ML20009C274: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:a PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 23O1 MARKET STREET             ,
{{#Wiki_filter:a PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 23O1 MARKET STREET O
P.O. BOX 8699             gs                   O 1881   1981                         PHILADELPHI A. PA.19101                                     ,,
P.O. BOX 8699 gs 1881 1981 PHILADELPHI A. PA.19101 SHIELDS L. D ALTROFF Q
SHIELDS L. D ALTROFF Q
$p
            ..=: = ::_                                                                                     q July 15, 1981
..=: = ::_
                                                                          $p t
t q
s y'
s y' July 15, 1981
                                                                            \   .
\\
                                                                                                      ,g Re: Docket No. 50-278         !k h-Mr. John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Corrmission Washington, DC 20555 P.eference s : 1. Letter dated May 6, 1981, Ronald E. Engel, GeneI11 Electric Co., to T. A. Ippolito, NRC;  
,g
!k h-Re: Docket No. 50-278 Mr. John F.
Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Corrmission Washington, DC 20555 P.eference s :
1.
Letter dated May 6, 1981, Ronald E.
: Engel, GeneI11 Electric Co.,
to T.
A.
: Ippolito, NRC;  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Extension of Emergency Core Cooling System Performance Limits
Extension of Emergency Core Cooling System Performance Limits
: 2. Letter dated May 28, 1981, Ronald E. Engel, General Electric Co., to T. A. Ippolito, NRC;  
: 2. Letter dated May 28, 1981, Ronald E.
: Engel, General Electric Co.,
to T.
A.
: Ippolito, NRC;  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 33: Line 46:


==Dear Mr. Stolz:==
==Dear Mr. Stolz:==
At the request of M. Fairtile of your staff, we have rovfewed the above referenced letters and have discussed them with the General Electric Company.
General Electric has advised us that the information contained in the May 6 and May'28 letters is applicable to both Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3.
We have reviewed the Unit 3 peak cladding temperatures (PCT) for each fuel type given in General Electric Document NEDO-l 24082 Errata and Addenda Sheets Numbers 2,3 and 4, previously l
submitted to you, and have determined that these PC*'s do not exceed the PCT's assumed in the May 6 and May 28, 1:<81 letters for average planar exposures up to 40,000 megawatt days per short con.
In addition, General Electric Company has advised us that 00l 3
/0 810720042S 810715 PDR ADOCK 05000278 P
pop y


At the request of M. Fairtile of your staff, we have rovfewed the above referenced letters and have discussed them with the General Electric Company. General Electric has advised us that the information contained in the May 6 and May'28 letters is applicable to both Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3.
a Mr. John F. Stolz Page 2 c
We have reviewed the Unit 3 peak cladding temperatures (PCT) for each fuel type given in General Electric Document NEDO-l        24082 Errata and Addenda Sheets Numbers 2,3 and 4, previously l        submitted to you, and have determined that these PC*'s do not exceed the PCT's assumed in the May 6 and May 28, 1:<81 letters for average planar exposures up to 40,000 megawatt days per short con. In addition, General Electric Company has advised us that 00l 3
the analyses presented in NEDO-24082 Errata and Addenda Sheets Numbers 2,3 and 4 do not take cred2t for improvements.in ECCS evaluation models presented in the referenced May 6 and {{letter dated|date=May 28, 1981|text=May 28, 1981 letter}}s.
                                                                                                  /0 810720042S 810715 PDR ADOCK 05000278 P                    pop y  -,
 
a Mr. John F. Stolz                               Page 2 c
the analyses presented in NEDO-24082 Errata and Addenda Sheets Numbers 2,3 and 4 do not take cred2t for improvements .in ECCS     ,
evaluation models presented in the referenced May 6 and May 28, 1981 letters.
Based on the above, we request that the NRC approve MAPLHGR's for all Peach Bottom Unit 3 8x8 fuel types to a maximum exposure of 40,000 megawatt days per short ton.
Based on the above, we request that the NRC approve MAPLHGR's for all Peach Bottom Unit 3 8x8 fuel types to a maximum exposure of 40,000 megawatt days per short ton.
We recognize that the May 6 and May 28 letters provide information to support extended MAPLHGR's limits for exposures up to 50,000 megawatt-days per metric ton, however, since the analyse:' presented in NEDO-24082 only extends to 40,000 megawatt-days per short ton, we may request further extension of the MAPLHGR limits at some future date.
We recognize that the May 6 and May 28 letters provide information to support extended MAPLHGR's limits for exposures up to 50,000 megawatt-days per metric ton, however, since the analyse:' presented in NEDO-24082 only extends to 40,000 megawatt-days per short ton, we may request further extension of the MAPLHGR limits at some future date.
Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours, 9
Very truly yours, 9
                                                        ,      Y   )
Y
                                                          /,   /
)
/,
/
jllb'
jllb'
                                            .}}
.}}

Latest revision as of 01:13, 23 December 2024

Requests That NRC Approve MAPLHGR for 8 X 8 Fuel Types to Max Exposure of 40,000 MW-days Per Short Ton
ML20009C274
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/15/1981
From: Daltroff S
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To: Stolz J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8107200425
Download: ML20009C274 (2)


Text

a PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 23O1 MARKET STREET O

P.O. BOX 8699 gs 1881 1981 PHILADELPHI A. PA.19101 SHIELDS L. D ALTROFF Q

$p

..=: = ::_

t q

s y' July 15, 1981

\\

,g

!k h-Re: Docket No. 50-278 Mr. John F.

Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Corrmission Washington, DC 20555 P.eference s :

1.

Letter dated May 6, 1981, Ronald E.

Engel, GeneI11 Electric Co.,

to T.

A.

Ippolito, NRC;

Subject:

Extension of Emergency Core Cooling System Performance Limits

2. Letter dated May 28, 1981, Ronald E.
Engel, General Electric Co.,

to T.

A.

Ippolito, NRC;

Subject:

Additional Information negarding Extension of Emergency Core Cooling System Performance Limits

Dear Mr. Stolz:

At the request of M. Fairtile of your staff, we have rovfewed the above referenced letters and have discussed them with the General Electric Company.

General Electric has advised us that the information contained in the May 6 and May'28 letters is applicable to both Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3.

We have reviewed the Unit 3 peak cladding temperatures (PCT) for each fuel type given in General Electric Document NEDO-l 24082 Errata and Addenda Sheets Numbers 2,3 and 4, previously l

submitted to you, and have determined that these PC*'s do not exceed the PCT's assumed in the May 6 and May 28, 1:<81 letters for average planar exposures up to 40,000 megawatt days per short con.

In addition, General Electric Company has advised us that 00l 3

/0 810720042S 810715 PDR ADOCK 05000278 P

pop y

a Mr. John F. Stolz Page 2 c

the analyses presented in NEDO-24082 Errata and Addenda Sheets Numbers 2,3 and 4 do not take cred2t for improvements.in ECCS evaluation models presented in the referenced May 6 and May 28, 1981 letters.

Based on the above, we request that the NRC approve MAPLHGR's for all Peach Bottom Unit 3 8x8 fuel types to a maximum exposure of 40,000 megawatt days per short ton.

We recognize that the May 6 and May 28 letters provide information to support extended MAPLHGR's limits for exposures up to 50,000 megawatt-days per metric ton, however, since the analyse:' presented in NEDO-24082 only extends to 40,000 megawatt-days per short ton, we may request further extension of the MAPLHGR limits at some future date.

Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours, 9

Y

)

/,

/

jllb'

.