ML19331B167: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML19331B167
| number = ML19331B167
| issue date = 09/28/1971
| issue date = 09/28/1971
| title = Submits Mapleton Intervenors' Preliminary Views on Environ Issues,In Response to ASLB 710826 Order.Concurs W/Saginaw Intervenors' Views.Environ Issues Will Be Stated in Greater Detail After Applicant & NRC Submissions
| title = Submits Mapleton Intervenors Preliminary Views on Environ Issues,In Response to ASLB 710826 Order.Concurs W/Saginaw Intervenors Views.Environ Issues Will Be Stated in Greater Detail After Applicant & NRC Submissions
| author name = Like I
| author name = Like I
| author affiliation = REILLY & LIKE
| author affiliation = REILLY & LIKE
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
              ,                  gggggggg UOW1 hu:Mtn elm p"
gggggggg UOW1 hu:Mtn elm PROD. & UUL, ToJ1.380 p
PROD. & UUL, ToJ1.380 007 11971 e. O nzrr.r.r, tras Axn senxeroen Qw sanast                   cocw6stsons Ar 2.aw q,         8" soo waar xAzw stazur
007 11971 e. O nzrr.r.r, tras Axn senxeroen Qw sanast cocw6stsons Ar 2.aw 8"
                                                @            mAarson,z.v.uroa g,.g.,,,,                                     xo -. e-sooo
q, soo waar xAzw stazur mAarson,z.v.uroa g,.g.,,,,
                ,,=y,,-==,,=..
xo -. e-sooo
                                                                                                          -.=, .-.
-.=,.-.
                                                                                                        . A, -,
,,=y,,-==,,=... '
September 28, 1971             -
. A, -,
                                                                                                                /         \
September 28, 1971
Arthur W. Murphy, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board                                             s           .,
/
Columbia University School of Law                                     .
\\
                                                                                                                ),
Arthur W. Murphy, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board s
                                                                                                                ','      f~2 g                   Box 38, 435 West 116th Street                                                               NC New York, N.Y. 10027                                                                         4'/
Columbia University School of Law
V
),
    '                                                                                            - 6.-
f~2 g
Ret In the Hatter of Consumers Power Compan Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-329 and 50-330 Dear Professor Murphys Mapleton intervenors hereby submit under protest, their pre-liminary statement of views on environmen,tal questions, as re-quested by the Board in its order of August 26, 1971. Mapleton reserves its right to present its views on environmental questions and to raise environmental issues at an appropriate stage of this proceeding after the applicant has filed its supplementary environ.
Box 38, 435 West 116th Street
',' NC New York, N.Y. 10027 4'/
- 6.-
V Ret In the Hatter of Consumers Power Compan Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-329 and 50-330 Dear Professor Murphys Mapleton intervenors hereby submit under protest, their pre-liminary statement of views on environmen,tal questions, as re-quested by the Board in its order of August 26, 1971. Mapleton reserves its right to present its views on environmental questions and to raise environmental issues at an appropriate stage of this proceeding after the applicant has filed its supplementary environ.
mental report and the Staff has filed its detailed environmental statement on environmental issues, in accordance with the require-ments of the Calvert Cliffs decision and the post-Calvert Cliffs
mental report and the Staff has filed its detailed environmental statement on environmental issues, in accordance with the require-ments of the Calvert Cliffs decision and the post-Calvert Cliffs
* implementing regulations of the AEC.
* implementing regulations of the AEC.
In general, Mapleton believes that all adverse environmental effects fuel cycle,  and social and economic costs associated with the nuclear fuel enrichment,       to wit, mining, milling, feed material preparation, fuel fabrication, reactor operation, transpor-tation, fuel reprocessing, and ultimate high-level radioactive waste storage and disposal should be considered in this proceeding.
In general, Mapleton believes that all adverse environmental effects and social and economic costs associated with the nuclear fuel cycle, to wit, mining, milling, feed material preparation, fuel enrichment, fuel fabrication, reactor operation, transpor-tation, fuel reprocessing, and ultimate high-level radioactive waste storage and disposal should be considered in this proceeding.
Each phase of the nuclear energy technology is interdependent with the ones which precede and follow it, and each has an immediate or long-term effect on the environment. Each is relevant to the issues in a reactor licensing proceeding.
Each phase of the nuclear energy technology is interdependent with the ones which precede and follow it, and each has an immediate or long-term effect on the environment. Each is relevant to the issues in a reactor licensing proceeding.
i i
i i
l                                 The proposed nuclear reactor is a point in the nuclear fuel cycle spectrum. The effluent which comes out of the plant in the l                    wastes discharged. to the atmosphere or receiving body of water, or I                    removal from the plant, and which is shipped from the plant, has an immediate and long-term effect on the environment, and constitutes a drain upon scarce uranium retources.
l The proposed nuclear reactor is a point in the nuclear fuel cycle spectrum. The effluent which comes out of the plant in the wastes discharged. to the atmosphere or receiving body of water, or l
removal from the plant, and which is shipped from the plant, has an I
immediate and long-term effect on the environment, and constitutes a drain upon scarce uranium retources.
l l
l l
l 1
l 1
Line 44: Line 49:
i l
i l
x
x
                                                                                                                            /
/
8007250 h                         _
8007250 h
^
g
g
                                                                                                                      ^


Raitty. IJu's ano Senwatoen
Raitty. IJu's ano Senwatoen September 28, 1971 Arthur W.
.                                                                September 28, 1971 Arthur W. Murphy, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Board The Board should request from the applicant and the Staff evidence of the probable impact and long-term effect of the wastes to be shipped away from the proposed reactor on the in-transit environment through which the wastes are transported, the environ-ment of the fuel reprocessing plant which will handle such wastes, and on the environment of the perpetual care repository of the long lived high-level radioactive wastes generated by such re-actor.
Murphy, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Board The Board should request from the applicant and the Staff evidence of the probable impact and long-term effect of the wastes to be shipped away from the proposed reactor on the in-transit environment through which the wastes are transported, the environ-ment of the fuel reprocessing plant which will handle such wastes, and on the environment of the perpetual care repository of the long lived high-level radioactive wastes generated by such re-actor.
The intervention of the State of Kansas in this proceeding requires the Board to consider the issue of ultimate disposition of such high-level radioactivt wastes.
The intervention of the State of Kansas in this proceeding requires the Board to consider the issue of ultimate disposition of such high-level radioactivt wastes.
Mapleton concurs with Saginaw intervenors in their views as to the environmental issues involved in this proceeding.
Mapleton concurs with Saginaw intervenors in their views as to the environmental issues involved in this proceeding.
We believe, however, it is prematurs to specify the environ-mental issues in any gre-ter detail until we have received appli-cant's and Staff's environmental submissions.
We believe, however, it is prematurs to specify the environ-mental issues in any gre-ter detail until we have received appli-cant's and Staff's environmental submissions.
* We intend to presert substantial evidence on environmental*
We intend to presert substantial evidence on environmental issues.
issues.                                                               ,
As evidence of this intent, we served (although we were not obliged to) Professor Eckert's tastimony.
As evidence of this intent, we served (although we were not obliged to) Professor Eckert's tastimony.
As further evidence that Mapleton has undertaken to assemble further environmental evidence, as stated in our letter of September 14, 1971, we serve now, without prejudice, the statement of Dr.
As further evidence that Mapleton has undertaken to assemble further environmental evidence, as stated in our letter of September 14, 1971, we serve now, without prejudice, the statement of Dr.
Charles W. Huver.
Charles W. Huver.
Discovery For the reasons stated in our letter of September 14, 1971, Mapleton believes motions for discovery are premature at this time.
Discovery For the reasons stated in our letter of September 14, 1971, Mapleton believes motions for discovery are premature at this time.
We however serve notice that we will, af ter the filing of appli-cant's and Staff's further environmental submissions, move for discovery of all documents underlying such submissions or relied m--m-             = -.+d     ,a 4 mm....m,   g,a.eem ww., .,m         , , ,
We however serve notice that we will, af ter the filing of appli-cant's and Staff's further environmental submissions, move for discovery of all documents underlying such submissions or relied m--m-
=
-.+d
,a 4
mm....m, g,a.eem ww.,
.,m


      ,    RI "ty 1. sus axo Scswassaa September 28, 1971         l
RI "ty 1. sus axo Scswassaa September 28, 1971 l
                                                            '                                            l Arthur W. Murphy, Esq., Chairman                                                       l Atomic Safety & Licensing Board 3
l Arthur W. Murphy, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Board 3
upon   in the preparation thereof, or referred to therein by appli-cant and Staff.
upon in the preparation thereof, or referred to therein by appli-cant and Staff.
pec fully               ,
pec fully ILLY LIKE & SCI ER ILame g Like Enc.
ILLY LIKE & SCI           ER g Like ILame Enc.
l copy tos ASLB members Secretary All counsel of record e
l copy tos ASLB members Secretary All counsel of record e
4
4
    'l e
'l e
O a
O a
                                                  . .-e-         -
.-e-y 2---v
_ _ _              y 2---v   "-'}}
"-'}}

Latest revision as of 04:21, 31 December 2024

Submits Mapleton Intervenors Preliminary Views on Environ Issues,In Response to ASLB 710826 Order.Concurs W/Saginaw Intervenors Views.Environ Issues Will Be Stated in Greater Detail After Applicant & NRC Submissions
ML19331B167
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 09/28/1971
From: Like I
REILLY & LIKE
To: Murphy A
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19331B168 List:
References
NUDOCS 8007250857
Download: ML19331B167 (3)


Text

.

gggggggg UOW1 hu:Mtn elm PROD. & UUL, ToJ1.380 p

007 11971 e. O nzrr.r.r, tras Axn senxeroen Qw sanast cocw6stsons Ar 2.aw 8"

q, soo waar xAzw stazur mAarson,z.v.uroa g,.g.,,,,

xo -. e-sooo

-.=,.-.

,,=y,,-==,,=... '

. A, -,

September 28, 1971

/

\\

Arthur W. Murphy, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board s

Columbia University School of Law

),

f~2 g

Box 38, 435 West 116th Street

',' NC New York, N.Y. 10027 4'/

- 6.-

V Ret In the Hatter of Consumers Power Compan Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-329 and 50-330 Dear Professor Murphys Mapleton intervenors hereby submit under protest, their pre-liminary statement of views on environmen,tal questions, as re-quested by the Board in its order of August 26, 1971. Mapleton reserves its right to present its views on environmental questions and to raise environmental issues at an appropriate stage of this proceeding after the applicant has filed its supplementary environ.

mental report and the Staff has filed its detailed environmental statement on environmental issues, in accordance with the require-ments of the Calvert Cliffs decision and the post-Calvert Cliffs

  • implementing regulations of the AEC.

In general, Mapleton believes that all adverse environmental effects and social and economic costs associated with the nuclear fuel cycle, to wit, mining, milling, feed material preparation, fuel enrichment, fuel fabrication, reactor operation, transpor-tation, fuel reprocessing, and ultimate high-level radioactive waste storage and disposal should be considered in this proceeding.

Each phase of the nuclear energy technology is interdependent with the ones which precede and follow it, and each has an immediate or long-term effect on the environment. Each is relevant to the issues in a reactor licensing proceeding.

i i

l The proposed nuclear reactor is a point in the nuclear fuel cycle spectrum. The effluent which comes out of the plant in the wastes discharged. to the atmosphere or receiving body of water, or l

removal from the plant, and which is shipped from the plant, has an I

immediate and long-term effect on the environment, and constitutes a drain upon scarce uranium retources.

l l

l 1

TMS DOCUMENT CONTAINS POOR QUAUTY PAGES 1

i l

x

/

8007250 h

^

g

Raitty. IJu's ano Senwatoen September 28, 1971 Arthur W.

Murphy, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Board The Board should request from the applicant and the Staff evidence of the probable impact and long-term effect of the wastes to be shipped away from the proposed reactor on the in-transit environment through which the wastes are transported, the environ-ment of the fuel reprocessing plant which will handle such wastes, and on the environment of the perpetual care repository of the long lived high-level radioactive wastes generated by such re-actor.

The intervention of the State of Kansas in this proceeding requires the Board to consider the issue of ultimate disposition of such high-level radioactivt wastes.

Mapleton concurs with Saginaw intervenors in their views as to the environmental issues involved in this proceeding.

We believe, however, it is prematurs to specify the environ-mental issues in any gre-ter detail until we have received appli-cant's and Staff's environmental submissions.

We intend to presert substantial evidence on environmental issues.

As evidence of this intent, we served (although we were not obliged to) Professor Eckert's tastimony.

As further evidence that Mapleton has undertaken to assemble further environmental evidence, as stated in our letter of September 14, 1971, we serve now, without prejudice, the statement of Dr.

Charles W. Huver.

Discovery For the reasons stated in our letter of September 14, 1971, Mapleton believes motions for discovery are premature at this time.

We however serve notice that we will, af ter the filing of appli-cant's and Staff's further environmental submissions, move for discovery of all documents underlying such submissions or relied m--m-

=

-.+d

,a 4

mm....m, g,a.eem ww.,

.,m

RI "ty 1. sus axo Scswassaa September 28, 1971 l

l Arthur W. Murphy, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Board 3

upon in the preparation thereof, or referred to therein by appli-cant and Staff.

pec fully ILLY LIKE & SCI ER ILame g Like Enc.

l copy tos ASLB members Secretary All counsel of record e

4

'l e

O a

.-e-y 2---v

"-'