SECY-17-0095, VR-SECY-17-0095: Review and Approval of Proposed Revision to Regulatory Guide 5.77, Insider Mitigation Program (Wright): Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[SECY-17-0095, Review and Approval of Proposed Revision to Regulatory Guide 5.77, Insider Mitigation Program]]
| number = ML21188A089
| issue date = 07/06/2021
| title = VR-SECY-17-0095: Review and Approval of Proposed Revision to Regulatory Guide 5.77, Insider Mitigation Program (Wright)
| author name = Wright D
| author affiliation = NRC/OCM
| addressee name = Vietti-Cook A
| addressee affiliation = NRC/SECY
| docket =
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = SECY-17-0095, SRM-SECY-17-0095
| document report number = VR-SECY-17-0095
| package number = ML21188A083
| document type = Commission Voting Record (CVR)
| page count = 1
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NOTATION VOTE RESPONSE SHEET TO:
Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary FROM:
Commissioner Wright
 
==SUBJECT:==
SECY-17-0095: REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PROPOSED REVISION TO REGULATORY GUIDE 5.77 INSIDER MITIGATION PROGRAM Approved __X__ Disapproved ____ Abstain ____ Not Participating ____
COMMENTS: Below __X__ Attached ____ None ____
I appreciate the staffs efforts to incorporate lessons learned from years of inspections, operating experience, and licensee interactions related to insider mitigation programs into Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide (RG) 5.77. The Committee to Review Generic Requirements endorsed this revision after determining that it did not impose a new staff position, any new requirements, or a backfit.0F1 This revision also does not supersede Revision 0 of RG 5.77, which continues to be an acceptable approach to implementing an insider mitigation program. Therefore, I approve the staffs recommendation to issue Revision 1 of RG 5.77. However, I agree with Chairman Hanson and former Commissioner Burns that before issuance, the document should be edited for consistency, accuracy, formatting, and a determination regarding which content should be marked U and OUO/SRI. The staff should provide this edited version to the Commission in a Commissioners Assistants note before issuance. Further, the staff should notify the Commission if it has any recommended substantive changes based on information and experience gained since this paper was submitted to the Commission.
Entered in STARS SIGNATURE Yes__X__ No____
DATE 1 See ADAMS Accession No. ML17228A119 (non-public).}}

Latest revision as of 11:24, 9 January 2025