ML17275A435: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17275A435
| number = ML17275A435
| issue date = 07/14/1980
| issue date = 07/14/1980
| title = Ack Receipt of NRC 800430 Ltr Approving Request to Discontinue Certain Aquatic Monitoring & Requesting Copies of Util Submittals to State of Wa Re Water Quality.Nrc Does Not Have Authority to Require Water Quality Filings
| title = Ack Receipt of NRC Approving Request to Discontinue Certain Aquatic Monitoring & Requesting Copies of Util Submittals to State of Wa Re Water Quality.Nrc Does Not Have Authority to Require Water Quality Filings
| author name = Renberger D
| author name = Renberger D
| author affiliation = WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
| author affiliation = WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8007210392
| document report number = NUDOCS 8007210392
| title reference date = 04-30-1980
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 18
| page count = 18
Line 16: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:RESULATOR+NFORMAT ION DISTRIBUTION             S                     EM (RIDE)           el"Ig ACCESSION NBR:8007210392             DOC ~ DATE: 80/07/10 NOTARIZED: NO                                       DO FACIL:50 397     NPPSS     Nuclear Projecti     Unit 2i Hashington Public                       Powe 50 060   LSPPSS   Nuclear Projecti Unit ii Washington Public                             Powe         05000460 AUTH'AME                 AUTHOR   AFFILIATION RENBERGERiD ~ LE       Washington Public Power Supply System REC IP ~ NAME           RECIPIENT AFFILIATION YOUNGBLOOD<B.J.             Licensing Branch 1
{{#Wiki_filter:RESULATOR+NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION S EM (RIDE) el"Ig ACCESSION NBR:8007210392 DOC ~ DATE: 80/07/10 NOTARIZED:
NO DO FACIL:50 397 NPPSS Nuclear Projecti Unit 2i Hashington Public Powe 50 060 LSPPSS Nuclear Projecti Unit ii Washington Public Powe 05000460 AUTH'AME AUTHOR AFFILIATION RENBERGERiD ~ LE Washington Public Power Supply System REC IP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION YOUNGBLOOD<B.J.
Licensing Branch 1


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
ACk receipt of NRC 800030 ltr approving request to discontinue certain aquatic monitoring 8 requesting copies of util submittals to State of HA re water quality NRC does                       ~
ACk receipt of NRC 800030 ltr approving request to discontinue certain aquatic monitoring 8 requesting copies of util submittals to State of HA re water quality ~ NRC does not have authority to require water quality filings'ISTRIBUTION CODE:
not have authority to require water quality CODE:     A001S   COPIES RECEIVED:LTR       g ENCL filings'ISTRIBUTION
A001S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR g ENCL ~ SIZE:~
                                                                                            ~ SIZE:~
TITLE: General Distr ibution for after Issuance of Opeiating Lic NOTES:PM:
TITLE: General       Distr ibution for after Issuance of Opeiating Lic NOTES:PM: 2     copies of al     1 material.                                                                 05000397 RECIPIENT             COPIES            RECIPIENT                              COPIES ID CODE/NAME           LTTR ENCL        ID CODE/NAME                          LTTR ENCL ACTION s     YOUNGBLOODi B 05           1            LYNCHED,                                  12 BOURNI A E A ~           12    1 INTERNAL: D/DIRiHUM FAC         S                     DIRi HUM  FAC SFY I8E              12                    NRC PDR         02 OELD              10                    OR ASSESS BR   19 01                                                                    1'XTERNAL:
2 copies of al 1 material.
ACRS             20     16     1       LPDR             03 NSIC              00      1
05000397 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME ACTION s YOUNGBLOODiB 05 BOURNI A E A ~
                                                                                                    ~ut. a2 tg8g 53             o TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIREDs             LTTR   ~     ENCL
INTERNAL: D/DIRiHUM FAC S
I8E 12 OELD 10 01 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
12 1
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME
: LYNCHED, DIRiHUM FAC SFY NRC PDR 02 OR ASSESS BR 19 COPIES LTTR ENCL 12 1'XTERNAL:
ACRS NSIC 20 00 16 1
1 LPDR 03
~ut. a2 tg8g 53 o
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIREDs LTTR ~
ENCL


wo H
wo H
1 tt   P
1 tt P
  ~'
~'
I'
I'


Washington- Public Power Supply System A JOINT OPERATING AGENCY P, 0. BOX 988   3000 GEO. WASHINOSON WAY   RIOHI.jNO, WASHINGTON 99352 PHONE (509) 375.5000 July 14,  1980 Docket Nos.:           50-397 50-460 50-513 Mr. B. J. Youngblood, Chief Li cens i ng Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.. C. 20555
Washington-Public Power Supply System A JOINT OPERATING AGENCY P, 0. BOX 988 3000 GEO. WASHINOSON WAY RIOHI.jNO, WASHINGTON 99352 PHONE (509) 375.5000 Docket Nos.:
50-397 50-460 50-513 July 14, 1980 Mr. B. J.
Youngblood, Chief Licens ing Branch No.
1 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.. C.
20555


==Dear Mr. Youngblood:==
==Dear Mr. Youngblood:==
==Subject:==
==Subject:==
WPPSS   Nuclear   Project Nos. 1,     2 and 4 Water Use and       ualit Re orts
WPPSS Nuclear Project Nos. 1, 2 and 4
Water Use and ualit Re orts


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
Letter, D. L. Renberger from         B. J. Youngblood Dated   April 30,'980 This will acknowledge receipt of the above referenced letter .
: Letter, D. L. Renberger from B. J.
Your   letter approved our request to discontinue certain aquatic monitor-ing. In addition, however, you ask that in the future:
Youngblood Dated April 30,'980 This will acknowledge receipt of the above referenced letter.
            . . copies of     all Supply System submittals to the State re-lating to       water use and quality regulations be sent to the NRC.
Your letter approved our request to discontinue certain aquatic monitor-ing.
In addition, however, you ask that in the future:
. copies of all Supply System submittals to the State re-lating to water use and quality regulations be sent to the NRC.
This should include copies of NPDES applications, revisions and renewal requests as well as other reports required under the NPDES permit."
This should include copies of NPDES applications, revisions and renewal requests as well as other reports required under the NPDES permit."
The Supply System         believes the NRC to be without authority to require routine filing of these water quality related submittals. Nevertheless, reserving its right to object to continued filing in the future, the Supply System       will voluntarily       honor your request.
The Supply System believes the NRC to be without authority to require routine filing of these water quality related submittals.
Our belief concerning the authority of the NRC to require submission of water quality reports filed with EPA and its delegated agencies is based upon recent de'cisions of the NRC Appeal Board which interpret Section 5ll(c}(2) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33, U.S.C. 1326), culminating with ALAB-569, H. B. Robinson. 1/
Nevertheless, reserving its right to object to continued filing in the future, the Supply System will voluntarily honor your request.
Our belief concerning the authority of the NRC to require submission of water quality reports filed with EPA and its delegated agencies is based upon recent de'cisions of the NRC Appeal Board which interpret Section 5ll(c}(2) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33, U.S.C.
1326), culminating with ALAB-569, H. B. Robinson.
1/
gd
gd


d O
d O


Hr. B. J. Youngblood Page Two July 14,     1980 Water Use and     guality Reports J2
Hr.
      ~q 1iy~idg In H. B. Robinson, the Appeal Board reviewed its holdings in Seabrook s pons ibi i ti es under NEPA.
B. J.
1 f    i  fi
Youngblood Page Two July 14, 1980 Water Use and guality Reports In H. B. Robinson, the Appeal Board reviewed its holdings in Seabrook J2
    , Peach Bottom g3 and Yellow Creek 4/ concerning the role of the NRC guoting its earlier opinion in       Yellow Creek concerning the role of agencies other than EPA in water quality and pollution control matters, the Appeal Board said:
, Peach Bottom g3 and Yellow Creek 4/ concerning the role of the NRC
        "Third, those agencies are not to 'second guess'PA by undertaking independent analyses and setting their own standards in this area.
~q 1iy~idg f
And, finally, given the pointed Congressional comments cited, NRC, as statutory successor to the AEC, is unmistakably bound by those strictures."
i fi s pons ibi 1 ities under NEPA.
10 NRC at 561 and   then, reviewing the holding in Yellow Creek, said:
guoting its earlier opinion in Yellow Creek concerning the role of agencies other than EPA in water quality and pollution control matters, the Appeal Board said:
        "On   the basis of this analysis, we held squarely 'that NRC may not undercut EPA by undertaking its own analyses and reaching its own conclusions in water quality issues already decided by EPA.'"
"Third, those agencies are not to 'second guess'PA by undertaking independent analyses and setting their own standards in this area.
10 NRC at 561
And, finally, given the pointed Congressional comments cited,
+1   . In the Natter of Carolina Power 8 Li ht Com an H. B. Robinson, Unct No. 2 , v. ALAB-569,"
: NRC, as statutory successor to the AEC, is unmistakably bound by those strictures."
10 NRC at 561 and then, reviewing the holding in Yellow Creek, said:
"On the basis of this analysis, we held squarely 'that NRC may not undercut EPA by undertaking its own analyses and reaching its own conclusions in water quality issues already decided by EPA.'"
10 NRC at 561
+1 In the Natter of Carolina Power 8 Li ht Com an H.
B. Robinson, Unct No.
2
, v. ALAB-569,"
10 NRC at 557 (1979).
10 NRC at 557 (1979).
g2     Public Service Com an of New Ham shire, (Seabrook Units 1 5 2 , ALAB-366, 5 NRC 39 1977 , affirmed, CLI-77-8, 5 NRC 503 (1977); and ALAB-422, 6 NRC 33 (1977).
g2 Public Service Com an of New Ham shire, (Seabrook Units 1
3/     Philadel hia Electric   Com an   (Peach Bottom Units 2 5 3 ,   ALAB-216, 8 EC 13.
5 2
g4     Tennessee   Valle Authorit (Yellow Creek Units 1 5 2 , AL   B-515, 8 NRC 702 (1978).
, ALAB-366, 5 NRC 39 1977
, affirmed, CLI-77-8, 5
NRC 503 (1977);
and ALAB-422, 6 NRC 33 (1977).
3/
Philadel hia Electric Com an (Peach Bottom Units 2 5 3, ALAB-216, 8 EC 13.
g4 Tennessee Valle Authorit (Yellow Creek Units 1
5 2
, AL B-515, 8
NRC 702 (1978).


"~
"~
Hr. B. J. Youngblood Page Three July 14, 1980 Water Use and guality Reports Finally, in H. B. Robinson, the Appeal Board concluded:
 
      "If anything, events teach that the staff and Boards can best expend their limited resources by concentrating on those questions which only this Coomission can handle, rather than by duplicating the efforts of a sister agency in a field peculiarly within that agency's competence."
Hr.
10 NRC at 561 Since the Appeal Board has now made     it clear that the NRC staff is bound by Section 511(c)(2) of the Clean Water Act to take EPA water quality decisions at face value, simply factoring them into cost-benefit balanc-ing under NEPA; and'is foreclosed by-that Act from undertaking- indepen-dent analyses; copies of water use and quality submittals can be of no practical use to the NRC staff. The Supply System contends that a requirement that copies of these reports be furnished routinely to the NRC staff perpetuates   the "needless duplica'tion" of paperwork enjoined by the Clean Water Act and the Appeal Board's decisions.
B. J.
Since, however,   it is understood -that your request involves no more than furnishing   NRC with duplicate copies of water quality submittals made to the State of Washington, the Supply System will comply with the request.
Youngblood Page Three July 14, 1980 Water Use and guality Reports Finally, in H.
The Supply System is willing to do so at this time because     it believes that the duplication of documents will'equire only a small additional effort and understands that this undertaking will not require prepara-tion of special reports on these topics specifically for the NRC staff.
B. Robinson, the Appeal Board concluded:
"If anything, events teach that the staff and Boards can best expend their limited resources by concentrating on those questions which only this Coomission can handle, rather than by duplicating the efforts of a sister agency in a field peculiarly within that agency's competence."
10 NRC at 561 Since the Appeal Board has now made it clear that the NRC staff is bound by Section 511(c)(2) of the Clean Water Act to take EPA water quality decisions at face value, simply factoring them into cost-benefit balanc-ing under NEPA; and'is foreclosed by-that Act from undertaking-indepen-dent analyses; copies of water use and quality submittals can be of no practical use to the NRC staff.
The Supply System contends that a
requirement that copies of these reports be furnished routinely to the NRC staff perpetuates the "needless duplica'tion" of paperwork enjoined by the Clean Water Act and the Appeal Board's decisions.
: Since, however, it is understood -that your request involves no more than furnishing NRC with duplicate copies of water quality submittals made to the State of Washington, the Supply System will comply with the request.
The Supply System is willing to do so at this time because it believes that the duplication of documents will'equire only a small additional effort and understands that this undertaking will not require prepara-tion of special reports on these topics specifically for the NRC staff.
Yery truly yours, D. L. Renberger Assistant Director, Technology mch
Yery truly yours, D. L. Renberger Assistant Director, Technology mch


I
I
    ~g REgy 0                       UNITED STATES Cl 0          NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I                 C                  WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 Dp
 
  +n
~g REgy 0
    +~*<<+
Cl0 I
            ~O July 11,       1980 TO ALL APPLICANTS FOR OPERATING LICENSES AND CONSTRUCTION PERMIT HOLDERS In the process of establishing priorities for the licensing reviews of operating license applications, we rely principally on'he best estimates of the construction completion date of utilities. In most cases, this date will be confirmed or modified by our Caseload Forecast Panel which usually visits a specific plant site no more than once a year. Because of a number of recent s'Iippages in applicants'onstruction completion schedules, we believe         it is appropriate at this time to request up-to-date schedules from all applicants. Accordingly, we are requesting you to advise us of your present best estimate of the construction completion date for your facility (faciIities) and fuel load target date so that we may establish our licensing priorities based on the latest available data. For your information, I have enclosed a listing provided to the House Appropriations Subcommittee of target schedules for those plants seeking operating licenses in the next three years. Those applicants not listed in the enclosure should provide the date they pl'an to tender their Operating License Application (FSAR and ER) to the NRC.
C Dp
Upon   receipt of your response, we anticipate a potential revision to our present licensing review priorities. Note that the order of our priorities is somewhat influenced by a hearing which is required for some of the OL applications.
+n
~O
+~*<<+
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 July 11, 1980 TO ALL APPLICANTS FOR OPERATING LICENSES AND CONSTRUCTION PERMIT HOLDERS In the process of establishing priorities for the licensing reviews of operating license applications, we rely principally on'he best estimates of the construction completion date of utilities.
In most cases, this date will be confirmed or modified by our Caseload Forecast Panel which usually visits a specific plant site no more than once a year.
Because of a number of recent s'Iippages in applicants'onstruction completion schedules, we believe it is appropriate at this time to request up-to-date schedules from all applicants.
Accordingly, we are requesting you to advise us of your present best estimate of the construction completion date for your facility (faciIities) and fuel load target date so that we may establish our licensing priorities based on the latest available data.
For your information, I have enclosed a listing provided to the House Appropriations Subcommittee of target schedules for those plants seeking operating licenses in the next three years.
Those applicants not listed in the enclosure should provide the date they pl'an to tender their Operating License Application (FSAR and ER) to the NRC.
Upon receipt of your response, we anticipate a potential revision to our present licensing review priorities.
Note that the order of our priorities is somewhat influenced by a hearing which is required for some of the OL applications.
Inasmuch as we are still limited in our casework by our manpower resources, we request that your response be as up-to-date as possible.
Inasmuch as we are still limited in our casework by our manpower resources, we request that your response be as up-to-date as possible.
Please'provide your response within   thirty days of receipt of this letter.
Please'provide your response within thirty days of receipt of this letter.
incerely,,
incerely,,
re        . ssenhut,    erector Division o Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
As Stated re
: ssenhut, erector Division o Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ccs w/encl:
Service List


As  Stated ccs w/encl:
<<a
Service List


<<a ENCLOSURE   l TABLE 1 TARGET DATES   Of LICENSING     STEPS FOR PLANTS SEEKING OPERATING LICENSES IN TNE NEXT THREE YEARS FSAR                ER                                     SER ~                         Itearlnd"     ~Const. Coo ."*       ASIII"     Ot Plant      Tendere~ocketed    Tendered   Rocketed     SER       ACRE       ~su > l.     OES     FES*   Start ~Coe s. ~A.Est. RAC Est. On~talon   Issued EAST CENTRAL AREA RELIABILITY COORDINATION AGREEHENT ZIaaner   I     5/75       9/75   6/75       9/75     1/79         3/79     10/BOE         10/76   6/77   6/79   12/BOE   8/BOE     2/DIE       2/DIE   2/BIE Fenel 2         10/74       4/75   10/74       4/75     3/81 E       4/81 E     6/81   f     12/SOE   5/BIE 7/DIE   9/01 E 6/BIE   11/81 E     11/81 E 11/81E 6/SIE   8/O'IE r
ENCLOSURE l Plant FSAR Tendere~ocketed TABLE 1 TARGET DATES Of LICENSING STEPS FOR PLANTS SEEKING OPERATING LICENSES IN TNE NEXT THREE YEARS ER SER ~
Hldl and    2   8/77     11/77   3/78       4/78   10/82E       11/82E       1/83E         6/BOE   1/BOE 2/83E   8/83E   4/84E 1                                  4/84E     10/83E   4/84E (1)
Itearlnd"
Hldl and I       8/77     11/77   3/78       4/78   10/82E       11/82E       1/83E         6/SOE 11/BOE   2/83E   8/83E   9/84E     9/84E     10/83E   9/84E ( I )
~Const.
Harble   Hill   6/79       3/82E   6/l9       4/83E   I/84E       2/84E       4/84E       ll/83E 4/84E   8/84E   I/85E   4/82E     4/85E       3/SSE   4/85E (2)
Coo."*
ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS CnTTTanche 3/78       5/78   3/78       1/79     3/Slf       4/SIE       6/Blf         9/BOE   2/81E 9/SIE 12/BIE   3/BIE     2/82E       2/82E   2/BZE Sooth Texas I   5/78       7/78   5/78       7/78   ll/82E       12/82E       3/83f         4/82E   9/82E 4/83E   7/83E   9/83E     9/83E HID-ATLANTIC AREA COUNCIL Saleei 2         8/71       8/71     7/71       7/71   10/71         2/79       4/BOE(LP) 10/72       4/73   None   Req'd   2/80       4/BOE         NA     4/BDC (LP) 10/BOE(FP)                                                                    10/BDE (Vl')
ASIII" Ot Tendered Rocketed SER ACRE
Sns  ne-        4/78      7/78    5/78        6/78    2/BIE        3/BIE       5/SIE         6/79 11/BOE   6/BIE 8/SIE     4/81     10/BIE     10/81 E  10/8 I E anna 12/SOE   I/Blf                         3/DIE Sns   oe-       4/78       7/78     5/78       6/78     2/81 E       3/81 E hanna 5/DIE         6/79 ll/BOE   6/Blf 8/Slf     4/82E     4/83E     IO/Blf   4/83L 12/BOE   I/Blf                         3/BIE
~su
> l.
OES FES*
Start
~Coe s.
~A.Est.
RAC Est.
On~talon Issued EAST CENTRAL AREA RELIABILITY COORDINATION AGREEHENT ZIaaner I 5/75 9/75 6/75 9/75 1/79 3/79 10/BOE 10/76 6/77 6/79 12/BOE 8/BOE 2/DIE 2/DIE 2/BIE Fenel 2
10/74 4/75 10/74 4/75 3/81 E 4/81 E 6/81 f 12/SOE 5/BIE 7/DIE 9/01 E 6/BIE 11/81 E 11/81 E 11/81E 6/SIE 8/O'IE r
Hldland 2
8/77 11/77 3/78 4/78 10/82E 11/82E 1/83E 6/BOE 1 1/BOE 2/83E 8/83E 4/84E 4/84E 10/83E 4/84E (1)
Hldland I
8/77 11/77 3/78 4/78 10/82E 11/82E 1/83E 6/SOE 11/BOE 2/83E 8/83E 9/84E 9/84E 10/83E 9/84E
( I )
Harble Hill 6/79 3/82E 6/l9 4/83E I/84E 2/84E 4/84E ll/83E 4/84E 8/84E I/85E 4/82E 4/85E 3/SSE 4/85E (2)
CnTTTanche ELECTRIC RELIABILITYCOUNCIL OF TEXAS 3/78 5/78 3/78 1/79 3/Slf 4/SIE 6/Blf 9/BOE 2/81E 9/SIE 12/BIE 3/BIE 2/82E 2/82E 2/BZE Sooth Texas I
5/78 7/78 5/78 7/78 ll/82E 12/82E 3/83f 4/82E 9/82E 4/83E 7/83E 9/83E 9/83E Saleei 2
Sns ne-anna 8/71 4/78 8/71 7/71 7/71 10/71 7/78 5/78 6/78 2/BIE HID-ATLANTICAREA COUNCIL 2/79 4/BOE(LP) 10/72 4/73 10/BOE(FP)
None Req'd 2/80 4/BOE NA 4/BDC (LP) 10/BDE (Vl')
10/81 E 10/8 I E 3/DIE 3/BIE 5/SIE 6/79 11/BOE 6/BIE 8/SIE 4/81 10/BIE 12/SOE I/Blf Sns oe-hanna 4/78 7/78 5/78 6/78 2/81 E 3/81 E 5/DIE 6/79 ll/BOE 6/Blf 8/Slf 4/82E 4/83E IO/Blf 4/83L 12/BOE I/Blf 3/BIE


FSNI                  Lit                                            Si                                    ~lla>>ri ~  '                I: ~ i~>al. Cuerr          ASLOii      OL I< I ant        2 Iculcred llackulca   Tcndercii   t)uckctcd                 ACIIS           S<< I tl ~
I< Iant 2
it'E)i I)L'5     fCSa     Start.    ~C<NII Sa        ~n>>.ssl.          Cuc  Csl. Ilcci csea  issued I) tl)-NdfIt I CA It)If it)'t)OL IICT)tt)ttt'.
FSNI Iculcred llackulca Lit Tcndercii t)uckctcd Si it'E)i ACIIS S<< I tl ~
laSalle I                 9/16       5/ll     lu/16         5/77   9/t)AC         li)/Uoc       12/Iiuf       3/lU       11/70     tionc       Re<1'<I           6/tii)E         lz/ooc                 I?/I!OI Las>>lie       2           9/16       5(77     10/16         5/77   9(IIAC         IP(AIIE       12/AAE         3/lii     11(lU     )tone      tie<I'd            I</OIL        . 2/02L                    2/i)ZL
I)L'5 fCSa I)tl)-NdfIt I CA It)Ifit)'t)OL IICT)tt)ttt'.
~ll ran I                6/78      11/10      6(78        11/78    10/0l E         11/t)1 f       I/02f         2/01$       7(ul f. 2/U2C      4/I)?            4/02L            7/82E      6/il?C    I/Ua'.C lu/i)IL  L'/OUC 12/AIC
~lla>>ri ~ '
~ll rnn    2              6/ill      11  /18    6/70       I I/70   lA/GIE         11/0 I C       1/t)2f       2(8 I C       7/Ul f    2/02L      4/t)ZC          4/03L            1/83E      6/uzL 6/Ulf li)/I)If.                                          12/UIE      I/U3L'/uhC Oral<4<nod        1      6(70      11/18    6/lu         1 I /78 IO/0 I E       11/0 I C       I/02f         I/A3E         ts/83E   2/U2E 4/i)2L                5/03E          6/04E        6/02C 7/t)3E 10/03E                                          12/03C lira) di<nnd      2      6/18       I I /78   6/70         11/lU   10/0 I f.       11/Ul E       I/02c         1/03E         (3/03E   2/02C       4/IIZC         4/iihC         6/USE         6/OZE      6/IV~L 1/U3f IU/03C                                           12/03C
Start.
~C>>l   law       I       )0/79       0/t)UE 10/79         12/8of   6/02f           1/Gzc         t)/02E       1/01E     12/81E       9/U2E 10/02E             lu/uzE         12/02E        12/02E    12/u2t.
~C<NII Sa I:~ i~>al. Cuerr
Cllnlcn      I        12/79       li)/GAL 12/19           3/Ul f  9/02C           10/02E       11/02C         10/01E         3/02E 12/82E       1/t)3C           4/U2E           3/83E         3/03L     3/i)3L OuitT))EAST Pt))tftt Ct)uitl)IIIATIIIGCAuHCIL Sl  urelsaa              9/15        1/16     9/lg           I/75   9/uuE       10/UOE         IZ/IIOC         3/ll       10/ll       I/ulf 0/Olf               11/OOE         lu/GIE       10/I) I f. 10/till SOUTIICASTERII ELECT)I IC REL IAOILITY Cuui)CIL ilnrth Anna 2                   5/13       5/13     6/70           6/10   6/76,       I/ll         4/Ai) (LP) 12/12             4/13     I I/16       6/1I              4/OO          4/00        I I/1I    4/I<II (t I'1 IO/IIIIC(I'P)                           9/75       9/IS                                          12/15    lu/iiul (I I')
~n>>.ssl.
~5c  ua ak I          I2//3          1/14    (3)            (3)   3/19           6/19       2/i)A (LP)     10/71       7/14       tin<i<     Itc<i 4            2/iiu          2/80      ttA        2/iui (<<)
Cuc Csl.
9/UOC(EP)                               7/Ih       I/14                                          2/15    9/inu (I i')
ASLOii Ilccicsea OL issued laSalle I
~seuu ak 2            I2//3          1/14      (3)            (3)  3/19          5/79          5/GIE        10/7)        1/14      tionc      )le<)'. d          U/Oi)E         5/UIE     IIA       5/I) I I.
9/16 5/ll lu/16 5/77 9/t)AC li)/Uoc 12/Iiuf 3/lU 11/70 tionc Re<1'<I 6/tii)E lz/ooc I?/I!OI Las>>lie 2
1(14        7/74                                          2/15
~ll ran I
~ll rnn 2 Oral<4<nod 1
lira) di<nnd 2 9/16 5(77 6/78 11/10 6/ill 1 1 /18 6(70 11/18 10/16 5/77 6(78 11/78 9(IIAC IP(AIIE 12/AAE 3/lii 11(lU 10/0l E 11/t)1 f I/02f 2/01$
7(ul f.
6/70 I I/70 lA/GIE 11/0 I C 1/t)2f 2(8 I C 7/Ulf 6/lu 1 I/78 IO/0I E 11/0 I C I/02f I/A3E ts/83E 6/18 I I/78 6/70 11/lU 10/0 If.
11/Ul E I/02c 1/03E (3/03E 2/U2C 4/I)?
L'/OUC lu/i)IL 2/02L 4/t)ZC 6/Ulf li)/I)If.
2/U2E 4/i)2L 7/t)3E 10/03E 2/02C 4/IIZC 1/U3f IU/03C 4/02L 7/82E 4/03L 1/83E 5/03E 6/04E 4/iihC 6/USE
)tone tie<I'd I</OIL 2/02L 6/il?C 12/AIC 6/uzL 12/UIE 6/02C 12/03C 6/OZE 12/03C 2/i)ZL I/Ua'.C I/U3L'/uhC 6/IV~L
~C>>l law I
Cllnlcn I
)0/79 0/t)UE 10/79 12/8of 6/02f 1/Gzc t)/02E 1/01E 12/81E 9/U2E 10/02E lu/uzE 12/79 li)/GAL 12/19 3/Ulf 9/02C 10/02E 11/02C 10/01E 3/02E 12/82E 1/t)3C 4/U2E 12/02E 3/83E 3/03L 3/i)3L 12/02E 12/u2t.
Sl urelsaa 9/15 OuitT))EAST Pt))tftt Ct)uitl)IIIATIIIGCAuHCIL 1/16 9/lg I/75 9/uuE 10/UOE IZ/IIOC 3/ll 10/ll I/ulf 0/Olf 11/OOE lu/GIE SOUTIICASTERII ELECT)IIC REL IAOILITY Cuui)CIL 10/I) If.
10/till ilnrth Anna 2 5/13
~seuu ak 2 I2//3
~5c ua ak I I2//3 1/14 1/14 (3)
(3) 3/19 5/79 5/GIE 10/7) 1/14 tionc 1(14 5/13 6/70 6/10 6/76, I/ll 4/Ai) (LP) 12/12 4/13 I I/16 IO/IIIIC(I'P) 9/75 (3)
(3) 3/19 6/19 2/i)A (LP) 10/71 7/14 tin<i<
9/UOC(EP) 7/Ih 6/1I 9/IS Itc<i 4 I/14
)le<)'. d 7/74 4/OO 4/00 I I/1I 12/15 2/iiu 2/80 ttA 2/15 U/Oi)E 5/UIE IIA 2/15 4/I<II (t I'1 lu/iiul(I I')
2/iui (<<)
9/inu (I i')
5/I)I I.


F SAR                   ER                                     SERi                           llearln<   '*   ConSt.                                ASLO        OL nMIE s t.
Plant F SAR Tendere~ocketed ER Tendered Ilocketed SERi llearln< '*
CokttP."'nl Plant          Tendere~ocketed        Tendered    Ilock eted SER         ACRS       ~~uil.       DES     FES*       Start     ~om   .     . Erssnntt.                       Oectston   Issued SOUTHEASTERN ELECTRIC      RELIABILITY COUNCIL      CON'T HcGulre   1         4/74         5/74     4/74         5/74     3/78        4/78      7/GOE      10/75    4/76       8/78      8/78      5/BOE                    11/BOE      4/79    II/BOE (4) 3/77      4/77 HcGulre 2            4/74          5/74      4/74         5/74     3/78       4/78       7/GOE     10/75   4/76       8/78       8/78     1/82E                    2/82E      4/79      2/82E (4) 3/77       4/77 Matts Oar    1     6/76        10/76        (5)         (5)   1/81E       2/81 E     4/81 E     6/78   12/78       Hone       Req'd   9/BOE                     5/81E       NA        5/BIE Matts Gar    2      6/76        10/7&        (5)          (5)  1/8'IE    . 2/BIE      4/BIE      6/78   12/78       None     Req'd   6/81E                     3/82E       NA       3/82E Se ner t           12/76           2/77     12/76         2/77   8/BOE       9/BOE     11/BOE       6/79   9/BOE   12/GOE 2/OIE       12/BOE               12/BOE           4/81E    4/BIE 10/BOE 12/BOE:                                             2/GIE
SER ACRS
~carte   2           8/13         8/73     8/73        8/73    5/75      6/75        7/GOE(LP)   7/74 12/74       None      Req'd    6/BOE                    7/BOE      NA        7/BQE(LP) 12/BOE(FP)                                                                                         12/BOE(f P)
~~uil.
Oellefonte I          2/78          6/78      2/78         6/78     2/82E      3/82E      6/82E      2/81E   7/81E     Hone       Req'd   7/82E                     7/82E       NA        7/BZE Oellefonte      2    2/78          6/78      2/78         6/78     2/82E       3/82E     6/BZE       2/BIE  7/BIE      None      Req'd    6/83E                    6/83E      NA        6/83E Catawba   1         3/79         10/BOE     3/79       10/BOE   8/82E       9/82E     10/82E       5/82E   9/82E     12/82E     2/83E   4/83E                     4/83E       4/83E     4/83E SOUTHMEST POMER POOL Grand CuTf I                4/78         6/78     4/78         6/78   5/BIE       6/BIE     8/BIE       2/81E     7/81E     None     Req'd   9/BIE                     9/81E       NA       9/BIE Materford      3      9/78       12/78       9/78       12/78     5/BIE     6/81E     8/81E       3/BIE     8/81 E     9/81 E 12/81E   10/81     E                 2/82E       2/82E     2/BZE Molf Creek            2/80         3/BIE     2/80       10/81E     I/83E     2/83E     4/83E       5/82E   10/82E       7/83E     8/83E 10/BZE                     10/83E     10/83E   \0/83K MESTERN SYSTEHS COORDINATING COUNCIL 0la bio            '0/73         10/73     8/71         8/71 10/74         7/78     5/GOE(LP)   12/72   5/73       10/77       8/GOE 5/BOE                       5/BOE     10/GOE  10/BUI.(LP) 7~an on  t                                                                              1/81 (FP)                     12/76     12/76                                                     I/OIl(fit)
DES FES*
Oiablo i~an on 2              10/73      10/73      8/71         8/71 10/74         7!78     I/81 (FP)   12/72   5/73       'IO/7'I     8/BOE   3/BIE                     3/81E     10/BOE     3/8 I l 12/76      12/76
Start
~om.
ConSt.
CokttP."'nl
. Erssnntt.
nMIEs t.
ASLO Oectston OL Issued HcGulre 1
HcGulre 2 Matts Oar 1
Matts Gar 2 4/74 5/74 4/74 5/74 6/76 10/76 6/76 10/7&
SOUTHEASTERN ELECTRIC RELIABILITYCOUNCIL CON'T 4/74 5/74 3/78 4/78 7/GOE 10/75 4/76 8/78 3/77 8/78 3/77 8/78 4/77 8/78 4/77 5/BOE 11/BOE 1/82E 2/82E (5)
(5)
(5)
(5) 1/81E 2/81 E 4/81 E 1/8'IE
. 2/BIE 4/BIE 6/78 12/78 Hone Req'd 9/BOE 5/81E 6/78 12/78 None Req'd 6/81E 3/82E 4/74 5/74 3/78 4/78 7/GOE 10/75 4/76 4/79 II/BOE (4) 4/79 2/82E (4)
NA 5/BIE NA 3/82E Se ner t 12/76 2/77 12/76 2/77 8/BOE 9/BOE 11/BOE 6/79 9/BOE 12/GOE 2/OIE 12/BOE 12/BOE 10/BOE 12/BOE:
~carte 2
8/13 8/73 Oellefonte I 2/78 6/78 Oellefonte 2
2/78 6/78 6/BOE 7/BOE 7/GOE(LP) 7/74 12/74 12/BOE(FP) 5/75 6/75 None Req'd 8/73 8/73 2/78 6/78 2/81E 7/81E Hone Req'd 7/82E 7/82E 2/BIE 7/BIE None Req'd 6/83E 6/83E 2/82E 3/82E 6/82E 2/78 6/78 2/82E 3/82E 6/BZE Catawba 1
3/79 10/BOE 3/79 10/BOE 8/82E 9/82E 10/82E 5/82E 9/82E 12/82E 2/83E 4/83E 4/83E 4/81E 4/BIE 2/GIE NA 7/BQE(LP) 12/BOE(fP)
NA 7/BZE NA 6/83E 4/83E 4/83E Grand CuTf I Materford 3 Molf Creek SOUTHMEST POMER POOL 4/78 6/78 4/78 6/78 5/BIE 6/BIE 8/BIE 2/81E 7/81E None Req'd 9/BIE 9/81E NA 9/BIE 9/78 12/78 9/78 12/78 5/BIE 6/81E 8/81E 3/BIE 8/81 E 9/81 E 12/81E 10/81 E 2/82E 2/82E 2/BZE 2/80 3/BIE 2/80 10/81E I/83E 2/83E 4/83E 5/82E 10/82E 7/83E 8/83E 10/BZE 10/83E 10/83E
\\0/83K 0labio 7~an on t Oiablo i~an on 2
'0/73 10/73 10/73 10/73 MESTERN SYSTEHS COORDINATING COUNCIL 8/71 8/71 10/74 7/78 5/GOE(LP) 12/72 5/73 10/77 8/GOE 5/BOE 5/BOE 1/81 (FP) 12/76 12/76 8/71 8/71 10/74 7!78 I/81 (FP) 12/72 5/73
'IO/7'I 8/BOE 3/BIE 3/81E 12/76 12/76 10/GOE 10/BUI.(LP)
I/OIl(fit) 10/BOE 3/8 Il


I'Sh))                 Cll                                   St'I( ~                           )(earing"           Cnn  St  ~ Cdk~kr>>> ~          hSLU'      AL (slant    Senlere~ocksted        Yenilered    Ilackaled  SCII       ~CIIS       ~Ku>>I.         OES       FES~   Start ~Cnd>>.     ~ll ~t. sl.     ISIC     ksl ~ oc'cCCnn   lssuud MESTC((rl SIS ICNS L'UAIIAI((hl)I(A CUU(ICIL Cl)>>'7 Ssln (Ienrra    d      I I /76         3/77   I I/76 7         3/7 3 7   0/AAE       9(OAE     12/UAE         1 I/70     10/OUE   I/0 I C 0/I) I I. 11/UUE           6/OIL           6/0) C   6/UIL I                                                                                              10/UOE l)/UUC                                          I/UIC Ssldl nnalra       3     I I/76         3/77   11/76         3/77 0/OAE       '7/AUE   12/OAE         I I/78     10/OOE   I/Olf 4/01 E           I /0 I C      5/UZE          Id/Ul C  5/02L 10/UAC   ll/UAE                                         I/AIC
(slant I'Sh))
) I>> sld lnIUtnA    3/70          6/70    12/76          1/77  3/OZE        0/f52C    ~/UZE           I/0 I E 6/8 I E ((one   Ileq'         7/02L'/02E                     llh       7/UZL Hdde 1 e~dr Pa)n VKrhe             IA)79         l2/OAE   $ Z/79       1 g/OOC f/82E       5/82E       7/l)ZE         7/OIE 12/Ol    f  0/02E )0/02E         11/UZC           1Z/UZE       12/02E   12/UZL
Senlere~ocksted Cll Yenilered Ilackaled St'I(
~
)(earing" SCII
~CIIS
~Ku>>I.
OES FES~
Start
~Cnd>>.
Cnn St ~
Cdk~kr>>> ~
~ll ~t. sl.
ISIC ksl ~
hSLU' AL oc'cCCnn lssuud Ssln (Ienrra d
MESTC((rl SIS ICNS L'UAIIAI((hl)I(A CUU(ICIL Cl)>>'7 I I/76 3/77 I I/76 3
7 3/7 7 0/AAE 9(OAE 12/UAE 1 I/70 10/OUE I/0I C 0/I)II.
11/UUE 6/OIL 10/UOE l)/UUC I
6/0) C 6/UIL I/UIC Ssldl nnalra 3
)I>>sld lnIUtnA Hdde 1 e~dr I I/76 3/77 11/76 3/77 0/OAE
'7/AUE 12/OAE 3/70 6/70 12/76 1/77 3/OZE 0/f52C
~/UZE II/78 10/OOE I/Olf 4/01 E 10/UAC ll/UAE I/0 I C 5/UZE I/0I E 6/8 I E
((one Ileq' 7/02L'/02E llh 7/UZL Id/UlC 5/02L I/AIC Pa)n VKrhe IA)79 l2/OAE
$Z/79 1 g/OOC f/82E 5/82E 7/l)ZE 7/OIE 12/Olf 0/02E )0/02E 11/UZC 1Z/UZE 12/02E 12/UZL


ASSUllPTIONS USED FOR PROJECTING TARGET SCHEDULES Coamission decision on   full-power NTOL requirements made in June-1980.
ASSUllPTIONS USED FOR PROJECTING TARGET SCHEDULES Coamission decision on full-power NTOL requirements made in June-1980.
Commission decision on treatment of Class 9 accidents in NEPA statements adopts staff recommendation in SECY 80-131 and is made in June 1980.
Commission decision on treatment of Class 9 accidents in NEPA statements adopts staff recommendation in SECY 80-131 and is made in June 1980.
Projected safety reviews are generally scheduled to start   33 months prior to construction completion dates including time for   ACRS review and hearings.
Projected safety reviews are generally scheduled to start 33 months prior to construction completion dates including time for ACRS review and hearings.
Projected environmental reviews are generally scheduled to start 24 months prior to construction completion dates including time for hearing.
Projected environmental reviews are generally scheduled to start 24 months prior to construction completion dates including time for hearing.
For plants with construction completion dates before the end of 1982 the target schedules for OL review were developed, based on the NRC construction completion dates, on a plant specific basis to minimize delays in OL issuance.
For plants with construction completion dates before the end of 1982 the target schedules for OL review were developed, based on the NRC construction completion dates, on a plant specific basis to minimize delays in OL issuance.


FOOTNOTES- FOR TABLE 1 E   Oenotes   estimated date
FOOTNOTES-FOR TABLE 1
* Oate entered     is for last supplement to   SER/FES   issued.
E Oenotes estimated date Oate entered is for last supplement to SER/FES issued.
Mhere two   entries are made, first entry concerns radiological safety matters and second concerns environmental matters. A single entry indicates Hearing and/or ASLB decision considered both radiological and safety matters.
Mhere two entries are made, first entry concerns radiological safety matters and second concerns environmental matters.
The difference in estimates for construction completion, be-tween the   applicant and NRC, is attributable to an independent assessment by the NRC staff of factors affecting construction completion. Generally, the NRC staff estimates are more con-servative (i.e., later completion dates) and are based upon actual experience in constructing similar plants. Second unit of a dual unit facility is usually completed about 18 months after   first unit.
A single entry indicates Hearing and/or ASLB decision considered both radiological and safety matters.
(LP) denotes   low power (FP) denotes   full   power Applicant construction schedule slipped from 11/80 to 4/84 due to foundation problems with auxiliary building and financial considerations.
The difference in estimates for construction completion, be-tween the applicant and NRC, is attributable to an independent assessment by the NRC staff of factors affecting construction completion.
(2)  Mork stoppage order issued by NRC in August 1979 for gA-related problems on safety portions of       facility. NRC estimates about 18 months before full-sca1e construction will resume.             Thus, the large difference in construction complete dates.
Generally, the NRC staff estimates are more con-servative (i.e., later completion dates) and are based upon actual experience in constructing similar plants.
Environmental reviews for Sequoyah 1 and 2 were conducted under a   lead agency agreement with TVA. TVA's final environmental statements (FES) incorporated and addressed the AEC's contents on the respective draft statements.         The FES's were then accepted as the NEPA statements for the project.
Second unit of a dual unit facility is usually completed about 18 months after first unit.
(4)  Schedule shown assumes hearing record will not be reopened for THI-2 issues.       lf ASLB reopens record, fu11 power OL issuance may be   delayed.
(LP) denotes low power (FP) denotes full power (2)
TVA's FES   for Matts   Bar 1 and 2 were consider ed to be the environmental     report submitted to   NRC. NRC   then issued   its own OES   and FES   for project.}}
(4)
Applicant construction schedule slipped from 11/80 to 4/84 due to foundation problems with auxiliary building and financial considerations.
Mork stoppage order issued by NRC in August 1979 for gA-related problems on safety portions of facility.
NRC estimates about 18 months before full-sca1e construction will resume.
: Thus, the large difference in construction complete dates.
Environmental reviews for Sequoyah 1 and 2 were conducted under a lead agency agreement with TVA.
TVA's final environmental statements (FES) incorporated and addressed the AEC's contents on the respective draft statements.
The FES's were then accepted as the NEPA statements for the project.
Schedule shown assumes hearing record will not be reopened for THI-2 issues.
lf ASLB reopens
: record, fu11 power OL issuance may be delayed.
TVA's FES for Matts Bar 1 and 2 were consider ed to be the environmental report submitted to NRC.
NRC then issued its own OES and FES for project.}}

Latest revision as of 08:53, 8 January 2025

Ack Receipt of NRC Approving Request to Discontinue Certain Aquatic Monitoring & Requesting Copies of Util Submittals to State of Wa Re Water Quality.Nrc Does Not Have Authority to Require Water Quality Filings
ML17275A435
Person / Time
Site: Columbia, Washington Public Power Supply System  Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 07/14/1980
From: Renberger D
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: Youngblood B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8007210392
Download: ML17275A435 (18)
v • d • e


Text

RESULATOR+NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION S EM (RIDE) el"Ig ACCESSION NBR:8007210392 DOC ~ DATE: 80/07/10 NOTARIZED:

NO DO FACIL:50 397 NPPSS Nuclear Projecti Unit 2i Hashington Public Powe 50 060 LSPPSS Nuclear Projecti Unit ii Washington Public Powe 05000460 AUTH'AME AUTHOR AFFILIATION RENBERGERiD ~ LE Washington Public Power Supply System REC IP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION YOUNGBLOOD<B.J.

Licensing Branch 1

SUBJECT:

ACk receipt of NRC 800030 ltr approving request to discontinue certain aquatic monitoring 8 requesting copies of util submittals to State of HA re water quality ~ NRC does not have authority to require water quality filings'ISTRIBUTION CODE:

A001S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR g ENCL ~ SIZE:~

TITLE: General Distr ibution for after Issuance of Opeiating Lic NOTES:PM:

2 copies of al 1 material.

05000397 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME ACTION s YOUNGBLOODiB 05 BOURNI A E A ~

INTERNAL: D/DIRiHUM FAC S

I8E 12 OELD 10 01 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

12 1

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME

LYNCHED, DIRiHUM FAC SFY NRC PDR 02 OR ASSESS BR 19 COPIES LTTR ENCL 12 1'XTERNAL:

ACRS NSIC 20 00 16 1

1 LPDR 03

~ut. a2 tg8g 53 o

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIREDs LTTR ~

ENCL

wo H

1 tt P

~'

I'

Washington-Public Power Supply System A JOINT OPERATING AGENCY P, 0. BOX 988 3000 GEO. WASHINOSON WAY RIOHI.jNO, WASHINGTON 99352 PHONE (509) 375.5000 Docket Nos.:

50-397 50-460 50-513 July 14, 1980 Mr. B. J.

Youngblood, Chief Licens ing Branch No.

1 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.. C.

20555

Dear Mr. Youngblood:

Subject:

WPPSS Nuclear Project Nos. 1, 2 and 4

Water Use and ualit Re orts

Reference:

Letter, D. L. Renberger from B. J.

Youngblood Dated April 30,'980 This will acknowledge receipt of the above referenced letter.

Your letter approved our request to discontinue certain aquatic monitor-ing.

In addition, however, you ask that in the future:

. copies of all Supply System submittals to the State re-lating to water use and quality regulations be sent to the NRC.

This should include copies of NPDES applications, revisions and renewal requests as well as other reports required under the NPDES permit."

The Supply System believes the NRC to be without authority to require routine filing of these water quality related submittals.

Nevertheless, reserving its right to object to continued filing in the future, the Supply System will voluntarily honor your request.

Our belief concerning the authority of the NRC to require submission of water quality reports filed with EPA and its delegated agencies is based upon recent de'cisions of the NRC Appeal Board which interpret Section 5ll(c}(2) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33, U.S.C.

1326), culminating with ALAB-569, H. B. Robinson.

1/

gd

d O

Hr.

B. J.

Youngblood Page Two July 14, 1980 Water Use and guality Reports In H. B. Robinson, the Appeal Board reviewed its holdings in Seabrook J2

, Peach Bottom g3 and Yellow Creek 4/ concerning the role of the NRC

~q 1iy~idg f

i fi s pons ibi 1 ities under NEPA.

guoting its earlier opinion in Yellow Creek concerning the role of agencies other than EPA in water quality and pollution control matters, the Appeal Board said:

"Third, those agencies are not to 'second guess'PA by undertaking independent analyses and setting their own standards in this area.

And, finally, given the pointed Congressional comments cited,

NRC, as statutory successor to the AEC, is unmistakably bound by those strictures."

10 NRC at 561 and then, reviewing the holding in Yellow Creek, said:

"On the basis of this analysis, we held squarely 'that NRC may not undercut EPA by undertaking its own analyses and reaching its own conclusions in water quality issues already decided by EPA.'"

10 NRC at 561

+1 In the Natter of Carolina Power 8 Li ht Com an H.

B. Robinson, Unct No.

2

, v. ALAB-569,"

10 NRC at 557 (1979).

g2 Public Service Com an of New Ham shire, (Seabrook Units 1

5 2

, ALAB-366, 5 NRC 39 1977

, affirmed, CLI-77-8, 5

NRC 503 (1977);

and ALAB-422, 6 NRC 33 (1977).

3/

Philadel hia Electric Com an (Peach Bottom Units 2 5 3, ALAB-216, 8 EC 13.

g4 Tennessee Valle Authorit (Yellow Creek Units 1

5 2

, AL B-515, 8

NRC 702 (1978).

"~

Hr.

B. J.

Youngblood Page Three July 14, 1980 Water Use and guality Reports Finally, in H.

B. Robinson, the Appeal Board concluded:

"If anything, events teach that the staff and Boards can best expend their limited resources by concentrating on those questions which only this Coomission can handle, rather than by duplicating the efforts of a sister agency in a field peculiarly within that agency's competence."

10 NRC at 561 Since the Appeal Board has now made it clear that the NRC staff is bound by Section 511(c)(2) of the Clean Water Act to take EPA water quality decisions at face value, simply factoring them into cost-benefit balanc-ing under NEPA; and'is foreclosed by-that Act from undertaking-indepen-dent analyses; copies of water use and quality submittals can be of no practical use to the NRC staff.

The Supply System contends that a

requirement that copies of these reports be furnished routinely to the NRC staff perpetuates the "needless duplica'tion" of paperwork enjoined by the Clean Water Act and the Appeal Board's decisions.

Since, however, it is understood -that your request involves no more than furnishing NRC with duplicate copies of water quality submittals made to the State of Washington, the Supply System will comply with the request.

The Supply System is willing to do so at this time because it believes that the duplication of documents will'equire only a small additional effort and understands that this undertaking will not require prepara-tion of special reports on these topics specifically for the NRC staff.

Yery truly yours, D. L. Renberger Assistant Director, Technology mch

I

~g REgy 0

Cl0 I

C Dp

+n

~O

+~*<<+

UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 July 11, 1980 TO ALL APPLICANTS FOR OPERATING LICENSES AND CONSTRUCTION PERMIT HOLDERS In the process of establishing priorities for the licensing reviews of operating license applications, we rely principally on'he best estimates of the construction completion date of utilities.

In most cases, this date will be confirmed or modified by our Caseload Forecast Panel which usually visits a specific plant site no more than once a year.

Because of a number of recent s'Iippages in applicants'onstruction completion schedules, we believe it is appropriate at this time to request up-to-date schedules from all applicants.

Accordingly, we are requesting you to advise us of your present best estimate of the construction completion date for your facility (faciIities) and fuel load target date so that we may establish our licensing priorities based on the latest available data.

For your information, I have enclosed a listing provided to the House Appropriations Subcommittee of target schedules for those plants seeking operating licenses in the next three years.

Those applicants not listed in the enclosure should provide the date they pl'an to tender their Operating License Application (FSAR and ER) to the NRC.

Upon receipt of your response, we anticipate a potential revision to our present licensing review priorities.

Note that the order of our priorities is somewhat influenced by a hearing which is required for some of the OL applications.

Inasmuch as we are still limited in our casework by our manpower resources, we request that your response be as up-to-date as possible.

Please'provide your response within thirty days of receipt of this letter.

incerely,,

Enclosure:

As Stated re

ssenhut, erector Division o Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ccs w/encl:

Service List

<<a

ENCLOSURE l Plant FSAR Tendere~ocketed TABLE 1 TARGET DATES Of LICENSING STEPS FOR PLANTS SEEKING OPERATING LICENSES IN TNE NEXT THREE YEARS ER SER ~

Itearlnd"

~Const.

Coo."*

ASIII" Ot Tendered Rocketed SER ACRE

~su

> l.

OES FES*

Start

~Coe s.

~A.Est.

RAC Est.

On~talon Issued EAST CENTRAL AREA RELIABILITY COORDINATION AGREEHENT ZIaaner I 5/75 9/75 6/75 9/75 1/79 3/79 10/BOE 10/76 6/77 6/79 12/BOE 8/BOE 2/DIE 2/DIE 2/BIE Fenel 2

10/74 4/75 10/74 4/75 3/81 E 4/81 E 6/81 f 12/SOE 5/BIE 7/DIE 9/01 E 6/BIE 11/81 E 11/81 E 11/81E 6/SIE 8/O'IE r

Hldland 2

8/77 11/77 3/78 4/78 10/82E 11/82E 1/83E 6/BOE 1 1/BOE 2/83E 8/83E 4/84E 4/84E 10/83E 4/84E (1)

Hldland I

8/77 11/77 3/78 4/78 10/82E 11/82E 1/83E 6/SOE 11/BOE 2/83E 8/83E 9/84E 9/84E 10/83E 9/84E

( I )

Harble Hill 6/79 3/82E 6/l9 4/83E I/84E 2/84E 4/84E ll/83E 4/84E 8/84E I/85E 4/82E 4/85E 3/SSE 4/85E (2)

CnTTTanche ELECTRIC RELIABILITYCOUNCIL OF TEXAS 3/78 5/78 3/78 1/79 3/Slf 4/SIE 6/Blf 9/BOE 2/81E 9/SIE 12/BIE 3/BIE 2/82E 2/82E 2/BZE Sooth Texas I

5/78 7/78 5/78 7/78 ll/82E 12/82E 3/83f 4/82E 9/82E 4/83E 7/83E 9/83E 9/83E Saleei 2

Sns ne-anna 8/71 4/78 8/71 7/71 7/71 10/71 7/78 5/78 6/78 2/BIE HID-ATLANTICAREA COUNCIL 2/79 4/BOE(LP) 10/72 4/73 10/BOE(FP)

None Req'd 2/80 4/BOE NA 4/BDC (LP) 10/BDE (Vl')

10/81 E 10/8 I E 3/DIE 3/BIE 5/SIE 6/79 11/BOE 6/BIE 8/SIE 4/81 10/BIE 12/SOE I/Blf Sns oe-hanna 4/78 7/78 5/78 6/78 2/81 E 3/81 E 5/DIE 6/79 ll/BOE 6/Blf 8/Slf 4/82E 4/83E IO/Blf 4/83L 12/BOE I/Blf 3/BIE

I< Iant 2

FSNI Iculcred llackulca Lit Tcndercii t)uckctcd Si it'E)i ACIIS S<< I tl ~

I)L'5 fCSa I)tl)-NdfIt I CA It)Ifit)'t)OL IICT)tt)ttt'.

~lla>>ri ~ '

Start.

~C<NII Sa I:~ i~>al. Cuerr

~n>>.ssl.

Cuc Csl.

ASLOii Ilccicsea OL issued laSalle I

9/16 5/ll lu/16 5/77 9/t)AC li)/Uoc 12/Iiuf 3/lU 11/70 tionc Re<1'>lie 2

~ll ran I

~ll rnn 2 Oral<4<nod 1

lira) di<nnd 2 9/16 5(77 6/78 11/10 6/ill 1 1 /18 6(70 11/18 10/16 5/77 6(78 11/78 9(IIAC IP(AIIE 12/AAE 3/lii 11(lU 10/0l E 11/t)1 f I/02f 2/01$

7(ul f.

6/70 I I/70 lA/GIE 11/0 I C 1/t)2f 2(8 I C 7/Ulf 6/lu 1 I/78 IO/0I E 11/0 I C I/02f I/A3E ts/83E 6/18 I I/78 6/70 11/lU 10/0 If.

11/Ul E I/02c 1/03E (3/03E 2/U2C 4/I)?

L'/OUC lu/i)IL 2/02L 4/t)ZC 6/Ulf li)/I)If.

2/U2E 4/i)2L 7/t)3E 10/03E 2/02C 4/IIZC 1/U3f IU/03C 4/02L 7/82E 4/03L 1/83E 5/03E 6/04E 4/iihC 6/USE

)tone tie<I'd I</OIL 2/02L 6/il?C 12/AIC 6/uzL 12/UIE 6/02C 12/03C 6/OZE 12/03C 2/i)ZL I/Ua'.C I/U3L'/uhC 6/IV~L

~C>>l law I

Cllnlcn I

)0/79 0/t)UE 10/79 12/8of 6/02f 1/Gzc t)/02E 1/01E 12/81E 9/U2E 10/02E lu/uzE 12/79 li)/GAL 12/19 3/Ulf 9/02C 10/02E 11/02C 10/01E 3/02E 12/82E 1/t)3C 4/U2E 12/02E 3/83E 3/03L 3/i)3L 12/02E 12/u2t.

Sl urelsaa 9/15 OuitT))EAST Pt))tftt Ct)uitl)IIIATIIIGCAuHCIL 1/16 9/lg I/75 9/uuE 10/UOE IZ/IIOC 3/ll 10/ll I/ulf 0/Olf 11/OOE lu/GIE SOUTIICASTERII ELECT)IIC REL IAOILITY Cuui)CIL 10/I) If.

10/till ilnrth Anna 2 5/13

~seuu ak 2 I2//3

~5c ua ak I I2//3 1/14 1/14 (3)

(3) 3/19 5/79 5/GIE 10/7) 1/14 tionc 1(14 5/13 6/70 6/10 6/76, I/ll 4/Ai) (LP) 12/12 4/13 I I/16 IO/IIIIC(I'P) 9/75 (3)

(3) 3/19 6/19 2/i)A (LP) 10/71 7/14 tin<i<

9/UOC(EP) 7/Ih 6/1I 9/IS Itc<i 4 I/14

)le<)'. d 7/74 4/OO 4/00 I I/1I 12/15 2/iiu 2/80 ttA 2/15 U/Oi)E 5/UIE IIA 2/15 4/I<II (t I'1 lu/iiul(I I')

2/iui (<<)

9/inu (I i')

5/I)I I.

Plant F SAR Tendere~ocketed ER Tendered Ilocketed SERi llearln< '*

SER ACRS

~~uil.

DES FES*

Start

~om.

ConSt.

CokttP."'nl

. Erssnntt.

nMIEs t.

ASLO Oectston OL Issued HcGulre 1

HcGulre 2 Matts Oar 1

Matts Gar 2 4/74 5/74 4/74 5/74 6/76 10/76 6/76 10/7&

SOUTHEASTERN ELECTRIC RELIABILITYCOUNCIL CON'T 4/74 5/74 3/78 4/78 7/GOE 10/75 4/76 8/78 3/77 8/78 3/77 8/78 4/77 8/78 4/77 5/BOE 11/BOE 1/82E 2/82E (5)

(5)

(5)

(5) 1/81E 2/81 E 4/81 E 1/8'IE

. 2/BIE 4/BIE 6/78 12/78 Hone Req'd 9/BOE 5/81E 6/78 12/78 None Req'd 6/81E 3/82E 4/74 5/74 3/78 4/78 7/GOE 10/75 4/76 4/79 II/BOE (4) 4/79 2/82E (4)

NA 5/BIE NA 3/82E Se ner t 12/76 2/77 12/76 2/77 8/BOE 9/BOE 11/BOE 6/79 9/BOE 12/GOE 2/OIE 12/BOE 12/BOE 10/BOE 12/BOE:

~carte 2

8/13 8/73 Oellefonte I 2/78 6/78 Oellefonte 2

2/78 6/78 6/BOE 7/BOE 7/GOE(LP) 7/74 12/74 12/BOE(FP) 5/75 6/75 None Req'd 8/73 8/73 2/78 6/78 2/81E 7/81E Hone Req'd 7/82E 7/82E 2/BIE 7/BIE None Req'd 6/83E 6/83E 2/82E 3/82E 6/82E 2/78 6/78 2/82E 3/82E 6/BZE Catawba 1

3/79 10/BOE 3/79 10/BOE 8/82E 9/82E 10/82E 5/82E 9/82E 12/82E 2/83E 4/83E 4/83E 4/81E 4/BIE 2/GIE NA 7/BQE(LP) 12/BOE(fP)

NA 7/BZE NA 6/83E 4/83E 4/83E Grand CuTf I Materford 3 Molf Creek SOUTHMEST POMER POOL 4/78 6/78 4/78 6/78 5/BIE 6/BIE 8/BIE 2/81E 7/81E None Req'd 9/BIE 9/81E NA 9/BIE 9/78 12/78 9/78 12/78 5/BIE 6/81E 8/81E 3/BIE 8/81 E 9/81 E 12/81E 10/81 E 2/82E 2/82E 2/BZE 2/80 3/BIE 2/80 10/81E I/83E 2/83E 4/83E 5/82E 10/82E 7/83E 8/83E 10/BZE 10/83E 10/83E

\\0/83K 0labio 7~an on t Oiablo i~an on 2

'0/73 10/73 10/73 10/73 MESTERN SYSTEHS COORDINATING COUNCIL 8/71 8/71 10/74 7/78 5/GOE(LP) 12/72 5/73 10/77 8/GOE 5/BOE 5/BOE 1/81 (FP) 12/76 12/76 8/71 8/71 10/74 7!78 I/81 (FP) 12/72 5/73

'IO/7'I 8/BOE 3/BIE 3/81E 12/76 12/76 10/GOE 10/BUI.(LP)

I/OIl(fit) 10/BOE 3/8 Il

(slant I'Sh))

Senlere~ocksted Cll Yenilered Ilackaled St'I(

~

)(earing" SCII

~CIIS

~Ku>>I.

OES FES~

Start

~Cnd>>.

Cnn St ~

Cdk~kr>>> ~

~ll ~t. sl.

ISIC ksl ~

hSLU' AL oc'cCCnn lssuud Ssln (Ienrra d

MESTC((rl SIS ICNS L'UAIIAI((hl)I(A CUU(ICIL Cl)>>'7 I I/76 3/77 I I/76 3

7 3/7 7 0/AAE 9(OAE 12/UAE 1 I/70 10/OUE I/0I C 0/I)II.

11/UUE 6/OIL 10/UOE l)/UUC I

6/0) C 6/UIL I/UIC Ssldl nnalra 3

)I>>sld lnIUtnA Hdde 1 e~dr I I/76 3/77 11/76 3/77 0/OAE

'7/AUE 12/OAE 3/70 6/70 12/76 1/77 3/OZE 0/f52C

~/UZE II/78 10/OOE I/Olf 4/01 E 10/UAC ll/UAE I/0 I C 5/UZE I/0I E 6/8 I E

((one Ileq' 7/02L'/02E llh 7/UZL Id/UlC 5/02L I/AIC Pa)n VKrhe IA)79 l2/OAE

$Z/79 1 g/OOC f/82E 5/82E 7/l)ZE 7/OIE 12/Olf 0/02E )0/02E 11/UZC 1Z/UZE 12/02E 12/UZL

ASSUllPTIONS USED FOR PROJECTING TARGET SCHEDULES Coamission decision on full-power NTOL requirements made in June-1980.

Commission decision on treatment of Class 9 accidents in NEPA statements adopts staff recommendation in SECY 80-131 and is made in June 1980.

Projected safety reviews are generally scheduled to start 33 months prior to construction completion dates including time for ACRS review and hearings.

Projected environmental reviews are generally scheduled to start 24 months prior to construction completion dates including time for hearing.

For plants with construction completion dates before the end of 1982 the target schedules for OL review were developed, based on the NRC construction completion dates, on a plant specific basis to minimize delays in OL issuance.

FOOTNOTES-FOR TABLE 1

E Oenotes estimated date Oate entered is for last supplement to SER/FES issued.

Mhere two entries are made, first entry concerns radiological safety matters and second concerns environmental matters.

A single entry indicates Hearing and/or ASLB decision considered both radiological and safety matters.

The difference in estimates for construction completion, be-tween the applicant and NRC, is attributable to an independent assessment by the NRC staff of factors affecting construction completion.

Generally, the NRC staff estimates are more con-servative (i.e., later completion dates) and are based upon actual experience in constructing similar plants.

Second unit of a dual unit facility is usually completed about 18 months after first unit.

(LP) denotes low power (FP) denotes full power (2)

(4)

Applicant construction schedule slipped from 11/80 to 4/84 due to foundation problems with auxiliary building and financial considerations.

Mork stoppage order issued by NRC in August 1979 for gA-related problems on safety portions of facility.

NRC estimates about 18 months before full-sca1e construction will resume.

Thus, the large difference in construction complete dates.

Environmental reviews for Sequoyah 1 and 2 were conducted under a lead agency agreement with TVA.

TVA's final environmental statements (FES) incorporated and addressed the AEC's contents on the respective draft statements.

The FES's were then accepted as the NEPA statements for the project.

Schedule shown assumes hearing record will not be reopened for THI-2 issues.

lf ASLB reopens

record, fu11 power OL issuance may be delayed.

TVA's FES for Matts Bar 1 and 2 were consider ed to be the environmental report submitted to NRC.

NRC then issued its own OES and FES for project.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17275A435&oldid=5102223"