ML20069P607: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-
{{#Wiki_filter:r t
r t
BALTIM ORE GAS AND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER P.O. BOX 1475 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 NORMAN J. BowMAKER VICE PRESIDENT GENE RAL SERVICES December 2,1982 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissica Washington, D. C. 20555 ATTENTION: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Licensing
BALTIM ORE GAS AND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER P.O. BOX 1475 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 NORMAN J. BowMAKER VICE PRESIDENT GENE RAL SERVICES December 2,1982 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissica Washington, D. C. 20555 ATTENTION: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Licensing


Line 24: Line 23:


==REFERENCES:==
==REFERENCES:==
a)             Generic Letter 82-23 b)   10CFR 73.40 (D) c)   ANSI Standard, N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants Gentlemen:
a)
Generic Letter 82-23 b) 10CFR 73.40 (D) c)
ANSI Standard, N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants Gentlemen:
Reference (a) issues a request to all Licensees to verify that their Technical Specifications conform with the Code of Federal Regulations, Reference (b), with respect to annual reviews of the Safeguards Contingency Plan (Security Plan). We have reviewed the applicable documents defining and implementing these requirements and we have determined that our Facility is currently in conformance and meets the intent of Reference (b).
Reference (a) issues a request to all Licensees to verify that their Technical Specifications conform with the Code of Federal Regulations, Reference (b), with respect to annual reviews of the Safeguards Contingency Plan (Security Plan). We have reviewed the applicable documents defining and implementing these requirements and we have determined that our Facility is currently in conformance and meets the intent of Reference (b).
There is, however, some ambiguity regarding the use of the terminology " review" and " audit" as it appears among various references. We, therefore, have referred to the American National Standard, Reference (c), in securing a strict definition of these terms.
There is, however, some ambiguity regarding the use of the terminology " review" and " audit" as it appears among various references. We, therefore, have referred to the American National Standard, Reference (c), in securing a strict definition of these terms.
5003 8212080197 821202 PDR P
5003 8212080197 821202 PDR ADOCK 05000317 P
ADOCK 05000317 pgp
pgp


2.
2.
1 The following discussion provides the basis for our finding of conformance:
1 The following discussion provides the basis for our finding of conformance:
}                     Section 4 of ANSI Standard N18.7 defines the difference between reviews and audits of programs and activities at Operating Nuclear
}
!                      Power Plants. The onsite operating organization (Plant Operational i                     and Safety Review Committee) is responsible for assisting the Plant Manager (Plant Superintendent at Calvert Cliffs) in keeping abreast of general plant conditions and verifying that the day-to-day
Section 4 of ANSI Standard N18.7 defines the difference between reviews and audits of programs and activities at Operating Nuclear Power Plants. The onsite operating organization (Plant Operational i
;                      operating activities are conducted safely and in accordance with j                     applicable administrative controls. In part, the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee reviews all changes to the Safeguards l                     Contingency Plan and in fulfilling this responsibility recommends to i
and Safety Review Committee) is responsible for assisting the Plant Manager (Plant Superintendent at Calvert Cliffs) in keeping abreast of general plant conditions and verifying that the day-to-day operating activities are conducted safely and in accordance with j
applicable administrative controls. In part, the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee reviews all changes to the Safeguards l
Contingency Plan and in fulfilling this responsibility recommends to i
the Plant Manager, for referral to the offsite committee, any subjects of potential concern. The Plant Manager in carrying out his responsibilities, refers all appropriate subjects to the Off-Site Safety Review Committee and independent reviewers.
the Plant Manager, for referral to the offsite committee, any subjects of potential concern. The Plant Manager in carrying out his responsibilities, refers all appropriate subjects to the Off-Site Safety Review Committee and independent reviewers.
:                      The Off-Site Safety Review Committee, also addressed in section 4 of ANSI N18.7, is responsible for ensuring that all subjects of
The Off-Site Safety Review Committee, also addressed in section 4 of ANSI N18.7, is responsible for ensuring that all subjects of potential concern referred to the committee receive timely review and resolution by the Corporate and Plant Management. In addition 4
,                      potential concern referred to the committee receive timely review and resolution by the Corporate and Plant Management. In addition 4                     to these normal ' responsibilities, the Off-Site Safety Review Committee maintains cognizance over all auditing activities 1                     associated with the Safeguards Contingency Plan. All audits involve a verification of compliance and effectiveness of implementation of Federal laws, internal rules and procedures associated with the Safeguards Contingency Plan. These audits of selected aspects of operational phase activities are performed at a frequency j                     commensurate with their safety significance and in such a manner as to assure that the audit is completed within a period of 24 months.
to these normal ' responsibilities, the Off-Site Safety Review Committee maintains cognizance over all auditing activities 1
.                      Sections 6.5.1.4 and 6.5.1.6 of the Technical Specifications define the l
associated with the Safeguards Contingency Plan. All audits involve a verification of compliance and effectiveness of implementation of Federal laws, internal rules and procedures associated with the Safeguards Contingency Plan. These audits of selected aspects of operational phase activities are performed at a frequency j
meeting frequency and responsibilities of the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee. The Committee convenes monthly, as a i                      minimum, and is responsible for reviewing changes to the Safeguards
commensurate with their safety significance and in such a manner as to assure that the audit is completed within a period of 24 months.
;                      Contingency Plan and implementing procedures and recommending j                     changes to the Off-Site Safety Review Committee.
Sections 6.5.1.4 and 6.5.1.6 of the Technical Specifications define the l
i Sections 6.5.2.5, 6.5.2.7 and 6.5.2.8 of the Technical Specifications define the meeting frequency, review and audit responsibilities of the Off-Site Safety Review Committee. The Committee convenes every 6 months, as a minimum, and is responsible for reviewing all changes to the Safeguards Contingency Plan referred by the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee and is responsible for ensuring that an
meeting frequency and responsibilities of the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee. The Committee convenes monthly, as a minimum, and is responsible for reviewing changes to the Safeguards i
!                      audit of the Safeguards Contingency Plan is completed at a frequency
Contingency Plan and implementing procedures and recommending j
;                      of at least once per 24 months, i
changes to the Off-Site Safety Review Committee.
i Sections 6.5.2.5, 6.5.2.7 and 6.5.2.8 of the Technical Specifications define the meeting frequency, review and audit responsibilities of the Off-Site Safety Review Committee. The Committee convenes every 6 months, as a minimum, and is responsible for reviewing all changes to the Safeguards Contingency Plan referred by the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee and is responsible for ensuring that an audit of the Safeguards Contingency Plan is completed at a frequency of at least once per 24 months, i
t i
t i
e i
e i
: 3.                                             j
 
          ~
3.
j
~
Section 1009, subsection 5.3.1 of the Security Plan Implementation Procedures states that an independent audit of the Calvert Cliffs Security Plan (Contingency Plan) and it's implementing procedures will be conducted annually. The report is reviewed by the Off-Site Safety and Review Committee as well as the Plant Operational and Safety Review Commit
Section 1009, subsection 5.3.1 of the Security Plan Implementation Procedures states that an independent audit of the Calvert Cliffs Security Plan (Contingency Plan) and it's implementing procedures will be conducted annually. The report is reviewed by the Off-Site Safety and Review Committee as well as the Plant Operational and Safety Review Commit
* 3e.
* 3e.
In summary, all changes to the Safeguards Contingency Plan are reviewed within the required annual frequency by the POSRC and in addition, an annual independent review is performed on all changes to the plan that have transpired since the last biennial audit. Any subjects of potential concern arising as a result of the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee review are referred to the Off-Site Safety Review Committee and reviewed within the required frequency.
In summary, all changes to the Safeguards Contingency Plan are reviewed within the required annual frequency by the POSRC and in addition, an annual independent review is performed on all changes to the plan that have transpired since the last biennial audit. Any subjects of potential concern arising as a result of the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee review are referred to the Off-Site Safety Review Committee and reviewed within the required frequency.
To alleviate any future misinterpretations of Reference (b), we suggest that Generic Letter 82-23 be rescinded and reissued with more clarification as to the use of the terms " review" and " audit". This clarification should reflect the guidance contained in Reference (c).                                                                           l If we can be of any further assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.
To alleviate any future misinterpretations of Reference (b), we suggest that Generic Letter 82-23 be rescinded and reissued with more clarification as to the use of the terms " review" and " audit". This clarification should reflect the guidance contained in Reference (c).
l If we can be of any further assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours, M
Very truly yours, M
1M/3. Bowmaker Vice President General Services NJB/EPG/sik cc:   Messrs. R. E. Architzel, NRC Resident Inspector J. A. Biddison, Jr., General Counsel, Legal G. V. Bresnick, Manager, Real Estate and Office Services R. C. Dernoga, General Supervisor, Security Services G. M. Hinton, Supervisor, Quality Assurance D. H. Jaffe, Project Manager, NRC R. O. Mathews, Asst. General Supervisor, Nuclear Security 1
1M/3. Bowmaker Vice President General Services NJB/EPG/sik cc:
L. Wenger, Nuclear Power Department l
Messrs.
E. P. Gwiazdowski, Security Planning Specialist l'
R. E. Architzel, NRC Resident Inspector J. A. Biddison, Jr., General Counsel, Legal G. V. Bresnick, Manager, Real Estate and Office Services R. C. Dernoga, General Supervisor, Security Services G. M. Hinton, Supervisor, Quality Assurance D. H. Jaffe, Project Manager, NRC R. O. Mathews, Asst. General Supervisor, Nuclear Security L. Wenger, Nuclear Power Department 1
l E. P. Gwiazdowski, Security Planning Specialist l'
i 4}}
i 4}}

Latest revision as of 10:15, 16 December 2024

Discusses Ambiguity Re Use of Terminology Review & Audit in Generic Ltr 82-23 & 10CFR73.40.ANSI Std N18.7-1976 Used for Strict Definition of Terms
ML20069P607
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  
Issue date: 12/02/1982
From: Bowmaker N
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Clark R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
GL-82-23, NUDOCS 8212080197
Download: ML20069P607 (3)


Text

r t

BALTIM ORE GAS AND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER P.O. BOX 1475 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 NORMAN J. BowMAKER VICE PRESIDENT GENE RAL SERVICES December 2,1982 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissica Washington, D. C. 20555 ATTENTION: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Licensing

SUBJECT:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos. I and 2, Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318 Response to Generic Letter 82-23, Darrell G. Eisenhut to all Licensees of October 1,1982

REFERENCES:

a)

Generic Letter 82-23 b) 10CFR 73.40 (D) c)

ANSI Standard, N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants Gentlemen:

Reference (a) issues a request to all Licensees to verify that their Technical Specifications conform with the Code of Federal Regulations, Reference (b), with respect to annual reviews of the Safeguards Contingency Plan (Security Plan). We have reviewed the applicable documents defining and implementing these requirements and we have determined that our Facility is currently in conformance and meets the intent of Reference (b).

There is, however, some ambiguity regarding the use of the terminology " review" and " audit" as it appears among various references. We, therefore, have referred to the American National Standard, Reference (c), in securing a strict definition of these terms.

5003 8212080197 821202 PDR ADOCK 05000317 P

pgp

2.

1 The following discussion provides the basis for our finding of conformance:

}

Section 4 of ANSI Standard N18.7 defines the difference between reviews and audits of programs and activities at Operating Nuclear Power Plants. The onsite operating organization (Plant Operational i

and Safety Review Committee) is responsible for assisting the Plant Manager (Plant Superintendent at Calvert Cliffs) in keeping abreast of general plant conditions and verifying that the day-to-day operating activities are conducted safely and in accordance with j

applicable administrative controls. In part, the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee reviews all changes to the Safeguards l

Contingency Plan and in fulfilling this responsibility recommends to i

the Plant Manager, for referral to the offsite committee, any subjects of potential concern. The Plant Manager in carrying out his responsibilities, refers all appropriate subjects to the Off-Site Safety Review Committee and independent reviewers.

The Off-Site Safety Review Committee, also addressed in section 4 of ANSI N18.7, is responsible for ensuring that all subjects of potential concern referred to the committee receive timely review and resolution by the Corporate and Plant Management. In addition 4

to these normal ' responsibilities, the Off-Site Safety Review Committee maintains cognizance over all auditing activities 1

associated with the Safeguards Contingency Plan. All audits involve a verification of compliance and effectiveness of implementation of Federal laws, internal rules and procedures associated with the Safeguards Contingency Plan. These audits of selected aspects of operational phase activities are performed at a frequency j

commensurate with their safety significance and in such a manner as to assure that the audit is completed within a period of 24 months.

Sections 6.5.1.4 and 6.5.1.6 of the Technical Specifications define the l

meeting frequency and responsibilities of the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee. The Committee convenes monthly, as a minimum, and is responsible for reviewing changes to the Safeguards i

Contingency Plan and implementing procedures and recommending j

changes to the Off-Site Safety Review Committee.

i Sections 6.5.2.5, 6.5.2.7 and 6.5.2.8 of the Technical Specifications define the meeting frequency, review and audit responsibilities of the Off-Site Safety Review Committee. The Committee convenes every 6 months, as a minimum, and is responsible for reviewing all changes to the Safeguards Contingency Plan referred by the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee and is responsible for ensuring that an audit of the Safeguards Contingency Plan is completed at a frequency of at least once per 24 months, i

t i

e i

3.

j

~

Section 1009, subsection 5.3.1 of the Security Plan Implementation Procedures states that an independent audit of the Calvert Cliffs Security Plan (Contingency Plan) and it's implementing procedures will be conducted annually. The report is reviewed by the Off-Site Safety and Review Committee as well as the Plant Operational and Safety Review Commit

  • 3e.

In summary, all changes to the Safeguards Contingency Plan are reviewed within the required annual frequency by the POSRC and in addition, an annual independent review is performed on all changes to the plan that have transpired since the last biennial audit. Any subjects of potential concern arising as a result of the Plant Operational and Safety Review Committee review are referred to the Off-Site Safety Review Committee and reviewed within the required frequency.

To alleviate any future misinterpretations of Reference (b), we suggest that Generic Letter 82-23 be rescinded and reissued with more clarification as to the use of the terms " review" and " audit". This clarification should reflect the guidance contained in Reference (c).

l If we can be of any further assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours, M

1M/3. Bowmaker Vice President General Services NJB/EPG/sik cc:

Messrs.

R. E. Architzel, NRC Resident Inspector J. A. Biddison, Jr., General Counsel, Legal G. V. Bresnick, Manager, Real Estate and Office Services R. C. Dernoga, General Supervisor, Security Services G. M. Hinton, Supervisor, Quality Assurance D. H. Jaffe, Project Manager, NRC R. O. Mathews, Asst. General Supervisor, Nuclear Security L. Wenger, Nuclear Power Department 1

l E. P. Gwiazdowski, Security Planning Specialist l'

i 4