ML20007E553: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20007E553 | | number = ML20007E553 | ||
| issue date = 01/07/2020 | | issue date = 01/07/2020 | ||
| title = COL Docs - FW: LAR-19-018: | | title = COL Docs - FW: LAR-19-018: PCS Wetted Perimeter Test Modification | ||
| author name = | | author name = | ||
| author affiliation = NRC | | author affiliation = NRC | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | {{#Wiki_filter:From: | ||
Rankin, Jennivine Sent: | |||
Tuesday, January 7, 2020 9:15 AM To: | |||
Vogtle PEmails | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: LAR-19-018: PCS Wetted Perimeter Test Modification For discussion at January 9, 2020 public meeting. | FW: LAR-19-018: PCS Wetted Perimeter Test Modification For discussion at January 9, 2020 public meeting. | ||
From: Rankin, Jennivine Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2019 8:32 AM To: Kellenberger, Nicholas <X2NRKELL@SOUTHERNCO.COM> | From: Rankin, Jennivine Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2019 8:32 AM To: Kellenberger, Nicholas <X2NRKELL@SOUTHERNCO.COM> | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
| Line 27: | Line 30: | ||
: 1. Can SNC and WEC step through the methods/testing in WCAP-15846 that were used to determine why 90% wetted perimeter coverage is equivalent at the 266 elevation and the 244 elevation? | : 1. Can SNC and WEC step through the methods/testing in WCAP-15846 that were used to determine why 90% wetted perimeter coverage is equivalent at the 266 elevation and the 244 elevation? | ||
: 2. Is the difference in measurement location accounted for in the engineering evaluation relative to the ITAAC acceptance criteria? Did SNC account for measurement uncertainty and obstructions such as baffle supports and lifting lugs? | : 2. Is the difference in measurement location accounted for in the engineering evaluation relative to the ITAAC acceptance criteria? Did SNC account for measurement uncertainty and obstructions such as baffle supports and lifting lugs? | ||
: Thanks, Jennie Jennie Rankin, Project Manager Vogtle Project Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | : Thanks, Jennie Jennie Rankin, Project Manager Vogtle Project Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
Hearing Identifier: | Hearing Identifier: | ||
Vogtle_COL_Docs_Public Email Number: | |||
515 Mail Envelope Properties (BY5PR09MB481843DE1A9A665804EC6A7E983F0) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: LAR-19-018: PCS Wetted Perimeter Test Modification Sent Date: | FW: LAR-19-018: PCS Wetted Perimeter Test Modification Sent Date: | ||
1/7/2020 9:14:34 AM Received Date: | |||
1/7/2020 9:14:38 AM From: | |||
Rankin, Jennivine Created By: | |||
Jennivine.Rankin@nrc.gov Recipients: | |||
"Vogtle PEmails" <Vogtle.PEmails@nrc.gov> | "Vogtle PEmails" <Vogtle.PEmails@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
BY5PR09MB4818.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1370 1/7/2020 9:14:38 AM Options Priority: | |||
Normal Return Notification: | |||
No Reply Requested: | |||
No Sensitivity: | |||
Normal Expiration Date:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 03:07, 23 December 2024
| ML20007E553 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 01/07/2020 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | NRC/NRR/DNRL |
| References | |
| Download: ML20007E553 (2) | |
Text
From:
Rankin, Jennivine Sent:
Tuesday, January 7, 2020 9:15 AM To:
Vogtle PEmails
Subject:
FW: LAR-19-018: PCS Wetted Perimeter Test Modification For discussion at January 9, 2020 public meeting.
From: Rankin, Jennivine Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2019 8:32 AM To: Kellenberger, Nicholas <X2NRKELL@SOUTHERNCO.COM>
Subject:
LAR-19-018: PCS Wetted Perimeter Test Modification Hi Nick -
As mentioned previously, the staff has met to discuss LAR 19-018 regarding PCS Wetted Perimeter Test Modification. The staff would like to discuss the following discussion topics on January 9, 2020. The purpose of the call is to gain additional understanding so the NRC staff can verify that measuring the wetted perimeter at a different location does not change the wetted surface area as credited in the design basis analysis.
Can you please let me know if SNC and WEC are able to support a discussion on January 9?
- 1. Can SNC and WEC step through the methods/testing in WCAP-15846 that were used to determine why 90% wetted perimeter coverage is equivalent at the 266 elevation and the 244 elevation?
- 2. Is the difference in measurement location accounted for in the engineering evaluation relative to the ITAAC acceptance criteria? Did SNC account for measurement uncertainty and obstructions such as baffle supports and lifting lugs?
- Thanks, Jennie Jennie Rankin, Project Manager Vogtle Project Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Hearing Identifier:
Vogtle_COL_Docs_Public Email Number:
515 Mail Envelope Properties (BY5PR09MB481843DE1A9A665804EC6A7E983F0)
Subject:
FW: LAR-19-018: PCS Wetted Perimeter Test Modification Sent Date:
1/7/2020 9:14:34 AM Received Date:
1/7/2020 9:14:38 AM From:
Rankin, Jennivine Created By:
Jennivine.Rankin@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Vogtle PEmails" <Vogtle.PEmails@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
BY5PR09MB4818.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1370 1/7/2020 9:14:38 AM Options Priority:
Normal Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date: