ML20004F908: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-
{{#Wiki_filter:-
i   .
i Deholt M]SCn NY!!U *i" June 24, 1981 EF2-53793, Rev. A /IF '
Deholt M]SCn NY!!U *i" June 24, 1981                 _
, f).
EF2-53793, Rev. A /IF '
^ '/
                                                                          , f).
\\
                                                                                  ^ '/     .
[
                                                                          \
Q 6
[       Q       6
fY f
                                                                  . \.3 >    9fY          fi
. \\.3 9
                                                                        \
i V
Mr. L. L. Kintner                                           V    f' Division of Project Management                  ,        N\ p/,g -       6 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation                           Q
f'
              ~U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
\\
Mr. L. L. Kintner N p/,g -
\\
6 Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Q
~U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
Line 33: Line 39:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
PSB Position (8.3.5)         -
PSB Position (8.3.5)
Reactor Containment Electrical Penetrations
Reactor Containment Electrical Penetrations


==Dear Mr. Kintner:==
==Dear Mr. Kintner:==
Please find attached Detroit Edison's revised response to the draf t PSB position (PSB-2) on Reactor Containment Elect 1Acal Penetrations.
Please find attached Detroit Edison's revised response to the draf t PSB position (PSB-2) on Reactor Containment Elect 1Acal Penetrations.
Sincerely, 7M f                 b William F. Colbert Technical Director Enric Fermi Unit #2 RB/w                                                                 OOl lll
Sincerely, 7M f b
      '810 e 2 a o/(s 9'                   g
William F. Colbert Technical Director Enric Fermi Unit #2 RB/w OOl lll
'810 e 2 a o/(s 9' g


8                                                                                   ,
8 l[
l[     4' Juna 22, 1981
4' Juna 22, 1981 EF2-53793 Rev. A
  ~
~
EF2-53793 Rev. A ATTACHMENT.                                      .
ATTACHMENT.
POSITION ON REACTOR CONTAINMENT PRIMARY ELECTRICAL PENETRATION PROTECTION                                                                               ,
POSITION ON REACTOR CONTAINMENT PRIMARY ELECTRICAL PENETRATION PROTECTION
                  -The. Detroit Edison. Company Fermi 2 Project, .has made a review of the
-The. Detroit Edison. Company Fermi 2 Project,.has made a review of the
                  -Reactor' Containment Primary Electrical. Penetrations. The main objective Lof this' review wassto-determine that the electricalipenetration1
-Reactor' Containment Primary Electrical. Penetrations. The main objective Lof this' review wassto-determine that the electricalipenetration1 0
:assembliescare designed to withstand, without the;1oss of mechanical integrity, the ' maximum available. fault current versus time ' conditions
:assembliescare designed to withstand, without the;1oss of mechanical integrity, the ' maximum available. fault current versus time ' conditions that could occur,~given single random failures of circuit overload-
                                                                    ~
~
that could occur,~given single random failures of circuit overload-
. devices-as recommended by Regulatory Guide 1.63, Revision 1.
                  . devices-as recommended by Regulatory Guide 1.63, Revision 1.
'" Electrical Penetration Assemblies in Containment Structures for
                  '" Electrical Penetration Assemblies in Containment Structures for
. Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants".
                . Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants".
In making the review,'the fol?owing assumption was primary:
In making the review,'the fol?owing assumption was primary:
                  -The I 2t characteristics of the penetration conductors as #urnished by Conax Corp. were used as a basis #or determining integrity. It is realized, however, that the I t'2 curves as furnished by Conax Corp.
2
r                -are conservative in nature and that the I E t curve points are not necessarily 1the points of damage to the mechanical integrity of the penetrations.
-The I t characteristics of the penetration conductors as #urnished by Conax Corp. were used as a basis #or determining integrity. It is that the I t' curves as furnished by Conax Corp.
                  ;However,-in our. review, we followed this conservatism, giving additional assurance that-potential-damage ~to the penetration is thereby reduced to nilJif properly protected.
2 realized, however, E
                - -The lfollowing positions. are taken by Detroit Edison, based on the results of this review. These positions are in line with the guidelines set forth 'in Regulatory Guide'l.63..
-are conservative in nature and that the I t curve points are not necessarily r
For-low-energy penetrations, maximum fault current does not approach the I 2tsof the penetration conductor;'no, backup or redundant protection is provided.
1the points of damage to the mechanical integrity of the penetrations.
On;1ow-voltage oower penetrations where maximum fault current versus time will i                 exceed the I t of the penetration conductor (considering single random failure l-                 of the primary pcocection) backup protection will be provided by one of the two following methods:
;However,-in our. review, we followed this conservatism, giving additional assurance that-potential-damage ~to the penetration is thereby reduced to nilJif properly protected.
,;                          1. cIf adequate backup pratection can be obtained from the feeder
- -The lfollowing positions. are taken by Detroit Edison, based on the results of this review. These positions are in line with the guidelines set forth 'in Regulatory Guide'l.63..
[                               . position and the fault can be cleared in sufficient time to
For-low-energy penetrations, maximum fault current does not approach the 2I tsof the penetration conductor;'no, backup or redundant protection is provided.
On;1ow-voltage oower penetrations where maximum fault current versus time will i
exceed the I t of the penetration conductor (considering single random failure l-of the primary pcocection) backup protection will be provided by one of the two following methods:
: 1. cIf adequate backup pratection can be obtained from the feeder
[
. position and the fault can be cleared in sufficient time to 2
prevent reaching the I t of the penetration conductor - no
[
[
prevent reaching the I 2t of the penetration conductor - no L                               additional ~ redundant protective devices will be provided.                                                                       ,
L additional ~ redundant protective devices will be provided.
I-l' l-I,                       '
I-l' l-I, l -
l -
l:
l:
1 1
1 1
1.~  ..        . _..      ..-4 . _ -. . ;- -;  _.~.3-    . _ , . - , , . . . _ . . -  - , , , , ,-.J._,       . . . . . . - . _ . , - - . . - . . . - ,-
,-.J._,
1.~
..-4
.~.3-


                                                                  ~.
~.
1,...
1,...
                                                                          'Juna 22, 1981 EF2-53793 Rev. A
'Juna 22, 1981 EF2-53793 Rev. A 2.
: 2. Where the feeder position cannot provide adequate clearing time, an additional protective device, fuse or breaker'as necessary, will be provided.
Where the feeder position cannot provide adequate clearing time, an additional protective device, fuse or breaker'as necessary, will be provided.
            ~ There are only two medium voltage power penetrations. These are used for the Reactor Recirculation Pump Motor MG set output from the generator to
~ There are only two medium voltage power penetrations. These are used for the Reactor Recirculation Pump Motor MG set output from the generator to
            - the pump motors. In ?hese cases the primary protection is provided by tripping the main MG set motor drive incoming circuit breaker. positions.
- the pump motors. In ?hese cases the primary protection is provided by tripping the main MG set motor drive incoming circuit breaker. positions.
            - Backup protection is provided by tripping che generator field breakers.
- Backup protection is provided by tripping che generator field breakers.
            -Proper relaying assures operati.on of the field breaker.
-Proper relaying assures operati.on of the field breaker.
Loads 'to the primary containment not necessary for reactor operation, i.e.,
Loads 'to the primary containment not necessary for reactor operation, i.e.,
lighting and welding will be naintained in a deenergized condition.
lighting and welding will be naintained in a deenergized condition.
.-            Although every effort will be made to complete the installation of necessary-redundant devices in time for fuel load, we do commit to completing all such work by. time of the first refueling outage.
Although every effort will be made to complete the installation of necessary-redundant devices in time for fuel load, we do commit to completing all such work by. time of the first refueling outage.
9 0
9 0
r 5__   _a
r 5__
_a
_}}
_}}

Latest revision as of 11:23, 23 December 2024

Forwards Revised Response to Draft Power Sys Branch Position 8.3.5 Re Reactor Containment Electrical Penetrations
ML20004F908
Person / Time
Site: Fermi 
Issue date: 06/24/1981
From: Colbert W
DETROIT EDISON CO.
To: Kintner L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
EF2-53793, NUDOCS 8106260164
Download: ML20004F908 (3)


Text

-

i Deholt M]SCn NY!!U *i" June 24, 1981 EF2-53793, Rev. A /IF '

, f).

^ '/

\\

[

Q 6

fY f

. \\.3 9

i V

f'

\\

Mr. L. L. Kintner N p/,g -

\\

6 Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Q

~U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

Reference:

Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit #2 NRC Docket No. 50-341

Subject:

PSB Position (8.3.5)

Reactor Containment Electrical Penetrations

Dear Mr. Kintner:

Please find attached Detroit Edison's revised response to the draf t PSB position (PSB-2) on Reactor Containment Elect 1Acal Penetrations.

Sincerely, 7M f b

William F. Colbert Technical Director Enric Fermi Unit #2 RB/w OOl lll

'810 e 2 a o/(s 9' g

8 l[

4' Juna 22, 1981 EF2-53793 Rev. A

~

ATTACHMENT.

POSITION ON REACTOR CONTAINMENT PRIMARY ELECTRICAL PENETRATION PROTECTION

-The. Detroit Edison. Company Fermi 2 Project,.has made a review of the

-Reactor' Containment Primary Electrical. Penetrations. The main objective Lof this' review wassto-determine that the electricalipenetration1 0

assembliescare designed to withstand, without the;1oss of mechanical integrity, the ' maximum available. fault current versus time ' conditions that could occur,~given single random failures of circuit overload-

~

. devices-as recommended by Regulatory Guide 1.63, Revision 1.

'" Electrical Penetration Assemblies in Containment Structures for

. Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants".

In making the review,'the fol?owing assumption was primary:

2

-The I t characteristics of the penetration conductors as #urnished by Conax Corp. were used as a basis #or determining integrity. It is that the I t' curves as furnished by Conax Corp.

2 realized, however, E

-are conservative in nature and that the I t curve points are not necessarily r

1the points of damage to the mechanical integrity of the penetrations.

However,-in our. review, we followed this conservatism, giving additional assurance that-potential-damage ~to the penetration is thereby reduced to nilJif properly protected.

- -The lfollowing positions. are taken by Detroit Edison, based on the results of this review. These positions are in line with the guidelines set forth 'in Regulatory Guide'l.63..

For-low-energy penetrations, maximum fault current does not approach the 2I tsof the penetration conductor;'no, backup or redundant protection is provided.

On;1ow-voltage oower penetrations where maximum fault current versus time will i

exceed the I t of the penetration conductor (considering single random failure l-of the primary pcocection) backup protection will be provided by one of the two following methods:

1. cIf adequate backup pratection can be obtained from the feeder

[

. position and the fault can be cleared in sufficient time to 2

prevent reaching the I t of the penetration conductor - no

[

L additional ~ redundant protective devices will be provided.

I-l' l-I, l -

l:

1 1

,-.J._,

1.~

..-4

.~.3-

~.

1,...

'Juna 22, 1981 EF2-53793 Rev. A 2.

Where the feeder position cannot provide adequate clearing time, an additional protective device, fuse or breaker'as necessary, will be provided.

~ There are only two medium voltage power penetrations. These are used for the Reactor Recirculation Pump Motor MG set output from the generator to

- the pump motors. In ?hese cases the primary protection is provided by tripping the main MG set motor drive incoming circuit breaker. positions.

- Backup protection is provided by tripping che generator field breakers.

-Proper relaying assures operati.on of the field breaker.

Loads 'to the primary containment not necessary for reactor operation, i.e.,

lighting and welding will be naintained in a deenergized condition.

Although every effort will be made to complete the installation of necessary-redundant devices in time for fuel load, we do commit to completing all such work by. time of the first refueling outage.

9 0

r 5__

_a

_