ML20009C054: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20009C054
| number = ML20009C054
| issue date = 07/08/1981
| issue date = 07/08/1981
| title = Responds to 810629 Ltr Requesting Addl Info Re SER Open Items.Commitment Date of 810530 Cannot Be Met Due to Continuing Reassignment of NRC Personnel & Late NRC Review of Util Submitted Matl
| title = Responds to Requesting Addl Info Re SER Open Items.Commitment Date of 810530 Cannot Be Met Due to Continuing Reassignment of NRC Personnel & Late NRC Review of Util Submitted Matl
| author name = Mccaffrey B
| author name = Mccaffrey B
| author affiliation = LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
| author affiliation = LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = SNRC-592, NUDOCS 8107200223
| document report number = SNRC-592, NUDOCS 8107200223
| title reference date = 06-29-1981
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
Line 16: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-.               _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:-.
o e
o e
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION am,,,,,
            ,. am,,,,,                   SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION P.O. BOX 618, NORTH COUfeTRY ROAD
P.O. BOX 618, NORTH COUfeTRY ROAD
* WADING RIVER, N.Y.11792 July   8, 1981                                                             SNRC-592
* WADING RIVER, N.Y.11792 July 8, 1981 SNRC-592
                                                                                            }'''
}'''
Mr. Robert L. Tedesco                                                                         '
Mr. Robert L.
g          gt A3sistant Director for Licensing                                                     \
Tedesco g
Division of Licensing                                                 ,                ,4%**
gt A3sistant Director for Licensing
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                   9-                                               ,
\\
Washington, D.C. 2055                                                ] g b p s-)g# }}
Division of Licensing
CT      #                ,,
,4%**
Shoreham Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1                     /
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 9-] g b p s-)g# }}
4
Washington, D.C.
                                                                                                    \/
2055 CT Shoreham Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1
Docket No. 50-322                             ,            gj ' '
/
\\/
4 gj ' '
Docket No. 50-322


==Dear Mr. Tedesco:==
==Dear Mr. Tedesco:==
 
1 Long Island Ligh ing Company is in receipt of your letter of June 29, 1981 to Mr. M.
1 Long Island Ligh ing Company is in receipt of your letter of June 29, 1981 to Mr. M. S. Pollock on the subject of Additional Information for the Safety Evaluation Report. This response is written at Mr. Pollock's direction to document the schedular information that I provided you with via phone on July 6,                           1981.
S.
As you can see from the table attached, LILCO will have provided essentially all the requested information by July 20. I have also committed to you to once again place a licensing team in residence in Bethesda during the week of July 13 to facilitate closure of as many Open Items as possible. With a similar commit-ment of resources by the NRC, I believe some real progress can be made during this period.
Pollock on the subject of Additional Information for the Safety Evaluation Report.
It is unfortunate to have such an extensive Request for Additional Information coming at a time when we should already have had the Supplement to the SER issued. LILCO met its commitment contained in our letter from Mr. M. S. Pollock, dated April 15, 1981, to have responses to all the SER Open Items submitted by May 30, 1981.
This response is written at Mr. Pollock's direction to document the schedular information that I provided you with via phone on July 6, 1981.
We also had licensing representation in residence at NRC during the period of June 4 to 12. It is our observation that we are faced with a significant number of remaining unresolved issues due in large part to:
As you can see from the table attached, LILCO will have provided essentially all the requested information by July 20.
: 1. A continuing reassignment of NRC Staff reviewers that has, in recent months, forced LILCO to expend considerable resources to restate previous discussions for the benefit of the new people involved.
I have also committed to you to once again place a licensing team in residence in Bethesda during the week of July 13 to facilitate closure of as many Open Items as possible.
With a similar commit-ment of resources by the NRC, I believe some real progress can be made during this period.
It is unfortunate to have such an extensive Request for Additional Information coming at a time when we should already have had the Supplement to the SER issued.
LILCO met its commitment contained in our letter from Mr. M.
S. Pollock, dated April 15, 1981, to have responses to all the SER Open Items submitted by May 30, 1981.
We also had licensing representation in residence at NRC during the period of June 4 to 12.
It is our observation that we are faced with a significant number of remaining unresolved issues due in large part to:
1.
A continuing reassignment of NRC Staff reviewers that has, in recent months, forced LILCO to expend considerable resources to restate previous discussions for the benefit of the new people involved.
3c>ol
3c>ol
                                                                                                        .5 i O 0107200223 PDR ADOCK h hPDR 2
.5 i O 0107200223 h h 2 PDR ADOCK PDR "J
"J                         --                      - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _


e e
e e
Mr. Robert Tedesco July 8, 1981 Page Two
Mr. Robert Tedesco July 8,
: 2. Late review of submitted mat'erial. We found Staff reviewers were in many instances just getting to our responses on Open Items at a time when draft SER sections were to have been completed according to the NRC schedule.
1981 Page Two 2.
Late review of submitted mat' rial.
We found Staff e
reviewers were in many instances just getting to our responses on Open Items at a time when draft SER sections were to have been completed according to the NRC schedule.
Thus, any additicnal questions arising out of this review were, by definition, late with respect to a July 1 scheduled SER supplement.
Thus, any additicnal questions arising out of this review were, by definition, late with respect to a July 1 scheduled SER supplement.
: 3. Distribution of submitted material t) individual reviewers was in many instances late and cont: ibuted to Item 2.
3.
Distribution of submitted material t) individual reviewers was in many instances late and cont: ibuted to Item 2.
The above three " contributions" to the current situation are offered as constructive observations with the hope that the NRC will consider them in your reevaluation of the licensing review program. I also would request that future letters, strictly related to HRR review of the Shoreham docket, be directed to my attention.
The above three " contributions" to the current situation are offered as constructive observations with the hope that the NRC will consider them in your reevaluation of the licensing review program. I also would request that future letters, strictly related to HRR review of the Shoreham docket, be directed to my attention.
Very truly yours, Ad Wk             y B. R. McCaff Manager Project Engineering BRM/pd Attach nent cc: M. S.       Pollock (w/ attachment)
Very truly yours, Ad Wk B.
R. McCaff y
Manager Project Engineering BRM/pd Attach nent cc:
M.
S. Pollock (w/ attachment)
>}}
>}}

Latest revision as of 02:19, 23 December 2024

Responds to Requesting Addl Info Re SER Open Items.Commitment Date of 810530 Cannot Be Met Due to Continuing Reassignment of NRC Personnel & Late NRC Review of Util Submitted Matl
ML20009C054
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 07/08/1981
From: Mccaffrey B
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
To: Tedesco R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
SNRC-592, NUDOCS 8107200223
Download: ML20009C054 (2)
v • d • e


Text

-.

o e

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION am,,,,,

P.O. BOX 618, NORTH COUfeTRY ROAD

  • WADING RIVER, N.Y.11792 July 8, 1981 SNRC-592

}

Mr. Robert L.

Tedesco g

gt A3sistant Director for Licensing

\\

Division of Licensing

,4%**

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 9-] g b p s-)g# Washington, D.C. 2055 CT Shoreham Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1 / \\/ 4 gj ' ' Docket No. 50-322

Dear Mr. Tedesco:

1 Long Island Ligh ing Company is in receipt of your letter of June 29, 1981 to Mr. M. S. Pollock on the subject of Additional Information for the Safety Evaluation Report. This response is written at Mr. Pollock's direction to document the schedular information that I provided you with via phone on July 6, 1981. As you can see from the table attached, LILCO will have provided essentially all the requested information by July 20. I have also committed to you to once again place a licensing team in residence in Bethesda during the week of July 13 to facilitate closure of as many Open Items as possible. With a similar commit-ment of resources by the NRC, I believe some real progress can be made during this period. It is unfortunate to have such an extensive Request for Additional Information coming at a time when we should already have had the Supplement to the SER issued. LILCO met its commitment contained in our letter from Mr. M. S. Pollock, dated April 15, 1981, to have responses to all the SER Open Items submitted by May 30, 1981. We also had licensing representation in residence at NRC during the period of June 4 to 12. It is our observation that we are faced with a significant number of remaining unresolved issues due in large part to: 1. A continuing reassignment of NRC Staff reviewers that has, in recent months, forced LILCO to expend considerable resources to restate previous discussions for the benefit of the new people involved. 3c>ol .5 i O 0107200223 h h 2 PDR ADOCK PDR "J

e e Mr. Robert Tedesco July 8, 1981 Page Two 2. Late review of submitted mat' rial. We found Staff e reviewers were in many instances just getting to our responses on Open Items at a time when draft SER sections were to have been completed according to the NRC schedule. Thus, any additicnal questions arising out of this review were, by definition, late with respect to a July 1 scheduled SER supplement. 3. Distribution of submitted material t) individual reviewers was in many instances late and cont: ibuted to Item 2. The above three " contributions" to the current situation are offered as constructive observations with the hope that the NRC will consider them in your reevaluation of the licensing review program. I also would request that future letters, strictly related to HRR review of the Shoreham docket, be directed to my attention. Very truly yours, Ad Wk B. R. McCaff y Manager Project Engineering BRM/pd Attach nent cc: M. S. Pollock (w/ attachment) >}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20009C054&oldid=4656369"