ND-18-0227, Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load Item 2.5.05.02.i (Index Number 565): Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Michael J. Yox               7825 River Road Regulatory Affairs Director Waynesfxtro, GA 30830 A Southern Nuclear                                  Vogtle 3 & 4                706-848-6459 tei 410-474-8587 ceii FEB 2 2 2018                                                                    myox@southernco.com Docket Nos.:      52-025 52-026 ND-18-0227 10CFR 52.99(c)(3)
{{#Wiki_filter:A Southern Nuclear FEB 2 2 2018 Docket Nos.:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Southern Nuclear Operating Company Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Unit 3 and Unit 4 Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-davs Prior to Initial Fuel Load Item 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number 5651 Ladies and Gentlemen:
52-025 52-026 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Michael J. Yox Regulatory Affairs Director Vogtle 3 & 4 7825 River Road Waynesfxtro, GA 30830 706-848-6459 tei 410-474-8587 ceii myox@southernco.com ND-18-0227 10CFR 52.99(c)(3)
Pursuant to 10 CFR 52.99(c)(3), Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby notifies the NRC that as of February 16, 2018, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 and Unit 4 Uncompleted Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number 565] has not been completed greater than 225-days prior to initial fuel load. The Enclosure describes the plan for completing this ITAAC. Southern Nuclear Operating Company will, at a later date, provide additional notifications for ITAAC that have not been completed 225-days prior to initial fuel load.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Unit 3 and Unit4 Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-davs Prior to Initial Fuel Load Item 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number 5651 Ladies and Gentlemen:
This notification is informed by the guidance described in NEI 08-01, Industry Guideline for the ITAAC Closure Process Under 10 CFR Part 52, which was endorsed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.215. In accordance with NEI 08-01, this notification includes ITAAC for which required inspections, tests, or analyses have not been performed or have been only partially completed. All ITAAC will be fully completed and all Section 52.99(c)(1) ITAAC Closure Notifications will be submitted to NRC to support the Commission finding that all acceptance criteria are met priorto plant operation, as required by 10 CFR 52.103(g).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 52.99(c)(3), Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby notifies the NRC that as of February 16, 2018, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 and Unit 4 Uncompleted Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number565] has not been completed greater than 225-days prior to initial fuel load.The Enclosure describes the plan for completing this ITAAC. Southern Nuclear Operating Company will, at a later date, provide additional notifications for ITAAC that have not been completed 225-days priorto initial fuel load.
This notification is informed by the guidance described in NEI 08-01, Industry Guideline for the ITAAC Closure Process Under 10 CFR Part 52, which was endorsed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.215. In accordance with NEI 08-01, this notification includes ITAACfor which required inspections, tests, or analyses have not been performed or have been only partially completed. All ITAAC will be fully completed and allSection 52.99(c)(1) ITAAC Closure Notifications will be submitted to NRC to support the Commission finding that all acceptance criteriaare met priorto plant operation, as required by 10 CFR 52.103(g).
This letter contains no new NRC regulatory commitments.
This letter contains no new NRC regulatory commitments.
If there are any questions, please contact Tom Petrak at 706-848-1575.
If there are any questions, please contact Tom Petrak at 706-848-1575.
Respectfully submitted.
Respectfully submitted.
Michael J. Yox           ^
Michael J. Yox
^
Regulatory Affairs Directbr Vogtle 3 &4
Regulatory Affairs Directbr Vogtle 3 &4


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 and Unit 4 Completion Plan for Uncompleted ITAAC 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number 565]
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 and Unit4 Completion Plan for Uncompleted ITAAC 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number565]
MJY/RAS/amw
MJY/RAS/amw


Line 48: Line 50:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 2 of 7 ITAAC Statement Design Commitment
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 2 of 7 ITAAC Statement Design Commitment
: 2. The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 can withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of safety function.
: 2. The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 can withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of safety function.
3.a) The Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function, for the time required to perform the safety function.
3.a) The Class 1E equipment identified inTable 2.5.5-1 as being qualifiedfor a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function, forthe time required to perform the safety function.
Insoections. Tests. Analvses i) Inspection will be performed to verify that the seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 is located on the Nuclear Island.
Insoections. Tests. Analvses i) Inspection will be performed to verify that the seismic Category Iequipmentidentified inTable 2.5.5-1 is located on the Nuclear Island.
: 11) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses of seismic Category I equipment will be performed.
: 11) Typetests, analyses, or a combination oftype tests and analyses of seismic Category I equipment will be performed.
ill) Inspection will be performedfor the existence of a report verifying that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.
ill) Inspection will be performedforthe existence of a report verifying that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.
i) Type tests, analysis, or a combination of type tests and analysis will be performed on Class 1E equipment located in a harsh environment.
i) Typetests, analysis, or a combination oftype tests and analysis will be performed on Class 1E equipment located in a harsh environment.
ii) Inspection will be performed of the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations located in a harsh environment.
ii) Inspection will be performed ofthe as-built Class 1E equipmentand the associated wiring, cables, and terminations located in a harsh environment.
Acceotance Criteria i) The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 is locatedon the Nuclear Island.
Acceotance Criteria i) The seismicCategoryIequipment identified in Table2.5.5-1 is locatedon the Nuclear Island.
ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category I equipmentcan withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of safety function.
ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category Iequipmentcan withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of safety function.
iii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismicaliy bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.
iii) Areport existsand concludes thatthe as-built equipment including anchorage isseismicaliy bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.
i) A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment. This equipmentcan withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.
i) Areport exists and concludesthat the Class 1E equipment identified in Table2.5.5-1 as being qualified fora harsh environment. This equipmentcan withstand the environmental conditions that wouldexist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.
ii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and anaiyses.
ii) Areport exists and concludesthat the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations identifiedin Table 2.5.5-1 as being qualifiedfor a harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and anaiyses.


U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 3 of 7 ITAAC Completion Description This ITAAC requires that inspections, tests, and analyses be performed and documented to ensure the In-core Instrumentation System (IIS) equipment identified as seismic Category I or Class 1E in the Combined License (COL) Appendix C, Table 2.5.5-1 (the Table) is designed and constructed in accordance with applicable requirements.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 3 of 7 ITAAC Completion Description This ITAAC requires that inspections, tests, and analyses be performed and documented to ensure the In-core Instrumentation System (IIS) equipment identified as seismic Category I or Class 1E in the Combined License (COL) Appendix C, Table 2.5.5-1 (the Table) is designed and constructed in accordance with applicable requirements.
i) The seismic Category I eouioment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 is located on the Nuclear Island.
i) The seismic Category I eouioment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 is located on the Nuclear Island.
To assure that seismic Category I equipment can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function, all the equipment in the Table is designed to be located on the seismic Category I Nuclear Island. In accordance with Equipment Qualification (EG) Walkdown ITAAC Guideline (Reference 1), an inspection is conducted of the IISto confirm the satisfactory installation of the seismically qualified equipment. The inspection includes verification of equipment make/model/serial number and verification of equipment location (Building, Elevation, Room). The EG As-Built Reconciliation Reports (EQRR) (Reference 2) identified in Attachment A document the results of the inspection and conclude that the seismic Category I equipment is located on the Nuclear Island.
To assure that seismic Category I equipment can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function, allthe equipment inthe Table is designed to be located on the seismic Category INuclearIsland. In accordance with Equipment Qualification (EG) Walkdown ITAAC Guideline (Reference 1), an inspection is conducted of the IISto confirmthe satisfactory installation of the seismically qualified equipment. The inspection includes verificationof equipment make/model/serial number and verification of equipment location (Building, Elevation, Room). The EG As-Built Reconciliation Reports (EQRR) (Reference 2) identified in Attachment A document the results of the inspection and conclude that the seismic Category I equipment is located on the Nuclear Island.
ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Cateoorv I equipment can withstand seismic design basis dvnamic loads without loss of safetv function.
ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Cateoorv I equipment can withstand seismic design basis dvnamic loads without loss of safetv function.
Seismic Category I equipment in the Table requires type tests and/or analyses to demonstrate structural integrity and operability. Structural integrity of the passive seismic Category I mechanical equipment is demonstrated by analysis in accordance with American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Section III (Reference 3).
Seismic Category Iequipment inthe Table requires type tests and/or analyses to demonstrate structural integrity and operability. Structural integrity ofthe passive seismic Category I mechanical equipmentis demonstrated byanalysis in accordance with American Societyof Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Section III (Reference 3).
Safety-related (Class 1E) electrical equipment in the Table is seismically qualified by type testing combinedwith analysis in accordance with Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standard 344-1987 (Reference4). This equipment includes safety-related (Class 1E) field sensors and the safety-related electrical connectorassemblies. The specific qualification method (i.e., type testing, analysis, or combination) used for each piece of equipment in the Table is identified in Attachment A. Additional information about the methods used to qualify API000 safety-related equipment is provided inthe Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Appendix 3D (Reference 5). The EG Reports (Reference 6) identified in Attachment A contain applicable test reports and associated documentation and conclude that the seismic Category Iequipment can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function.
Safety-related (Class 1E) electrical equipment inthe Table is seismically qualified bytype testing combinedwith analysis in accordance with Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standard 344-1987 (Reference4). Thisequipment includes safety-related (Class 1E) field sensors and the safety-related electrical connectorassemblies. The specific qualification method (i.e., typetesting, analysis, or combination) used foreach piece of equipment in the Table is identified in Attachment A. Additional information about the methods used to qualify API000 safety-relatedequipmentis provided inthe Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Appendix 3D(Reference 5). The EG Reports (Reference 6) identified inAttachment A contain applicable test reports and associated documentation and conclude that the seismicCategory Iequipment can withstand seismicdesign basis loads without loss of safety function.
iiil A reoort exists and concludes that the as-built eouioment including anchorage is seismicallv bounded bv the tested or analvzed conditions.
iiil A reoort exists and concludes that the as-built eouioment including anchorage is seismicallv bounded bv the tested or analvzed conditions.
An inspection (Reference 1) is conducted to confirm the satisfactory installation of the seismicallyqualified equipment in the Table. The inspection verifies the equipment make/model/serial number, as-designed equipment mounting orientation, anchorage and clearances, and electrical and other interfaces. The documentation of installed configuration of seismically qualified equipment includes photographs and/or sketches/drawings of equipment/mounting/interfaces.
An inspection (Reference 1) is conducted to confirm the satisfactory installation of the seismicallyqualified equipment inthe Table. The inspectionverifies the equipment make/model/serial number, as-designed equipment mounting orientation, anchorage and clearances, and electrical and other interfaces. The documentation of installed configuration of seismically qualified equipmentincludesphotographs and/or sketches/drawingsof equipment/mounting/interfaces.


U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 4 of 7 As part of the seismic qualification program, consideration is given to the definition of the clearances needed around the equipment mounted in the plant to permit the equipment to move during a postulated seismic event without causing impact between adjacent pieces of safety-related equipment. This is done as part of seismic testing by measuring the maximum dynamic relative displacement of the top and bottom of the equipment. EQ Reports (Reference 6) identify the equipment mounting employed for qualification and establish interface requirements for assuring that subsequent in-plant installation does not degrade the established qualification.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 4 of 7 As part of the seismic qualification program, consideration is given to the definition of the clearances needed around the equipment mounted in the plant to permit the equipment to move during a postulated seismic event without causing impact between adjacent pieces ofsafety-related equipment. This is done as part ofseismic testing by measuring the maximum dynamic relative displacement of the top and bottom of the equipment. EQ Reports (Reference 6) identify the equipment mounting employedfor qualification and establish interface requirements forassuring that subsequent in-plant installation does not degrade the established qualification.
Interface requirements are defined based on the test configuration and other design requirements.
Interface requirements are defined based on the test configuration and other design requirements.
Attachment A identifies the EQRR (Reference 2) completed to verify that the as-built seismic Category Iequipment listed in the Table, including anchorage, is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions, IEEE Standard 344-1987 (Reference 4), and NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.100 (Reference 7).
Attachment A identifiesthe EQRR (Reference 2) completed to verify that the as-built seismic CategoryIequipment listed in the Table, including anchorage, is seismically bounded bythe tested or analyzed conditions, IEEE Standard 344-1987(Reference 4), and NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.100 (Reference 7).
h A reoort exists and concludes that the Class 1E eauioment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as being Qualified for a harsh environment. This eouioment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, durino. and followino a desion basis accident without loss of safetv function for the time reouired to perform the safetv function.
h A reoort exists and concludes that the Class 1E eauioment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as being Qualified for a harsh environment. This eouioment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, durino. and followino a desion basis accident without loss of safetv function for the time reouired to perform the safetv function.
The harsh environment Class 1E equipment in the Table is qualified by type testing and/or analyses. Class 1E electrical equipment type testing is performed in accordance with IEEE Standard 323-1974 (Reference 8) and RG 1.89 (Reference 9) to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49. Type testing of safety-related equipment meets the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, General Design Criterion 4. Attachment Aidentifies the EQ program and specific qualification method for each piece of Class IE electrical equipment located in a harsh environment. Additional information about the methods used to qualify API 000 safety-related equipment is provided in the UFSAR Appendix 3D (Reference 5). EQ Reports (Reference 6) identified in Attachment A contain applicable test reports and associated documentation and concludethat the equipment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, andfollowing a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.
The harsh environment Class 1E equipment inthe Table is qualified by type testing and/or analyses. Class 1Eelectrical equipment typetesting is performed in accordancewith IEEE Standard 323-1974(Reference 8) and RG 1.89 (Reference 9) to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49. Typetestingofsafety-related equipment meets the requirements of 10 CFR Part50, Appendix A, General Design Criterion 4. Attachment Aidentifies the EQ program and specific qualification method for each pieceofClass IE electrical equipment located in a harsh environment. Additional information about the methods used to qualify API 000 safety-related equipment is provided in the UFSAR Appendix 3D (Reference 5). EQ Reports (Reference 6) identified inAttachmentAcontain applicabletest reports and associated documentation and concludethat the equipment can withstand the environmental conditions that would existbefore, during, andfollowing a design basis accident without lossof safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.
iil A reoort exists and concludes that the as-built Class 1E eouioment and the associated wirino. cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as beino Qualified for a harsh environment are bounded bv tvpe tests, analvses. or a combination of tvoe tests and analvses.
iil A reoort exists and concludes that the as-built Class 1E eouioment and the associated wirino. cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as beino Qualified for a harsh environment are bounded bv tvpe tests, analvses. or a combination of tvoe tests and analvses.
An inspection (Reference 1) is conducted of the IIS to confirm the satisfactory installation ofthe Class 1E equipment in the Table. The inspection verifies the equipment location, make/model/serial number, as-designed equipment mounting, wiring, cables, and terminations, and confirms that the environmental conditions for the zone (Attachment A) in which the equipment is mounted are bounded bythe tested and/oranalyzed conditions. It also documents the installed configuration with photographs or sketches/drawings of equipment mounting and connections. The EQRR (Reference 2) identified in Attachment Adocument this inspection and conclude that the as-built harsh environment Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations are bounded bythe qualified configuration and IEEE Standard 323-1974 (Reference 8).
An inspection (Reference 1)isconducted of the IIS toconfirm the satisfactory installation ofthe Class 1E equipmentin the Table. The inspection verifies the equipmentlocation, make/model/serialnumber, as-designed equipment mounting, wiring, cables, and terminations, and confirms that the environmental conditions for the zone (Attachment A) in which the equipment is mounted are bounded bythe tested and/oranalyzed conditions. It also documents the installed configuration with photographs or sketches/drawings of equipment mounting andconnections. The EQRR (Reference 2) identified in Attachment Adocument this inspection and conclude thatthe as-built harshenvironment Class 1Eequipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations are bounded bythe qualified configuration and IEEE Standard 323-1974 (Reference 8).


U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 5 of 7 Together, these reports (References 2 and 6) provide evidence that the ITAAC Acceptance Criteria requirements are met:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 5 of 7 Together, these reports (References 2 and 6) provide evidence that the ITAAC Acceptance Criteria requirements are met:
* The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 is located on the Nuclear Island;
The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 is located on the Nuclear Island; A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category Iequipment can withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of safety function; A report exists and concludes that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions; A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment. This equipment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident withoutloss of safety function for the time required to performthe safety function; and A report exists and concludes that the as-builtClass 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as beingqualified fora harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses.
* A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category I equipment can withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of safety function;
* A report exists and concludes that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions;
* A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment. This equipment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function; and
* A report exists and concludes that the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses.
References 2 and 6 are available for NRC inspection as part of the Unit 3 and Unit 4 ITAAC 2.5.05.02.1 Completion Packages (References 10 and 11, respectively).
References 2 and 6 are available for NRC inspection as part of the Unit 3 and Unit 4 ITAAC 2.5.05.02.1 Completion Packages (References 10 and 11, respectively).
List of ITAAC Findings In accordance with plant procedures for ITAAC completion. Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) performed a review of all ITAAC findings pertaining to the subject ITAAC and associated corrective actions. This finding review, which included now-consolidated ITAAC Indexes 566, 567, 568, and 569, found no relevant ITAAC findings associated with this ITAAC.
List of ITAAC Findings Inaccordance with plant procedures for ITAAC completion. Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) performed a review ofall ITAAC findings pertaining to the subject ITAAC and associated correctiveactions. Thisfinding review, which included now-consolidated ITAAC Indexes 566, 567, 568, and 569, found no relevant ITAAC findings associated with this ITAAC.
References (available for NRC inspection)
References (available for NRC inspection) 1.
: 1. ND-xx-xx-001, "EG Walkdown ITAAC Guideline"
ND-xx-xx-001, "EG Walkdown ITAACGuideline"
: 2. EQ As-Built Reconciliation Reports (EQRR) as identified in AttachmentA for Units 3 and 4
: 2. EQ As-Built Reconciliation Reports (EQRR) as identified inAttachmentAfor Units 3 and 4
: 3. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV)
: 3. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV)
Code, Section III, "Rules for Construction of Nuclear Power Plant Components," 1998 Edition with 2000 Addenda
Code, Section III, "Rules for Construction of Nuclear Power Plant Components," 1998 Edition with 2000 Addenda 4.
: 4. IEEE Standard 344-1987, "IEEE Recommended Practices for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations"
IEEE Standard 344-1987, "IEEE Recommended Practices for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations"
: 5. Vogtle 3&4 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Appendix 3D, "Methodology for Qualifying API 000 Safety-Related Electrical and Mechanical Equipment"
: 5. Vogtle 3&4 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Appendix 3D, "Methodology for Qualifying API 000 Safety-Related Electrical and Mechanical Equipment"


U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 6 of 7
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 6 of 7 6.
: 6. Equipment Qualification (EG) Reports as identified in Attachment A
Equipment Qualification (EG) Reports as identified in Attachment A 7.
: 7. Regulatory Guide 1.100, Rev. 2, "Seismic Qualification of Electric and Mechanical Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants"
Regulatory Guide 1.100, Rev. 2, "Seismic Qualification of Electric and Mechanical Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants" 8.
: 8. IEEE Standard 323-1974, "IEEE Standard for Qualifying Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations"
IEEE Standard 323-1974, "IEEE Standard for Qualifying Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations"
: 9. Regulatory Guide 1.89, Rev 1, "Environmental Qualification of Certain Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants" 10.2.5.05.02.i-U3-CP-Rev X, "Completion Package for Unit 3 ITAAC 2.5.05.02.i [Index Number 565]"
: 9. Regulatory Guide 1.89, Rev1, "Environmental Qualification ofCertain Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants" 10.2.5.05.02.i-U3-CP-Rev X, "Completion Package for Unit 3 ITAAC 2.5.05.02.i [Index Number 565]"
11.2.5.05.02.i-U4-CP-Rev X, "Completion Package for Unit 4 ITAAC 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number 565]"
11.2.5.05.02.i-U4-CP-Rev X, "Completion Package for Unit 4 ITAAC 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number 565]"
: 12. NEI 08-01, "Industry Guideline for the ITAAC Closure Process Under 10 CFR Part 52"
: 12. NEI 08-01, "Industry Guideline forthe ITAAC Closure Process Under10 CFR Part 52"


U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 7 of 7 Attachment A System: In-core Instrumentation System (IIS)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 7 of 7 Attachment A System: In-core Instrumentation System (IIS)
CiasslE/
Equipment Name ^
Seismic Quai. For                     Envir Quai      Type of          EG Reports          As-Buiit EORR Equipment Name ^                                Envir. Zone ^
Seismic Cat. i
Cat. i
* CiasslE/
* Harsh Envir.                Program ^         Quai.         (Reference 6)       (Reference 2) ^
Quai. For Harsh Envir.
                                                +
+
Incore Thimble Assemblies (at                                                                     APP-JS94-VBR-002 /
Envir. Zone ^ Envir Quai Program ^
Type Tests &                        2.5.05.02.i-U3-EQRR-least three assemblies in each     Yes   Yes^''Wes^^>       1           E*S                       APP-JS94-VBR-001/
Type of Quai.
Analysis                                PCDXXX core quadrant)                                                                              APP-JS94-VFR-XXX Notes:
EG Reports (Reference 6)
+ Excerpt from COL Appendix C Tabie 2.5.5-1
As-Buiit EORR (Reference 2) ^
: 1. See Table 3D.5-1 of UFSAR
Incore Thimble Assemblies (at least three assemblies in each core quadrant)
: 2. E - Electrical Equipment Program S = Quaiified for submergence or operation with spray
Yes Yes^''Wes^^>
    * - Harsh Environment
1 E*S Type Tests &
: 3. The Unit 4 As-Built EORR are numbered "2.5.05.02.i-U4-EQRR-PCDXXX"
Analysis APP-JS94-VBR-002 /
APP-JS94-VBR-001/
APP-JS94-VFR-XXX 2.5.05.02.i-U3-EQRR-PCDXXX Notes:
+ Excerpt from COL Appendix C Tabie 2.5.5-1 1.
See Table 3D.5-1 of UFSAR 2.
E - Electrical Equipment Program S = Quaiified for submergence or operation with spray
* - Harsh Environment 3.
The Unit 4 As-Built EORR are numbered "2.5.05.02.i-U4-EQRR-PCDXXX"
: 4. Only applies to the safety-related assemblies. There are at ieast two safety-reiated assemblies in each core quadrant.}}
: 4. Only applies to the safety-related assemblies. There are at ieast two safety-reiated assemblies in each core quadrant.}}

Latest revision as of 09:18, 6 January 2025

Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load Item 2.5.05.02.i (Index Number 565)
ML18054A565
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/2018
From: Yox M
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of New Reactors
References
ITAAC 2.5.05.02.i, ND-18-0227
Download: ML18054A565 (10)
v • d • e


Text

A Southern Nuclear FEB 2 2 2018 Docket Nos.:

52-025 52-026 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Michael J. Yox Regulatory Affairs Director Vogtle 3 & 4 7825 River Road Waynesfxtro, GA 30830 706-848-6459 tei 410-474-8587 ceii myox@southernco.com ND-18-0227 10CFR 52.99(c)(3)

Southern Nuclear Operating Company Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Unit 3 and Unit4 Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-davs Prior to Initial Fuel Load Item 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number 5651 Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to 10 CFR 52.99(c)(3), Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby notifies the NRC that as of February 16, 2018, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 and Unit 4 Uncompleted Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number565] has not been completed greater than 225-days prior to initial fuel load.The Enclosure describes the plan for completing this ITAAC. Southern Nuclear Operating Company will, at a later date, provide additional notifications for ITAAC that have not been completed 225-days priorto initial fuel load.

This notification is informed by the guidance described in NEI 08-01, Industry Guideline for the ITAAC Closure Process Under 10 CFR Part 52, which was endorsed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.215. In accordance with NEI 08-01, this notification includes ITAACfor which required inspections, tests, or analyses have not been performed or have been only partially completed. All ITAAC will be fully completed and allSection 52.99(c)(1) ITAAC Closure Notifications will be submitted to NRC to support the Commission finding that all acceptance criteriaare met priorto plant operation, as required by 10 CFR 52.103(g).

This letter contains no new NRC regulatory commitments.

If there are any questions, please contact Tom Petrak at 706-848-1575.

Respectfully submitted.

Michael J. Yox

^

Regulatory Affairs Directbr Vogtle 3 &4

Enclosure:

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 and Unit4 Completion Plan for Uncompleted ITAAC 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number565]

MJY/RAS/amw

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Page 2 of 3 To:

Southern Nuclear Operating Company/ Georgia Power Company Mr. D. A. Bost (w/o enclosures)

Mr. M. D. Rauckhorst (w/o enclosures)

Mr. M. D. Meier Mr. D. H. Jones (w/o enclosures)

Mr. D. L. McKinney Mr. M. J. Yox Mr. D. L. Fulton Mr. J. D. Williams Mr. F. H. Willis Ms. A. L. Pugh Mr. A. 8. Parton Mr. W. A. Sparkman Mr. 0. E. Morrow Ms. K. M. Stacy Mr. M. K. Washington Mr. J. P. Redd Ms. A. C. Chamberlain Mr. D. R. Culver Mr. T. G. Petrak Document Services RTYPE: VND.LI.L06 File AR.01.02.06 cc:

Nuclear Reaulatorv Commission Mr. W. Jones (w/o enclosures)

Ms. J. M. Heisserer Mr. C. P. Patel Mr. M. E. Ernstes Mr. G. J. Khouri Mr. T. E. Chandler Ms. S. E. Temple Ms. P. Braxton Mr. T. C. Brimfield Mr. A. J. Lerch Mr. C. J. Even Mr. F. D. Brown Mr. B. J. Kemker Ms. A. E. Rivera-Varona Ms. L. A. Kent Oaiethoroe Power Corporation Mr. R. B. Brinkman Municipal Electric Authoritv of Georgia Mr. J. E. Fuller Mr. S. M. Jackson

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Page 3 of 3 Dalton Utilities Mr. T. Bundros Westinqhouse Electric Company. LLC Dr. L. Oriani (w/o enclosures)

Mr. D. 0. Durham (w/o enclosures)

Mr. M. M. Corletti Ms. L. G. iller Mr. D. Hawkins Ms. J. Monahan Mr. J. L. Coward Ms. N. E. Deangelis Other Mr. J. E. Hesler, Bechtel Power Corporation Ms. L. Matis, Tetra Tech NUS, Inc.

Dr. W. R. Jacobs, Jr., Ph.D., CDS Associates, inc.

Mr. 8. Roetger, Georgia Public Service Commission Ms. 8. W. Kernizan, Georgia Public Service Commission Mr. K. C. Greene, Troutman Sanders Mr. 8. Blanton, Baich Bingham

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 1 of 7 Southern Nuclear Operating Company ND-18-0227 Enclosure Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 and Unit 4 Completion Plan for Uncompleted ITAAC 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number 565]

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 2 of 7 ITAAC Statement Design Commitment

2. The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 can withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of safety function.

3.a) The Class 1E equipment identified inTable 2.5.5-1 as being qualifiedfor a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function, forthe time required to perform the safety function.

Insoections. Tests. Analvses i) Inspection will be performed to verify that the seismic Category Iequipmentidentified inTable 2.5.5-1 is located on the Nuclear Island.

11) Typetests, analyses, or a combination oftype tests and analyses of seismic Category I equipment will be performed.

ill) Inspection will be performedforthe existence of a report verifying that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.

i) Typetests, analysis, or a combination oftype tests and analysis will be performed on Class 1E equipment located in a harsh environment.

ii) Inspection will be performed ofthe as-built Class 1E equipmentand the associated wiring, cables, and terminations located in a harsh environment.

Acceotance Criteria i) The seismicCategoryIequipment identified in Table2.5.5-1 is locatedon the Nuclear Island.

ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category Iequipmentcan withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of safety function.

iii) Areport existsand concludes thatthe as-built equipment including anchorage isseismicaliy bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.

i) Areport exists and concludesthat the Class 1E equipment identified in Table2.5.5-1 as being qualified fora harsh environment. This equipmentcan withstand the environmental conditions that wouldexist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.

ii) Areport exists and concludesthat the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations identifiedin Table 2.5.5-1 as being qualifiedfor a harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and anaiyses.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 3 of 7 ITAAC Completion Description This ITAAC requires that inspections, tests, and analyses be performed and documented to ensure the In-core Instrumentation System (IIS) equipment identified as seismic Category I or Class 1E in the Combined License (COL) Appendix C, Table 2.5.5-1 (the Table) is designed and constructed in accordance with applicable requirements.

i) The seismic Category I eouioment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 is located on the Nuclear Island.

To assure that seismic Category I equipment can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function, allthe equipment inthe Table is designed to be located on the seismic Category INuclearIsland. In accordance with Equipment Qualification (EG) Walkdown ITAAC Guideline (Reference 1), an inspection is conducted of the IISto confirmthe satisfactory installation of the seismically qualified equipment. The inspection includes verificationof equipment make/model/serial number and verification of equipment location (Building, Elevation, Room). The EG As-Built Reconciliation Reports (EQRR) (Reference 2) identified in Attachment A document the results of the inspection and conclude that the seismic Category I equipment is located on the Nuclear Island.

ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Cateoorv I equipment can withstand seismic design basis dvnamic loads without loss of safetv function.

Seismic Category Iequipment inthe Table requires type tests and/or analyses to demonstrate structural integrity and operability. Structural integrity ofthe passive seismic Category I mechanical equipmentis demonstrated byanalysis in accordance with American Societyof Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Section III (Reference 3).

Safety-related (Class 1E) electrical equipment inthe Table is seismically qualified bytype testing combinedwith analysis in accordance with Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standard 344-1987 (Reference4). Thisequipment includes safety-related (Class 1E) field sensors and the safety-related electrical connectorassemblies. The specific qualification method (i.e., typetesting, analysis, or combination) used foreach piece of equipment in the Table is identified in Attachment A. Additional information about the methods used to qualify API000 safety-relatedequipmentis provided inthe Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Appendix 3D(Reference 5). The EG Reports (Reference 6) identified inAttachment A contain applicable test reports and associated documentation and conclude that the seismicCategory Iequipment can withstand seismicdesign basis loads without loss of safety function.

iiil A reoort exists and concludes that the as-built eouioment including anchorage is seismicallv bounded bv the tested or analvzed conditions.

An inspection (Reference 1) is conducted to confirm the satisfactory installation of the seismicallyqualified equipment inthe Table. The inspectionverifies the equipment make/model/serial number, as-designed equipment mounting orientation, anchorage and clearances, and electrical and other interfaces. The documentation of installed configuration of seismically qualified equipmentincludesphotographs and/or sketches/drawingsof equipment/mounting/interfaces.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 4 of 7 As part of the seismic qualification program, consideration is given to the definition of the clearances needed around the equipment mounted in the plant to permit the equipment to move during a postulated seismic event without causing impact between adjacent pieces ofsafety-related equipment. This is done as part ofseismic testing by measuring the maximum dynamic relative displacement of the top and bottom of the equipment. EQ Reports (Reference 6) identify the equipment mounting employedfor qualification and establish interface requirements forassuring that subsequent in-plant installation does not degrade the established qualification.

Interface requirements are defined based on the test configuration and other design requirements.

Attachment A identifiesthe EQRR (Reference 2) completed to verify that the as-built seismic CategoryIequipment listed in the Table, including anchorage, is seismically bounded bythe tested or analyzed conditions, IEEE Standard 344-1987(Reference 4), and NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.100 (Reference 7).

h A reoort exists and concludes that the Class 1E eauioment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as being Qualified for a harsh environment. This eouioment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, durino. and followino a desion basis accident without loss of safetv function for the time reouired to perform the safetv function.

The harsh environment Class 1E equipment inthe Table is qualified by type testing and/or analyses. Class 1Eelectrical equipment typetesting is performed in accordancewith IEEE Standard 323-1974(Reference 8) and RG 1.89 (Reference 9) to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49. Typetestingofsafety-related equipment meets the requirements of 10 CFR Part50, Appendix A, General Design Criterion 4. Attachment Aidentifies the EQ program and specific qualification method for each pieceofClass IE electrical equipment located in a harsh environment. Additional information about the methods used to qualify API 000 safety-related equipment is provided in the UFSAR Appendix 3D (Reference 5). EQ Reports (Reference 6) identified inAttachmentAcontain applicabletest reports and associated documentation and concludethat the equipment can withstand the environmental conditions that would existbefore, during, andfollowing a design basis accident without lossof safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.

iil A reoort exists and concludes that the as-built Class 1E eouioment and the associated wirino. cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as beino Qualified for a harsh environment are bounded bv tvpe tests, analvses. or a combination of tvoe tests and analvses.

An inspection (Reference 1)isconducted of the IIS toconfirm the satisfactory installation ofthe Class 1E equipmentin the Table. The inspection verifies the equipmentlocation, make/model/serialnumber, as-designed equipment mounting, wiring, cables, and terminations, and confirms that the environmental conditions for the zone (Attachment A) in which the equipment is mounted are bounded bythe tested and/oranalyzed conditions. It also documents the installed configuration with photographs or sketches/drawings of equipment mounting andconnections. The EQRR (Reference 2) identified in Attachment Adocument this inspection and conclude thatthe as-built harshenvironment Class 1Eequipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations are bounded bythe qualified configuration and IEEE Standard 323-1974 (Reference 8).

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 5 of 7 Together, these reports (References 2 and 6) provide evidence that the ITAAC Acceptance Criteria requirements are met:

The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 is located on the Nuclear Island; A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category Iequipment can withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of safety function; A report exists and concludes that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions; A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment. This equipment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident withoutloss of safety function for the time required to performthe safety function; and A report exists and concludes that the as-builtClass 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.5.5-1 as beingqualified fora harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses.

References 2 and 6 are available for NRC inspection as part of the Unit 3 and Unit 4 ITAAC 2.5.05.02.1 Completion Packages (References 10 and 11, respectively).

List of ITAAC Findings Inaccordance with plant procedures for ITAAC completion. Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) performed a review ofall ITAAC findings pertaining to the subject ITAAC and associated correctiveactions. Thisfinding review, which included now-consolidated ITAAC Indexes 566, 567, 568, and 569, found no relevant ITAAC findings associated with this ITAAC.

References (available for NRC inspection) 1.

ND-xx-xx-001, "EG Walkdown ITAACGuideline"

2. EQ As-Built Reconciliation Reports (EQRR) as identified inAttachmentAfor Units 3 and 4
3. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV)

Code,Section III, "Rules for Construction of Nuclear Power Plant Components," 1998 Edition with 2000 Addenda 4.

IEEE Standard 344-1987, "IEEE Recommended Practices for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations"

5. Vogtle 3&4 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Appendix 3D, "Methodology for Qualifying API 000 Safety-Related Electrical and Mechanical Equipment"

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 6 of 7 6.

Equipment Qualification (EG) Reports as identified in Attachment A 7.

Regulatory Guide 1.100, Rev. 2, "Seismic Qualification of Electric and Mechanical Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants" 8.

IEEE Standard 323-1974, "IEEE Standard for Qualifying Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations"

9. Regulatory Guide 1.89, Rev1, "Environmental Qualification ofCertain Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants" 10.2.5.05.02.i-U3-CP-Rev X, "Completion Package for Unit 3 ITAAC 2.5.05.02.i [Index Number 565]"

11.2.5.05.02.i-U4-CP-Rev X, "Completion Package for Unit 4 ITAAC 2.5.05.02.1 [Index Number 565]"

12. NEI 08-01, "Industry Guideline forthe ITAAC Closure Process Under10 CFR Part 52"

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-18-0227 Enclosure Page 7 of 7 Attachment A System: In-core Instrumentation System (IIS)

Equipment Name ^

Seismic Cat. i

  • CiasslE/

Quai. For Harsh Envir.

+

Envir. Zone ^ Envir Quai Program ^

Type of Quai.

EG Reports (Reference 6)

As-Buiit EORR (Reference 2) ^

Incore Thimble Assemblies (at least three assemblies in each core quadrant)

Yes Yes^Wes^^>

1 E*S Type Tests &

Analysis APP-JS94-VBR-002 /

APP-JS94-VBR-001/

APP-JS94-VFR-XXX 2.5.05.02.i-U3-EQRR-PCDXXX Notes:

+ Excerpt from COL Appendix C Tabie 2.5.5-1 1.

See Table 3D.5-1 of UFSAR 2.

E - Electrical Equipment Program S = Quaiified for submergence or operation with spray

  • - Harsh Environment 3.

The Unit 4 As-Built EORR are numbered "2.5.05.02.i-U4-EQRR-PCDXXX"

4. Only applies to the safety-related assemblies. There are at ieast two safety-reiated assemblies in each core quadrant.
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ND-18-0227,_Notice_of_Uncompleted_ITAAC_225-days_Prior_to_Initial_Fuel_Load_Item_2.5.05.02.i_(Index_Number_565)&oldid=5021573"