ML20005E197: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:(-. ' Alabama Power Company .
{{#Wiki_filter:(-.
' Alabama Power Company.
40 inverness Center Parkway
40 inverness Center Parkway
* Post Ottece 00 1295" Dirrningham, Alabama 35201 Telephone 205 0045581 W. G Hairston, til Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations                                                   ggg g,g tre swwn eroc system December 27. 1989 e
* Post Ottece 00 1295" Dirrningham, Alabama 35201 Telephone 205 0045581 W. G Hairston, til Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations ggg g,g December 27. 1989 tre swwn eroc system e
  !    Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364
Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Attention: Document Control Desk washington, D. C. 20555
  ;-    U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Attention: Document Control Desk
  '    washington, D. C. 20555


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Reply to a Notice of Violation J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant NRC Inspection of September 11 - October 10, 1989 RE:           Report Number 50-348/89-22-01 50-364/89-22-01 Gentlemen:
Reply to a Notice of Violation J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant NRC Inspection of September 11 - October 10, 1989 RE:
his letter refers to the violation cited in the subject inspection reports
Report Number 50-348/89-22-01 50-364/89-22-01 Gentlemen:
  ,      which state:
his letter refers to the violation cited in the subject inspection reports which state:
        "During the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) inspection conducted on September 11 - October 10, 1989, violations of NRC requirements were identified.
"During the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) inspection conducted on September 11 - October 10, 1989, violations of NRC requirements were identified.
Wis violation involved a breach of containment integrity (one violation was previously discussed in a letter to Alabama Power dated November 9, 1989). In accordance with the ' General Statement of Policy Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,' 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), this violation is c.ited below:
Wis violation involved a breach of containment integrity (one violation was previously discussed in a letter to Alabama Power dated November 9, 1989). In accordance with the ' General Statement of Policy Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,' 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), this violation is c.ited below:
A.     Technical Specification 3.9.4.C requires, during core alteration or movement of irradiated fuel within containment, that each containment building penetration providing direct access from the containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere be either closed by an isolation valve, blind flange, or manual valve.
A.
I contrary to the above, on October 1, 1989, Unit I containment integrity was
Technical Specification 3.9.4.C requires, during core alteration or movement of irradiated fuel within containment, that each containment building penetration providing direct access from the containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere be either closed by an isolation valve, blind flange, or manual valve.
'                breached during a core alteration involving the unlatching of the control
contrary to the above, on October 1, 1989, Unit I containment integrity was I
;                rod drive mechanisms. The unlatching of the control rods was performed L                 from 12:45 p.m. until about 7:48 p.m. on october 1. During that time the atmospheric relief valves for each of the steam generators were open and the secondary manway cover for steam generator 1C was open for the duration l
breached during a core alteration involving the unlatching of the control rod drive mechanisms. The unlatching of the control rods was performed L
of the core alteration. The secondary manway cover for the IB steam generator was replaced at 2:00 p.m. The open steam generator manways and the open atmospheric relief valves constitute a pathway from the containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere during the core alterations.
from 12:45 p.m. until about 7:48 p.m. on october 1.
During that time the atmospheric relief valves for each of the steam generators were open and the secondary manway cover for steam generator 1C was open for the duration l
of the core alteration. The secondary manway cover for the IB steam generator was replaced at 2:00 p.m.
The open steam generator manways and the open atmospheric relief valves constitute a pathway from the containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere during the core alterations.
This a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I)."
This a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I)."
9001040054 E:91227                                                             /
9001040054 E:91227 PDR ADOCK 05000348
PDR       ADOCK 05000348                                                               i I
/
O                           PDC                                                           h
I h i
O PDC
(
(


{ ...o Nuclear Regulatory Comission
{
          . December 27, 1989 Page 2 Admission or Denial The above violation occurred as described in the subject reports.
...o Nuclear Regulatory Comission December 27, 1989 Page 2 Admission or Denial The above violation occurred as described in the subject reports.
Reason for Violation his violation was caused by personnel error in that the Shif t Supervisor and Shift Foreman involved failed to follow existing procedures for valve position verification.
Reason for Violation his violation was caused by personnel error in that the Shif t Supervisor and Shift Foreman involved failed to follow existing procedures for valve position verification.
Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved
Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved 1.
: 1. We steam generator atmospheric relief valve was closed.
We steam generator atmospheric relief valve was closed.
: 2. Management suspended all core alterations until a detailed check of all containment penetrations was performed to verify containment refueling integrity was properly established.
2.
i Corrective Steps To Avoid Further Violations
Management suspended all core alterations until a detailed check of all containment penetrations was performed to verify containment refueling integrity was properly established.
: 1. h e Shiit Supervisor and Shift Foreman involved in this event were counseled about properly verifying the status of equipment.
i Corrective Steps To Avoid Further Violations 1.
: 2. A detailed check of all containment penetrations was performed to verify containment refueling integrity was properly established.
h e Shiit Supervisor and Shift Foreman involved in this event were counseled about properly verifying the status of equipment.
: 3. All Operations crews were briefed on this event.
2.
: 4. The procedure for establishing containment refueling integrity was strengthened by adding explicit signoffs for containment penetrations with verification requirements to ensure that containment refueling integrity is properly established.
A detailed check of all containment penetrations was performed to verify containment refueling integrity was properly established.
3.
All Operations crews were briefed on this event.
4.
The procedure for establishing containment refueling integrity was strengthened by adding explicit signoffs for containment penetrations with verification requirements to ensure that containment refueling integrity is properly established.
Date of Pull Compliance December 5, 1989 Affirmation f-I affirm that this response is true and complete to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. The information contained in this letter is not considered to be of a proprietary nature.
Date of Pull Compliance December 5, 1989 Affirmation f-I affirm that this response is true and complete to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. The information contained in this letter is not considered to be of a proprietary nature.
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
: d. k Ma ,W K W. G. Hairston, III l
: d. k Ma,W K W. G. Hairston, III l
WGH:emb-5.9 cet     Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. E. A. Reeves Mr. G. F. Maxwell}}
WGH:emb-5.9 cet Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. E. A. Reeves Mr. G. F. Maxwell}}

Latest revision as of 08:45, 23 December 2024

Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-348/89-22 & 50-364/89-22 on 890911-1010.Corrective Actions:Steam Generator Atmospheric Relief Valve Closed & Core Operations Suspended.Shift Supervisor Involved in Event Counseled
ML20005E197
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 12/27/1989
From: Hairston W
ALABAMA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9001040054
Download: ML20005E197 (2)


Text

(-.

' Alabama Power Company.

40 inverness Center Parkway

  • Post Ottece 00 1295" Dirrningham, Alabama 35201 Telephone 205 0045581 W. G Hairston, til Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations ggg g,g December 27. 1989 tre swwn eroc system e

Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Attention: Document Control Desk washington, D. C. 20555

SUBJECT:

Reply to a Notice of Violation J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant NRC Inspection of September 11 - October 10, 1989 RE:

Report Number 50-348/89-22-01 50-364/89-22-01 Gentlemen:

his letter refers to the violation cited in the subject inspection reports which state:

"During the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) inspection conducted on September 11 - October 10, 1989, violations of NRC requirements were identified.

Wis violation involved a breach of containment integrity (one violation was previously discussed in a letter to Alabama Power dated November 9, 1989). In accordance with the ' General Statement of Policy Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,' 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), this violation is c.ited below:

A.

Technical Specification 3.9.4.C requires, during core alteration or movement of irradiated fuel within containment, that each containment building penetration providing direct access from the containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere be either closed by an isolation valve, blind flange, or manual valve.

contrary to the above, on October 1, 1989, Unit I containment integrity was I

breached during a core alteration involving the unlatching of the control rod drive mechanisms. The unlatching of the control rods was performed L

from 12:45 p.m. until about 7:48 p.m. on october 1.

During that time the atmospheric relief valves for each of the steam generators were open and the secondary manway cover for steam generator 1C was open for the duration l

of the core alteration. The secondary manway cover for the IB steam generator was replaced at 2:00 p.m.

The open steam generator manways and the open atmospheric relief valves constitute a pathway from the containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere during the core alterations.

This a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I)."

9001040054 E:91227 PDR ADOCK 05000348

/

I h i

O PDC

(

{

...o Nuclear Regulatory Comission December 27, 1989 Page 2 Admission or Denial The above violation occurred as described in the subject reports.

Reason for Violation his violation was caused by personnel error in that the Shif t Supervisor and Shift Foreman involved failed to follow existing procedures for valve position verification.

Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved 1.

We steam generator atmospheric relief valve was closed.

2.

Management suspended all core alterations until a detailed check of all containment penetrations was performed to verify containment refueling integrity was properly established.

i Corrective Steps To Avoid Further Violations 1.

h e Shiit Supervisor and Shift Foreman involved in this event were counseled about properly verifying the status of equipment.

2.

A detailed check of all containment penetrations was performed to verify containment refueling integrity was properly established.

3.

All Operations crews were briefed on this event.

4.

The procedure for establishing containment refueling integrity was strengthened by adding explicit signoffs for containment penetrations with verification requirements to ensure that containment refueling integrity is properly established.

Date of Pull Compliance December 5, 1989 Affirmation f-I affirm that this response is true and complete to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. The information contained in this letter is not considered to be of a proprietary nature.

Respectfully submitted,

d. k Ma,W K W. G. Hairston, III l

WGH:emb-5.9 cet Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. E. A. Reeves Mr. G. F. Maxwell