ML20056H603: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:..
-, ~
e 4
V 0 T E' d'N?,&3 NOTATION
\\
- _Q' __
RESPONSE SHEET
. e e ic;, '
9 = _;
a
[
T0:
SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMISSION FROM:
C0mISSIONER DE PLANQUE
 
==SUBJECT:==
SECY-93-205 - PROPOSED MEMORANDUM 0F j
UNDERSTANDING BENEEN THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION i
APPROVED x twith DISAPPROVED ABSTAIN co.w ents)
NOT PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION i
C0l44ENTS:
I concur with the edits / comments of Commissioners Rogers and Remick.
In addition, I understand that the 1;RCn; MSS (Agreement States) conducts device evaluations to document the occupational safet" and cuality of the device, which is not covered by TDA/CDRH.
If this is the case, the MOU should be revised to so indicate.
h
(/
WM_-
SIGNATURE RELEASE VOTE
/ xx /
August 3, 1993 DATE WITHHOLD VOTE
/
/
)
I NO poF ENTERED ON "AS" YES xx i
9309100178 930903 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR l}}

Latest revision as of 12:39, 17 December 2024

Approves W/Comment SECY-93-205, Proposed MOU Between Fda & Nrc
ML20056H603
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/03/1993
From: De Planque E
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 9309100178
Download: ML20056H603 (1)


Text

..

-, ~

e 4

V 0 T E' d'N?,&3 NOTATION

\\

- _Q' __

RESPONSE SHEET

. e e ic;, '

9 = _;

a

[

T0:

SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMISSION FROM:

C0mISSIONER DE PLANQUE

SUBJECT:

SECY-93-205 - PROPOSED MEMORANDUM 0F j

UNDERSTANDING BENEEN THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION i

APPROVED x twith DISAPPROVED ABSTAIN co.w ents)

NOT PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION i

C0l44ENTS:

I concur with the edits / comments of Commissioners Rogers and Remick.

In addition, I understand that the 1;RCn; MSS (Agreement States) conducts device evaluations to document the occupational safet" and cuality of the device, which is not covered by TDA/CDRH.

If this is the case, the MOU should be revised to so indicate.

h

(/

WM_-

SIGNATURE RELEASE VOTE

/ xx /

August 3, 1993 DATE WITHHOLD VOTE

/

/

)

I NO poF ENTERED ON "AS" YES xx i

9309100178 930903 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR l