ML20086R461: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:- | {{#Wiki_filter:- | ||
9.- | 9.- | ||
e@ana recn:can | e@ana recn:can i | ||
Nwer Comnany s n u, m m~;- | |||
Enclosure Contains i | |||
Upon Separation This | 6AFEGUARDS INFORMATION y | ||
Page is Decontrolled | Upon Separation This auf | ||
.l J | |||
Page is Decontrolled JNOfANA 1 | |||
IAfCNfGAN POWER | |||
) | |||
i l | i l | ||
July 19, 1995 | July 19, 1995 AEP:NRC:1206' | ||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission b | 'I Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 i | ||
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 | U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission b | ||
Specifically, the request is to eliminate from the Donald C. Cook Nuclear-Plant security plan the requirement to continuously staff | ATTN: | ||
the duplicate alarm station. | Document Control Desk l | ||
Washington, D. C. | |||
20555 Gentlemen: | |||
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 I | |||
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM 10 CFR 73.55 DUPLICATE ALARM STATION STAFFING REQUIREMENT This letter is our application, pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5,'for an exemption from 10 CFR 73.55(e)(1) and other sections of 10 CFR 73. | |||
Specifically, the request is to eliminate from the Donald C. Cook Nuclear-Plant security plan the requirement to continuously staff the duplicate alarm station. | |||
If this exemption request is approved, an amendment to the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Modified i | |||
Amended Security Plan will be required under 10 CFR 50.90. | |||
Our proposed determination of no significant hazards consideration performed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92 is contained in Attachment 1, | Our proposed determination of no significant hazards consideration performed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92 is contained in Attachment 1, | ||
~ | |||
with justification for the request for exemption from 10 CFR 73.55(e)(1). A description'of the proposed physical security plan changes, our analysis concerning the effectiveness of the security plan, and our justification for the exemption are also contained in | with justification for the request for exemption from 10 CFR 73.55(e)(1). A description'of the proposed physical security plan changes, our analysis concerning the effectiveness of the security plan, and our justification for the exemption are also contained in. | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, this exemption is justifiable since | The details of the specific changes to the physical security plan, with the existing sections affected and with the proposed changed sections -are contained in Attachment 2. | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, this exemption is justifiable since (1) no law specifically requires that NRC regulations mandate a | |||
(1) no law specifically requires that NRC regulations mandate a continuously manned duplicate alarm station and the Commission is authorized to grant exemptions to 10 CFR 73 requirements, (2) it will not endanger life or property or the common defense, (3) it is | ~ | ||
in the public interest, (4) the underlying purpose of the rule will | continuously manned duplicate alarm station and the Commission is authorized to grant exemptions to 10 CFR 73 requirements, (2) it will not endanger life or property or the common defense, (3) it is in the public interest, (4) the underlying purpose of the rule will be served, (5) continued compliance results in undue hardship and cost from excess staffing expenses compared to nuclear plants in other nations, and (6) the duplicate alarm station equipment will be maintained operable, in case it is needed for contingencies. | ||
be served, (5) continued compliance results in undue hardship and | 1 9507310147 950719 1 | ||
cost from excess staffing expenses compared to nuclear plants in other nations, and (6) the duplicate alarm station equipment will be maintained operable, in case it is needed for contingencies. | PDR ADOCK 05000315 F | ||
1 9507310147 950719 | PDR j | ||
j | |||
i | i | ||
:.nclosure COntains 5AFEGUARDS INFORMATION UpOn Separation This Page is Dec0ntrollej;l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | :.nclosure COntains 5AFEGUARDS INFORMATION UpOn Separation This Page is Dec0ntrollej;l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP:NRC:1206' Page 2 In addition, this is a cost beneficial' licensing action (CBLA) submittal and represents a large dollar value CBLA item. | ||
lifetime cost savings associated with this CBLA are approximately | The lifetime cost savings associated with this CBLA are approximately | ||
$5,379,770, as detailed in Attachment 3. | |||
These proposed changes have been reviewed and approved by the Cook Nuclear Site Vice President / Plant Manager and the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee. | These proposed changes have been reviewed and approved by the Cook Nuclear Site Vice President / Plant Manager and the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee. | ||
Please | Please acknowledge receipt of this | ||
: letter, which contains safeguards information, by signing and returning the enclosed safeguards information transmittal form to D. | |||
J. | |||
Ashley, Cook-Nuclear Plant, One Cook Place, Bridgman, Michigan 49106. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.21, it is requested that the subject transmittals be withheld from public disclosure and not placed in the Public Document Room. | In accordance with 10 CFR 73.21, it is requested that the subject transmittals be withheld from public disclosure and not placed in the Public Document Room. | ||
Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this exemption request. | Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this exemption request. | ||
Sincerely, CL t | Sincerely, CL t | ||
E. E. Fitzpatrick Vice President SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS !*#3 DAY OF | E. E. Fitzpatrick Vice President SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS !*#3 DAY OF | ||
'o 1995 | |||
,/,; L.v,.. /. | |||
,' rn | |||
_o _ | _o _ | ||
tiotary Public My Commission Expires: J M 00 eh Attachments 1 | |||
cc: | |||
tiotary Public | A. A. Blind G. Charnoff H. J. Miller NFEM Section Chief I | ||
My Commission Expires: J M 00 eh Attachments | NRC Resident Inspector Bridgman J. R. Padgett l | ||
NFEM Section Chief | |||
J. R. Padgett | |||
~ | |||
,5 e | |||
: - Enclosure Contains - | : - Enclosure Contains - | ||
# fSAFEGUARDS iWrDFMATION | |||
'- Upon; S2parsuan This | |||
'Page is-Ca:entrolled - | |||
-l | |||
~ | |||
be: | 4 U. S. Nuclear' Regulatory Connaission | ||
D. R. Mihalik J. B. Shinnock W. ~ G. Smith, Jr. | 'AEP:NRC:1206 Page.3 s | ||
PRONET DC-N-6015.1 | i be: | ||
i | S. J. Brewer /D.'H Malin/K. J. Toth/L. M. Smart U. M. Hodge ' Bridgman J. A. Kobyra/S. H. Steinhart/S. P. Hodge D. R. Mihalik J. B. Shinnock W. ~ G. Smith, Jr. | ||
-l J. S.-Wiebe J. B. Hickman, NRC - Washington, D.C. | |||
PRONET DC-N-6015.1 i | |||
,i f | |||
f F | f F | ||
6 | 6 | ||
-l v | |||
e 1 | e 1 | ||
i | i | ||
~... | |||
, - -}} | |||
Latest revision as of 01:36, 14 December 2024
| ML20086R461 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook |
| Issue date: | 07/19/1995 |
| From: | Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| AEP:NRC:1206, NUDOCS 9507310147 | |
| Download: ML20086R461 (3) | |
Text
-
9.-
e@ana recn:can i
Nwer Comnany s n u, m m~;-
Enclosure Contains i
6AFEGUARDS INFORMATION y
Upon Separation This auf
.l J
Page is Decontrolled JNOfANA 1
IAfCNfGAN POWER
)
i l
July 19, 1995 AEP:NRC:1206'
'I Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 i
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission b
ATTN:
Document Control Desk l
Washington, D. C.
20555 Gentlemen:
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 I
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM 10 CFR 73.55 DUPLICATE ALARM STATION STAFFING REQUIREMENT This letter is our application, pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5,'for an exemption from 10 CFR 73.55(e)(1) and other sections of 10 CFR 73.
Specifically, the request is to eliminate from the Donald C. Cook Nuclear-Plant security plan the requirement to continuously staff the duplicate alarm station.
If this exemption request is approved, an amendment to the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Modified i
Amended Security Plan will be required under 10 CFR 50.90.
Our proposed determination of no significant hazards consideration performed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92 is contained in Attachment 1,
~
with justification for the request for exemption from 10 CFR 73.55(e)(1). A description'of the proposed physical security plan changes, our analysis concerning the effectiveness of the security plan, and our justification for the exemption are also contained in.
The details of the specific changes to the physical security plan, with the existing sections affected and with the proposed changed sections -are contained in Attachment 2.
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, this exemption is justifiable since (1) no law specifically requires that NRC regulations mandate a
~
continuously manned duplicate alarm station and the Commission is authorized to grant exemptions to 10 CFR 73 requirements, (2) it will not endanger life or property or the common defense, (3) it is in the public interest, (4) the underlying purpose of the rule will be served, (5) continued compliance results in undue hardship and cost from excess staffing expenses compared to nuclear plants in other nations, and (6) the duplicate alarm station equipment will be maintained operable, in case it is needed for contingencies.
1 9507310147 950719 1
PDR ADOCK 05000315 F
PDR j
j
i
- .nclosure COntains 5AFEGUARDS INFORMATION UpOn Separation This Page is Dec0ntrollej;l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP:NRC:1206' Page 2 In addition, this is a cost beneficial' licensing action (CBLA) submittal and represents a large dollar value CBLA item.
The lifetime cost savings associated with this CBLA are approximately
$5,379,770, as detailed in Attachment 3.
These proposed changes have been reviewed and approved by the Cook Nuclear Site Vice President / Plant Manager and the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee.
Please acknowledge receipt of this
- letter, which contains safeguards information, by signing and returning the enclosed safeguards information transmittal form to D.
J.
Ashley, Cook-Nuclear Plant, One Cook Place, Bridgman, Michigan 49106.
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.21, it is requested that the subject transmittals be withheld from public disclosure and not placed in the Public Document Room.
Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this exemption request.
Sincerely, CL t
E. E. Fitzpatrick Vice President SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS !*#3 DAY OF
'o 1995
,/,; L.v,.. /.
,' rn
_o _
tiotary Public My Commission Expires: J M 00 eh Attachments 1
cc:
A. A. Blind G. Charnoff H. J. Miller NFEM Section Chief I
NRC Resident Inspector Bridgman J. R. Padgett l
~
,5 e
- - Enclosure Contains -
- fSAFEGUARDS iWrDFMATION
'- Upon; S2parsuan This
'Page is-Ca:entrolled -
-l
~
4 U. S. Nuclear' Regulatory Connaission
'AEP:NRC:1206 Page.3 s
i be:
S. J. Brewer /D.'H Malin/K. J. Toth/L. M. Smart U. M. Hodge ' Bridgman J. A. Kobyra/S. H. Steinhart/S. P. Hodge D. R. Mihalik J. B. Shinnock W. ~ G. Smith, Jr.
-l J. S.-Wiebe J. B. Hickman, NRC - Washington, D.C.
PRONET DC-N-6015.1 i
,i f
f F
6
-l v
e 1
i
~...
, - -