ML20058M796: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:"
[ l.;,s, c
w s,..
k; S
. UNITED STATES C
= NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
j I.
WASHINGTON, o. C. 20066 s
July ~20, 1990 j
CHAIRMAN m
Ms'..Cindy Monaco u
.Cortland County Planning Department
'69 Contral Ave.
P.G. Box 5590 t
Cortland, New York' 13045
 
==Dear Ms. Monaco:==
L1'amiresponding _to your {{letter dated|date=June 4, 1990|text=June 4,1990 letter}}, in which you l
; questioned the basis for the Commission's statement that it will not look favorably-(on long-term, on-site storage of low-level
~
radioactive waste LLW) beyond' January 1,11996.
In view-of your j
concerns,1 will briefly explain our intent in formulating our m
1
,. position on this matter.
The Commission's: statement reflects.the intent -of Congress in the a
J low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, which fencour_ ages States to take a>propriate actions-to ensure that Ddisposal capacity-is availa)1e by January 1, 1996.
The Commission,.;11ke the States, is responsible for carrying out'the provisions of'this law._ NRC approval'of long-term,
.on-site storage a's a substitute for develoament of new disposal capacity would clearly be~ inconsistent wit 1 the 1985 Act.
I want-to' emphasize that our statement applies.to'long-term storage <used as a means to avoid the clear intent of the law.
The Commission recognizes that licensees'need-to.have interim
.(short-term) storage capability while~ disposal capacity is being.
developed by the States, in the interest of protecting the
- public health and ' safety. and. maintaining occupational ex )osure as l-low as. reasonably achievable, however, we believe that t1e length E
Lof time that LLW.islplaced in storage.should be minimized.
Enclosed -for your information is an assessment prepared for the NRC by. the Brookhaven National Laboratory of technical problems
' attendant to the extended storage of LLW.
4 E
Lf The~Commissien will continue to follow.the progress of the States L
inLdeveloping new LLW disposal facilities.
We will work to
.res'olve emergin'g issues to help ensure a stable-regulatory framework consistent with safety and timely compliance with the 9008130069 900807 jEM PROJ PDC e
 
-(
=
q s.
ty..
c 4.-..i.
. Ms~. Cindy.iMonaco 2
1 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of-1985.
o
.The Commission.is confident (that LLW. disposal. facilities licensed 1
in'accordance with NRC's regulations in 10 CFR Part 61 or s--
compatibleLState--regulations will fully protect the public health and safety and-the environment.
I' hope.thes'e commentsiand the enclosed information clarify our.
position on this matter.
Sincerely.
r
\\
. 9-Kenneth M. Carr
 
==Enclosure:==
9 u
NUREG/CR-4062 cc:
E. Gleason-NY State-Liaison Officer l.
^
p L.
f, Ll' t,
4 k
I.
l l'
..}}

Latest revision as of 07:58, 17 December 2024

Responds to Questioning Basis for NRC Statement Re long-term Onsite Storage of Low Level Radwaste Beyond 960101
ML20058M796
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/20/1990
From: Carr K
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Monaco C
CORTLAND COUNTY, NY
Shared Package
ML20058K836 List:
References
REF-PROJ-M-12 NUDOCS 9008130069
Download: ML20058M796 (2)


Text

"

[ l.;,s, c

w s,..

k; S

. UNITED STATES C

= NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.

j I.

WASHINGTON, o. C. 20066 s

July ~20, 1990 j

CHAIRMAN m

Ms'..Cindy Monaco u

.Cortland County Planning Department

'69 Contral Ave.

P.G. Box 5590 t

Cortland, New York' 13045

Dear Ms. Monaco:

L1'amiresponding _to your June 4,1990 letter, in which you l

questioned the basis for the Commission's statement that it will not look favorably-(on long-term, on-site storage of low-level

~

radioactive waste LLW) beyond' January 1,11996.

In view-of your j

concerns,1 will briefly explain our intent in formulating our m

1

,. position on this matter.

The Commission's: statement reflects.the intent -of Congress in the a

J low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, which fencour_ ages States to take a>propriate actions-to ensure that Ddisposal capacity-is availa)1e by January 1, 1996.

The Commission,.;11ke the States, is responsible for carrying out'the provisions of'this law._ NRC approval'of long-term,

.on-site storage a's a substitute for develoament of new disposal capacity would clearly be~ inconsistent wit 1 the 1985 Act.

I want-to' emphasize that our statement applies.to'long-term storage <used as a means to avoid the clear intent of the law.

The Commission recognizes that licensees'need-to.have interim

.(short-term) storage capability while~ disposal capacity is being.

developed by the States, in the interest of protecting the

- public health and ' safety. and. maintaining occupational ex )osure as l-low as. reasonably achievable, however, we believe that t1e length E

Lof time that LLW.islplaced in storage.should be minimized.

Enclosed -for your information is an assessment prepared for the NRC by. the Brookhaven National Laboratory of technical problems

' attendant to the extended storage of LLW.

4 E

Lf The~Commissien will continue to follow.the progress of the States L

inLdeveloping new LLW disposal facilities.

We will work to

.res'olve emergin'g issues to help ensure a stable-regulatory framework consistent with safety and timely compliance with the 9008130069 900807 jEM PROJ PDC e

-(

=

q s.

ty..

c 4.-..i.

. Ms~. Cindy.iMonaco 2

1 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of-1985.

o

.The Commission.is confident (that LLW. disposal. facilities licensed 1

in'accordance with NRC's regulations in 10 CFR Part 61 or s--

compatibleLState--regulations will fully protect the public health and safety and-the environment.

I' hope.thes'e commentsiand the enclosed information clarify our.

position on this matter.

Sincerely.

r

\\

. 9-Kenneth M. Carr

Enclosure:

9 u

NUREG/CR-4062 cc:

E. Gleason-NY State-Liaison Officer l.

^

p L.

f, Ll' t,

4 k

I.

l l'

..