ML20056H603: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:.. | ||
-, ~ | |||
e 4 | |||
V 0 T E' d'N?,&3 NOTATION | |||
\\ | |||
- _Q' __ | |||
RESPONSE SHEET | |||
. e e ic;, ' | |||
9 = _; | |||
a | |||
[ | |||
T0: | |||
SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMISSION FROM: | |||
C0mISSIONER DE PLANQUE | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
SECY-93-205 - PROPOSED MEMORANDUM 0F j | |||
UNDERSTANDING BENEEN THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION i | |||
APPROVED x twith DISAPPROVED ABSTAIN co.w ents) | |||
NOT PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION i | |||
C0l44ENTS: | |||
I concur with the edits / comments of Commissioners Rogers and Remick. | |||
In addition, I understand that the 1;RCn; MSS (Agreement States) conducts device evaluations to document the occupational safet" and cuality of the device, which is not covered by TDA/CDRH. | |||
If this is the case, the MOU should be revised to so indicate. | |||
h | |||
(/ | |||
WM_- | |||
SIGNATURE RELEASE VOTE | |||
/ xx / | |||
August 3, 1993 DATE WITHHOLD VOTE | |||
/ | |||
/ | |||
) | |||
I NO poF ENTERED ON "AS" YES xx i | |||
9309100178 930903 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR l}} | |||
Latest revision as of 12:39, 17 December 2024
| ML20056H603 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/03/1993 |
| From: | De Planque E NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9309100178 | |
| Download: ML20056H603 (1) | |
Text
..
-, ~
e 4
V 0 T E' d'N?,&3 NOTATION
\\
- _Q' __
RESPONSE SHEET
. e e ic;, '
9 = _;
a
[
T0:
SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMISSION FROM:
C0mISSIONER DE PLANQUE
SUBJECT:
SECY-93-205 - PROPOSED MEMORANDUM 0F j
UNDERSTANDING BENEEN THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION i
APPROVED x twith DISAPPROVED ABSTAIN co.w ents)
NOT PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION i
C0l44ENTS:
I concur with the edits / comments of Commissioners Rogers and Remick.
In addition, I understand that the 1;RCn; MSS (Agreement States) conducts device evaluations to document the occupational safet" and cuality of the device, which is not covered by TDA/CDRH.
If this is the case, the MOU should be revised to so indicate.
h
(/
WM_-
SIGNATURE RELEASE VOTE
/ xx /
August 3, 1993 DATE WITHHOLD VOTE
/
/
)
I NO poF ENTERED ON "AS" YES xx i