ML13115A081: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION III | |||
2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 | |||
LISLE, IL 60532-4352 | |||
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio | April 24, 2013 | ||
Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC | |||
President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear | |||
4300 Winfield Road | Mr. Michael J. Pacilio | ||
Warrenville, IL 60555 | Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC | ||
SUBJECT: | President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear | ||
4300 Winfield Road | |||
Dear Mr. Pacilio: | Warrenville, IL 60555 | ||
On March 29, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection | SUBJECT: | ||
at your Clinton Power Station. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection, | CLINTON POWER STATION BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS | ||
which were discussed on March 29, 2013, with Mr. B. Taber, and other members of your staff. | BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000461/2013503 | ||
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and | Dear Mr. Pacilio: | ||
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. | On March 29, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection | ||
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed | at your Clinton Power Station. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection, | ||
personnel. | which were discussed on March 29, 2013, with Mr. B. Taber, and other members of your staff. | ||
No findings were identified during this inspection. | The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and | compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. | ||
its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in | The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed | ||
the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) | personnel. | ||
component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), | No findings were identified during this inspection. | ||
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and | ||
Electronic Reading Room). | its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in | ||
the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) | |||
component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), | |||
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public | |||
Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Docket No. 50-461 | |||
License No. NPF-62 | /RA/ | ||
Enclosure: | |||
cc w/encl: | Joseph Maynen, Acting Chief | ||
Plant Support Branch | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket No. 50-461 | |||
License No. NPF-62 | |||
Enclosure: | |||
Inspection Report 05000461/2013503; | |||
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information | |||
cc w/encl: | |||
Distribution via ListServ' | |||
Enclosure | |||
Docket No: | U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
License No: | REGION III | ||
Report No: | Docket No: | ||
Licensee: | 50-461 | ||
Facility: | License No: | ||
Location: | NPF-62 | ||
Dates: | Report No: | ||
Inspectors: | 05000461/2013503 | ||
Licensee: | |||
Exelon Generation Company, LLC | |||
Facility: | |||
Approved by: | Clinton Power Station | ||
Location: | |||
Clinton, IL | |||
Dates: | |||
March 25 through 29, 2013 | |||
Inspectors: | |||
R. Jickling, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector | |||
J. Beavers, Emergency Preparedness Inspector | |||
R. Ruiz, Senior Resident Inspector | |||
N. Valos, Senior Reactor Analyst | |||
Approved by: | |||
J. Maynen, Acting Chief | |||
Plant Support Branch | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
IR 05000461/2012503; 03/25/2013 - 03/29/2013; Clinton Power Station; Baseline Emergency | 1 | ||
Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection. | Enclosure | ||
This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by two regional | SUMMARY OF FINDINGS | ||
inspectors, one reactor analyst, and one resident inspector. The significance of most findings is | IR 05000461/2012503; 03/25/2013 - 03/29/2013; Clinton Power Station; Baseline Emergency | ||
indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, | Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection. | ||
Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may | This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by two regional | ||
be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program | inspectors, one reactor analyst, and one resident inspector. The significance of most findings is | ||
for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in | indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, | ||
NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006. | Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may | ||
A. | be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program | ||
for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in | |||
NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006. | |||
B. | A. | ||
NRC-Identified and Self-Revealed Findings | |||
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness | |||
No findings were identified. | |||
B. | |||
Licensee-Identified Violations | |||
No violations were identified. | |||
1. | 2 | ||
Enclosure | |||
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01) | REPORT DETAILS | ||
1. | |||
REACTOR SAFETY | |||
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness | |||
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01) | |||
.1 | |||
Exercise Evaluation | |||
a. | |||
Inspection Scope | |||
The inspectors reviewed the March 26, 2013, biennial emergency preparedness | |||
exercise objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major | |||
elements of the licensees emergency plan and to verify that the exercises simulated | |||
problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees | |||
capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and | |||
exercises conducted in 2011, 2012, and 2013, to verify that those drills scenarios were | |||
sufficiently different from the scenario used in the March 26, 2013, exercise. | |||
The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the | |||
risk-significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action | |||
decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past | |||
exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities: | |||
* | |||
Control Room Simulator (CRS); | |||
* | |||
Technical Support Center (TSC); | |||
* | |||
Operations Support Center (OSC); and | |||
* | |||
Emergency Operations Facility (EOF). | |||
The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, | |||
transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with | |||
offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall | |||
implementation of the licensees emergency plan. | |||
The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, OSC, and EOF | |||
to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. | |||
The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to | |||
obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants | |||
performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors | |||
independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to | |||
adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the | |||
Attachment to this report. | |||
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection | |||
Procedure (IP) 71114.01-06. | |||
b. | |||
Findings | |||
No findings were identified. | |||
4. | |||
3 | |||
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151) | Enclosure | ||
4. | |||
OTHER ACTIVITIES | |||
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness | |||
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151) | |||
.1 | |||
Drill/Exercise Performance | |||
a. | |||
Inspection Scope | |||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator | |||
(PI) for the period from the third quarter 2012 through fourth quarter 2012. To determine | |||
the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance | |||
contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory | |||
Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, was used. The inspectors | |||
reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee | |||
accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI | |||
guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes | |||
including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, assessments of | |||
PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and | |||
performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to | |||
this report. | |||
This inspection constituted one Drill/Exercise Performance sample as defined in | |||
IP 71151-05. | |||
b. | |||
Findings | |||
No findings were identified. | |||
.2 | |||
Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation | |||
a. | |||
Inspection Scope | |||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response | |||
Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the third quarter 2012 | |||
through fourth quarter 2012. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during | |||
those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, | |||
Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, was used. | |||
The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the | |||
licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and | |||
the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes | |||
including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, performance during | |||
the 2012 drills, and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key ERO positions. | |||
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. | |||
This inspection constituted one ERO Drill Participation sample as defined in | |||
IP 71151-05. | |||
b. | |||
Findings | |||
No findings were identified. | |||
.3 | |||
4 | |||
Enclosure | |||
.3 | |||
Alert and Notification System | |||
a. Inspection Scope | |||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) | |||
PI for the period from the third quarter 2012 through fourth quarter 2012. To determine | |||
the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance | |||
contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator | |||
Guideline, Revision 6, was used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records | |||
associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in | |||
accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI Guidance. Specifically, the inspectors | |||
reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing | |||
opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. | |||
4OA6 Management Meetings | Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. | ||
This inspection constituted one ANS sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | |||
b. Findings | |||
No findings were identified. | |||
4OA6 Management Meetings | |||
.1 | |||
ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | Exit Meeting Summary | ||
On March 29, 2013, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to | |||
Mr. B. Taber and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the | |||
issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input | |||
discussed was considered proprietary. | |||
ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | |||
1 | |||
Licensee | Attachment | ||
B. Taber, Plant Manager | SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | ||
K. Baker, Regulatory Assurance Manager | KEY POINTS OF CONTACT | ||
D. Bond, Emergency Preparedness Manager | Licensee | ||
J. Cunningham, Operations Director | B. Taber, Plant Manager | ||
S. Kowalski, Senior Manager Design Engineering | K. Baker, Regulatory Assurance Manager | ||
M. Mayer, Security | D. Bond, Emergency Preparedness Manager | ||
S. ORiley, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator | J. Cunningham, Operations Director | ||
W. Paggent, On-Line Work Manager | S. Kowalski, Senior Manager Design Engineering | ||
P. Quealy, Senior Drill and Exercise Specialist | M. Mayer, Security | ||
C. Rocha, Nuclear Oversight Manager | S. ORiley, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator | ||
T. Stoner, Maintenance Director | W. Paggent, On-Line Work Manager | ||
J. Stovall, Chemistry Manager | P. Quealy, Senior Drill and Exercise Specialist | ||
J. Waddel, Safety and Human Performance Manager | C. Rocha, Nuclear Oversight Manager | ||
Nuclear Regulatory Commission | T. Stoner, Maintenance Director | ||
B. Kemker, Senior Resident Inspector | J. Stovall, Chemistry Manager | ||
J. Waddel, Safety and Human Performance Manager | |||
Opened, Closed, and Discussed | Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
None | B. Kemker, Senior Resident Inspector | ||
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED | |||
Opened, Closed, and Discussed | |||
None | |||
The following is a partial list of documents reviewed during the inspection. Inclusion on this list | 2 | ||
does not imply that the NRC inspector reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather that | Attachment | ||
selected sections or portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection | LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED | ||
effort. Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or | The following is a partial list of documents reviewed during the inspection. Inclusion on this list | ||
any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report. | does not imply that the NRC inspector reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather that | ||
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation | selected sections or portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection | ||
- Clinton Station 2013 Ingestion Pathway NRC Graded Exercise; March 22, 2013 | effort. Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or | ||
- CPS 4305.01; Security Threat/Intrusion; Revision 7 | any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report. | ||
- EP-AA-111; Emergency Classification and Protective Action Recommendation; Revision 18 | 1EP1 Exercise Evaluation | ||
- EP-AA-113; Personnel Protective Actions; Revision 11 | - Clinton Station 2013 Ingestion Pathway NRC Graded Exercise; March 22, 2013 | ||
- EP-AA-114; Notifications; Revision 11 | - CPS 4305.01; Security Threat/Intrusion; Revision 7 | ||
- AR 01493441; Exercise-JIC News Release Was Identified As Including Several Problems; | - EP-AA-111; Emergency Classification and Protective Action Recommendation; Revision 18 | ||
- EP-AA-113; Personnel Protective Actions; Revision 11 | |||
- AR 01493436; Exercise-JIC First Press Conference Reported Several Inaccurate Statements; | - EP-AA-114; Notifications; Revision 11 | ||
- AR 01493441; Exercise-JIC News Release Was Identified As Including Several Problems; | |||
- AR 01493433; Exercise-Performance Weaknesses Were Identified for Control Room and OSC | March 27, 2013 | ||
- AR 01493436; Exercise-JIC First Press Conference Reported Several Inaccurate Statements; | |||
- AR 01493430; Exercise-EOF Protective Measures Group Incorrectly Reported Two Radiation | March 27, 2013 | ||
- AR 01493433; Exercise-Performance Weaknesses Were Identified for Control Room and OSC | |||
- AR 01493418; Exercise-TSC Failed to Provide the Correct Radiation Release Path For Dose | Repair Team Request, Dispatch, and Tracking; March 27, 2013 | ||
- AR 01493430; Exercise-EOF Protective Measures Group Incorrectly Reported Two Radiation | |||
- AR 01493414; Exercise-Equipment Operators Minimum Staffing Was Not Demonstrated; | Release Paths and One Correctly; March 27, 2013 | ||
- AR 01493418; Exercise-TSC Failed to Provide the Correct Radiation Release Path For Dose | |||
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification | Assessment-No Impact to PARs For This Scenario; March 27, 2013 | ||
- Clinton Power Monthly Siren Availability Report; July - December 2012 | - AR 01493414; Exercise-Equipment Operators Minimum Staffing Was Not Demonstrated; | ||
- EP-AA-125-1002; DEP Monthly Data; July - December 2012 | March 27, 2013 | ||
- EP-AA-1003; Key ERO Participation and Stability Monthly Data; September - December 2012 | |||
- LS-AA-2110; Monthly Data Elements for NRC ERO Drill Participation; September - December | 4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification | ||
- LS-AA-2120; Monthly Data Elements for NRC DEP; July - December 2012 | - Clinton Power Monthly Siren Availability Report; July - December 2012 | ||
- LS-AA-2130; Monthly Data Elements for NRC ANS Reliability; July - December 2012 | - EP-AA-125-1002; DEP Monthly Data; July - December 2012 | ||
- EP-AA-1003; Key ERO Participation and Stability Monthly Data; September - December 2012 | |||
- LS-AA-2110; Monthly Data Elements for NRC ERO Drill Participation; September - December | |||
2012 | |||
- LS-AA-2120; Monthly Data Elements for NRC DEP; July - December 2012 | |||
- LS-AA-2130; Monthly Data Elements for NRC ANS Reliability; July - December 2012 | |||
ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access Management System | 3 | ||
ANS | Attachment | ||
AR | LIST OF ACRONYMS USED | ||
CFR | ADAMS | ||
CRS | Agencywide Documents Access Management System | ||
DEP | ANS | ||
DRS | Alert and Notification System | ||
EOF | AR | ||
EP | Action Request | ||
ERO | CFR | ||
IP | Code of Federal Regulations | ||
IR | CRS | ||
JIC | Control Room Simulator | ||
NEI | DEP | ||
NRC | Drill and Exercise Performance | ||
OSC | DRS | ||
PAR | Division of Reactor Safety | ||
PARS | EOF | ||
PI | Emergency Operations Facility | ||
SDP | EP | ||
TSC | Emergency Preparedness | ||
ERO | |||
Emergency Response Organization | |||
IP | |||
Inspection Procedure | |||
IR | |||
Inspection Report | |||
JIC | |||
Joint Information Center | |||
NEI | |||
Nuclear Energy Institute | |||
NRC | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
OSC | |||
Operations Support Center | |||
PAR | |||
Protective Action Recommendation | |||
PARS | |||
Publicly Available Records System | |||
PI | |||
Performance Indicator | |||
SDP | |||
Significance Determination Process | |||
TSC | |||
Technical Support Center | |||
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio | |||
Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC | April 24, 2013 | ||
4300 Winfield Road | Mr. Michael J. Pacilio | ||
Warrenville, IL 60555 | Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC | ||
SUBJECT: | President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear | ||
4300 Winfield Road | |||
Dear Mr. Pacilio: | Warrenville, IL 60555 | ||
On March 29, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your | SUBJECT: | ||
Clinton Power Station. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection, which were | CLINTON POWER STATION BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL | ||
discussed on March 29, 2013, with Mr. B. Taber, and other members of your staff. | EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000461/2013503 | ||
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance | Dear Mr. Pacilio: | ||
with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors | On March 29, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your | ||
reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. | Clinton Power Station. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection, which were | ||
No findings were identified during this inspection. | discussed on March 29, 2013, with Mr. B. Taber, and other members of your staff. | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure, | The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance | ||
and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public | with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors | ||
Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's | reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. | ||
Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site | No findings were identified during this inspection. | ||
at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure, | ||
and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public | |||
Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's | |||
Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site | |||
at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Docket No. 50-461 | /RA/ | ||
License No. NPF-62 | Joseph Maynen, Acting Chief | ||
Enclosure: | Plant Support Branch | ||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
cc w/encl: | Docket No. 50-461 | ||
DISTRIBUTION: | License No. NPF-62 | ||
See next page | Enclosure: | ||
DOCUMENT NAME: -CLI 2013 503 (RDJ).DOCX | Inspection Report 05000461/2013503; | ||
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information | |||
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with | cc w/encl: | ||
attach/encl "N" = No copy | Distribution via ListServ' | ||
OFFICE | |||
NAME | DISTRIBUTION: | ||
DATE | See next page | ||
DOCUMENT NAME: -CLI 2013 503 (RDJ).DOCX | |||
Publicly Available | |||
Non-Publicly Available | |||
Sensitive | |||
Non-Sensitive | |||
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with | |||
attach/encl "N" = No copy | |||
OFFICE | |||
RIII | |||
RIII | |||
RIII | |||
RIII | |||
NAME | |||
JMaynen for RJickling | |||
JMaynen | |||
DATE | |||
04/24/13 | |||
04/24/13 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
Letter to Mr. Michael J. Pacilio from Mr. Joseph Maynen dated April 24, 2013. | |||
SUBJECT: | |||
Letter to Mr. Michael J. Pacilio from Mr. Joseph Maynen dated April 24, 2013. | |||
DISTRIBUTION: | |||
Doug Huyck | SUBJECT: | ||
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource | CLINTON POWER STATION BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS | ||
RidsNrrPMClinton Resource | BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000461/2013503 | ||
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource | DISTRIBUTION: | ||
Chuck Casto | Doug Huyck | ||
Cynthia Pederson | RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource | ||
Steven Orth | RidsNrrPMClinton Resource | ||
Allan Barker | RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource | ||
Carole Ariano | Chuck Casto | ||
Christine Lipa | Cynthia Pederson | ||
Linda Linn | Steven Orth | ||
DRSIII | Allan Barker | ||
DRPIII | Carole Ariano | ||
Patricia Buckley | Christine Lipa | ||
Tammy Tomczak | Linda Linn | ||
DRSIII | |||
DRPIII | |||
Patricia Buckley | |||
Tammy Tomczak | |||
ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov | ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:16, 11 January 2025
| ML13115A081 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton |
| Issue date: | 04/24/2013 |
| From: | Maynen J Plant Support Branch II |
| To: | Pacilio M Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
| Robert Jickling | |
| References | |
| IR-13-503 | |
| Download: ML13115A081 (11) | |
See also: IR 05000461/2013503
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210
LISLE, IL 60532-4352
April 24, 2013
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio
Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear
4300 Winfield Road
Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT:
CLINTON POWER STATION BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000461/2013503
Dear Mr. Pacilio:
On March 29, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection
at your Clinton Power Station. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection,
which were discussed on March 29, 2013, with Mr. B. Taber, and other members of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed
personnel.
No findings were identified during this inspection.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and
its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in
the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS)
component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS),
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public
Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Joseph Maynen, Acting Chief
Plant Support Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-461
License No. NPF-62
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000461/2013503;
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
cc w/encl:
Distribution via ListServ'
Enclosure
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Docket No:
50-461
License No:
Report No:
Licensee:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Facility:
Clinton Power Station
Location:
Clinton, IL
Dates:
March 25 through 29, 2013
Inspectors:
R. Jickling, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector
J. Beavers, Emergency Preparedness Inspector
R. Ruiz, Senior Resident Inspector
N. Valos, Senior Reactor Analyst
Approved by:
J. Maynen, Acting Chief
Plant Support Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
1
Enclosure
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000461/2012503; 03/25/2013 - 03/29/2013; Clinton Power Station; Baseline Emergency
Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection.
This report covers a one week period of announced baseline inspection by two regional
inspectors, one reactor analyst, and one resident inspector. The significance of most findings is
indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609,
Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may
be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program
for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in
NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.
A.
NRC-Identified and Self-Revealed Findings
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
No findings were identified.
B.
Licensee-Identified Violations
No violations were identified.
2
Enclosure
REPORT DETAILS
1.
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01)
.1
Exercise Evaluation
a.
Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the March 26, 2013, biennial emergency preparedness
exercise objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major
elements of the licensees emergency plan and to verify that the exercises simulated
problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees
capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and
exercises conducted in 2011, 2012, and 2013, to verify that those drills scenarios were
sufficiently different from the scenario used in the March 26, 2013, exercise.
The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the
risk-significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action
decision making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past
exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:
Control Room Simulator (CRS);
Technical Support Center (TSC);
Operations Support Center (OSC); and
Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions,
transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with
offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall
implementation of the licensees emergency plan.
The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the CRS, TSC, OSC, and EOF
to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance.
The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to
obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants
performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors
independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to
adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the
Attachment to this report.
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection
Procedure (IP) 71114.01-06.
b.
Findings
No findings were identified.
3
Enclosure
4.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151)
.1
Drill/Exercise Performance
a.
Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator
(PI) for the period from the third quarter 2012 through fourth quarter 2012. To determine
the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance
contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory
Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, was used. The inspectors
reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee
accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI
guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes
including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, assessments of
PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and
performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to
this report.
This inspection constituted one Drill/Exercise Performance sample as defined in
b.
Findings
No findings were identified.
.2
Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation
a.
Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Emergency Response
Organization (ERO) Drill Participation PI for the period from the third quarter 2012
through fourth quarter 2012. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during
those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02,
Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, was used.
The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the
licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and
the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes
including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, performance during
the 2012 drills, and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key ERO positions.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
This inspection constituted one ERO Drill Participation sample as defined in
b.
Findings
No findings were identified.
4
Enclosure
.3
Alert and Notification System
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS)
PI for the period from the third quarter 2012 through fourth quarter 2012. To determine
the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance
contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator
Guideline, Revision 6, was used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records
associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in
accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI Guidance. Specifically, the inspectors
reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing
opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
This inspection constituted one ANS sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Management Meetings
.1
Exit Meeting Summary
On March 29, 2013, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to
Mr. B. Taber and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the
issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input
discussed was considered proprietary.
ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
1
Attachment
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee
B. Taber, Plant Manager
K. Baker, Regulatory Assurance Manager
D. Bond, Emergency Preparedness Manager
J. Cunningham, Operations Director
S. Kowalski, Senior Manager Design Engineering
M. Mayer, Security
S. ORiley, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
W. Paggent, On-Line Work Manager
P. Quealy, Senior Drill and Exercise Specialist
C. Rocha, Nuclear Oversight Manager
T. Stoner, Maintenance Director
J. Stovall, Chemistry Manager
J. Waddel, Safety and Human Performance Manager
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
B. Kemker, Senior Resident Inspector
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened, Closed, and Discussed
None
2
Attachment
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
The following is a partial list of documents reviewed during the inspection. Inclusion on this list
does not imply that the NRC inspector reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather that
selected sections or portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection
effort. Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or
any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report.
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
- Clinton Station 2013 Ingestion Pathway NRC Graded Exercise; March 22, 2013
- CPS 4305.01; Security Threat/Intrusion; Revision 7
- EP-AA-111; Emergency Classification and Protective Action Recommendation; Revision 18
- EP-AA-113; Personnel Protective Actions; Revision 11
- EP-AA-114; Notifications; Revision 11
- AR 01493441; Exercise-JIC News Release Was Identified As Including Several Problems;
March 27, 2013
- AR 01493436; Exercise-JIC First Press Conference Reported Several Inaccurate Statements;
March 27, 2013
- AR 01493433; Exercise-Performance Weaknesses Were Identified for Control Room and OSC
Repair Team Request, Dispatch, and Tracking; March 27, 2013
- AR 01493430; Exercise-EOF Protective Measures Group Incorrectly Reported Two Radiation
Release Paths and One Correctly; March 27, 2013
- AR 01493418; Exercise-TSC Failed to Provide the Correct Radiation Release Path For Dose
Assessment-No Impact to PARs For This Scenario; March 27, 2013
- AR 01493414; Exercise-Equipment Operators Minimum Staffing Was Not Demonstrated;
March 27, 2013
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification
- Clinton Power Monthly Siren Availability Report; July - December 2012
- EP-AA-125-1002; DEP Monthly Data; July - December 2012
- EP-AA-1003; Key ERO Participation and Stability Monthly Data; September - December 2012
- LS-AA-2110; Monthly Data Elements for NRC ERO Drill Participation; September - December
2012
- LS-AA-2120; Monthly Data Elements for NRC DEP; July - December 2012
- LS-AA-2130; Monthly Data Elements for NRC ANS Reliability; July - December 2012
3
Attachment
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED
Agencywide Documents Access Management System
Alert and Notification System
Action Request
CFR
Code of Federal Regulations
Control Room Simulator
Drill and Exercise Performance
Division of Reactor Safety
Emergency Response Organization
IP
Inspection Procedure
IR
Inspection Report
NEI
Nuclear Energy Institute
NRC
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Operations Support Center
Protective Action Recommendation
Publicly Available Records System
Performance Indicator
Significance Determination Process
April 24, 2013
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio
Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear
4300 Winfield Road
Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT:
CLINTON POWER STATION BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL
EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000461/2013503
Dear Mr. Pacilio:
On March 29, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your
Clinton Power Station. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection, which were
discussed on March 29, 2013, with Mr. B. Taber, and other members of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance
with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors
reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
No findings were identified during this inspection.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure,
and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public
Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's
Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site
at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Joseph Maynen, Acting Chief
Plant Support Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-461
License No. NPF-62
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000461/2013503;
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
cc w/encl:
Distribution via ListServ'
DISTRIBUTION:
See next page
DOCUMENT NAME: -CLI 2013 503 (RDJ).DOCX
Publicly Available
Non-Publicly Available
Sensitive
Non-Sensitive
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with
attach/encl "N" = No copy
OFFICE
RIII
RIII
RIII
RIII
NAME
JMaynen for RJickling
JMaynen
DATE
04/24/13
04/24/13
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Letter to Mr. Michael J. Pacilio from Mr. Joseph Maynen dated April 24, 2013.
SUBJECT:
CLINTON POWER STATION BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000461/2013503
DISTRIBUTION:
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource
RidsNrrPMClinton Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Chuck Casto
Cynthia Pederson
DRSIII
DRPIII
Patricia Buckley
ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov