ML17286A695

Forwards Data Logs for Control Room Visits for 910313-0402, Per Util

ML17286A695
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	04/02/1991
From:	John Baker WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:	Perkins K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
NUDOCS 9104170034
Download: ML17286A695 (99)

Text

..ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTR ATION SYS1 EM REGULATORY -INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

.ACCESSION NBR:9104170034 DOC.DATE: 91/04/02 NOTARIZED'O DOCKET 4

FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 050003 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BAKER,J.W.

Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION PERKINS,K.

Region 5 (Post 820201)

SUBJECT:

Forwards data logs for control room visits for 910313-0402, per util 910329 ltr.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOID COPIES RECEIVED:LTR

(

ENCL g SIZE: ail TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES:

D RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/DEIIB DEDRO NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DOEA/OEAB NRR/DRIS/DIR NRR/PMASQILRID2 OE RE ILE OM EXTERNAL: EGGG/BRYCE, J. H.

NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 2

2 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME ENG,P.L.

AEOD AEOD/TPAB NRR MORISSEAU,D NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DREP/PEPB9D NRR/DST/DIR SE2 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS1 RGN5 FILE 01 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1

'1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

A D

D D

NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

D D

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISI'RIBUTION LISIS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 24 ENCL 24

1 1l \\

1

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 96B

~ 3000 George Washington Way

~ Richland, Washington 99352 April2, 1991 Ken Perkins United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596

Subject:

DATALOGS OF CONTROL ROOM VISITS Please find enclosed the data logs of the Control Room visits for the time period, March 13 through April2, 1991, per our letter dated March 29, 1991.

Sincerely, J

. Baker P-2 Plant Manager sg Enclosures 9104 OCK 05000397 0034 910402 PDR ADOC R

ge-8/

WASII INC?O'I PI HLIC'0% HH C3l SUPPLY SYSTEi>I FUNCTIONALMANUAL FOR NUCLEAR OPERATION NUCI KAR OPKRATION STANDARD NUMSKRI PACK:

OP

~

RKV~

7 ',

1 HNP-2 MANAGEMENT HALKTHROUGH PROGRAM DATE:

+// )7 MANAGEMENT OBSERVATIONS I. ASSIGNED PERSONS:

2. SHIF":"'HIFTMGR.: NR+A

3. SHIFT:

4.

BUILDING(S) VISITED:

TIME IN: l~

OUT:

SHIFT MGR.:

Reactor General Service Turbine Generator Diesel Generator Radwaste Other 7.

RECOMMEHDATIOHS:

(Observations of a long-tern nature for poss>b]e implovements in operations, maintenance, equipment, and safety).

8. Management of supporting organizations should provide observations on performance of software/hardware provided to support HHP-2 operati'on.

g.

Team members should indicate below if they desire feedback on actions taken, or to be taken, resulting from their observations.-

res

)

No I

I 5.

GENERAL COMMENT

S: gdlEPPQ ~IC~ED CA-WQ~giggg gag +//p~pf)Typ/~I,

~~C)y OF@'F6>o&~f&E8(7&I, 6oAPvcy oF= ~rnf oA g/(y-~.

~cJ~JCc~f ~ GuP~ z~P F~cLPFp CPu&57)ad+

6.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:

(Observations requiring, or potentially requiring immediate action by the Shift lianger).

~-

040 K22DS PINT)

ATTACHMENT 1 I'91 pp 1 y-pp3-~

WASH IPCZO'5 tl ~ LIC tOllCA 43 SUPPLY SYSTEFuI FUNCTIONALMANUAL FOR NUCLEAR OPERATION NUCl EAR OPERATION STANDARO NUMIIKR:

PACK:

OF

~

RKV 7

7 1

HHP-2 MANAGEMENT HALKTHROUGH PROGRAM HATE:

MANAGEMENT OBSERVATIONS

l. ASSIGNED PERSONS:

/

TIME IH @~SIGHT.

O7<5'.

SHIFT:

SHEFT HGR.: C4 l/O/J 3.

SHIFT.

SHZFT MGR.

4.

BUILDING(S) VISITED:

Reactor General Service Turbine Generator Diesel'enerator Radwaste Other 5.

GENERAL COMMENT

S: gg(pp~p ((CASE-./F C/l&i//4N/3+//'l goFE~IIF S/7~/o, geSGCT S o/- Ax~o/a II 4W&iAIG, Ccpv4'uoT'F &m///r ore/ P/~q -g-o, 4IXPIF'&vTS PO+ ~/ I IFH//F FIPCPFD glu+SP~

6.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:

(Observations requiring, or potentially requiring immediate action by the Shift Manger).

ct 7.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

(Observations of a long-tern nature for possible improvements in operations, maintenance, equipment, and safety).

8.

Management of supporting organizations should provide observations on performance of software/hardware provided to support HHP-2 operation.

9.

Team members should indicate below if they desire feedback on actions taken, or to be taken, resulting from their observations.;

r r

"es I

I Ho)

$ 44 22205 I2/$7)

ATTACHMENT 1

FIELD BSERVATIQN Observer Crew/Employem Scope of3ob Observed

'lease mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Gcncrally Complctcly

.3.

4.

Was the crew/individual.properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools,

'nowledge, procedures)?

Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

I Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

Were safe work practices followed?

t Ig

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological workrequirements 2

/Q

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

<J~

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices l~+QQ Q

Q ll Concerns:

t r 5ÃaM i

rA QlA~

~

~

Comments.

lQ ~

u UP

>w NXLC.

J AM Recommendations:

I i'g.

4

(

.. ~

lg

~-'(

g~gp gg~g >g/4d/IK ~Ã +

~

~

) J

~, >J < ~ ~~g;idge

,g~. p r'pgJ P/5~&l

/

)

I

(

~

M 4

Wjt/

/

~if ~ n~

g~$ >

@%4' V g

~

'E Cl'Vl~

" I ~

(ijj; gisi4~~(.c" l~~'f

~~)(gg ptv l)Pi'c'cN ~~"~ f 1p/g+ Q// p~P/pl\\IZ f'+A~

lf

~

'i.pi'

~

~ I

)er.

S~

ob)5.

54k 4

~k 5

b"I e4vph

,t @l~, k!aJ i"~'>>9'~~

..~ '~g)b o&'~

Z--:,.;-=;."

+5%

i~+A J

~

p'X

,CIA~ii $g>v,+,

>(w sFa< a, f yA y7g '~ @vs'

. e

.~'gs

~

S'vg

,; ':-' 'i': '..-"';,:. ~i:.".::.."-:?'""'.=,,.',"- --..".,; ".":.

I

V

LD BSERVATI N Observer'ate Crew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

Not at All RATINGS GcncraHy Complctcly I. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Weresafeworkpractices foHowed?

~)p,

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

Qp

6. Was time used effectively 2 r

7. Was good hoeseheepiog practiced i (p,

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

5[<

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents

'?

igudq~qvj

'l~~

~

~o/,

il(ea p~~ '~~

p.>,,~~ ~~<(~.4 fifo+llrlin4 (fg~()zip~<~

I t

l I

I 1

r'r ~'.

year r

't.~

~

j

~

~ iQ a

"<3'+r I

I i

t 1I

'b

\\

/,J4) ~~h l0+

b IA

,g,.g 4z ~>jl, cw~ r~~" ~~~

~',c<

C r'.l C

I 4

~

&*SNIHCTO'I PS SLID P014CH 49 SUPPLY SYSTEI>I FUNCTIONALMANUAL FOR NUCLEAR OPERATlON

~

e

, NIICLEAROPERATION STANOARO i'

NuMDERI I

FACET OF

~

REV 7

1

.HHP-2 MAHAGEMEHT HALKTHROUGH PROGRAM N~T/9( Pe~ vis'lT'ATE:

MAHAGEMEHT OBSERVATIOHS

l. ASSIGiTEO PERSONS:

2. SHIFT:

SHIFT MGR '~~ '4

3. SHIFT'INE IN:/OSS OUT: J//D SHIFT MGR RECOMMEHDATIOHS:

(Observations of a long-term nature for possible improvemenI.S in operations, maintenance, equipment, and safety).

'8.

Management of supporting organizations should provide observations on performance of software/hardware provided to support HHP-2 operation..

9 Team members should indicato below if they desire feodback on actions taken to be taken, resulting from their observations.

Yes

[

Ho

[

4.

BUILDIHG(S) VISITED:

Reactor

~

Turbine Generator Radwaste General Service Diesel Generator Other S.

GENERAL COHMEHTS: QE(PPGP Q~J'iCP QQ~ /PPQjggggf g~

, YiE~7M~, &Mw'eAq~~& F>< 7(lg 4P DD'CSJiCP ~OP ggPL iriCPPt&~.I'Ag F> k<Ogy EP~~~><~>

6.

CORRECTIVE ACTIOHS:

(Observations requiring, or potentially requiring immediate action by the Shift Manger).

~

SHC E22D I rifC7)

ATTACHMENT 1

WASHIMCZO'0 PI ~ LIC POL CM

~,

4D SUPPLY SYSTEi>i FUNCTIONALMANUAL FOR NUCLEAR OPERATION

~ NVCI.KAROtKRATIONSTANOARD NUMIIKRR tACK OF RKV 7

7, 1

HNP-2 MANAGEMENT HALKTHROUGH PROGRAM OATS:

>//<F MANAGEMENT OBSERVATIONS 1.

ASSIGHEO PERSONS:

TIME IN:O~NWUT.. O~~

2. SHIF:

SHIFT MGR.: ++ ~+

S.

SHIFT:

5 IFT HGR.:

4.

BUILDING(S) VISITED:

Reactor General Service Turbine Generator Diesel Generator Radwaste Other S.

GENERAL COMMENT

S:

QPg +~+ P+~ gg/gPj~g P5~

~~us C ~lq 5'IEG ~$76 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:

(Observations requiring, or potentially requiring immediate action by the Shift Manger).

7.

RECOMMEHDATIONS:

(Observations of a long-term nature for posEs>hie improvements in operations, maintenance, equipment, and safety).

8. Management of supporting organizations should provide observations on perl orll ance of software/hardware provided to support HHP-2 operation.

9.

Ho

)

Team members should indicate below if they desire feedback on actions taken, or to be taken, resulting from their observations.

'es

)

w' SCS 2220i Pf$ 7)

ATTACHMENT 1

p+3(I5

~-,pg (/>,Mceiiw(i'>0<~

Pl>. ~~

f,':,. ~~</ <'Irjy,<>>//V%5 8~I t

~l p ~/g~u,i,nr Lrh ls 4 e.4 p""I' f'~'

9ij.'. k., "g f

P'<<4

~

h

'.A t I C~.

4 Qt g 0

'8

\\ ~ h Ii >

, Ij.-=

/~fjpgj~f j gg/Q (Ilk~/ISA P

lt~lgp g(

ppJ $ /Pl /'

f~ll 4'+tK AP

~

I

~

I 6

'4:"-

(x FQ

(~p <J~

g/n~,~e.g/p('iSCPf k": "I.1'

'J ~+4 t

~jip (/(gjpg$/iPV(AI 07-

/p(~((p p

)'/IIJ/ "Q Pj'~~~p;g PiI l~>~~ <~ f"~

Qp;p! gpj~~P ~~

~ r

e

FIELD B ERVATI N Observer Date Crew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed'(dQ Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not ct All Generally Completely 3.

4.

Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2 I

Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

Were safe work practices followed 2

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices:

Concerns Comments:

A4 AQltd 4'a

'.8 U PA

( w d+

Aw )

r Recommendations:

~ 'W t&wQ!rp. '( +'s~gp~.~g'~>gct+4') "g:. trip~

1 p pj J )

A V P I~$ 1j'tp\\f 4 5 Qflf~. \\ ~N QPJk CakR:i; ll~

I

~tpg3. (~

4b QCjr~j I H.

j/g<>.,>gp,g/Q jJI1'lazily l Pll

~+<A /

r.(.I~>," ~,a iii~W~~'~ '

"~J~~

pl g (g p

()g~l', ~ ÃkWI)ff y jC

~>> glcl,A

~

~swJ.~7ivih 4+'~~"+

~""I g~J~y/,Q> glry'l~~ Mals S'I' g(y - y7 D - pGPi (u'r($a I

i'(((-, Ws>f.g ~4 l~

g$ g~i~ fj!viue-+'~~ @~~

i~-Ho,Ab ~~i

@.'81 "Q p"+

4'~ g iver vsse'v)e)1) gy,j/ e~z (i

.,g~ l>$ (>e~r~4 cy~Prjdp~ SC<NF'HO

~ $@g /r7~)lji>'/

W.

g +Cw, f~~ '~gt

'w '+-,

C.crt>+, ~~~pl ',db -+'f"Q~yQ W,dpvY'j~g.'~~oyr.V~w',~~iy~r~'ilp~~g~A~

R-6

'4 5 gg]R)oY tg(c~+

A

~~1 J

gg) f gp),gtP g~~k>>dl,tfl~j ~f4...~-.

Cg/')$ $ e pC 6~Jbc,,

a.

~

~C

5j lpljPL(

gg(O..

~c

~I~7

~ +g joe@(

/ c~, fjgcÃ$"

p,~oa!c l,A~

OP<"

)

(cia'l/1~ '~

~~j j

C<.

g c/g p$ p$p

) Q/i 0pf 8/aPi S>V<14 l

~y f QQ~IQ~~

(~riV~ Y""~0r';

c,jw, ~~a,wryq>SPg~.if C'0

( I,/,

( '$i~g~r,9 (~i PoliCq,.<

l~~ ~<

j

~ ~

)(.-,Qgle Jco co 0en i

p kd 'L<~~

~

g qf,j~p g

() i J(

5(ii> f)<('YQPI

~/,Lly s,--:a I:/

i

+ cd/)~

Ik oi i. ~~,i//." P"4'~<s~.

~

'~~~

, gyp'

.!'],.Pc.l )y. f(

g,J~ f(yrf(

$ gf 5p9$ )K, f(

gp[~c:( ( z:xb 4 " "."" ~li= ~"""~1

,: (

/.<

f pup&

< peek~

0

~i~<< - j>/t, o,a lvee '~o~

1

( s.~4k~

g~ r-k

~khi"--':-:-..".,"'.",:;.".".':-::::.",".";."-':"::,'-":='

~

(/

~~].Q~J Q g~e.l~C 4s);Jag.

jQg~- $<zlzppJ k))k 9m". I(lcL+ p J"'gq,.

r~ 'c ark <:.O'D Pea Itl'"'; g 1

o(Q. Kll SALVE'-I ~ll"tk Qoj~1 si'J8 V'Idp 4 fjJyj'iiif r

t

)h.>

..., ~,ss pi's,

',~a

~'

~ i,>

ee

<~

m~

>y;m~

>m,>>, a'~:c

~c-~

>+

. > ~',

+a

~pa ct~ <'

g,'

~

LD B ERVATI N Observer.

Q5c Crew/Bnployees-Scope ofJob Observed

~

'4146%~

1 Date Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

Not at All RATINGS Gcncrally Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the

'ob?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2

6. Was time used eQ'ectively?

r

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary 2

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practrces

'oncerns:

~

~

~

Comments 0(- ILJ I lltA Recommendations:

LD BSERVATI e/

Observer:

Date:

Crew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed Age 6F Q*>f 1 Roi2. A~i4t tt4<

Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions, Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures) 2

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2 I

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and Itnowledgeable to perform the job ?

II

4. Were safe work practices followed 2

>1p, 5, Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2 H)~

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary

'?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents?

0

Good Practices:

Concerns

~

~

Comments '

l lW I, 6W

'T lk

+i 0i Q6

'M A.

f 'Uhb Abbe~

4 QQ 74<

QUA Pi~pQQ~J r

Recommendations:

0

~

~

Alai'<)Br'g~~$ -

P

(,iqprl~(

'C ra~

lQ' o

~

'p)g gv)8 l]Bh~'<IPÃqy. I

/

oi~lo i'Ji~ci..s~gp/n~~ ~'"~

""',.j~

~E;,ling jSW - vl5 w&dk i~

5]yul"r+-k' Sk 6A ~

FIELD B ERVATI N Observer Crew/Employees h

Scopeof JobObserved

~

0JYG eche fj-c7-t Date: ~

~

F 0

0-c3 GO Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

Not at All Gcnctally Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

?

2. Were procedures used atid adhered to aS reqtured? ~

0 Qg~U~

~+Qt- ~g~

/sS

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological workrequirements?

6. Was e usedeffecgvely? g~/ ~ ~g Nas C>

euN',

e)C~ 5 4gaS Qra P j

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Didcrewfunctio asatyamtocompletethejob?

Scum EC sinu.

pr c~~s

9. Was the crew ab to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall perfonnance ofthe job and sequence of events?

Good Practices Concerns:

Comments:

Recommendations:

FIELD B ERV TI N Observer Date Crew/Employees

'cope ofJob Observed Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Complctcly

1. Was the crew/mdividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures) 2

'.'-".~ 2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2

3. Were. crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2 t"lp,

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2 Qg

6. Was time used effectively 2 r

7. Was good housekeeping practiced? Qp,

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary 2

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall perfonnance of'the job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices:

Concerns Comments:

KlAAi C t

~5~

WO P

r Recommendations:

w ~ ++'j+~,l~ ~+g4>+g+rQ+

'~~Jy+)w ~~i WFd qg~k~myÃp~p+4C'/gyes

~pg ~vo/v~ /~/o z +v~.'p

~

.s r

$).i&PQ'pW~~++ lS'~p >>~ i>Q Jgqiq +~. gS >g<f'I

"~b-~~'~ I MA4 Jr 3

gp,(gQJn p

&PM

~A 8'~ &~iM~

l (fpgpJ Ck(V~gcg,cA, 7Pilg f8'. "'+

~

J

~

1 F

FIELD B ERVATI Observer:

Date:

zo Rl Crew/Employees '

UKAhg Scope ofJob Observed

'lease mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Gcncrally Complctcly Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (Le., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2 t )p,

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary 2

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents

'?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

Comments:

r Recommendations:

Observer'FIELD B ERVATI J

Q.Y-ey

]70m - /8'Ia

~/qy Crew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed

/cue Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Completely

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately shlled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

rt

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

C Comments cJ 5er. w Roeeauuenrhions:

o r/~ (~l~w 'T J&L ~+~~

](~ )(f~ g)~)

y'pH~ j~'j~~lp~ />pp/Jjf-Qi/f~

p(/,.>p,c Hy. /I(n/sp z ~c~'zw~,

I

".:.'.s.",.~.'P....":i.>

f,p bled< /i/>s!

~s V,

7

/g% pJ,// dl/AP Pi'd7I P<j~

P.

h

~( qg pJC~5cj+ (jlig l5P~Cf~

~PA

~gf~ $~ 4 sdl&04 leSu <~irZ~:W:.~,.

k wP>> oj < s'4/c~~~~v>l

>=% ~~ f'~+!

p/~)g 4j h~)i~ (icgf"po.~ E~,

ph10'~p

FIELD 8 ERVATI N p zljf/

Crew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed '

~ ~

~+K g ~ r~~~se w P.Lc. ~~

z~g ~ram ue Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

Not ac AH RATINGS Gcncrdly Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (l.e., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

I I~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

?

~

~ ~ ~

I

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectauons?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices:

Concerns Co ments:

Recommendations:

P ~+a 9~;g,(..,

el~i i'g(gg.g(~ pc~'s a~J O':J '4'r"'< Hie

() j~ (/ ~gag ggy(vlf/zj nii c...(0 l

p//

@ icing, g(ia~rl (risc/AieJ 7

7.

lie'v)~~ ~,'~i&.f '"~ I'"i'.

it< " r r-*~

j, h

d'- i'(id/~ Pl

<~

~>,'"'""~i

()I;,ir)py/~i -cu: 4-,i Jr'~ "~"~

'L

~

)"'".-',-:.-'"-'.,

~

I

FIELD BSER I/'ATI N Observer

. >/z,~i~ I Qd Crew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed

'lease mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

Not at AH RATINGS Gcncrally Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2.. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?,

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices Concerns:

Comments Recommendations:

0

07' lP"'~~'gpl..ll pl(-.<d ~

R,l'~,

'I'gc.

,'g e/w P

p.~

i >~i~.>s ck~'> '"~ ~ ~ - 'Q Ql,.~~(

~

i ii

)Ii/ ~

tn g7p77IZ I

'l

'rg

~FIELD B ~AD N Observer

'rew/Employees

'cope of Job Observed Q

nt tlt2%

Date:

Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely

1. Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures) 2

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2 lg

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological workrequirements 2 + 1 q

6. Was time used effectively 2

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

Comments:.

Recommendations:

ytz.~

u iiiq)g ~~49>g ~>'~alii rcislvcTe)$ 4(cl~k~l9~

']

Q@pJ 6/jQ )A+ QLc(q 4g~ <0 P@/

'CO Cr.'~J~JJ(

I I

gP(

75 "(e!n ale(;" ader.-"(~<+

,'gP fi44. T ~ i ~44'/44 gd 4~4.m l

I.

)

it,

~ I@I'(/Cu~.IS>l<

I

~ '"

4 4

~

4

~

~

4

Su;I >b/

lb 5qngcaZ I.J~s'd>,

9~v).l g(ISzc 'sr'/pg

/~((~<'w)1 c>>dv>y")u< (s( i >II <ale(j(.)

7f go5 p,

~p ~j~,,m o(p/

J I

f f

~g ~i@~ '>)~~i'~~i li." can)

Py!Pc~'>'le>

g~ ci.p(pg ((c~~~

P 1

,.(

j P;

Ob5e&,

J

~'s

~~gyp (g>qqe.

~ /pro Sl",/rijJc~79'~ ~"'0 i

Rn~~ hA) <$ A))~k <3Pt,'>l I Bs,c vz

+io s> y e

lv~e uyp, ( 5/7-fj(

PISA aiwl,,

,p>g-g~

us b'Pli C./Q u> k<x nC'g~ g> C~ ~i> (gu$ c~ i~ r'I'"~ r g

~. a~q.ski f~;".'-~ L~~-

<<':"~~/

l~iZO ke ~~~a )Joe HR"'-:-~

I 0 (a h>c ) Ici:;)/<~/l l55'<(

LD B ERVATl N Date Crew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed

'lease mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely

1. Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (icos tools, knowledge, procedures)?

tt

~

1

~

~

~

~

~

? I I

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11 ~ Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisQed with the overall performance of the job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

Comments:

~AJ/

Recommendations:

0

1i T~ s(~

og) p (pi ~yfly) re~~ l~0 0.

+4ynRQ $gpup~ -IJI1i4'tu&

Ay/n ((fop((gc(c, 5"/I Elpfpw.

IV>

s>q p~wV<~'5SL~~>

l7jgcz%J p4o7J s

e <<;< &~4~@ pres ~+i~~~

v>)~lr iN~."/" piAlf,

~

~

1 p,

~

FIELD B ERVATI N Observer Date:

Crew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed's lK

'rAL Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures) 2

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2 8(g

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

tJ)<

6. Was time used effectively?

~ 7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices Concerns:

Comments 0

Wo Recommendations:

iud. ~l~1 4'"-" )

I 0/ I <<~7<< I

'>rwi>>'i' r/75k~

jg,>aod ldk-i~1~ 7'

~p, fClr~<</}YQ 4'~ ""j I

~ J l.'."-.",-'

4,','gA'~

~

~

i t

)

n

-~

8 L

L iv'

~ r

~

1%

P

0

"P y,

.p I

~

+

~

'/

'k-ng+ge "ski+;~~~( ~P~)pg.")qs'~pqg)+'~v) ~~/rf ~v. a r j

(p~

~My vd<v-

~c

~

~)

p-,sc gc

,z,lq pg,~~/tJ p ll'jhowf al leap~

(gp+4'I Wl P l

p,

~(y~ivq-pJ

<<'4 g4~ C))g, (4i'.3 a

c. $V'J4l.

4 f~~p,g cdi~l ~~~

~>0/~

~:u)'r)AJq Ccats<+>

<~ 0",

lq~/QM5 a": >'

4~

P"

FIELD B ERVATI N Observer

'rew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed whse W-ACE Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not ar All Gcncrally Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

t

~~

1

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

s

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices foHowed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2

6. Was time used eH'ectively?

r

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents?

A

1 C

Ci

/P~

Comments:

~r~

Recommendations:

LD B ERVATI N Observer Crew/Employees'o Scope ofJob Observed Date '

780 Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All

, Generally Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

II

~

t

?I

~

~

~

~

?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

y

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions w.hen necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

Comments:

zY Reeetnfnendntions:

FIELD B ERVATI N Observer Crew/E ploy~.

$gbPbof JbbQbmgyee

~ W IV U 4+vef' c/cell 0+zehu Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at AH GcncraHy Complctcly

1. Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (Le., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

I w

~"

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological workrequirements?

6. Was time used effectively 2 r

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence ofevents?

Qa7 g/07 OQS'EAtl b oSsegv ogSdgtl b

Excel/cub Auuover rummy Sou reserve 4 6'/8S'.

AeC orsouucC.

u~gershseI A-

~. ge ~s s'umber ~

zxbe a duhio'uAS(e.

ouZA~ev'u N uA ad~ li hb-lleierfed comme&a'onc~:

OVgrn+ g 7~

dJ'g dree ru o(tu'ia ra& Sfidd eou~~C(

iubovt Pie recent/ 4 euiu s aoiZ ruhr the kkre hoick r..e

'rem~iHo~

Fime oNcreo e,k,

'reio Noo.bu Ala i/A creius h irld euh hk cueie oive tlo 4.

4us i e hAve Ar reAdrebou o

o4-c.

ek.

(A's oveee.'oos'ue

/euoov ~gag rioov.

Recommendations:

ouF

gpss 1

ISS < $

1<V

'50'/r i~

d~~< J.~/~+'

)gp~ g'(halo~~

~q ~j, l)~iJ~ ~ Tl~

q @ p~

e, g gl(5 y

~P iy>,~j,gQ pm@ p+~~C 1

"=- g6pv j~4u ~~dao'<<~

L/7 3, ~r 1

I I

~

~

zgzg -$g(~~ io (4,~4{' AnA WC' (cyr l~<IC<pi" i5-i~/'

c-g rP~i5 ~,

l~q g~<~ y~( )~/kc P + p~~~'Pi,C>~

u CdR5g $8+

J'

~

I~

p"e pO

)

P I Soli fp.gQ/ -(j pMJtVKl)4'8r&lg

>i [t FP4v gQ g~jg L'np pJ 14>k W( a/. ~p.

gq(- 4k SvP.z.-(~inc /4<)

s~I-4t(.l I co.~4+5)~g G~ J)g~f( cut'a$

Spew

~Rp<)pp, L(D, July )1ygp vgiiq ~(o kgb Og;l!>>~

Ik2 'a q[y l f'ipig i5fiRS Il h;6) cu.

(()

<d~~ A, i$ lf'CS, <" ~ ~~~

f)~ /isaac coR~7@u,q s~i~5ts R>g '~<erik tz,h> sh~qrs U N3vugp d>~ a

- /Vu slpwpl+pj'j$5~'wr 2,',

i C

~ II&

C I

V

,js

C

'CS

• )4, 4'

P

LD B ERVA N

Observer:

Crew/Employees

'cope of Job Obeereef Date 3 lRJ

/f0-~Q~

SP8.

i8~c ~~

/9CW Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All GeneraHy Completely

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (Le., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was'good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when ne"-"sary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices:

Concans:

Comments:

Ca~

Recommendations:

~

J

~

" r~w kg":j:

P

".4".L-c E

~l lr) y,g Hctv~1 -

(<g + f8 Q%

Oh'~ pjlI p~Q 0lsr VlSee(flleils]8k<'~l)r. jl/i/ ~ropy

~

~8'r<~h~~4oy~s.

I J

I h

(41( l~~,qp,~%I,:;c "I, (

r I /QV

<<ii

>c.(.

L(

~ 8 P

gC'.

FIELD B ERVATIQN Observer Date:

Crew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures) 2 Were procedures used and.adhered to as required?

3.

4.

Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological workrequirements 2

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2 ~ p

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity. ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

omments:

I Recommendations:

I t

~

~ ', w:"~

~

qz

~,.',,' '.",,'Z," ' '

~..

~ 4 C

C j.s,'" '!t'j-s

..s.. ',

>~- ~

'P"~i ~ ~..~..i. i'~>; ~;;-i Q.r ~, ~," "~~

. ',: ~~.

'; ',:.. ',!<; ".;.. ~ i:e 4 I i u) (Yld;Jp~

Cl l~~ lll4>> Rid'l+lk~

~~ l>

OLenL~A A~i.~W i&,3 (g~ gi I

[VOrrl~ [~p<Cp<'/~,

PVo(djs'~pvkk

$p) (a~le /we, -p~ A'~hV'. QTjj ppp z)( I'p

~ >~~i (81m.

A < Gp~

"":"> Ewe e~~ d

LD B

RVATI N Observer:

Date:

i9 Crew/Employees Scope ofJob Observed Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.'ATINGS Not at All Gcncrally CompIctcly

1. Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (l.e., tools, knowledge, procedures)

'?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2 ~

J >

6. Was time used effectively 2

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents?

Good Practices:

Concerns Comments:

Recommendations:

LD B

RV N

do/>= Blu~

Observer:

~ 7

/MZ/ZOlI) did l8>c IC ~

Ze Jc's SFiP Cfc dry

~ + y 7 Scope ofJob Observed.

O~

Wl Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

Not ac All Genaally Completely

1. Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately shlled and knowledgeable to perform the job ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiolo ical workrequirements?

+6 cuw ~&~Ay

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence ofevems?

~ID k.$85+

Good Practices:

Concerns:

Comments:

ke 8 E &~. 3(~cu <<.D ~ CX~ m

~~ C"g.~. i*

jib~ ~Le M~M~~,

Observer Crew/Employees'D B ERVATI N gzlRI Scope ofJob Observed g.o 0 Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the followingquestions.

Indicate N/Aifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely

.1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

. ~

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately shlled and knowledgeable to perform the job

?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2

6. Was time used eQ'ectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary 2

10. Did the quality ofwork meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity ofwork meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance ofthe job and sequence ofevents 2

Good Practices Concerns:

Comments:

4 ltll Recommendations: