|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Adams
| | #REDIRECT [[Information Notice 2011-20, Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction]] |
| | number = ML19205A432
| |
| | issue date = 07/24/2019
| |
| | title = NRC060 - NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011)
| |
| | author name =
| |
| | author affiliation = NRC/OGC
| |
| | addressee name =
| |
| | addressee affiliation = NRC/ASLBP
| |
| | docket = 05000443
| |
| | license number =
| |
| | contact person = SECY RAS
| |
| | case reference number = 50-443 LA-2, ASLBP-17-953-02-LA-BD01, RAS 55108
| |
| | document type = Legal-Pre-Filed Exhibits
| |
| | page count = 8
| |
| }}
| |
| {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| |
| | |
| NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
| |
| | |
| ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
| |
| | |
| In the Matter of
| |
| | |
| NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC
| |
| | |
| (Seabrook Station, Unit 1)
| |
| | |
| Docket No. 50-443-LA-2
| |
| | |
| ASLBP No. 17-953-02-LA-BD01
| |
| | |
| Hearing Exhibit
| |
| | |
| Exhibit Number:
| |
| | |
| Exhibit Title:
| |
| | |
| NRC060
| |
| NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by
| |
| | |
| Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011)
| |
| | |
| ML112241029 UNITED STATES
| |
| | |
| NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
| |
| | |
| OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
| |
| | |
| OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS
| |
| | |
| OFFICE OF NEW REACTORS
| |
| | |
| WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001
| |
| | |
| November 18, 2011
| |
| | |
| NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2011-20:
| |
| CONCRETE DEGRADATION BY ALKALI-SILICA
| |
| | |
| REACTION
| |
| | |
| ==ADDRESSEES==
| |
| All holders of an operating license or construction permit for a nuclear power reactor under
| |
| | |
| Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Domestic Licensing of
| |
| | |
| Production and Utilization Facilities, except those who have permanently ceased operations
| |
| | |
| and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
| |
| | |
| All holders of or applicants for an early site permit, standard design certification, standard
| |
| | |
| design approval, manufacturing license, or combined license under 10 CFR Part 52, Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.
| |
| | |
| All holders of or applicants for a license for a fuel cycle facility issued pursuant to
| |
| | |
| 10 CFR Part 70, Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material.
| |
| | |
| All holders of and applicants for a gaseous diffusion plant certificate of compliance or an
| |
| | |
| approved compliance plan under 10 CFR Part 76, Certification of Gaseous Diffusion Plants.
| |
| | |
| All holders of and applicants for a specific source material license or for uranium recovery
| |
| | |
| operating license or construction permit under 10 CFR Part 40, Domestic Licensing of Source
| |
| | |
| Material. Uranium recovery facilities include conventional mills, heap leach facilities, and in situ
| |
| | |
| recovery facilities.
| |
| | |
| All holders of and applicants for an independent spent fuel storage installation license under
| |
| | |
| 10 CFR Part 72, Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste.
| |
| | |
| ==PURPOSE==
| |
| The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to inform
| |
| | |
| addressees of the occurrence of alkali-silica reaction (ASR)-induced concrete degradation of a
| |
| | |
| seismic Category 1 structure at Seabrook Station. The NRC expects that recipients will review
| |
| | |
| the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid
| |
| | |
| similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements;
| |
| therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
| |
| | |
| ==BACKGROUND==
| |
| ASR is one type of alkali-aggregate reaction that can degrade concrete structures. ASR is a
| |
| | |
| slow chemical process in which alkalis, usually predominantly from the cement, react with
| |
| | |
| certain reactive types of silica (e.g., chert, quartzite, opal, and strained quartz crystals) in the
| |
| | |
| aggregate, when moisture is present. This reaction produces an alkali-silica gel that can absorb
| |
| | |
| water and expand to cause micro-cracking of the concrete. Excessive expansion of the gel can
| |
| | |
| lead to significant cracking which can change the mechanical properties of the concrete. In
| |
| | |
| order for ASR to occur, three conditions must be present: a sufficient amount of reactive silica
| |
| | |
| in the aggregate, adequate alkali content in the concrete, and sufficient moisture.
| |
| | |
| ASR can be identified as a likely cause of degradation during visual inspection by the unique
| |
| | |
| craze, map or patterned cracking and the presence of alkali-silica gel (see Figure 1 in the
| |
| | |
| enclosure). However, ASR-induced degradation can only be confirmed by optical microscopy
| |
| | |
| performed as part of petrographic examination of concrete core samples.
| |
| | |
| To prevent ASR-induced concrete degradation, the American Society for Testing and Materials
| |
| | |
| (ASTM) has issued standards for testing concrete aggregate during construction to verify that
| |
| | |
| only non-reactive aggregates are present. These standards include ASTM C227, Standard
| |
| | |
| Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Cement-Aggregate Combinations (Mortar-Bar
| |
| | |
| Method); ASTM C289, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of
| |
| | |
| Aggregates (Chemical Method); ASTM C295, Standard Guide for Petrographic Examination of
| |
| | |
| Aggregates for Concrete; ASTM C1260, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity
| |
| | |
| of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method); ASTM C1293, Standard Test Method for Determination of
| |
| | |
| Length of Change of Concrete Due to Alkali-Silica Reaction; and ASTM C1567, Standard Test
| |
| | |
| Method for Determining the Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Combinations of Cementitious
| |
| | |
| Materials and Aggregates (Accelerated Mortar-Bar Method).
| |
| | |
| ASR degrades the measured mechanical properties of the concrete at different rates.
| |
| | |
| Therefore, relationships between compressive strength and tensile or shear strength and
| |
| | |
| assumptions about modulus of elasticity that were used in the original design of affected
| |
| | |
| structures may no longer hold true if ASR-induced degradation is identified.
| |
| | |
| Technical information on ASR-induced concrete degradation appears in specialized literature, such as the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administrations Report on the
| |
| | |
| Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Mitigation of Alkali-Silica Reaction in Transportation Structures, issued January 2010, and the American Concrete Institutes ACI 221.1R-98, Report on Alkali
| |
| | |
| Reactivity.
| |
| | |
| ==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
| |
| After observing concrete cracking patterns typical of ASR, in August 2010, the licensee for
| |
| | |
| Seabrook Station performed petrographic examinations and compressive strength and modulus
| |
| | |
| of elasticity testing of concrete core samples removed from below-grade portions of the control
| |
| | |
| building (a seismic Category I structure) that confirmed that ASR had caused the cracking.
| |
| | |
| These concrete core samples demonstrated a substantial reduction in compressive strength compared to test cylinders cast during construction and a modulus of elasticity substantially
| |
| | |
| lower than the expected value. The licensee completed a prompt operability determination that
| |
| | |
| concluded margins to the code design limits remained such that the structural integrity of the
| |
| | |
| control building continued to be demonstrated.
| |
| | |
| The Seabrook Station final safety analysis report specifies concrete testing during construction
| |
| | |
| using ASTM C289 and ASTM C295, which were the accepted standards at the time of
| |
| | |
| construction. However, ASR-induced degradation still occurred.
| |
| | |
| The licensee believes that the waterproof membrane was damaged during original installation or
| |
| | |
| backfill activities causing water intrusion that resulted in the ASR problems. Water intrusion was
| |
| | |
| exacerbated by the fact that dewatering channels were abandoned.
| |
| | |
| Additional information appears in the licensees responses to requests for additional information
| |
| | |
| related to license renewal, dated December 17, 2010, April 14 and August 11, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos.
| |
| | |
| ML103540534, ML11108A131, and ML11227A023, respectively), and in NRC inspection reports
| |
| | |
| dated May 12 and May 23, 2011 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML111330689 and ML111360432, respectively).
| |
| | |
| ==DISCUSSION==
| |
| As noted above, ASTM has several standards for testing aggregates during construction to
| |
| | |
| verify that only non-reactive aggregates are present, thereby preventing future ASR-induced
| |
| | |
| degradation. However, ASTM issued updated standards ASTM C1260 and ASTM C1293 and
| |
| | |
| provided guidance in the appendices of ASTM C289 and ASTM C1293 that cautions that the
| |
| | |
| tests described in ASTM C227 and ASTM C289 may not accurately predict aggregate reactivity
| |
| | |
| when dealing with late- or slow-expanding aggregates containing strained quartz or
| |
| | |
| microcrystalline quartz. Therefore, licensees that tested using ASTM C227 and ASTM C289 could have concrete that is susceptible to ASR-induced degradation. Beginning at initial
| |
| | |
| construction, licensees may implement measures to prevent ASR-inducted concrete
| |
| | |
| degradation such as selecting non-reactive materials, and controlling water infiltration by
| |
| | |
| protecting and preserving waterproof membranes, or adding and maintaining dewatering
| |
| | |
| channels. Regardless of the measures taken during initial construction, visual inspections of
| |
| | |
| concrete can identify the unique map or patterned cracking and the presence of alkali-silica
| |
| | |
| gel in areas likely to experience ASR (i.e., concrete exposed to moisture). Additional
| |
| | |
| information can be found in the American Concrete Institutes ACI 349.3R-02, Evaluation of
| |
| | |
| Existing Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures.
| |
| | |
| In 10 CFR 50.65, Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear
| |
| | |
| Power Plants (the maintenance rule), the NRC requires that licensees monitor the performance
| |
| | |
| or condition of structures, systems, and components (SCCs) against licensee-established goals
| |
| | |
| in a manner sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that such SSCs are capable of fulfilling
| |
| | |
| their intended function. The regulations in 10 CFR 50.65 require that these goals be
| |
| | |
| established commensurate with safety and, where practical, take into account industry-wide
| |
| | |
| operating experience. In practice, for concrete structures, this usually translates into periodic
| |
| | |
| visual inspection; however, specific inspection criteria related to ASR are generally not included.
| |
| | |
| Section 1.5 of Regulatory Guide 1.160, Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants, explains that an acceptable structural monitoring program should evaluate the
| |
| | |
| results of periodic assessments to determine the extent and rate of any degradation of the
| |
| | |
| structures.
| |
| | |
| Once visual indications of ASR-induced concrete degradation have been identified, additional
| |
| | |
| actions to evaluate and monitor the condition, as recommended in the Federal Highway
| |
| | |
| Administration report (referenced above), may include confirming the presence of ASR through
| |
| | |
| microscopic examination of concrete cores; verifying the mechanical properties through testing
| |
| | |
| of concrete cores; and in situ monitoring of the concrete over time, such as crack mapping and
| |
| | |
| monitoring of concrete relative humidity. Nuclear power plant licensees may consider these
| |
| | |
| actions to determine the remaining potential reactivity, and the rate of ASR progression.
| |
| | |
| Because safety-related structures and nonsafety-related structures whose failure could affect
| |
| | |
| safety-related structures are within the scope of the maintenance rule, licensees are required to
| |
| | |
| monitor the condition of the structures against licensee-established goals to provide reasonable
| |
| | |
| assurance that the structures are capable of fulfilling their intended functions. If ASR-induced
| |
| | |
| degradation is identified in these structures, this condition monitoring would include determining
| |
| | |
| the extent and rate of the degradation.
| |
| | |
| The NRC staff is currently reviewing the license renewal application for Seabrook Station
| |
| | |
| submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 54, Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for
| |
| | |
| Nuclear Power Plants. The Seabrook Station is the first plant to address ASR-induced
| |
| | |
| concrete degradation as part of license renewal. The licensee for Seabrook Station is
| |
| | |
| developing aging management programs that will include additional measures and actions to
| |
| | |
| manage the effects of aging from ASR-induced degradation during the period of extended
| |
| | |
| operation. In support of its license renewal application, the licensee for Seabrook Station will
| |
| | |
| submit additional information that the NRC staff will review to ensure the licensee develops an
| |
| | |
| acceptable program to manage the effects of ASR.
| |
| | |
| ==CONTACT==
| |
| This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this
| |
| | |
| matter to the technical contact listed below or to the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor
| |
| | |
| Regulation project manager.
| |
| | |
| /RA by DWeaver for/
| |
| | |
| /RA/
| |
| | |
| Vonna Ordaz, Director
| |
| | |
| Timothy J. McGinty, Director
| |
| | |
| Division of Spent Fuel Storage
| |
| | |
| Division of Policy and Rulemaking
| |
| | |
| and Transportation
| |
| | |
| Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
| |
| | |
| Office of Nuclear Material Safety
| |
| | |
| and Safeguards
| |
| | |
| /RA by JTappert for/
| |
| | |
| Laura A. Dudes, Director
| |
| | |
| Division of Construction Inspection
| |
| | |
| and Operational Programs
| |
| | |
| Office of New Reactors
| |
| | |
| ===Technical Contact:===
| |
| Bryce C. Lehman, NRR
| |
| | |
| 301-415-1626 E-mail: Bryce.Lehman@nrc.gov
| |
| | |
| Enclosure:
| |
| Photograph of Concrete Degradation
| |
| | |
| Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under NRC Library/Document Collections.
| |
| | |
| ML112241029 OFFICE
| |
| | |
| NRR/DLR/RASB
| |
| | |
| Tech Editor*
| |
| BC:NRR/DLR/RASB D: NRR/DLR
| |
| | |
| BC:NRO/DE/SEB1 NAME
| |
| | |
| BLehman
| |
| | |
| KAzariah-Kribbs
| |
| | |
| RAuluck
| |
| | |
| BHolian
| |
| | |
| BThomas
| |
| | |
| DATE
| |
| | |
| 09/12/2011
| |
| 09/29/2011 email
| |
| | |
| 09/13/2011
| |
| 09/22/2011
| |
| 09/26/2011 email
| |
| | |
| OFFICE
| |
| | |
| BC: NRR/DE/EMCB LA: NRR/PGCB
| |
| | |
| PM:NRR/PGCB
| |
| | |
| BC:NRR/PGCB
| |
| | |
| NAME
| |
| | |
| MKhanna
| |
| | |
| CHawes
| |
| | |
| DBeaulieu
| |
| | |
| SRosenberg
| |
| | |
| DATE
| |
| | |
| 09/12/2011 email
| |
| | |
| 10/03/2011
| |
| 09/29/2011
| |
| 10/17/2011
| |
| | |
| OFFICE
| |
| | |
| D:NRO/DCIP
| |
| | |
| D:DSFST:NMSS
| |
| | |
| D:NRR/DPR
| |
| | |
| NAME
| |
| | |
| LDudes JTappert for V Ordaz
| |
| | |
| TMcGinty
| |
| | |
| OFFICE
| |
| | |
| 10/21/2011
| |
| 11/18/11
| |
| 10/24/11
| |
| | |
| IN 2011-20 Photograph of Concrete Degradation
| |
| | |
| Figure 1 Patterned cracking indicative of ASR-induced degradation
| |
| | |
| (generic example-NOT from nuclear industry)}}
| |
| | |
| {{Information notice-Nav}}
| |