
Welch, MN 55089 | Welch, MN 55089 | ||
SUBJECT: | SUBJECT: | ||
FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION FOR A WHITE FINDING AND | |||
NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000306/2009013; | |||
Dear Mr. Schimmel: | PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2 | ||
The purpose of this letter is to provide you the final results of our significance determination of the | Dear Mr. Schimmel: | ||
preliminary White finding identified in Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010. | The purpose of this letter is to provide you the final results of our significance determination of the | ||
The inspection finding was assessed using the Significance Determination Process and was | preliminary White finding identified in Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010. | ||
preliminarily characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate increased importance to | The inspection finding was assessed using the Significance Determination Process and was | ||
safety that may require additional U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspections. This | preliminarily characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate increased importance to | ||
White finding is associated with the licensees failure to design the component cooling water | safety that may require additional U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspections. This | ||
system such that it would be protected from the impact of a high energy line break, seismic, or | White finding is associated with the licensees failure to design the component cooling water | ||
tornado events. | system such that it would be protected from the impact of a high energy line break, seismic, or | ||
In a telephone conversation with Mr. Steven West of the NRC Region III office, on | tornado events. | ||
August 10, 2009, Mr. Michael Wadley, former Site Vice President, indicated that Northern States | In a telephone conversation with Mr. Steven West of the NRC Region III office, on | ||
Power Company - Minnesota did not contest the characterization of the risk significance of this | August 10, 2009, Mr. Michael Wadley, former Site Vice President, indicated that Northern States | ||
finding and that Northern States Power Company - Minnesota declined the opportunity to discuss | Power Company - Minnesota did not contest the characterization of the risk significance of this | ||
this issue in a regulatory conference or to provide a written response. | finding and that Northern States Power Company - Minnesota declined the opportunity to discuss | ||
After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that | this issue in a regulatory conference or to provide a written response. | ||
the inspection finding is appropriately characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate | After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that | ||
increased importance to safety that may require additional NRC inspections as stated in | the inspection finding is appropriately characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate | ||
Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010. | increased importance to safety that may require additional NRC inspections as stated in | ||
The NRC has also determined that the finding is a violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, | Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010. | ||
Criterion III, Design Control, as cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). The | The NRC has also determined that the finding is a violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, | ||
circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in the subject inspection report. | Criterion III, Design Control, as cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). The | ||
In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the Notice is considered escalated enforcement | circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in the subject inspection report. | ||
action because it is associated with a White finding. | In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the Notice is considered escalated enforcement | ||
The NRC has concluded that the information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective | action because it is associated with a White finding. | ||
actions taken, and the date when full compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed | The NRC has concluded that the information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective | ||
on the docket in the subject inspection report. Therefore, you are not required to respond to this | actions taken, and the date when full compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed | ||
letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your | on the docket in the subject inspection report. Therefore, you are not required to respond to this | ||
position. | letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your | ||
position. | |||
M. Schimmel | M. Schimmel | ||
As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2s performance, including this White finding, we | -2- | ||
have assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. | As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2s performance, including this White finding, we | ||
Therefore, we plan to conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001, | have assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. | ||
Inspection for One or Two White Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area, when your staff has | Therefore, we plan to conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001, | ||
notified us of your readiness for this inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to | Inspection for One or Two White Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area, when your staff has | ||
provide assurance that the root cause and contributing causes of risk significant performance | notified us of your readiness for this inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to | ||
issues are understood, the extent of condition is identified, and the corrective actions are | provide assurance that the root cause and contributing causes of risk significant performance | ||
sufficient to prevent recurrence. | issues are understood, the extent of condition is identified, and the corrective actions are | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its | sufficient to prevent recurrence. | ||
enclosure, and your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its | ||
for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC=s Agencywide | enclosure, and your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically | ||
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at | for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC=s Agencywide | ||
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not | Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at | ||
include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made | http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not | ||
available to the public without redaction. | include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made | ||
available to the public without redaction. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA by Cynthia D. Pederson Acting for/ | |||
Mark A. Satorius | |||
Docket No. 50-306 | Regional Administrator | ||
License No. DPR-60 | Docket No. 50-306 | ||
Enclosure: | License No. DPR-60 | ||
Notice of Violation | Enclosure: | ||
cc w/encl: | Notice of Violation | ||
cc w/encl: | |||
D. Koehl, Chief Nuclear Officer | |||
G. Salamon, Regulatory Affairs Manager | |||
P. Glass, Assistant General Counsel | |||
Nuclear Asset Manager | |||
J. Stine, State Liaison Officer, Minnesota Department of Health | |||
Tribal Council, Prairie Island Indian Community | |||
Administrator, Goodhue County Courthouse | |||
Commissioner, Minnesota Department | |||
of Commerce | |||
Manager, Environmental Protection Division | |||
Office of the Attorney General of Minnesota | |||
Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Dakota | |||
County Law Enforcement Center | |||
M. Schimmel | M. Schimmel | ||
As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2s performance, including this White finding, we have | -3- | ||
assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. Therefore, we plan to | |||
conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001, Inspection for One or Two White | As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2s performance, including this White finding, we have | ||
Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area, when your staff has notified us of your readiness for this | assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. Therefore, we plan to | ||
inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to provide assurance that the root cause and | conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001, Inspection for One or Two White | ||
contributing causes of risk significant performance issues are understood, the extent of condition is | Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area, when your staff has notified us of your readiness for this | ||
identified, and the corrective actions are sufficient to prevent recurrence. | inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to provide assurance that the root cause and | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and | contributing causes of risk significant performance issues are understood, the extent of condition is | ||
your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically for public inspection in | identified, and the corrective actions are sufficient to prevent recurrence. | ||
the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC=s Agencywide Documents Access and Management | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and | ||
System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To | your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically for public inspection in | ||
the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards | the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC=s Agencywide Documents Access and Management | ||
information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. | System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To | ||
the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards | |||
information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA by Cynthia D. Pederson Acting for/ | |||
Docket No. 50-306 | Mark A. Satorius | ||
License No. DPR-60 | Regional Administrator | ||
Enclosure: | Docket No. 50-306 | ||
Notice of Violation | License No. DPR-60 | ||
cc w/encl: | Enclosure: | ||
Notice of Violation | |||
cc w/encl: | |||
D. Koehl, Chief Nuclear Officer | |||
G. Salamon, Regulatory Affairs Manager | |||
P. Glass, Assistant General Counsel | |||
Nuclear Asset Manager | |||
DISTRIBUTION: | |||
See next page | |||
FILE NAME: G:\EICS\ENFORCEMENT\Enforcement Cases 2009\EA-09-167 Prairie Island CCW\EA-09- | J. Stine, State Liaison Officer, Minnesota Department of Health | ||
167 Prairie Island Draft Final Action.doc | |||
; Publicly Available ; Non-Sensitive | |||
Tribal Council, Prairie Island Indian Community | |||
Administrator, Goodhue County Courthouse | |||
1. OE concurrence received via e-mail from G. Gulla on August 31, 2009. | Commissioner, Minnesota Department | ||
of Commerce | |||
Manager, Environmental Protection Division | |||
Office of the Attorney General of Minnesota | |||
Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Dakota | |||
County Law Enforcement Center | |||
DISTRIBUTION: | |||
See next page | |||
FILE NAME: G:\\EICS\\ENFORCEMENT\\Enforcement Cases 2009\\EA-09-167 Prairie Island CCW\\EA-09- | |||
167 Prairie Island Draft Final Action.doc | |||
; Publicly Available ; Non-Sensitive | |||
OFFICE | |||
RIII | |||
RIII | |||
RIII | |||
D:OE | |||
RIII | |||
RIII | |||
NAME | |||
Lougheed | |||
Giessner | |||
West | |||
Bowman for | |||
Carpenter1 | |||
Orth | |||
Pederson for | |||
Satorius | |||
DATE | |||
09/01/09 | |||
09/01/09 | |||
09/01/09 | |||
08/31/09 | |||
09/01/09 | |||
09/02/09 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
1. OE concurrence received via e-mail from G. Gulla on August 31, 2009. | |||
Letter to Mark A. Schimmel from Mark A. Satorius dated September 3, 2009 | Letter to Mark A. Schimmel from Mark A. Satorius dated September 3, 2009 | ||
SUBJECT: | SUBJECT: | ||
FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION FOR A WHITE FINDING AND | |||
NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000306/2009013; | |||
DISTRIBUTION: | PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2 | ||
ADAMS (PARS) | |||
RidsSecyMailCenter | DISTRIBUTION: | ||
OCADistribution | ADAMS (PARS) | ||
Bill Borchardt | RidsSecyMailCenter | ||
Bruce Mallett | OCADistribution | ||
Cynthia Carpenter | Bill Borchardt | ||
Nick Hilton | Bruce Mallett | ||
Marvin Itzkowitz | Cynthia Carpenter | ||
Catherine Marco | Nick Hilton | ||
Eric Leeds | Marvin Itzkowitz | ||
Bruce Boger | Catherine Marco | ||
Mark Satorius | Eric Leeds | ||
Cynthia Pederson | Bruce Boger | ||
Steven West | Mark Satorius | ||
Daniel Holody | Cynthia Pederson | ||
Carolyn Evans | Steven West | ||
William Jones | Daniel Holody | ||
Steven Orth | Carolyn Evans | ||
Jared Heck | William Jones | ||
Ross Moore | Steven Orth | ||
Mary Ann Ashley | Jared Heck | ||
Holly Harrington | Ross Moore | ||
Hubert Bell | Mary Ann Ashley | ||
Guy Caputo | Holly Harrington | ||
Mona Williams | Hubert Bell | ||
Allan Barker | Guy Caputo | ||
James Lynch | Mona Williams | ||
Viktoria Mitlyng | Allan Barker | ||
Prema Chandrathil | James Lynch | ||
Paul Pelke | Viktoria Mitlyng | ||
Patricia Lougheed | Prema Chandrathil | ||
Jeannie Choe | Paul Pelke | ||
Linda Linn | Patricia Lougheed | ||
Monte Phillips | Jeannie Choe | ||
John Giessner | Linda Linn | ||
Susan Bagley | Monte Phillips | ||
RidsNrrPMPrairieIsland | John Giessner | ||
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource | Susan Bagley | ||
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource | RidsNrrPMPrairieIsland | ||
ROPreports Resource | RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource | ||
OEMAIL Resource | RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource | ||
OEWEB Resource | ROPreports Resource | ||
OEMAIL Resource | |||
OEWEB Resource | |||
Northern States Power Company - Minnesota | |||
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 2 | ENCLOSURE | ||
NOTICE OF VIOLATION | |||
During a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted from June 15 to | Northern States Power Company - Minnesota | ||
July 9, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC | Docket No. 50-306 | ||
Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below: | Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 2 | ||
License No. DPR-60 | |||
EA-09-167 | |||
During a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted from June 15 to | |||
July 9, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC | |||
Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below: | |||
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, Design | |||
Control, requires, in part, that measures be established to assure that the design basis | |||
for safety-related functions of structures, systems, and components are correctly | |||
translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. Further, | |||
Criterion III requires that the design control measures provide for verifying or checking | |||
the adequacy of designs. | |||
This violation is associated with a White finding. | Contrary to the above, as of July 29, 2008, the licensee failed to implement design | ||
The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective | control measures to ensure that the design basis for the component cooling water | ||
actions taken and planned to be taken to correct the violation and to prevent recurrence, and the | system was correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and | ||
date when full compliance was achieved, is already adequately addressed on the docket in | instructions. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure that the safety-related function of | ||
Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010, dated August 5, 2009. However, | the component cooling water system was maintained following a high energy line break, | ||
you are required to submit a written statement or explanation pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 if the | seismic, or tornado events in the turbine building. | ||
description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that | This violation is associated with a White finding. | ||
case, or if you choose to respond, clearly mark your response as a "Reply to a Notice of | The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective | ||
Violation EA-09-167," and send it to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, | actions taken and planned to be taken to correct the violation and to prevent recurrence, and the | ||
ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001 with a copy to the Regional | date when full compliance was achieved, is already adequately addressed on the docket in | ||
Administrator, Region III, 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210, Lisle IL 60532, and a copy to the | Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010, dated August 5, 2009. However, | ||
NRC Resident Inspector at the Prairie Island facility, within 30 days of the date of the letter | you are required to submit a written statement or explanation pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 if the | ||
transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). | description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that | ||
If you contest this enforcement action, you should also provide a copy of your response, with the | case, or if you choose to respond, clearly mark your response as a "Reply to a Notice of | ||
basis for your denial, to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | Violation EA-09-167," and send it to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, | ||
Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001. | ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001 with a copy to the Regional | ||
If you choose to respond, your response will be made available electronically for public | Administrator, Region III, 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210, Lisle IL 60532, and a copy to the | ||
inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents | NRC Resident Inspector at the Prairie Island facility, within 30 days of the date of the letter | ||
Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at | transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). | ||
If you contest this enforcement action, you should also provide a copy of your response, with the | |||
basis for your denial, to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | |||
Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001. | |||
If you choose to respond, your response will be made available electronically for public | |||
inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents | |||
Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at | |||
Notice of Violation | Notice of Violation | ||
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Therefore, to the extent possible, the response | -2- | ||
should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be | |||
made available to the public without redaction. | ENCLOSURE | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11, you may be required to post this Notice within two working | http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Therefore, to the extent possible, the response | ||
days. | should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be | ||
made available to the public without redaction. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11, you may be required to post this Notice within two working | |||
days. | |||
Dated this 3rd day of September 2009 | Dated this 3rd day of September 2009 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:30, 14 January 2025
| ML092450624 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island |
| Issue date: | 09/03/2009 |
| From: | Satorius M Region 3 Administrator |
| To: | Schimmel M Northern States Power Co |
| References | |
| EA-09-167, IR-09-013 EA-09-167 | |
| Download: ML092450624 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000306/2009013
Text
September 3, 2009
Mr. Mark A. Schimmel
Acting Site Vice President
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant
Northern States Power Company - Minnesota
1717 Wakonade Drive East
Welch, MN 55089
SUBJECT:
FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION FOR A WHITE FINDING AND
NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000306/2009013;
PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2
Dear Mr. Schimmel:
The purpose of this letter is to provide you the final results of our significance determination of the
preliminary White finding identified in Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010.
The inspection finding was assessed using the Significance Determination Process and was
preliminarily characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate increased importance to
safety that may require additional U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspections. This
White finding is associated with the licensees failure to design the component cooling water
system such that it would be protected from the impact of a high energy line break, seismic, or
tornado events.
In a telephone conversation with Mr. Steven West of the NRC Region III office, on
August 10, 2009, Mr. Michael Wadley, former Site Vice President, indicated that Northern States
Power Company - Minnesota did not contest the characterization of the risk significance of this
finding and that Northern States Power Company - Minnesota declined the opportunity to discuss
this issue in a regulatory conference or to provide a written response.
After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that
the inspection finding is appropriately characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate
increased importance to safety that may require additional NRC inspections as stated in
Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010.
The NRC has also determined that the finding is a violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B,
Criterion III, Design Control, as cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). The
circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in the subject inspection report.
In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the Notice is considered escalated enforcement
action because it is associated with a White finding.
The NRC has concluded that the information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective
actions taken, and the date when full compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed
on the docket in the subject inspection report. Therefore, you are not required to respond to this
letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your
position.
M. Schimmel
-2-
As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2s performance, including this White finding, we
have assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix.
Therefore, we plan to conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001,
Inspection for One or Two White Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area, when your staff has
notified us of your readiness for this inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to
provide assurance that the root cause and contributing causes of risk significant performance
issues are understood, the extent of condition is identified, and the corrective actions are
sufficient to prevent recurrence.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its
enclosure, and your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically
for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC=s Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not
include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made
available to the public without redaction.
Sincerely,
/RA by Cynthia D. Pederson Acting for/
Mark A. Satorius
Regional Administrator
Docket No. 50-306
License No. DPR-60
Enclosure:
cc w/encl:
D. Koehl, Chief Nuclear Officer
G. Salamon, Regulatory Affairs Manager
P. Glass, Assistant General Counsel
Nuclear Asset Manager
J. Stine, State Liaison Officer, Minnesota Department of Health
Tribal Council, Prairie Island Indian Community
Administrator, Goodhue County Courthouse
Commissioner, Minnesota Department
of Commerce
Manager, Environmental Protection Division
Office of the Attorney General of Minnesota
Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Dakota
County Law Enforcement Center
M. Schimmel
-3-
As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2s performance, including this White finding, we have
assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. Therefore, we plan to
conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001, Inspection for One or Two White
Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area, when your staff has notified us of your readiness for this
inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to provide assurance that the root cause and
contributing causes of risk significant performance issues are understood, the extent of condition is
identified, and the corrective actions are sufficient to prevent recurrence.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and
your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically for public inspection in
the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC=s Agencywide Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To
the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards
information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction.
Sincerely,
/RA by Cynthia D. Pederson Acting for/
Mark A. Satorius
Regional Administrator
Docket No. 50-306
License No. DPR-60
Enclosure:
cc w/encl:
D. Koehl, Chief Nuclear Officer
G. Salamon, Regulatory Affairs Manager
P. Glass, Assistant General Counsel
Nuclear Asset Manager
J. Stine, State Liaison Officer, Minnesota Department of Health
Tribal Council, Prairie Island Indian Community
Administrator, Goodhue County Courthouse
Commissioner, Minnesota Department
of Commerce
Manager, Environmental Protection Division
Office of the Attorney General of Minnesota
Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Dakota
County Law Enforcement Center
DISTRIBUTION:
See next page
FILE NAME: G:\\EICS\\ENFORCEMENT\\Enforcement Cases 2009\\EA-09-167 Prairie Island CCW\\EA-09-
167 Prairie Island Draft Final Action.doc
- Publicly Available ; Non-Sensitive
OFFICE
RIII
RIII
RIII
D:OE
RIII
RIII
NAME
Lougheed
Giessner
West
Bowman for
Carpenter1
Orth
Pederson for
Satorius
DATE
09/01/09
09/01/09
09/01/09
08/31/09
09/01/09
09/02/09
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
1. OE concurrence received via e-mail from G. Gulla on August 31, 2009.
Letter to Mark A. Schimmel from Mark A. Satorius dated September 3, 2009
SUBJECT:
FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION FOR A WHITE FINDING AND
NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000306/2009013;
PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2
DISTRIBUTION:
RidsSecyMailCenter
OCADistribution
Bill Borchardt
Bruce Mallett
Cynthia Carpenter
Marvin Itzkowitz
Catherine Marco
Eric Leeds
Bruce Boger
Mark Satorius
Cynthia Pederson
Daniel Holody
Carolyn Evans
Ross Moore
Mary Ann Ashley
Holly Harrington
Hubert Bell
Guy Caputo
Mona Williams
James Lynch
Patricia Lougheed
Jeannie Choe
Monte Phillips
Susan Bagley
RidsNrrPMPrairieIsland
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
ROPreports Resource
OEMAIL Resource
OEWEB Resource
ENCLOSURE
Northern States Power Company - Minnesota
Docket No. 50-306
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 2
License No. DPR-60
During a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted from June 15 to
July 9, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC
Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below:
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, Design
Control, requires, in part, that measures be established to assure that the design basis
for safety-related functions of structures, systems, and components are correctly
translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. Further,
Criterion III requires that the design control measures provide for verifying or checking
the adequacy of designs.
Contrary to the above, as of July 29, 2008, the licensee failed to implement design
control measures to ensure that the design basis for the component cooling water
system was correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and
instructions. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure that the safety-related function of
the component cooling water system was maintained following a high energy line break,
seismic, or tornado events in the turbine building.
This violation is associated with a White finding.
The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective
actions taken and planned to be taken to correct the violation and to prevent recurrence, and the
date when full compliance was achieved, is already adequately addressed on the docket in
Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010, dated August 5, 2009. However,
you are required to submit a written statement or explanation pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 if the
description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that
case, or if you choose to respond, clearly mark your response as a "Reply to a Notice of
Violation EA-09-167," and send it to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001 with a copy to the Regional
Administrator, Region III, 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210, Lisle IL 60532, and a copy to the
NRC Resident Inspector at the Prairie Island facility, within 30 days of the date of the letter
transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
If you contest this enforcement action, you should also provide a copy of your response, with the
basis for your denial, to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001.
If you choose to respond, your response will be made available electronically for public
inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at
-2-
ENCLOSURE
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Therefore, to the extent possible, the response
should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be
made available to the public without redaction.
In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11, you may be required to post this Notice within two working
days.
Dated this 3rd day of September 2009