ML20098H013

Rept on Confirmatory Lab Testing Program for Category 1 Backfill

ML20098H013
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	09/30/1984
From:	BECHTEL GROUP, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20098H010	List: ML20098H009 ML20098H013
References
NUDOCS 8410090248
Download: ML20098H013 (133)

Text

_7, T

~'

.~.

V0GTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT t

REPORT ON CONFIRMATORY LABORATORY TESTING

. PROGRAM FOR-CATEGORY 1 BACKFILL PREPARED FOR SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES AND GEORGIA POWER COMPANY BY BECHTEL CIVIL AND MINERALS, INC., NORWALK SEPTEMBER 1984 84'10090248 840927 PDR-ADOCK05000g Ic. A..

n TABLE 0F CONTENTS Section Title h-

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1

'2.0 SAMPLING-1

-3.0 LABORATORY TESTING 2

4.0 EVALUATION 2

4.1 Maximum Dry Density 2

4.2 Moisture Content 3

4.3 Permeability 5

5.0

SUMMARY

OF CONCLUSIONS 5

REFERENCES 6

TABLES 7

APPENDICES i

I I_

c.

i LIST OF TABLES Table.

Title Page

~1 COMPARISON OF GPC AND LETCO TEST DATA 7

~ -' 2 '.

COMPARISON OF ASTM D-1557 AND D 4253-83 TEST DATA 8

o I

I i

i l

ii

,=-

~ 1

~V0GTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING' PLANT

, UNITS 1 & 2 TCONFIRMATORY LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM FOR CATEGORY 1 BACKFILL i

-1.0' TINTRODUCTION

~

'At the request of the Nuclear Regulatory Consission (NRC),.a laboratory

' testing. program-of. Category 1 backfill'was' developed by Bechtel and Southern Company ~ Services (SCS). 'The purpose of-the testing program was to-verify the typical maximum. dry densities which have been determined throughout the backfilling process by Georgia Power Company (GPC), and used to determine the

~

degree of compaction achieved in the field. Thir was determined by having both Georgia Power: Company and an independent _ laboratory perform maximum

' dry density tests (ASTM 1557)~on split samples. Additional testing was to

.be performed by the independent laboratory.- Law Engineering Testinc Company f(LETCO) was selected by the NRC to Laplement the confirmatory laboratory testing program.

LA total.of 12' samples of representative 1 Category 1 backfill material were tested by LETCO and_.GPC.

Data developed by LETCO and GPC are attached to lthis report as Appendices.1 and 2 respectively. A discussion of the data generated _by the two laboratories follows.

2.0' SAMPLING-

! Sampling of the backfill material was done by GPC. Seven of the twelve samples.were obtained'directly from borrow sources; the other five were obtained in.a manner that was consistent with the normal. handling of the 1 fill'in the-field.

Each sample weighed approximately 100 lbs and was

~

obtained.in,the following manner.

First a large bulk sample'of approximately 400 lbs was obtained from the borrow source or the fill'. -.Each large bulk' sample obtained from the borrow source was. thoroughly. mixed and then subdivided into 4 -.100 lb test samples. Large bulk samples obtained from the fill were not mixed prior to splitting them. Of the 4 - 100 lb~ test samples, one was shipped to LETCO and the-other three were retained by GPC.' Of-the. retained samples, one was used for testing by GPC and the others were. stored for record purposes. _ Prior to shipping,: testing and. storing samples, testing in accordance with ASTM D1140

' was performed by GPC on material obtained from'each.100 lb sample. The

, purpose offthe ASTM D 1140 testing was to determine percent passing the US No. 200 sieve size.ard'thus help GPC establish whether.the samples selected

-for testing met the criteria for soil types-defined in the testing program.~

The above' procedure of obtaining and selecting samples was followed for all

-; twelve test samples. The testing program developed.by Bechtel and SCS.

called for selection of 6: samples with fines of less than 5 percent and

4 samples each with fines ranging 1from 5 to 9 percent and 9 to 12 percent respectively. 1However because of sampling difficulties encountered in the

' field, only two samples in the 5 to 9 percent range of fines could be obtained.

.This was:due to the unavailability of this range of materials in the borrow E

' sources.. Therefore a total'of 12 samples were tested instead of 14 as-originally planned.

L 1

a

3.0 LABORATORY TESTING Both LETCO and GPC's field soils laboratory performed the modified Procter (ASTM D.1557) and sieve analysis (ASTM D 422) tests on the twelve soil

~

samples. LETCO also performed the soil tests listed below as required by the testing program. These tests were not performed by GPC as their field laboratory was not equipped to perform them.

t No.

Type of Test-Test Standard 1

Hydrometer Analysis ASTM D 422 2

Relative Density of ASTM D 4253-83 &

Cohesionless Soils D 4254-83 (New Standards issued in 1983) 3 Permeability of Soils US Army Corps. of Engineers, EM-1110-2-1906 Appeadix VII 7

4 Liquid Limit of Soils ASTM D 423 5.

Plastic Limit of Soils ASTM D 424 Description of testing procedures used is given in LETCO's report (Appendix 1) 4.0 EVALUATION 4.1 Maximum Dry Density Maximum dry densities obtained by LETCO and GPC from the modified Proctor i-test'(ASTM D 1557) are summarized in Table 1.

The data in Table I show that for material with less than 5 percent fines, LETCO's maximum dry densities ranged from 103.3 to 108.2 pcf and GPC's ranged from 101.9 to 104.7 pcf.

LETCO's maximum dry densities are higher than those obtained by GPC and the difference ranges from 0.8 to 3.5 pcf with an average of 2.0 pcf. When expressed as la percentage of the mean of the maximum dry densities for each sample obtained from the two laboratories, the differences range from 0.8 to 3.3 percent. This is less than the maximum limit of 4 percent specified for multilaboratory' precision in Table 3 of the ASTM D 1557 test standard.

Therefore the test results of both laboratories are considered to be in agreement.

-A similar trend is apparent for material ranging in fines from 5 to 12 percent.

For this type of material, LETCO's maximum dry density ranged from 107.8 to 115.3 'pcf and_ GPC's ranged from 106.8 to 114.2 pcf.

LETCO's dry densities exceed-those obtained by GPC. The difference in dry density ranges from 1.0 to 3.2 pcf with an average value of 1.7 pcf. When expressed as.a percentage of mean value, the differences range from 0.9 to 2.9 percent which is less than the maximum limit of 4.0 percent for multilaboratory precision. Again, the-test results of both laboratories are considered to be'in agreement.

2 a.,.--.--

A comparison of the maximum dry densities obtained by ASTM D 1557 with

.those obtained by' ASTM D 4253-83 is presented in Table 2.

These data-

-show that.for material with less than 5 percent fines, the ASTM D 4253

' dry method generally yields higher maximum dry densities than the ASTM D

4253-83 wet method and the ASTM D 1557 test. The ASTM D 4253-83 dry method values exceed GPC's ASTM D 1557 values by 2.4 to 4.3 pef. While the ASTM D 4253-83 dry method maximum densities are consistently higher than those yielded by ASTM D 1557, the ASTM D 4253-83 wet method shows no such trend. However for material with fines ranging from 5 to 12 percent, ASTM D 1557 yielded higher maximum dry densities than the ASTM D4253-83 wet and dry methods.

The data shown in Tables 1 and 2 indicate the following:

1.

As expected, maximum dry density increases with increasing percent passing the No. 200 sieve size. This trend is evident in the data generated by both laboratories.

2.

Maximum dry densities obtained by LETCO using the ASTM D 1557 test exceed those obtained by GPC by an average of approximately 2.0 pcf.

One possible cause for this difference may be the fact that GPC employs an automatic rammer as compared to a manually operated rammer used by LETCO.- However the differences for all samples tested are well within the 4 percent maximum precision limit specified in the ASTM D 1557 test standard. The higher LETCO densities when applied to the compaction test records would not significantly reduce the percent compaction reported by GPC. Therefore the conclusion that the fill meets the specification based on the compaction records remains unchanged.

3.

For material with fines ranging from 5 to 12 percent, the ASTM D 1557 test standard currently used by GPC yields densities higher than the relative density test. For materials with less than 5% fines the ASTM D 4253-83 (dry method) yields higher maximum dry densities than the D 1557 test. However the differences in maximum unit weights between the two types of tests are less than an average of about 4 pcf i

and the' fill would meet the specified compaction if the higher maximum i

unit weight were used.

4.2 Moisture Content Review of the Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) data shown in Table 1 indicates the following:

1.

For material with fines ranging from 5 to 12 percent the agreement between the LETCO and GPC optimum values is within the precision limits of ASTM D 1557, with the exception of samples S-7 and S-10.

In the case of sample S-10, the compaction curves prepared by the two laboratories are very similar and very flat. GPC has selected the moisture content at the maximum measured density for their optimum moisture content, which is reasonable. However, since three of the GPC points, covering a range of moisture contents from 10.4 to 16.6 percent, have dry densities of 106.8, 106.6 and 106.6 pef, it can be concluded that density is not very sensitive to moisture changes for this sample. The optimum probably lies 3

u

somewhere in the range of-10.4 to 16.6 percent.

T5.e IITCO value of 14.7 percent is within that range. Similarly for Sample S-7, GPC has reported dry densities of 108.4 and 108.6 pcf at moisture contents of 12.1 and 13.8 percent respectively. The optimum value appears to range

from 12.1 to 13.8 percent with the IETCO value of 11.3 percent being closer to the GPC lower bound value.

2.

For material with.less than 5 percent fines the differences between the

'LETCO and GPC optimum moisture contents exceed the precision limits of ASTM D 1557. The reasons for these differences are not apparent from the test data.

'3.

Using the-LETCO data, the following table was prepared to show moisture contents over which the required 97 percent relative compactior. can be achieved.

yD at 97%

Moisture Range Sample No.

x yD at 97% yD max Oh max (PCF)

(percent)

(percent) 3 B'

S-1 102.3 8-21*

15.5 S-2 100.2 6-22*

16.7 S-3 101.1 5-22*

19.3 S-4 105 10-21 18.1 S-5 102.6 13-22 18.5 S-6 103.8 10-19 16.0 S-7 107.2 6-20*

11.3 S-9 107.0 6-20*

14.8 S-10 104.6 6-19*

14.7 S-11 111.8 4-16.5*

13.2 S-12 109.9 3-16.5*

11.2

• Curve extrapolated 4

(

4.3 Permeability

> Permeability tests were performed on two backfill samples; one with approxi-mately 5.9 percent fines and the other with 11 percent fines. No perme-ability tests were performed on material with less than 5 percent fines.

Thedatashowthatformaterialwith5.9percentfinesthecoefficieng'of 3

permeability ranged from approximately 2.0 x 10 in/see to 6.0 x 10 cm/sec. For material the permeability ranged from approximately4.0x10(th11percentfines23 cm/sec to 4.0 x 10 cm/sec. A review of the data indicates the following:

1.

The coefficient of permeability of both samples tested increases with decrease in the degree of compaction.

2.

The coefficient of permeability decreases with increase in the fines

. content of the backfill material.

3.

Based on criteria developed by Terzaghi and Peck (Reference 1), material with 5.9 percent fines may be classified as possessing medium perme-ability. Material with 11.0 percent fines may be classified as possessing medium to low permeability depending on the degree to which the material is compacted.

4.

Materials with 5 to 12 percent fines when compacted to the specifica-tion requirements (97 percent or higher relative compaction) have medium to low permeability.

5.0

SUMMARY

OF CONCLUSIONS 1.

Based on the laboratory test data developed by LETCO and GPC it is

-concluded that differences in the maximum dry density values between

.the two laboratories are well within the precision limits set in the ASTM D 1557 test standard. Data from both laboratories show that for material types tested, the maximum dry density from ASTM D 1557 ranges from 101.9 to 115.3 pcf. These values of maximum dry density from laboratory tests are typical for these materials and are consistent with results previously obtained from laboratory tests performed by GPC and other laboratories. Maximum dry density values obtained by LETCO are slightly higher than those obtained by GPC but not enough to

-influence the degree of compaction reported by GPC. The laboratory test data support the conclusion that Category I backfill at Plant Vogtle has been compacted to the high degree of compactior' committed to by GPC in the PSAR. For materials with fines ranging from 5 to 12 percent, the ASTM D 4253-83 method of test yields maximum densities that are lower than those obtained from ASTM D 1557. For materials with less than 5 percent fines the ASTM D 4253-83 (dry method) yielded higher maximum dry densities than the ASTM D 1557 test. However the differences in maximum unit weights between GPC's ASTM D 1557 and

-LETCO's ASTM D 4253-83 tests average 3.2 pcf for material with less than 5% fines. These differences are not considered significant in view of the fact that the field records indicate the compaction achieved by GPC to be well over the specified compaction criteria for materials within this range.

5 L

l

m

~ 2.

The compaction curves presented by LETCO show that for material types tested the required 97 percent relative compaction can be achieved over a wide range of. moisture contents. This range is much wider than the limiting range of the construction specifications.

3.

Permeability tests show that backfill material with 5 to 12 percent fines when compacted to 97 percent relative compaction will have medium to low permeability.

REFERENCES 1.-

Terzaghi, K., and R. B. Peck, 1967 Soil Mechanics and Engineering Practice 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

6 L

7 TABLE 1 COMPARISON OF GPC AND LETCO TEST DATA l

LETCO GPC LETCO GPC Max Y OMC Max yD OMC

% Passing

% Passing Sample No.

(pcf)D

(%)

pcf

(%)

1. 200

1. 200 S-1

-105.5 15.5 103.9 12.0 3.2 3.7 S-2 103.3 16.7 101.9 11.3 3.4 4.0 S-3 104.2 19.3 103.4 11.7 3.3 3.7 S-4 108.2 18.1 104.7 13.5 3.3 4.4 S-5 105.8 18.5 103.4 13.2 3.0 2.9 S-6 107.0 16.0 104.7 15.0 3.4 3.2 S-7 110.5 11.3 108.6 13.8 7.5 7.4 S-9 110.3 14.8 109.0 14.0 10.0 9.4 S-10 107.8 14.7 106.8 10.4 5.9 5.6 S-11 115.3 13.2 114.2 14.3 11.0 9.7 S-12 113.3 11.2 110.1 13.5 10.7 9.3 S-13 111.2 13.5 109.5 13.5 9.5 9.5 1

)

i 7

l

r i

TABLE 2 COMPARISON OF ASTM D 1557 AND D 4353-83 TEST DATA Max y ASTMD$557 Max yD

• • YD Wet Dry Percent Fines ASTM D 4353-83 Sample No.

LETCO LETCO GPC LETCO S-1 3.2-105.5 103.9 105.9 107.5 S-2 3.4 103.3 101.9 104.2 105.8 S-3 3.3 104.2 103.4 105.8 105.9 S-4 3.3 108.2 104.7 104.0 107.1 S-5 3.0 105.8 103.4 103.8 107.7 S-6 3.4 107.0 104.7 104.0 107.3 S-7 7.5 110.5 108.6 110.2 108.4 S-8 10.0 110.3 109.0 107.0 101.7 S-9 5.9 107.8 106.8 111.3 106.8 S-10 11.0 115.3 114.2 106.9 106.9-S-11 10.7 113.3 110.1 99.5 100.7 S-12 9.5 111.2 109.5 107.3 102.6 i

8 m

q APPENDIX 1 L

/

e uw -----

=.m co-,.y 2

• T EoRGIA 30324 August'8, 1984 4

4 Southern Company services, Inc.

P.O. Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Attention:

Mr.

J.

A.

Bailey

Subject:

Report of Confirmatory Laboratory Testing Program For Category I Backfill Vogtle Electrical Generating Plant LETCo Job Number 7429 Gentlemen:

Law Engineering has completed the requested confirmatory laboratory testing of backfill materials, except for permeability testing.

The results of the tests are presented in this report.

Kwelve bags of soil were received from Plant Vogtle on June 15 and June 19, 1984.

Initially testing of fourteen samples was planned.

Due to sampling difficulties in tne field, samples initially numbered 8 and 14 were not delivered to us.

In tne laboratory the following tests were perf)rmed:

AiTM D 422-63 Particle Size Analysis of Soil ASTM D 1557-78 Moisture Density Relations of Soils and Soil Aggregate Mixtures using 10 l b. Rammer and 18 inch Drop (Method A).

ASTM D 2049-69 Pelative Density of Cohesionless Soil.

ASTM D 4253-83 Maximum Index Density of Soils using a Vibratory Table (Appendix non-mands'ory information included).

ASTM D 4254-83 Minimum Index Density of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density.

ASTM D 423-66 Liquid Limit of Soil.

ASTM D 424-59 Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils.

Tests are presently underway to evaluate the permeability of two samples, Humber 10 and 11.

The results of the permeability testing will be reported to you as soon as it is completed.

Grain Size Tests

Sauthorn CO2pany Sorvicos, Inc.

8-8-84 Page 2 s

The grain size distribution of the twelve samples received was determined by procedures outlined in ASTM D 422-63 Six o f the samples had less then 55 passing the No. 200 sieve, two of the samples had between 5 and 9% passing the No. 200 sieve and four of the samples had greater than 9% but less than 125 passing the No. 200 sieve.

The particle size distribution for materials coarser than the No. 200 sieve was determined by passing the materials over a set of nested sieves.

The particle size distribution for materials finer than the No. 200 sieve was determined by Hydrometer analysis for the three samples initially thought to be in the range of 9 to 12% passing the No. 200 sieve.

One sample, Number 10, contained 10% passing the No. 200 sieve, so was outside its planned range of 55 to 95 passing the No. 200 sieve.

During the relative density testing, three grain size tests were performed on samples to determine if grain size changes (degradation) occured due to performing several relative density tests on the same sample.

This grain size testing indicated that the gradation of the soil did not change appreciably during the relative density testing.

The results of the grain size testing is shown on the individual Erain size sheets and on the tabulated laboratory test results in the Appendix.

Modified Proctor Comoaction Tests Twelve modified proctor compaction tests were performed to evaluate the moisture density relations of the soils.

During testing the soils typically " bled" water from the compaction mold.

To evaluate this condition moisture content tests were performed on the soil samples both before and af ter compaction in the compaction mold.

The loss of water from the compaction mold during compaction was measured to vary from approximately one half percent to approximately four percent for tests performed wet of optimum moisture content.

The results of the modified Proctor compaction testing are shown on the individual modified Proctor compaction test sheets and on the Table of Laboratory Test Results in the Appendix.

Relative Density Testine Relative density testing was initiated using procedures outlined in ASTM D 2049-69 At the request of Hr. Joe Kane of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with approval f rom Mr. Walter Ferris of Bechtel Incorporated, who visited our laboratory to observe the testing f rom June 27, 1984 through June 29, 1984, the relative density program was modified.

Three soil samples were selected f rom each of the grain size ranges, less than 55 passing the No.

200 sieve.

5' to 95 passing the No. 200 sieve, and 9% to 125 passing the No. 200 sieve to evaluate the optimum amplitude of vibration.

Utilizing procedures outlined in ASTM D 4253-83, th War.""37.

S

Szuthorn Cccpony Sorvices, Inc.

8-8-84 Page 3 a

l

~

maximum density was determined by tne dry method at selected points over a range of amplitudes of vibration.

For each grain size range, the amplitude of vibrations which produced the highest maximum density was determined.

This optimum amplitude of vibration (3600 cycles per second frequency) was then used within each grain size range for determining maximum density by both the wet and dry methods.

The minimum density of each sample was determined by procedures outlined in ASTM D 4254-83 The results of the maximum and minimum density testing are shown on the attached relative density test sheets and on the plots of maximum density versus amplitude of vibration in the Appendix.

Plasticity Inder Plasticity index testing was performed on the three soil samples initially expected to fall within tne range of 95 to 125 passing the No. 200 sieve by procedures outlined in ASTM D 423-66 and D-424-59 The testing indicated that each of the three samples was non-liquid, non-plastic.

Discussion We understand that the results of the modified proctor compaction tests performed in our laboratory will be compared with like tests performed at Plant Vogtle.

We point out the precision of this test as shown on Table 3 of ASTM D-1557 allows an acceptable range of two results from dif ferent laboratory to be 45 of the sean value.

The multilaboratory standard deviation of maximum 2

density by the ASTM D 1557-82 method is shown as t 1.66.

For samples in the 0-55 and 55 - 95 passing the #200 sieve grain size "ange, the relative density test indicated maximum densities ranging from approximately one pound per cubic foot lecs to approximately three and one half pounds per cubic foot greater than the modified Proctor maximum density.

For soils in the 95 to 125 passing the No. 200 sieve grain size range, maximum density determined by the relative density method ranged from approximately three to eight pounds per cubic foot less than the modified Proctor maximum density.

Thank you for the opportunity of working with you on this project.

If you have any questions concerning this project or'if we can be of additional assistance to you, please contact us.

Very truly yours, LAW t:NGINEERING TESTING COMPANY John E. Ly ch am Allen Lancaster Laboratory Manager Civil Engineer

I i

0 i

l APPENDIX t

~ - -

' ' ~ ' ' ^ ~

~ ~ ~

e JO3 Ff 0.

7I b SHEET

/

OF

/

JOB NAME [v. M. [.

Yr")d//' O/c//)[

t.AW ENGINEERING TESTING COMr%NY rw.m r.w m e we & coawucte mm.e es co.wnams 396 PLASTEAS AVENUE N E r i. g'.

DATE 7 v"O-8g

-/

BY PO Box 1326,0

• ATLANTA GEOAG!A 30324

.434, e u ve CHECKED BY 2 DATE k

5asaple Cla :ifkaiion

. -. -. yA m-.

-. g -.-

I <>1o24. _.Grah Stie. _ _.. _..

Gre,u Stie DMribuben.

i Sarnple il compl#

! tample uniCe.d 1

1. ""* [' 7 Pos:.) ', Ps::

lDeccrini>E

Scun c Conl^o'

/

1 l 'te cjg;,

lo.

't2cc Sand,} SilI ~ clay

't v to w 40

- - - - Porlk," ode 4,. - -; Bonow n--

w-.-.---..---_-..

• I rne d. Sos;d i rnored t 4.2 loc.c 4e.6 3.2,; 96.8

~

5p I

Pih k [me i Eocrow

1. ?.

do a:cd. Enne n nhved

3. &

ICO.C 55.5 3.4 96.le SP To a frne le.

Ber<e n 1,;<d. :nnn n>ifed 3.6 100.0 51.7 3.3 96.7 l SP

..i-....

Tan fade de Scaew

• 4' n>,.g. Sand a h r. ' n E6 10 0. 0 32.?

2.3 96.7 5P e

Pirik fir.e 4 : Field 8*9 10 0.0 53.1 3.0 97.0,

SG

1. 0

,,;,.g. Sold un am1re i

• ~~

.Po h h fu.'r Facid O'

in,,;<n. C.,,,,,

un mithd.

7.8 10 0.0 48.1 3.4

%. (s SP

'de. Borrow Ornon e z'7

.j,,,,;,'.s, c,7, j oj,,.g

2. E 99,4

67. g 7,g 97.5.

5p_ su Ornnn s.

Cr<

g,,. id

~

• 9 io inc<i. [ve un ernie'd 4.0 99.9 75.9 10.0 90.0 SP-S M 7

Lichi brau't.

FriId I. 5 99.2 62.5 5.c) 94.1

' IO f,.,

4,,

,.o.,,J.

th> mi,en Sp cM r

,.naan

?Qio Ytr C O k $6e r A V)

• !I med. :and l nnyed

5. 2 98.2 66.4 ll.0 E 9.0 C.E 52 SP-SM B r w i. fr e - Berm w

• l2 q,,, g, :,,,.,.

r,,, c; 8.o too.n

g. g in.y g9. 3 3.~

7.o c cv 01013 r1.* l 1.*

j.'t y f er'

~I NA

1. d. [.,rd l ff t :r*.. pd k ?.

9.5 75, '

9.6 90.1 3&

5,9

$9-[M 1:

j yg osavEL SAND FINES 88 COnnSE l rlNc COanScl uEDluu I

FIN E SILT SIZES l CLAY SIZES U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 900

'l l

1 T

i' i

i i

I A

8 1

so I

e l

f

\\

l l

l l

1 0

SO h

l l

l l

I I

~

l 1

$ 70 I

=

i i

i l

l i

l l

l 1

i

>- so

.L-I E

(!

8 E

I g

l IM SO I

3

[

l I

I u.

i

, L b-4 0 l

I i z

i i

I i \\

u o

l i

i I

c so

\\

w l

1 I

8 i

i i

\\

i 20 i

i l

l

\\,

l i

1 i

e 1

(

l l

i i

\\

i I

s I

I 0

100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN M!LLIMETERS GORING NO.

DEPTH N AT WC LL PL PI DESCRIPTION OR CLASSIFIC ATION Law Engineering

• *,9 ' '

gouOw p;,,g;,,go m,s. g,,g Testing Company Mixed (SP) d Grain Size Distribution 7429 J

gp GRAVEL SAND ~d FINES c,,

g, SM COARSE l COARSE]

l FIN E SILT SIZES l CLAY SIZES riNE uEDiuu U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 800 l

l 3

I t

1 I

,0 i

l

)

80

=

>=

l I

e jI I

I

$ 70 i

113 l

l t

I 3

7 I

i 8

>- 60 I

I m

l l

e I'

1 w

3, i

e z

[

[

I E

l l

l i t I-40 z

i i

l g

I i

I I m 30 i

j i

m e

i i

i i

i l

i

(

l i

i l

1

\\

l i

I

\\

l i

i,

(

l s

0 J

100 10 1.0 0.1 0.0; O.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS OORING NO DEPTH N AT WC LL PL PI DESCRIPTION OR CLASSIFICATION Law Engineering Bgg >o

~!

Borrow Pihk Fhe to Med. Sand Testing Company Maes (50>

Grain Size Distribution 74 29 L

Ul C

GRAVEL SAND FINES 9$

COARSc l cO A RStl l

r:Nc SILT Sizc5 lCL A Y SIZES ucDiuu riNe U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 100 l

l 1

T i

i i

3 90 I

I I

i.

)

I I

I I

i i

i 8

I k

l l

4 e0 l

h l

l l

l 8

r 9 70

=

1 8

l3 4

g3 g

l l

l l

3:

4

> 60

,L 8

i f

l I

e l

b l

l' W

I 50 l

I u-i i

i I

I k h 40 Z

i i

8 i \\

i W

=

l l

I 30

\\

E8 l

20 I

k i

i l

I

\\

i I

l

\\

l I

I i

\\,

i I

I O

100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN.ilLLIMETERS

(

DEPTH N A T WC LL PL PI DESCRIPTION OR CL ASSiFIC ATION BORING NO.

Law Engineering Bo91 s-s Borrow Tan Fme to Med. Sand Testing Company

~~o-Mn. d (SP).

e l

Grain Size Distribution M9

yp GRAVcL SAND 98 FINc3 coAnse l riNe coAnstl ucDiuu l

r Nc sitT sizcs lcLav sizes U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 soo

=

=

=

i e

f I

i i

so I

i s

i a

L 8

5 i

e i

1 1

3 i

e k

I i

i l

t

}

8 so I

l-l I

l 1

1 I

8 g

9 70 i

I w

i i

i 3:

l l

l i

i

>- so E

.I f

I I

i a:

W i

l so E

i LL u,

i i

p 4,

,i i

1 z,

i a

O

[

t I

l k gr 30 m

CL

-l

- \\,

i i

gn I

l I

L I

i i

l i

\\

l l

T l

'l i

i.

\\

I i

l ll N-100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS BORING NO.

DEPTH N AT WC LL PL PI OcSCRIPTION OR CLASSIFIC ATION Law Engineering B

~Q" ~Borrow Tan Fihe to Med. Sand Testing Company Mded Grain Size Distribution 7429 (S P)

j g cRAvCL SAND FIN ES FIN E SILT SIZES lCL A Y SIZES 88 COARSE l

raNE cO A RSEl l

MEDluu U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4 to 20 40 60 100 200 SOO I

i N

i I

s I

s I

l 1

t t

i

(

[

l i

so l

l l

1 i H

4 I

I 70 f,

W I

a I'

g..

.q m

E

. b--.

i t

I W

50 I

=

q i

i F 40 l

I 2

\\

Z l

l 8

l 8

m l

i i

i

\\,

o E 30 i

--t IM i

i l

(

I i

i

\\

I i

20 l

i i

\\

l i

l 1

1 i

i

\\

I

~

I I

O 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GORING NO DEPTH N AT WC LL PL Pl DESCRIPTION OR CL ASSIFIC ATION Law Engineering 8~gsf p;,gg p;ng g,3,f, geg_ Sang Testing Company

~e Unmived (5P)

Grain Size Distribution M9

yp onavet saNo riNes riNe silt sizcs lCtav sizes COanscl ucosuu l

l 88 COmast r Nc U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200

=

soo l

t I

(

I e

'~~~

1 I

a I

g g

\\

8 i

so I

~~~~

l ao I

I-l 1

g I

e g-l 3

.__~

70 g

.p._.-

._j i

I j

>- s o L

l g

m i

i i

i g

I i

W I

So E

I

\\,

u-i I

I (

H do

'(

l I

l \\

8 Z

W i

i i \\

o l

c 30

-t W

l i

i

\\

i

\\

i 2o t.

i i

i l

s i

i

\\

's i

i too to 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS BOstlNG NO DcPTH N AT WC LL PL Pl DESCRIPTION OR CLAsslFIC ATION Law Engineering >o" "!

Bag Foiid Pink Fihe to Med. Sand Testing Company unadxed (SP)

Grain Size Distribution 74 29 es

jg GRAVEL SAND FINES

@M COARSE l

reNE CO A R SEl l

FINE SILT SIZES lCL AY SIZES MEDIUM U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3./4" 3./8" 4

10 20 40 60 100 200 l

i M

i I

i l

3 a

90 1

8 8

I

\\

l l

i e

i

( li i

1 l

I y

U g

._l.____

7e I

3

.7 1

> so l.

e

_ _l i

Q

(

l l

C W

I 8

! k l

so E

5 l

t 12-

i i

i e

i H 40 I

I L

n Z

i i

I

\\

i j

y a

t a

a 1

o l

i

\\

i E 3o i

a.

\\,

w l

i i

i I

L i

2.

I i

l l

\\

l i

l

\\

l i

l 1

4 1

i

~~-

I I

3 t

0

=

100 10 a.O O.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 80 RING NO DEPTH N AT WC LL PL PS DESCRIPTION OR CLASSIFIC ATION Law Engineering 8

~;o}

go,,,w o,ang, y,he to yeg. 5ans Testing Company

~e gg,g gp_ gg Grain Size Distribution 7429 i

a jg GRAVEL SAND 3 FINES h5 COARSE l

FINE CO A RSEl FINE SILT SIZES lCL AY SIZES l

MEDIUM U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 1 "3. /4 " 3/. 8" 4

10 20 40 60 100 200 3" 2" l

l 1

i l

1

~---

i so 1

(

I i

i e

i i

i I

I 1

)

a l

l s

so

+--

t '

\\1 l

8 I

L 7e y

7 f

> so l,

t i \\

o i

e l

i i

m i

1

_z,.

.r_

i i.

i i

L

'i I

g i

e t

~

F-43 i

i t

i i

1 1

z i

i m

O 8

1 1

8 l

C 30

<4,-

i m

i i

\\

i l

i l

1

\\

i i

l A

3 I

[

g i

i 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS eORING NO DEPTH N AT WC LL PL PS DESCRIPTION OR CLASSIFIC ATION Law Engineering Bg Fseld Orange Fhe to Med. Sand Testing Company

~ ~O Unmused

( SP-SM )

Grain Size Distribution 7429

I yg GRAVEL I

SAND T.NES h5 CO 4 RSE l

FINE COAR5d l

rsNE SILT SIZES l CLAY S82ES MEDIUM U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4 3/8" 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 i

i i

i

)

i i

t, t

1 l

l i

i

\\

l t-i i

\\

i s.,

d i, p__

y I

i i

=

e i

e a

5,,

i ji i

4 l

E I,

i i \\

e i,

3 p,,

_g t

t t

I!

5 m

L o,,

i l

1

\\

m W

8 I

8 l

I li

\\,

i 2.

l

(

l l

i ni l

l

\\

l

,t u;

l v

e

=

i c

i 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS Law Engineering F

d U. B F, e d Sand Testing Company -o-g,,g,g (Sp. guy Grain Size Distribution M9

O y

a r0 C

w

~.

r O

o e.

W

-Q 4

=

0 2

6 Ju g

Dm e

a 4

u m

e

.a d O

(f) o v s.

.c W

O a

Q O

N.

w C

o d

a 3

E I

i S

,8.

,q'

--.. s,-

-__q ---- ---

a a

d R

1 m o

/

O M W

/

6 I

N

/

z g

C M o f

g w-E w

1. g

- j W

3 %

o,.

s

.. /

M r

E OD 'o a

a 2

O

/

D 2

h 4

3 a: o e

g o %

5 N-f o w to 4.

w O

3 Z

(

N M

E

$ *- 1 2

o e

I 2

m;i 2

N e

e vi 2

c3 e

9 h D" 2 N

8 d

U

.====

_- _u=====,=,=======

@y CC r

w e,

h-o

't M gQc a

i 5

b-eEe

==.wn_.

._: a:.-.swnws s.,

5 L.

C O v

0.a y

2 c

8 L.

C E

Lu @c ~

_.t-

..t_.._

_ __r.t...,_. _..

_.n_.._=.-_.

a n-....

_- _,_,,_4_.,___.,. _

8 g *@

g C

H i

(T p @c g

'e-

____,__,_,.v..,

, nm,

_________u e

n a

e e

e e

e e

e e

+

~

+

e n

e idol 3M AU tl3Nid 1N33tl3tf

yp coastcs 88 co4Rsc l coaRstl l

riNe silt sizes lctav sizcs r Nc ucDluu U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4

10 20 40 60 100 200 500 I

I l

I I

I i

l

)

3 8

l l

l s i i

i e

a Lt I

h I

i

\\,,

l 80 h

l I

l l

8 I

70 g

a l

> 60 I,

I

.d-.

(D I

I 1

L-y g

k 50 l

b l

l l

l 3

i h 40 I

I 2

l l

1 l

\\

I uJ l

i I

\\

o i

g 30 e

)

id I

i 4

8 i

i l

i L

i 2o m

s i

l I

I

\\

j l

3 l

l N

I

~

10 i

l I

I

^

O 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS BOR I NG NO.

DcPTH N AT WC LL PL PI DcsCRIPTION OR class 1FIC ATION Law Engineering e>g9,[

g,,,,g gf. owr) F/ne fo Med. Sand Testing Company oe ~o-g,,eg (se-ss)

Grain Size Distribution 7429

yp onAvEL SAND FINES g

88 COanSt l r:Nc CO A RScl ucDiuu l

riNo SALT Sizcs lCLA Y SIZES U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4

10 20 40 60 100 200 soo

=

a l

l l

1 3

I i

i l

5 3

i E

t 8

i 90 t

i i

l l

)

1 I

a so l

l l

t i

F-I i

9 70

=

4 i

i 3

7

--.._)h l

\\

>- s o l

L

..__.4 m

i i \\

i 1

E i

I g

W I

n' E

[..

I so l

i I

L u.,

g t

I

\\

>= A o Z

j i

i I

\\

i u

a w

.7 i

I 30 o.

\\,

m l

i i

2o I

i l

1

\\

l

\\

e 1

i 3

i i

I i

i i

i i

o I

I

^

100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 1

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS BOR I NG NO.

DEPTH N AT WC LL PL PI DESCRIPTION OR CLASSirtC ATION Law Engineering By9 Fr ld N' ""

Grange fine {0 Med. Sand 3

Testing Company

>e

~ O.

Unmixed

( SP-SM )

Grain Size Distribution 7429

yp onavEL SAND FINES 88 COARSE l FIN E COARSE l MEDIUM l

FINE SILT SIZES lCL A Y SIZES U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4

10 20 40 60 100 200 000 I

i l

I I

i 1

l

)

I a

'-~~

90 I

8 3

1 I

l l

l 3

.L..

i 1

l l

8 I

l 8

80 h

l l

l l

4 I

7 9

70 f

i g

I f

>- 60

..l.

I p.-

-. -..... l a

CD I

l l

1 g

..p

.y..

g L

y_-

I 50 i

l W

[

i I

y i

r h 40

.I l

I 2

2

[

i I

l l

I w

a

.4 L

i O

i 1

l k

I g

(3" 30

[

I f

I 1

?

l l

\\

20

\\

i I

i i

i I

i g

i j

i 10 k

k I

I I

0

)

-l 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 1

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

'OOR I NG NO.

DEPTH N AT WC LL PL' P1 DESCRIPTION OR CLASSIFIC ATION Law Engineering Bo91 s-s Reid Run Affer Retalave Density Testing Company

~e Unmixed Test Grain Size Distribution 74 29

~....

y GRAVCL SAND 7 FINES 88 COARSE l

r:NE CO A RSEl MEDIUM l

rtNE SILT SIZES lCLAYEIZES U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4

10 20 40 50 100 200 too I'

i m' i

i

-s\\

90 I

i l

I t

i

__s l

l i

(

i i

3 l I

70 l

I l

._7

>= 6o I

l'

=

--,a E

l W

5o l

i

! \\

i 1

l-4o i

i i

1 i

Z i

i l

1

(

I 0

l l

l l

\\

~~~

E 30

\\

m i

i o.

L 20 g

I l

\\

l

,o tl i

i o

100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS DOR I NG NO.

DEPTH N AT WC LL PL PI DESCRIPTION OR CLASSIFIC ATION Law Engineering 8as,t Borrow Run ARer Relah.ve Densd.y S-Testing Company

>e N o.

Mu. d Test e

Grain Size Distribution 7429

yp GRAVEL SAND FIN ES QM CO A RSE l

FINE COARSE l MEDIUM l

FINE SILT SIZES l CLAY SIZES U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3" 2" 1"3/4" 3/8" 4 to 20 40 60 100 200 a

a soo l

I I

i N

I e

I I

l N

3 i

so I

i e

s 1

I I

l g

S I

1

\\

l 1

8 I

\\

l

,o F

i i

i

\\

i z

$ 70 l

8 il

...i i

m i

i g

_....I i

>- s o L.

t

,i

_ _,a

=

i i

W I

I s'

50 I

[

l i

I 2

\\

u-i i

i l

I F 40 t

Z

(

I i

i.

l I

t m

, 30

--- \\

m l

i i

a l

zo i

l 1

(

l l

l l

\\

,l

,o

~_

I I

I 8

o 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS BOR I NG NO.

DEPTH N AT WC LL PL PI DESCRIPTION OR CLASSIFIC ATION Law Engineering Bg>o slBorrow Run ARer Relative Density Testing Company

~ o-M&ed Test Grain Size Distribution 7429

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 BORING NUMBER IS N/A SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS S-1 BAG 1 SOURCE BORROW MIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.70

=

NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT =

4.2 PERCENT SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM VT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10

.1 100.0 20 17.1 93.3 40 131.4 48.6 60 190.3 22.4 100 242.0 5.2 300 247.1 3.2 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% CRAVEL 96.8% SAND 3.2% FINES UNIFORMITY COEF

=

2.98 COEF OF CURVATURE

=

.96 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS SP i

YOEt

!Cs12:

_.4 77b 3

' 9*"r.5 *.~ : #S 5..i~~4Yb.

==

IJ

LAV ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 BORING NUMBER IS N/A SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS S-2 BAG-1 SOURCE BORROV MIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.70 u

NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 3.6 PERCENT

=

SIEVE ANALYSIS STEVE

1. CUM VT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 j

10

.0 100.0 20 11.1 96.5 40 132.1 58.5 60 261.2 17.9 100 301.9 5.2 200 307.5 3.4 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% GRAVEL 96.6% SAND 3.4% FINES UNIFORMITY COEF 2.33 COEF Or CURVATURE 1.10

=

=

UNITIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS SP

-,,a,.-

' % *;*,v4

..g.iC.. G/toh {

.L.... t/r/T' L-

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 BORING NUMBER IS N/A SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS S-3 BAG-1 SOURCE MIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY = 2.70 NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT =

3.6 PERCENT SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM WT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER

-4 0

100.0 10 0

100.0 20 12.2 95.5 40 131.1 51.7 60 212.8 21.7 100 257.2 5.3 200 262.6 3.3 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% GRAVEL 96.7% SAND 3.3% FINES UNIFORMITY COEF =

2.81 COEF OF CURVATURE =

.99 UNIFIED SOIL CLLSSIFICATION IS SP t

MM a.

KD 4fiorgg Ad l

~-' ' * "

I 2dln<

==

J

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 BORING NUMBER IS N/A SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS S-4 BAG-1 SOURCE BORROW MIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY = 2.70 NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT =

2.5 PERCENT SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM WT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10

.0 100.0 20 17.6 93.7 40 171.5 38.4 60 231.7 16.8 100 264.9 4.8 200 269.0 3.3 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% GRAVEL 96.7% SAND 3.3% FINES UNIFORMITY COEF =

3.03 COEF OF CURVATURE =

1.11 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS SP Kb Wso/a J m

M/r

• i 4.*ra*T.*l.ll::*.

L

LAV ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 DORING NUM3ER IS N/A SAMFLE IDENTIFICATION IS S-5 BAG-1 SOURCs FIELD UNMIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY u 2.70 NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT =

8.9 PERCENT G8 EVE ANALYSIS S8 EVE

1. CUM VT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10

.1 100.0 20 12.7 95.5 40 133.7 53.1 60 226.2 20.6 800 271.4 4.8 g

200 276.3 3.0 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% GRAVEL 97.0% SAND 3.0% FINES UNIFORMITY COEF 2.68 COEF OF CURVATURE

=

1.00

=

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS SP I

- - ~

KD.

c,/zo/24 -

styrv. :..

==

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 EORING NUMBER IS N/A SAMFLE IDENTIFICATION IS S-6 BAG-1 SOURCE FIELD UNMIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.70

=

NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 7.8 PERCENT

=

SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM VT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10

.0 100.0 20 10.1 94.5 40 169.7 48.1 60 250.9 20.8 100 309.9 5.2 200 315.8 3.4 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% GRAVEL 96.6% SAND 3.4% FINES UNIFORMITY COEF =

2.93 COEF OF CURVATURE

.99

=

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS SP

- -'\\

-,_... c,tu /t f...

.M#"

. ;. M!"..:..= i A

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 BORING NUMBER IS N/A SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS BAG-1 SAMPLE 7 BORROW MIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY = 2.70 SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM WT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10 2.3 99.4 20 18.0 95.3 40 124.5 67.7 60 260.8 32.4 100 342.5 11.2 200 357.1 7.5 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% GRAVEL 92.5% SAND 7.5% FINES UNIFORMITY COEF =

3.08 COEF OF CURVATURE =

1.20 gp

&/tr/gf was 5lE)'? Y.

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 BORING NUMBER IS N/A SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS BAG-1 SAMPLE 9 FIELD UNMIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY = 2.70 SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM WT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10

.4 99.9 20 9.6 97.6 40 98.0 75.9 60 279.8 31.3 100 355.3 12.8 200 366.7 10.0 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% GRAVEL 90.0% SAND 10.0% FINES UNIFORMITY COEF =

4.81 COEF OF CURVATURE =

2.20 Kb

.. 4/tr/s4 e

'Nir

9 LAN ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 BORING NUMBER IS N/A SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS BAG-1 SAMPLE 10 FIELD UNMIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY = 2.70 SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM WT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10 3.2 99.2 20 24.5 S4.0 40 153.8 62.5 60 294.4 28.2 100 372.6 9.1 200 385.6 5.9 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION i

.0% GRAVEL 94.1% SAND 5.9% FINES UNIFORMITY COEF =

2.65 COEF OF CURVATURE =

1.07

-..s.

- 4Lrsay

%/,e

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 BORING NUMBER IS N/A SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS BAG 1 SAMPLE 11 SPECIFIC GRAVITY = 2.70 SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM WT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10 2.8 98.2 20 16.9 09.1 40 52.1 66.4 60 106.3 31.4 100 130.8 15.6 200 137.9 11.1 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ON SOII. PASSING NO.200 SIEVE ELAPSED HYDRO CORR TEMP DIA IN PERCENT TIME READING HYDRO MM FINER 1.0 19.5 15.2 24.

.0467 9.7 2.0 17.0 12.7 24.

.0336 8.1 5.0 16.5 12.2 24.

.0213 7.8 15.G 16.0 11.7 24.

.0123 7.4 30.0 15.0 10.7 24.

.0088 6.8 60.0 14.0 9.7 24.

.0062 6.2 254.0 13.0 8.7 24.

.0030 5.5 4320.0' 12.0 7.7 24.

.0007 4.9 PLASTICITY PROPERTIES OF MAT. PASSING NO. 40 SIEVE SOIL SAMPLE IS NON-PLASTIC GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

. 0 % G RAVEL 88.9% SAND 5.8% SILT 5.2% CLAY UNIFORMITY COEF =

7.31 COEF OF CURVATURE =

2.81 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS SW-SM AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS A-2-4 WITH A GROUP INDEX OF 0

9%W&

r/1/' '

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 EORING NUMBER IS N/A SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS BAG 1 SAMPLE 12 BORROW MIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY = 2.70 SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM WT PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10

.0 100.0 20 1.8 98.9 40 28.9 81.2 60 67.8 55.9 100 130.9 15.0 200 137.5 10.7

' HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ON SOIL PASSING NO.200 SIEVE ELAPSUt HYDRO CORR TEMP DIA IN PERCENT TIME READING HYDRO MM FINER 1.0 21.0 16.7 24.

.0463 10.7 2.0 20.0 15.7 24.

.0329 10.1 5.0 19.5 15.2 24.

.0209 9.7 15.0 19.5 15.2 24.

.0121 9.7 30.0 18.5 14.2 24.

.0086 9.1 60.0 17.5 13.2 24.

.0061 8.5 254.0 17.0 12.7 24.

.0030 8.1 4320.0-13.0 8.7 24.

.0007 5.6 PLASTICITY PROPERTIES OF MAT. PASSING NO. 40 SIEVE SOIL SAMPLE IS NON-PLASTIC GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% GRAVEL 89.3% SAND 3.7% SILT 7.0% CLAY UNIFORMITY COEF =

9.04 COEF OF CURVATURE =

4.07 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS SP-SM AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS A-2-4 WITH A GROUP INDEX OF 0

ggs/fd se b_n

LAN ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY i'-

SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429

. BORING NUMBER IS N/A.

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS BAG 1 SAMPLE 13 FIELD UNMIXED SPECIFIC GRAVITY = 2.70 i

SIEVE-ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM WT-PERCENT NUMBER RETAINED FINER 38.

.0 100.0 4

.5 99.7' 10

.8 99.5 20 4.4 97.0 40 36.2 75.4 60 96.2 34.6 100 128.3 12.7' 200 133.0 9.5 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ON SOIL PASSING NO.200 SIEVE ELAPSED HYDRO CORR TEMP DIA IN PERCENT TIME READING HYDRO' MM FINER 1.0 17.5 13.2 24.

.0473 8.9 2.0 17,0 12.7 24.

.0336 8.5 5.0 16.5

-12.2 24.

.0213 8.2 15. 0 ~

16.0 11.7 24.

.0123 7.8 30.0 15~.0 10.7 24.

.0088 7.2 60.0 14.0 9.7 24.

.0062 6.5 254.0 13.5 9.2 24.-

.0030 6.2 4320.0' 12.5 8.2 24.

.0007 5.5 PLASTICITY PROPERTIES OF MAT. PASSING NO. 40 SIEVE

. SOIL SAMPLE IS NON-PLASTIC GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.3% GRAVEL 90.2% SAND 3.6% SILT 5.9% CLAY

' UNIFORMITY COEF =

4.15 COEF OF CURVATURE =

1.72

. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS SP-SM AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS A3 WITH A GROUP INDEX OF 0

_f.d 4 tLflif

.j.

urt.:r::=::

81_ j.

'#/ "

.c. j

O LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL S.S.M P L E DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 EORING NUMBER IS BAC 1 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS SAMPLE 5 AFTER RELATIVE DENSITY TEST SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.70

=

SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM VT PERCENT NUMEER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10

.1 100.0 20 6.2 96.9 40 79.0 60.1 60 152.4 23.8 800 109.5 5.2 200 193.9 3.1 GRAIN' SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% GRAVEL 96.9% SAND 3.1% FINES UNIFORMITY COEF 2.40 COEF OF CURVATURE 1.06

=

=

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS SP

,=.~.,

LAV Ell 0!NEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL S.'.M " L " DATA FROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PL ANT VOGTT E 7429

-BORING NUMBER IS BAG 1 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS SAMPLE 7 AFTER RELATIVE DENSITY TEST

' SPECIFIC CRAVITY = 2.70 SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM WT PERCENT NUMEER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10 1.4 99.3 20-11.4 94.3 40 70.5 64.8 60 136.9 31.6 100-182.0 9.0 200 167.7 6.2 GRAIN. SIZE DISTRIBUTION

.0% CRAVEL-93.9% SAND 6.2% FINES UllIFORMITY COEF 2.58 COEF OF CURVATURE

.97

=

=

l' r

l l

l t

e LAV ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY SOIL SAMPLE DATA PROJECT NAME & NO. ARE PLANT VOGTLE 7429 BCRING NUMBER IS DAG 1 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION IS SAMPLE 11 AFTER RELATIVE DENSITY TEST SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.70

=

SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE

1. CUM WT PERCENT NUMEER RETAINED FINER 4

.0 100.0 10 4.0 98.0 30 21.6 89.2 4

40 70.1 64.9 60 141.6 29.2 100 173.3 13.4 200 181.5 9.2 GRAIN,SIEE DISTRIEUTION

.0% GRAVEL 90.8% SAND 9.2% FINES UNIFORMITY COEr =

4.51 COEF OF CURVATURE 1.85

=

. sob Ro.

7429 SHEET I

/

OF LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY m.~-..-,.<,-,~,-,

l/on//e JOB NAME 6. P. C.

/

,o of, /

box 26 *ATLANT EOAG:A 30324 BY N. d.

DATE 7MO/dY 404,873 47E1 CHECKED BY Mb O!I' ! S Y' DATE

/_.abe ra lery Prec/cr an d &la hs e Densify kuHs i

l MccliRid Preciar l

Rela + nie DencHy Vibra /ron aangle c

Ampli/udeI SceciCL l Mc e. Dry op hh, m N1sh. Dry Ma s.

Wei Mav. Drej ; (%k Jo Feak)f g9' i

Gwvilil

.! Den:;ly mes:Ju r e Denstly '

Den:lly l,DensHy (2 % > In.);

'f en.

*/. ;

e per >

tver.

iper;

--__3-____.

.__g_.___...__..

i i

'i

• I 10 5.5 l

15.S l

91 4

] jos 9 l

10 7.5 c, o gy5 g_ g3

1. 2 IC 3.2 16.7 86.0 10 4.2 t05.8 c.o175 2.67 J

i i

+

=t 3 lO4,2 I9.3 i

87.3 10 5.8 1059 C. O175 2.&L i

i l

1. 4-10 8.2

18. /

l 22.3 10 4.0 10 7.!

i 0.0175 2.68

_____L.

i t

d5,

ICE. ?

18.5 I

8 5. fc 10 3.8 i ' 10 7.7 0.0175 1 2.67 i

s 4

t

• !~

10 7. 0 16.0 89.9 i

104 0 107 3 i

o.0175 2.67 i

.e

_L

_.i_-___.

i i

=7 ll0 5 II. 3 89.7 110.2 i

10 6.4-0.022 2.64

.i' i

i

• ?

//O.2 I4. E 82.9 10 7.0 l

10I.7 0.022

?.GG l

1. 10 107 8

14. 7 88.4 til.3 10 6.8 y

0.022l

2. f.5 f

• II

//5 3

13. 3 66.9 10 6.9 10 6.4 o.ca6 ;

2. /,7 4. _.

e l?.

ll2.?

H.2 61.4

%.E 100 7 O. 0 E5 2.:3

=l3 lli. 7 13.5 62.5 10 7.3 10 2. 6

3. 025

2. G 2

A F 34911 A

~

N l

\\

i

) (\\

COMPACTION TEST i

\\

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

ma

\\

\\

1

\\ \\

\\

\\

't JOB NAME M/an/ VOOf[e

\\

\\

JOB NUMBER--

7429

\\ \\

CLIENT Georoia Power Companu

\\ \\

IE g

CONTRACTOR g

g 1 BORING NUMBER Bao * /

\\

1

\\'

SAMPLE NUMBER l

^

\\ \\

DEPTH Borrow Miied 12",

\\

\\

LOCATION

\\ g\\

SOIL DESCRIPTION Pih4 Ahe le Ned

\\

\\

Sand 1

\\ \\

METHOD OF TEST ASTM D /557 Meth. 'A "

12C

\\

h

\\

MAXIMUM DENSITY-PCF

/0 S. S

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % __/S. 5 y

g

'z IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

d i

\\T gg".

\\

T

\\

't

\\ \\

\\

\\

3 1

\\ \\

g 4-

\\

1

\\

gg i

\\ \\

\\

\\

i

\\ T

\\

i \\

( \\\\

t;:e 9%

T

\\

\\

i g-~

G

%L

\\ C(

g

\\

\\

\\ \\

b

\\

\\

$10e

(

\\ T T

' 1

\\

\\ 't E

\\ \\

\\ 't \\

\\

\\ 't 95{

{

g i

\\

T i

't \\ \\

^

e_ n_.

t T

\\

\\

A[2M

\\

T T(f-2.70/--t eo t \\

1 L T T r' ( T SS~

' \\

N t

\\ \\

\\

\\ \\ A ge

\\ T.'s 0

3 10 IU 20 23 30 35 40

\\ \\ X WATER CONTENT - PER CENT OF DRY WEIGHT

..i f

,n-,

.-,,,nn.

--...._,_,---_>-,c,-._n,_,,--n,.,-w--n,._,,,,-m,---v.-,,,,--_.,-

-mn--,w,-,,

---,,-,www.---,,se

e A r, 34913 A 34 0 1

\\

i

) i \\

COMPACTION TEST

(

\\

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

rua

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

JOB NAME Planf Voofle

\\

\\

\\

JOB NUMBER 7429

\\

\\

\\

CLIENT G eoraio.

Pou>er Compong

\\ \\ \\

CONTRACTOR 13C t

g 3

BORING NUMBER 600 */

i

\\

T

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER 2

1

\\

\\

DEPTH Borrew

/Vhired 4

\\

\\

12",

LOCATION

\\ \\ \\

SOIL DESCRIPTION Pihk Fihe le M ed.

g y

g Sand

\\

\\

METHOD OF TEST ASTM D /55 7 Me/h, "A "

\\

h

\\

MAXIMUM DENSITY PCF

/03.3 12C

\\

\\

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

llo 7

\\ \\

IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

'yk

-(

g ",

N y q T

T p

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

gg t

\\

\\

i \\

(

\\

\\

t T

\\

\\

e__

3 g

\\ \\

l e7 9

\\

(

t

\\

\\

T

$10c T

' \\

\\

T 't

\\ \\

b s

\\

t

\\

\\

't

\\ \\ T T

i \\

\\

T '(

t \\ \\

1 ( \\

ee

\\

\\

2.30

' ( [f-2.70

\\

T l

t N 7(f-2.so

{

\\

L T l

T r' ( T SS.

T t X g

y

\\ \\

\\

\\ \\

(

\\ N.'s SC

\\ T A 0

ti 10 16 20 25 30 35 40 WATER CONTENT - PER CENT OF DRY WEIGHT A.I

.. a,..

W 1 \\i i

)

( \\

COMPACTION TEST

(

\\

LAIN ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

r(

I

\\

\\

1

\\ \\

~~~

(

\\ i JOB NAME M/and YOOne

\\

T JOB NUMBER 74-29

\\

\\

CLIENT Georcia k

CONTRACTOR Power Comoano

\\

ISO ---

g g

g y

BORING NUMBER Bac#/

i

\\

T

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER 3

\\

\\

\\

DEPTH Rorro w Mded 12,

\\

\\

LOCATION

[

\\ 'g\\

SOIL DESCRIPTION 7'on Fihe fo Med.

Sand

~

METHOD OF TEST ASTM D /557 Meth. "A "

l20 MAXIMUM DENSITY PCF

/04,2

\\-

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

/ 9. 3 g

J g %

IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

2 y

g il",,

3g 3

\\

i i

g 3

r s

s llc

'\\

y g F

(

t Q_

i

\\ T

\\'

.==*W m,

~

x s

(

\\~

lgg T

(

\\

~

g p l

5 y (

s s g..

i l

\\ \\' '"\\

3 U

L"A T

t

\\

s D_

i l

3 y

x y 2.70 s ea

\\

L Ny 7

2.e0

%[\\

N T r es-

\\NA' N.3 g

N'T

"^

(

0 S

10 6

20 25 30 35 40 WATER CONTENT-PER CENT OF DRY WEl0HT

~ ~ ~ "

~

a.

l

i AF $4913 A i'

'M

\\ \\

A

) i \\

COMPACTION TEST

(

\\

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

mm.

\\

1

\\

E JOB NAME Plant Voolle

\\

\\

\\

JOB NUMBER 74 29

\\

\\

CLIENT (seorola Power Comoanu

\\ \\

IE CONTRACTOR g

-l t

\\

T BORING NUMBER 800 */

\\

i

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER 4-1

\\

\\

DEPTH Beren W Miied

\\

\\

12" LOCATION

\\ 'g\\

SOIL DESCRIPTION Ton Fine To M ed.

Sand

\\

1

\\

\\

\\

\\

METHOD OF TEST ASTM D /SS7 Meth. "A "

\\

T i

MAXIMUM DENSITY PCF

/08 2 12C h

k

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

18 /

'f

\\ \\,(

IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

(

\\

\\

\\

\\

gg~.

t

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

g g

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

t gg

\\

\\

\\

A

(

\\

T A!r

\\

't X

X

(

\\

\\

Q V

3

\\

\\

g

\\

T

(

\\ \\ \\

g

\\

(

( \\

T llne T

( \\

\\

T

\\

\\ \\

b

\\

t

\\

\\

N

't

\\ \\ \\

\\

'tl\\

\\ Cs t \\ \\

^

\\ \\

\\

\\

2 ao M

\\

T

' ( [f 2.70 g \\ T(7-a.eo 1

t 1 T r' ( 3 T \\ \\

SS

\\

i N

\\ \\

\\

\\ \\ ' A

\\ T.'(

SC X T 1

O ti 10 K) 20 25 35 40 WATER CONTENT - PER CENT OF CL 48

M

\\

\\

i

)

\\

COMPACTION TEST

\\

(

\\

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

\\

l

\\

ma 1

i

\\

\\

\\

\\

JOB NAME E/OS/

VoOEle

\\

\\

\\

JOB NUMBER 7429 ~

1 1

\\

CLIENT Georcia Power Como onu

~

\\ \\ 'g 13C CONTRACTOR

\\

3 BORING NUMBER B00 W/

\\

l

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER 5

1

\\

\\

DEPTH FiE/d Unmixed

\\

\\

12",

LOCATION

\\

\\

SOIL DESCRIPTION Pink Fine to Med.

g San d g

g

\\

\\

METHOD OF TEST AS TW1 D/SS 7 Meth. "A *

\\

T k

MAXIMUM DENSITY PCF

/O f. 6 12C I

L

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

/8 6 g

g IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

(

\\

T

\\

\\

gII._

g 3

\\

\\

\\

1

\\

\\

gg

\\

\\

\\

\\

T s

gg

\\

\\

i

(

\\

\\

1

\\

\\ \\

(

\\

\\

t;;g A

T

(

\\

g A.

N

\\

T i

F h

\\ \\

g s

\\ \\

(

Eie h3 T

w I\\

\\

T 't

\\ \\

E

\\

t \\

\\

't

\\ \\ T t

\\

't \\

\\

T '(

t \\ \\

1

( \\

T

\\

a go en

\\

T

(.

2.70 t g 7

2.40

% L T

( T T F' T

t \\

gg N

N

}

\\ \\

\\

l

\\ \\

(

}

X T.'s

( T X

ge l

0 0

10 10 20 23 30 15 4@

)

WATER CONTENT - PER CENT OF DRY WEleNT l

..i

A F 34913 A 1

i s

T i \\

COMPACTION TEST

(

\\

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

rus

\\

\\

1 i

\\

(

\\

\\

JOB NAME Pland VocNe

\\

\\

\\

JOB NUMBER 7429

\\

\\

CLIENT Georcin Paujer Comoond

\\ \\ 'g CONTRACTOR 13C g

g i

BORING NUMBER BdC */

\\

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER 6

\\

\\

\\

DEPTH fik/d Unmtk ed l

\\

\\

12",

LOCATION

\\ \\

SOIL DESCRIPTION PinA Fine io n?ed.

g Sand

\\

g 1

\\

\\

METHOD OF TEST ASTM D /557 47eth "A "

l

\\

T i

MAXIMUM DENSITY PCF 107 O 12 0 I

k

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

/(0 O

\\ \\

IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

g L

\\

T

\\

\\

I..

t

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

q g

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

ig

\\

\\

(

\\

T

\\

i \\

/

X

(

\\

\\

/

\\

T

\\

\\

j h

\\

T i

m t

\\

\\ \\

T

\\

(

m t

\\

\\

\\ V l

line-E T

( \\

\\

\\

T

\\

' t h \\ \\

\\

\\

t \\

i

\\

\\

T

't I

\\ \\ T I

T

't \\

\\

T '(

l t \\ \\

l T

( \\

T

\\

t oo ee

\\

T '(

2 70 2,e0

' t g 1

L T

( T T r' T

t X

[

gg T

N l

\\ \\ 'A

\\ \\ ' s l

' ( T.'(

t

( T 1

r me 1

"O O

10 10 20 25 30 35 4@

WATER CONTENT - PER CENT OF DRY WEleNT I

f

A F $49t 3 A M

\\

\\

\\

T

( \\

COMPACTION TEST

(

\\

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

r==

\\

\\

1

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

JOB NAME Planf Vo o fle

\\

T JOB NUMBER 74 29

\\

\\

CLIENT Geora &t Pnwer Comoano

\\ \\ 'g CONTRACTOR IM g

\\

3 BORING NUMBER Baa # /

\\

1

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER 7

1

\\

\\

DEPTH Bo rro w Miked

\\

\\

12" LOCATION

\\ 'g\\

SOIL DESCRIPTION Orance #in e

/c

/Yled. Sand

\\

y

\\

\\

\\

METHOD OF TEST ASTM D /557 Meth. "A "

\\

T MAXIMUM DENSITY PCF

//O.6 12C I

L

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

/1. 3

\\ \\

IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

g t

\\

T

\\

\\

g,"-

\\

\\

t

\\

\\

\\

\\

a

\\

\\

g t

\\

\\

g4 f

• 'N

\\

\\

1 X T

=

\\

i

\\

(

\\ \\

\\

\\

E

\\

T

,(

\\ \\

t

\\

(

(

\\

T

$gne.

T

( \\

\\

1 ><

I i

g

\\ \\

l

\\

t \\

\\

T

\\ \\ T

< \\

r f

(

T.'(

t \\ \\

T

( \\

me X

\\

t so

\\

T.' t 2 70 t \\ Ityt GO l

N

% 1 r'

3

( T T

' \\

SS N

\\

\\

Tm \\

\\. 1 ' (

X T.'(

me

( T 1

U D

10 fl to 25 3D 35 4D WATER CONTENT PER GMT OF ORY WtleNT

A F' 34913 A MG

\\ \\

t T i \\

COMPACTION TEST l

(

\\

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

rsa

\\

\\

1

\\

\\

\\

\\

't JOB NAME Plan /

\\/coHe

\\

\\

JOB NUMBER 7429

\\

\\

CLIENT Geor'aitt PntDer Cornoanu

\\ \\ 'g

~

13C CONTRACTOR t

\\

T BORING NUMBER Bag */

\\

T

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER 9

\\

\\

\\

DEPTH F*seld flnms*x ed

\\

\\

~ 12",

LOCATION

\\

\\

SOIL DESCRIPTION Orance fin e la Med.

\\

\\

y

\\

S and

\\

\\

METHOD OF TEST AS7'4 D /557 Merh. "A "

\\

T k

MAXIMUM DENSITY PCF

// O. 3 12C I

\\

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

/4. 8

\\ \\

IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

g t

\\

\\

\\

\\

kI._

t

\\

\\

d

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

g g-

\\

\\

\\

4 gg ses t

\\

\\

/U M

1

\\

7 i

\\

T T

\\

\\

e

\\

T 't

\\ \\

\\ \\

\\

( \\

T

$100 T

L A

\\

T 't

\\ \\

E

\\

\\

t l

\\

h

't

\\ \\ T n,"

T

't \\

\\

T

't i

s \\ \\

T

( \\

an

\\

\\

2.30 t

\\ i[/-2.so

\\

T '(

2.70

(

X t m i

V ' ( T t X l

SS i

3

, g

\\ \\

\\

\\ \\

\\

\\ T.'s 1

A T K 0-0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 l

WATER CONTENT - PER CENT OF DRY WEIGHT a.

f l'

i I

,m--.

ya--

A F 34913 A N

\\

\\

t

) i \\

COMPACTION TEST LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

(T

\\

~

ma

\\

\\

JOB NAME P/dn/ VoO Ne

\\

\\

JOB NUMBER 7429

~

\\

\\

CLIENT Georash Power Cornoanu

\\

~

IE CONTRACTOR

~

g g

g 3

BORING NUMBER Boo */

\\

T

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER

/0

~

I

\\

\\

DEPTH F/5/d Un m / xed

\\

\\

12 0 LOCATION

\\

\\

SOIL DESCRIPTION ff. Brown fin e fo g

Med. San d

\\

y

\\

\\

\\

\\

METHOD OF TEST ASTM D iss7 Meth. "A #

\\

h

\\

MAXIMUM DENSITY-PCF

/07. B f2C h

\\

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

M7

\\

y g

IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

g

(

\\

\\

\\

\\

o ll:

\\

\\

\\

1

\\

\\

g.

g

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

t ig

\\

1

\\

(

\\

\\

9 C

1)

\\

X t

\\

\\

\\ \\

e I

\\

\\

1C0 3

\\

\\

's

\\

\\ \\

g

\\ \\

\\

\\

\\

T bloc

\\

g 3

\\ \\ \\

E N

t \\

\\

% \\

\\ \\ \\

95 x

's N

\\

T

's

's \\ \\

V

\\ \\

e

\\ \\ \\

2 ao l

\\

T '(

2.70

( \\

TC 2.so N L3 V ' s %

( \\

85 x s s

\\ \\

\\

\\ \\ ' N

\\ T.'s A

% K O

O 10 15 20 25 30 36 40 WATER CONTENT - PER CENT OF DRY WElGHT a.i f

A F 34911 A N

\\ \\

i

) i \\

COMPACTION TEST

\\

\\

1 LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

m.

\\

\\

~ ~ ~

)

\\

\\

\\

\\

't JOB NAME Plani I/OOHe

~

\\

L

\\

JOB NUMBER 74-2 9

\\ \\

CLIENT G eorg th PotDer CornD a.Q IE CONTRACTOR g

(

g t

\\

BORING NUMBER Bag 7/

\\

T

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER

//

h.

\\

\\

DEPTH Rorre ro Mix ed

\\

\\

12C LOCATION

\\ \\

SOIL DESCRIPTION Tan F/I)F fo Me d.

g Sand

\\

y i

\\

\\

METHOD OF TEST ASTM D /557 Me7h. "A"

\\

\\

\\

MAXIMUM DENSITY PCF

//S.3 12C I

\\

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

13. 2

\\,'g g

IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

(

\\

\\

^

\\

\\

o ll*-

5

/

\\

t

\\

\\

8 E) \\

1

\\

L

\\

\\

g g

\\ \\

\\

\\

N

\\

\\

t gg

\\ \\

\\

\\

\\\\

\\

T e \\

\\ \\

\\ \\

\\ '<

.ggg 1 h

\\

\\

2

\\ \\

\\

\\

i'

\\ \\

g T \\ \\

\\

h \\

\\

T line V \\

( \\

\\ \\

T 't

\\ \\ \\ \\

\\ \\

t \\

\\

\\

\\ \\ \\

'( \\

~

\\

T

's i \\ \\

\\

\\ \\

\\ \\ \\

2 ao ge

' \\ [p2.70

\\

T

\\ \\ TCrt*

\\

1 3 V ' s \\

h \\ \\

85

\\

\\

\\

\\ \\

\\

\\

N ' s A T.\\

\\

% 1 gg0 S

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 WATER CONTENT - PER CENT OF ORY WEIGHT 4l

AF 34913 A MO

\\ \\

i T ( \\

COMPACTION TEST

(

\\

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

ma

\\

1

\\

3 i

\\

\\

\\

\\

JOB NAME Plan /

VoaHe

\\

\\

JOB NUMBER 7429

~

\\

\\

CLIENT Georoin Power Comoana 13C

\\ \\ 'g CONTRACTOR

~

g t

g T

BORING NUMBER 800 */

\\

T

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER 12 h

\\

\\

DEPTH Rorrow Miied

\\

\\

12 0 LOCATION

\\

\\

SOIL DESCRIPTION Bronjn

/~,h e fo g

\\ 8

\\

Med. Sond

\\

\\

\\

METHOD OF TEST ASTM D/557 McM. "A #

12C

\\

T

\\

MAXIMUM DENSITY PCF

//3.3 h

\\

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

//. 2 y

\\ \\g IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

2

(

\\

\\

u ll:

\\

\\

s!Ps

\\

\\

\\

g J^

\\

\\

\\

\\

s 4.

\\

\\

\\

g gg N

a

\\

T

\\

\\ 1

\\

19 1 y\\

\\

(

A

\\ \\

H T

\\

\\

lg

\\

T

,(

g

\\

\\ \\

\\ \\

\\

\\

\\

T IOC

\\

\\ \\

\\

T

't b

1

\\ \\

\\

\\ \\

\\

h i

\\ \\ \\

l

\\

't \\

\\

T

's N \\ \\

^

\\ \\

ee

\\ \\ \\

'( [2.80

\\

T T(p2.70/-2.so

( \\

1 L 3 V ' s N 85 T i X g

g

\\ \\

\\

\\ \\ X i

A T.N go A T K O

S 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 WATER CONTENT - PER CENT OF DRY WEIGHT

r-A F 34913 A N

\\ Q\\ f COMPACTION TEST g

\\

LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY.

t ma

\\

1

\\

~ ~ ~

3

\\

\\

\\

\\

i JOB NAME M/Ond YOaNe

~

\\

\\

\\

JOB NUMBER 74 P9

\\

\\

CLIENT Geora ier Potaer Cornoano

\\ k

\\

~

13C CONTRACTOR g

t

\\

\\

BORING NUMBER Bag # /

\\

T

\\

SAMPLE NUMBER

/3 h

\\

\\

DEPTH Field Un mixed

\\

\\

120 LOCATION

\\ k \\

SOIL DESCRIPTION Oronae Fihe fo Med.

Sand

\\

y

(

1

\\

\\

METHOD OF TEST ASTM D /667 N/e/h. 3 #

\\

T

\\

MAXIMUM DENSITY-PCF

///.2 12 0 h

\\

\\

OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %

13.5

\\ \\

g IN SITU MOISTURE CONTENT %

g

(

\\

T

\\

\\

o li*-

g

\\

\\

T

\\

\\

\\

1

\\

\\

g

\\

\\

CO din

\\

/

gg Jif R \\

1

\\

/

\\\\

\\

T

/

' \\

i X

'\\

/

\\3

/

T I

gg;

\\

\\

(

\\

\\ \\

g

\\ \\

\\

\\

\\

T

$10C

^

' \\

\\

T 't

\\

\\ \\

l b

\\ \\ \\

\\

\\ \\ T N '( \\

\\

T

's s G T

A \\

\\ \\ \\

2.30 ee l

\\

T '(

2.70 s \\

T 2.f0 1 n h f' ( h

\\

s X 85 g

g

\\ \\ \\

\\ \\ ' s A %.'s

\\

% 1 g 0 S

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 WATER CONTENT - PER CENT OF DRY WElGHT 41

2

' ry.o e

l...

w.2(&2 -

.-.+,1...,I_.,4,,i_,.........m..........,.

._.{

.+..

4,_,

....+.._J.-.....,._._._+...

4__

6+

,e.....

..... i.

dl.. -... k...l 6

... _...........--.a,_...

_ m..._

_.._.....+

..l,

. _._-.}.,...,......_........_......._._.,e.,

I._4...

u.

....._..+.+. -

q-.

.._.._..m.

+.

.._...._...--_..1 e.__.

u n..-

...b.._.d......____.......-.*.i.-...,..l,..,,.._

.4...L._.._....,..,._....

.. 7..._.._.l..,..

. I -....

.v..!.......

. _.i..

g

..)

s

.. _4

...u Q. _... _

1,.....

._...l.__..

. 4.....;

y._._...

...~._......t__....._...

(

d.

.,....._.. ~...

9-

_.,#._s,.,....r..

.. _.. _...6...

....l.......

._..._9....,..,

t._.-.-

...m

,._.7_..v..,..,i _.....;..,, _.

... _.._ r...._.._.

.g...v _..-.4.._._.

e

.7

..... 4....

,+

...r

..8 t.

.......r.._..._........._....._.._4,._,__.I_.-._.,._.54.._..

,i.....-,...._,_...._,....... _. +....,.

.........i._.-

4...4.._..

....,.!... _......._...__....).

t._-._.

.__.._. s..._. _ a.

g_._....,._....4.___._..._,._._._.._._.

....._..__1.___.._............

r_......, _.........

..t.-......

..m.. _.

...,._.~_o_...._....__..___9........_.._._g_...t-'*-*.**--*-'.._*.~~.*..'._~~

i. '. ' ' _ ~ _.. ~ *.._..~.1.'--"_~~..'...'.'--

........ _ _. _. p.

..4.._.~._.y

.........__._.._.t._._.L.._._,....._..___.__.._..,_._.____.t__-.____.,._._._.

__._.__._..._._...4____...._.._._ p. _ _

f_.__.. __..._. _-,_ _ _.,_.._.....,._... 4. _,.._..._.. _

L _. _....

-...- r_-'.~~_.

_ --~ - ---1_

_. _..._.n

.. ___._..__..,.___,..__4__-n._.n._..+.___;;

....._n_._i_..._.__,._..._..,._..:.._.-....

._- r..

.,._ }.

.._.--.,_6_..,._.

HO _.

......m

- _... 5 _..- _

t, 1_.

._4.__._.., _ - _ _

u

.s _... _

t_._

_4._.___.-

_-..__.._4

_ _ _... ~.,..

. _._...__.__.__.1..%._._._.,

+

m.

e

_..a..m_

__..._.._1

(_._._...__...._4,__.._.4_.a_._,_._

_. t

_ O D.

._ q

-1_.__

._.~ 9-

.. m....

i i

v

-i.__.._ m:_.__q 10..

.4._

4.__

..~,i*-_m-i.

5 t: -,.. 4

.4_--_-. _ _.. __

?

l 1

r _._,. _ -

..______4.____._,

_.__.. _1

--z._.. _ _

108_._.

. i.

_ _.a

- (A__

..m.

+ __,_

t, i

1 t

, c, _. _

r_

1._.. _ _

-,c--

y _.__...

. ___. _.m:

i---=.

1. .2._i

_i ___ ]

L

__[._._.__j y

y gf. =._.. ~.__.r

_-_.; _ ~.

1 L.

2

+ _.

w..._._

.u._.-_.,_~__e.

_.__...m p__

_._ ~_ ' __..'

^

^

1-

~

_-t_.~--__~~_.

- ~~'

IV.._.-

..L __. _.. _..__.

_._m_ %.

_ _...._._ ~~

f)

__t-

-~1__._

._. _.._. u_

.__.a._

2.._.

4 m. _. _;

._.__.t,___.__.4....

._ n

_4

-__.-__u._b.._.a.__.,._

.I~__._

t-

- + ~ ~

t~---+.*-g._..*..*...*.-+-*^.._.._.._.._.a~

.._w

..'4 s

.lO -

._..t_._ _.. t. -

_ r _._.4.._._...___.__..,i

__._.__m____._,._

y

.,___..u.._..

.__._p.-.a__

p..._.

__2._

._ _.4,

.,.. __.. _ ~,..... _..,.. _ _.. _.

y

_. _.1

_._4.._..__..,_....4___.._i....._1'.__. _.- _ ; _u._._..

r.___.__a..-____

s_.

~

1_-- -- _ -- - --- ---i - w$-

...__2...

..l_----

^

^

i

^

l_ _ _ _ _ - _.

Q po_

3,.._..._ __,

3.__._. _ _.. _....

.._...-.._._.____.__1

_ ~. _.. _..

_.._t._.__._.4._.___.__._._.r...t___ _..r__.4,...__._i...._.,__.._; _m.__.._.....!

t.._____.

._.,. _. __;._ _..___ _.__ _.___.._.. m.

.._._2....,_...._...___..___s_..._._._1.__._.._._..._.%.h.._..L_____t._._..__#__._._.r. -. _..__.

,r_..__

.__._. _._.,._... J.._._.._. _ o.. _._

). Q. _. p,-._

.. _ _. =........_

m.__.-_._._.

.._1,

___..._._i_.___..e

..p

___-_..__t.___.r_.._.._.___.__._._.._..m._.-..

_._.p

_.__.1. -... _ _ _,. _ _.. _ _

._.,t _.~...__..._a,__ :...i.

..._.._1...

..__.,6._._.

___._._._.r._-__..._..

4.__

+

x...._...-

4

._.._......_..___r......_.._..._.._.

- _t_..._..__.__..__.t~_._._.

.._.o._.

_.._i t.. _..

_.._._.._._....i._.._.._.~. _ _ _ ~.,

t's... __._.

..._.._..___,._.._4.__.~.___.._.4._.._.,_.,....__._.,

i._...

._.._f._._._.

. i m_.

. = i

._.._ 4 _ y. _.a __. f. _. t..__.._..

.~._._._4~_.,

..._a..._.

w..

y

_.. _... _.... _._..__ _._.. s...,.._ _

....;._..._..._.._,._.L.__..___.4._._.__

u...... _.. _.. _a.._..

. _a.

. r.

L___..

a. t.__.. _.........j...._.._.._..

+ _. _..._6_...

.._.h.

_.._ l

. _. t

._m..

O

..__...__.-.....------._.._.i._~..._.i._._.._.,.__.._.._t_._........._...

..._.._.......__..._...t..._._....

_ h___

..._ 1_..___._.... _

. ___.1..

.t

..r-__..

L... __

_--.-_,r._-

. 1

.._._..l_.___._.__....L___.

.__.~.....p_.___..._._.._..

t.

....2

.t__._..y.....

............. _ ~ _.....

..~.._n_......_......t_....._._..

_..........t..... _..

.... -... L....._

_i

_ -. __-.,..t._..._

........r..

~...__._....... _d. _-.. ~_..._..

.t,

_.... _. 4, 0 0 --

.4

. _._.r... l _._.,...

......._.t..

. _..L -

..t

... t

..._........._~.t.,...

.....,..7...._... _...

.t...t....._..._......._..._._.._........._.._._1._.

._. 4......

........................ _i.

. ~..

.i

.I

_l.

O ffy..,{

..I.

0,0 l... _....... 4 - _. a.

I a.

I i

.. _. } _...

QL.. _.. -

3

,. s...

.. _... Q.Q

d... -.......

.,. Q.

g ude....

.[.

- '. =.. -..,

9

...4..-e-.

.. y. _...

'(.

J.... =. +.. -

.4,+

.~....

6 ro h. - 9 *-on,. A m.

p e

.i

...,.... _. _........:.i

-..2.,

a ks.,....... -...)I, N....

.1.....

r, :

-,.o..

.-~_

.4...,....

.f.,.1.-.

.t

.--l_._.

..l.

.n......

..l._.,......

--......._......-_-t.-.

- t * -- ~ ~ t -

t-

- ', * ~ - -

. - _y

..l

_.,...... 1 _.. 6 _.

1.

... I l-i

_..a............ _..

.g

• • --,-.---3,~.

.. +.....-r-

.r

- ~. -...----8 1-4, i

,...i..-

- ---...,I

_.....I t

,i

6. - -

l.

._._.4.._.-.s.. _. -..-..... _..

..._,l..

t e.

....1.......

1-

i..

.[.

I

.........._.._._i

.~..,..

l...

. I..

..t.

d o

s._..._....... _...

.n i

t.

.g

.j.

.u % u.a ree su the Im ts c~n.

en 44 CF -

- ~

.l.

i

.T..

s....

..s..,~...

._..a,..

. 7..

...p,-

... g.. s..

ce-1.

...,+..m...s

.e.,...

s. 9*.

.t.,

... _ ~.....,.....,....._..........

m.

g

[

.a~

........ - _...~..,..43,..,,

.4 6...,.

~

. l. -,o... g _.....d......

...4 n

.....,n..

u.

..a....

.4-,.

._4...T..

4 u

.a.

s W-e 4.

.. l... +4.-...

6..-....,..,..,.l

.. +..

.4.

.s...

..g.... _.....

r-.

w

-..,... -d.

... -.... l -._,e.

.. }..,

4.

.e

+

6 m..I.,...

..,p.....

Q p.

....,.c.......

,.l....,..,.,,... -........ )

.s..

-..,....4.,.o..

.r,.

...g

.4...

4 n.

. 4..T.

..2. l. - _4.[.

..6.

4..

- ~.,. +. -.. _.

..*...-e..

..,_,..,l....

-.3 g.

......,. -. ~.,.....

i

... 4,. I ~.1

~,

3.... -_............

. ~

4.--..

.+..,..._._m.o_......_.

... -..... ~.,

.4

.........,...~

......... ~ -

.. ~.......

....,.-......, ~

_.9.-

s

...4_,.

.w

. 4

.L.........~...,........ - p

_5.

...... o 6..

. wig....T y

{..-_..<.

..p..

4-..

p.......-.

!......4.....l.7...

4-..-..w.-

.m....,...4..-...i..._.~..,..-,.....s.....-0-...l._..-......o

t. - m I.. -., _.....s..

. ~

... _....4

. g l.

+..

J..

.a._..q.. _ {..

.a

..u.I.........

b...u.

+

... +. +

k....+

....+.

+....

M.4-

.L.-

e._..._.~-._

....9+...l*..-........,._._.-...

. OllL

.... -... -. ~...

..m._

.g mee.

.,..._._,..p

..._.,._;_.~_.

a..-. O.C C

.- 4..- _.. _,

i..

+

i.

......, - -... _. -~I,.....

r_

r..-.-..!+-.y..--4.-.-*.

T..-- g-. ' *..- -+.t...

+ - - - - *...

_.........--.-.-*..-.--..-3 4

-+. +.

9

.a. _... ;...

-. p..

. j -.,

n..;.

_g.-

1_

4.

.L..._._......_ i r

q_._ _ 2.. _.. ; -

.3_.._-.._

..... g g _.....#.._

..a.... - _,.._

.. O_.

.. ~.

...y

... _. - - _._g-3 7.. -

4..

.2.

.p.

}

+. _ _

..I+

4. -. e.+

_- j t

...++

i 6

}^

- +- -

- L. ~. - 4

..._H

-.,4...

....+

4..

. ~ ',

IM

4

.a

.+

."-e,--4

,{.. -

.e.--.-

. -.4

-.e'.

{

-4

.{--

.O.......

q.

1...+.

.. - -.a..

. ~...

(

+

. +.

.. _~-

. p. 'l_- g

,-y,.+.,.

{-.

....s...--.

4

._.4

..- -. _..,.p

[*'*

..w p

..J 5~

+

,4 1

. +...-

~.-

. ~_

,-.-- }-

.1 I..

q _,,.

..~.

.. a

+,

4 g

.w

,4

~

...u.,..

.5

,._ +

,g

-+-... +.

6

~

, +. -

y 4--

b.

.__ 3

..,..o w

4-4.. a._

p 4,

,4-..4.._..

T 4-. -..

.--_I....,..._,.a.,-,-e

-.--.e.

+*..+

4-,--

.r.

6

+-....

4

.. ~.

$.. + --+...

- +

4.

1 x

84+

1...,...,

10... -.

4 ~.J I4

-L

'I*-

g-_

+ -...-

g

...,--,-..,......h.,.,.....-4..,l,.,..

6.

p

......_A.....

. g....

,. I

,... &. : _ _. 4.,.,

4

.w

_. 4 ~ -

....6 6

9

...y..-._

.. ~ -..

r-^*****--

. +. ~

.'..-*.'1'e~:' **-+---'-.t,*-*"-*~

.'.*+*.4**

+ - +..

."'~J...-.~4

.. +. -~.......-..

...l_44.

g

+.

4,

.p.-

..n. _,..

. 4.

+--

6.+,...j.,_.

g.........g__.,

5.

........i.

9

.,5J,,...

.. ~..,...,.,.

.,+.

.. _.... _4..,

.-.*4._......

.1

.--4..4..

{a.

e.

6..-...

4

.4 L..p..a..~,-.

.....I

{.

. - +.

w....

E

....'L 4

L._.

g 3

_,,I..

+...]:.

.,+,.. p

..J I-......_,

.. +-... -, n.

,..-.a....,.-a..

-..~....p..

e. -.

.....>.n.

_:+.q' u

._-+.m......-.p-.~>I.+*....._.-*

4..

...~......I~~.*t+-.--+

6.

+

~.e.

.. _. + - +

4_.

.eu 3,

-..I

}w -.....-I...,I*._.,..y

.. ~ [.

.L.

3.-

4...

I.

,6.

+.+..,.*. 4.

.....H

..9..4..-4...-

.-w.

.....a..4,..

.~y.

^... +.

...4,r._..

...,.4+.

t.

4...

+..

4

.~-..,..,.._.,...}k....L._-..I

^

..e..

..)

..]

D*,~.....

.w J-..

-....~..h'.-......

-. _.. h _.1, _._m n

,_.4._,;..

.- J. _-.......~,i

-.....L,._...,.4....m._.,

--4.... _ ~..

_..*6

+.

+.

.+.

. +.

.{-......._._4..

.4..~

4

.,.._.,.,.I....-.t'.9,..._.,

p

.7...

w;.

........,_.a...._.

4.

n t 2.

..t..,L_,......_..,...

m w

.~.i...,._,

M.......

..p.

+

...4..

4..

p r}.

p _

.J.u.a.

..-e4..~...

..9

~ -...... ~

-.4~e-..

....n.

... ~,

.m......, _...,.....

.q.

....n4.......,..r....L4.....,..;..._.....,

.,..g.

s.......e.,._..,.,..

,;.,. C'.. #

...m.

-4..,.

.1 n.-

...+-..n I01.,.en.-....4,_...

--m 4

...,...e.....4,..4...-,$...,...

+

..-4......_

.......6....,._....

.m...

.+:

......,-g...,..,.......,.}

..4...-

.,,.,s1....p....

. j.,.

.g._

..9......

..(.....

..4.....

.-.g

=..,

.... +......,

,f...

4-

...,6

.4

-.,... 4,....

....,-~t..__....

._.4...

...._..._...,.,._..1 s

...t_.-

.... _.........;_..... _...e.

. ~ _..

00.

..,.._.a

.,._. r

....._....._.._..p.c.t_...

........a._.....,t_._..1..4

.,.L._..

~-...

~..

..1..._4._....._..............,...

t..

.p

..t..._.....-.-..

2......

..... _.1-.... -....... -.

.-.1._._.,

....t...... _...... L,

.t._. __M..... _.. _... _. t.... -

..m s'.9

..~...........j.

.u_-.1,.....j......

.i..t

~- A 0,012 :--i

.:0.0/4. --M O.Ollo = =-4 0.018 - :" 7 -0.0E0===0 022^ W H 0 024 -

a.._.

t.

s...,.........4....+t.n

...g.

...g.

..l.

6

.4.

p.....

...t--,

.,I

. e. e....#

-.4.-

4

...+.

.g

.e 4

.. =

+

..-...4.-

...g.

g e

4

..... -..YbrabbV......J.g.A M ll u. del,.P..ea. k. i.k.P.

,L I N. i. _.-

--w:.

1 4

9

. )..

...,..}

[,

1.. +

.]

..l

.g 4,

l

.4

.{.

.n.

-. - l 4

[ - - - _..,3-m._._.

.. 4

.7 i

}

g e

1 l.

l p

--i...

.-l.,

.g

.....}.......,

l

...g~...... ]

,..p.

...__.6 4

,....t p

l

.g.....-...

.. _.3.

.6

. e

.-. 6

.a.

I-.-

.l

.l e.

e g

.g.

.{

(

.f

._,,l..

l i.

.....i_.. b _..,-

U.

'i,

.4 e

f.

-l p

i

.t wiuf n

• te. elw indi p

I o

r.M, U

,.rw..

....4..,.....(

y I

.~,,.,...-.,,.,,...

.,....,t..i,...,...,i,.-.,I.......,.,!...-4.,.

~

.i

..~..L...._...

...A....L...._.__4.

._.,. 4 g

......... r.......

a...

-.t.

. w.

s.

g4 1.

_...-.........m...L.._....

. ~..

%.a....._

....,i

...... ~....

n....:

._._.r...._

._.,t

.t

.........,L. _.....

7.

...... ~....... _.

....-.f

......l.....

....L...mr i _.

.._.t.~..... _.......

$ /,-

...... r........

t..

.l

..... _. t..~. t.... mL. _

... 4

_...t.

G -..

t

....,...,...,.o 4..

.,(*..4.

'.*t....:......,..

.j

._.4

.L.-4,__.,.

.....4

. ~ _

.....t _..._....,._.....L..

.4..

...3.._.........__

.4.a._....

t.

p e-....

~.........

a

._.g

..y

.**l.-

u.. _.

.m.+

~

{

3............

u.

6..

. ~..

g-S 4

-9..

6

.*4.

f

... 4.I.. 4.4.

...g.........

1.

.6

-*. -. "..***4...****-.*

- [.~.*

a

+.1....+.,..

• • • • • -M.a*'*".+,....-

t4-.--~-.+4...e -

4+...g _.

..m 4..++

J A.... p......t.-.*..*.*..... _

6.

.4......

m..4...'

.,.4.-....

e w+

• **.. +*

.+.h

-4.

.4~.

. + *

+a

.p..

i......

,..........4..+4.....4.....

7...+...- - -.

T'**.*.*...*-*-'**.'"..+*o* ****U.**..'t.:.p.

- +..,.

4.

. +.

.. -.....-..j.......,.

......-.3.......[.

.I

. _. +

... +

+.

..o.-...

p 4.....

.e

.p.

~T~~""*t

... '. ' +...~.,'.'*i,..'..'".'*P..**'.**t."p**~**'**1**[.*.".*+..**.'. '*-**~T*.*.*.*4'_'~.:..*.f*..-'..~.i

~

'*"..{*~'.4*.'.+Ih '.

.L - 4 I.

*6 N.~.

t.* *.* t*1

• • ~

. ~~ t T* *

• M' '.~ 4 76.'.

.$..I.*.*~.~., '".*'.+*,*.*~*.***h**'..~..'..'*..*L'*'

4 4-

**.'.1,'..).~,.~

.....w.

.t++.

... - -..4-e+

...-4, 1--

..-e-.

4....4....4.6..

+

-.. ~.

.p 4....

L-

..4..

.h

.9...+..,...

...-p-..+

,..4

a..-. i...: - -..

. -. ~

4.

_....- )

~ +.

I

- 4

..g 4..

f

.,4 -..-.

.u J.

..., ~__..

• +..I---.,

,. ~. -o.-.

I.~ - 4

-.w-i

-a4+

+.*

,w

+:

A---

+ G.

4..-.

4.

a...

.4 au

+. e t.

4e...--p...,,

-,--.q

.+.

..4-...-p.~.-

... h. 4 --

p

.+

..M

-p -

..~

+---

.--g

-, +:

-.6

.r

~

g

... o g S.!! -

D

- +..,. -.....

d.....

4 6..

~.t

..q

..---..a..

~ ~-

.u...-.

m..

s m.

.I

---.4-..

,.w9

.4.+...

,. -. +. -

+

4

..+-

1

.+

4 4!

.+.+

o_.-_.,.,

4

.o.

y.

-.p 9.,

.L 7 3

~+.J*.

.+.-.5 4

Y g.

.sy -..

.. +. -

. ^

6g,.5.--

w

+. + -

8 9

.u.,

C.-._-

+,y rC 4,.

p 4,

U g

to.

y

.p 9.,

..g I

4 8

I p.

. h.

f-

.. i, 4

-... +..

.-4--

... _. +.

4 J4

. -....i..

l o..

4 6-.

w

,y.

b.)'

i.

--,,---.3 m.

,.--,..4.~..q,

.~.-4..~,~-.

. ~.,

7,._-.

.4 4

l :

4.

..y,,,,,.---..

4.-.o.

4

_ $ -.1'

_..1

{-

-..--A.-- p 4

1..

?

e %e

._-r..g 4_ ~.

.l

~..

,~s t.-~~

t..-...

+,. _.,

-.. _ + +_...L t

.u

+_.

..~._..,.._I-._....

J..-

~

.-y

.. ~...,

e. 1

r. _+. 1.*.*....,..

_2..

e..

.4 p.!

_.. t.

y..+.-.

4_ +4 4,

{,..,.

. l 4

. +......-4-.

+..

4 4.+

.{

-e g...._..-.....

m..-... -. -.....n-.

,-e.

-+

..w...-.

.,4

. +.

q.

- 6.

e.

+....I.

.e+

~

C e,,n,;..--..4-.....e..-...p...-.4 p.-,-..

.. J +.

+-

4....

4

+

.. p

+,. -

4..

,4

+e-.

.6

.4.,...-s-4.

+

~

g

, +..

<n

.~+...e'..y r

...e.,

...e 4

.....+4.-,

.+

4--

. +.

y-

+....

... -.. ~

,-..-.e

.q.

.. +

...J..

1.

4,...+..

4

.+

.a

-4

--g

-4 b......

e

~. -.y.ey.4--,..

...,,,~.,-...... I,,....,..--.,

-.e

.-pn.-

_,.4

,..~l.

b_..-

.. g

}

e.n.~-,

. _..6 a. -. 9-.

.9.-a 4.-.

e

.w

... ~ 9

.+ - -..~

)

3

~,

d.

..4..-..,.9.._...

o.,,

...4.,...-T a.

.+..

j

. 9

.....,+

.e..

-s.n

. +

-4

.-.,...~....r.~4..

v.,.. -+'..n._

..I.

k 4

r 9...

4 4

4

. 4

.+

+

..L.

,6

4. +.....).-++'++.-.6...4,..* -q.**-..I+

....4,+....w..~.4-..

..+.

i

~..,..

-+..}.:

. n,-g

.4..

.,.,.,....... -...~

p.. o.

.4*..*t.

+ *.*.*..**.{*

4

.4 6.-.-

c..e.....

..-4 q

~4

.L ~.

~,-.I,,.

.,.....-..,y......

.,.,.4..,

_......._9 4.,..,,e o,

p..

.. 6

..-.p..._

..a

-.....,.-.9-....

4.

M...

s 4.+-.

.e+.

o..,...,

+..

T..u T.,...,.,.

..+...g.,.

-. -.a. I.4%g.

. --.. -. +,...

u,

.4

+

4.m..+.~4-....,...w.

.+..+

o.

.. 4.e...

o

,.+4

,.._4

. +.. ~~....

+.....,..%4..-_...g-.......

+4+..g.+,..u..+.

.._..y

_4+*+,

..4+..

.q...

..+..

..4,.

. +... _.+

.-..+w

,_ - p..e....

+. +

..-+ =.

...~.._.;

}4.~t o++.

....+,....+ 4.

.......+4.,

.,, m p

... +. -.....

h.

q.

+

'.'J..,...-.._.1 q

.1..+,_....

.. +___+

o

-.-.,+J.+._.. +.

A 1.......u_.....

+

,........... - -..+.

.}.

6 A

.,..l..

.+,

...4

&~

4

.4.......,%.,

A

...I

..,.4m.e 4.,.....o.p 4..

.{

..-.,.4,..

g.

.,. +...

.-4.~..

-..4...

~.

r..

..+t....

.. _ +.,

..a m+

9.,

e....

4

.s,

...w,

%..a...

.....,4.,i n..

....,. -,..en.

.4_

....4.,... _.+....,.

o.

4.

4.

.. ~.,

+.

..4.

r

.u

..e.

~...-

_7...

m

.--..g

...... ~

4

............e...

..I.......

...+.-4

. 3...-.

e e

.u......,...t......._.4.4._.

,.4.

..... W..

.~... - -...t%

1..._.

..... _1....._:

1

. a._ a

..a......_._.4... -...

.-.t_..._..-

..~.. a.. _.

..t.....

-.>.n......

.-)

.C l...r........

t

......._l.....-......

... u........ _ m....$..u...

0.017.

.1..

.f.

4..

. : f..,

a i

O 013.. r. l. -. 0.o. tS ".....

. 0.0. 19.=.. l.., 0.0 21........,.....l. =..T. 0,0 2 3. ~.,.....

.'o 2 5 ~,

.t.

.e.....j 6.

.1....

. l.

-g-l-....

... e _.

. _.4

.....5..

.g

(..

.s 4

9..I 6

.....,,... j

... ~..... -.... 6..

.v -.

5. _....

+..

4.

,._.&...,.m...... !....-... +

..... ~... -..

]Qf.}_-.

. -.g.

7 y

. i 6.

]

g.

Q..

Q__

P.e.

r f...

.l.

.I.

.j

..........,........... _.., -.... _ _..--......i

.I....,

.,.....1 4

........f l. _. _ - ~..\\,._.,

t p.

j.

.l.

..l,

....a....

.e

.I..4-j

.i.......,. -. _... _.

.e.

.e

.}...

.L..

..f.

l

.l...

1.

.l.

4 g.

a.

r.

._f.._..

....f...

l-

. 1 1

.e I.

, ~ _. t' 4

6 i'

...._.6.

i

- i.

- t.

.t.

> Nu.are, to t he Ind,

RELATIVE DENSITY TEST

~

• DATE 7-30-84 Ya (max)(wet) /o6.9 e (min)

JOB NAME ploof 1/aa //e Yd (max)(dry) /o7.5 e (min)

JOB NUMBER 7429 Yd (min) 91.4 e (max)

BORING NUMBER Bae */

Yd e

SAMPLE NUMBER

/

Dd DEPTH (FT.)

S ecific Gravity

2. (o 3 MOLD SIZE 1/to fl.3 P

METHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY funnel (FUNNEL OR SCOOP)

V/b. Amp ///ude - o of 75

• METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Dru $ Gle/

(DRY OR WET) 130 130 120 120 110 110 Dry wet

/~s A/

• 00 100 fj,-

f/

A w

/

u.

D N

go 90 I

3 5

d Eo y

80 80 x

.g I

[-

Y

.o i

l

.70 70 l

i l

60 60 i

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY Dd PERCENT

~~

~

RELATIVE DENSITY TEST DATE 7 84 yd (max)(wet) /04. 2 e (min)

JOB NAME p/on f Voa//e Yd (max)(dry) /05.d_ e (min)

JOB NUMBER 7429 Yd (min)

B&.o e (max)

BORING NUMBER Bog y/

Yd e

SAMPLE NUMBER 2

D3 DEPTH (FT.)

S ecific Gravity 2.67 MOLD SIZE Ho W.J P

METHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY Funne/

(FUNNEL OR SCOOP)

%*6. Amp ///ude - 0*O/76 "

METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Dru I wer (DRY OR WET)

~

130 130 120 120 110 110 Dry A

wet

/9'

/h 100 100 f-W' s

f/

m 90 90 m

f i

b

/

=

a E

5a l

'g 80 80 E

j t

I 70 70 60 60 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY Dd PERCENT

4 RELATIVE DENSITY TEST DATE 7 3/ Ya (max)(wet) /oS.B e (min)

JOB NAME p/on/ Vaa //e Yd (max)(dry) /os 9 e (min)

JOB N"MBER 7429 ~

Yd (min) 87.3 e (max)

BORING NUISER Bae *I Yd SAMPLE NUMBER 3

Da DEPTH (ET.)

S ecific Gravity P.66 MOLD SIZE l/po ff.J P

h C

Wb AmPIAude - 0.0175

• METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Dru / &lel (DRY OR WET) 130 130 120 120 110 110 Dry

~

/

ulet

/

100 100 j

/

/'/

w m

90 90 I

/

p g

9 5

5 a

a h

80 80 E

f i

70 70 60 60 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY Dd PERCENT

RELATIVE DENSITY TEST DATE 7-3/-84 Yd (max)(wet) /04. o e (min)

JOB NAME P/an/ Vog fk Yd (max)(dry) /o?. /

e (min)

JOB NUMBER 7+E9 Yd (min) 88.3 e (max)

BORING NUMBER Roa s/

Yd e

SAMPLE NUMBER

~4 Da DEPTH (Fr.)

MOLD SIZE

& R.3 Specific Gravity 8.fo 8 1

METHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY Funnel Vib. Ampidude 0.0/75 (FUNNEL OR SCOOP)

METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Ch/ / 6]ef (DRY OR WET) 130 120 120 110 110 OrY y

/

wel f

s

/'/~

100 r[

100

//

[/

s w

M r,

N 90 90 i

y i

g U

ee E

E E

E s

g h

80 80 Q

E f

i

>=

>=

70 0

60 60 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY Dd PERCENT

RELATIVE DENSITY TEST DATE 7-3/-84 Ya (max)(wet) /03.8 e (min)

I JOB NAME

1. /an t Voa//c Ya (max)(dry) /o?.7 e (min)

JOB NUMBER 7429 Yd (min)

28. /,

e (max)

BORING NUMBER Bag a /

~(d e

SAMPLE NUMBER S

Dd DEPTH (FT.)

S ecific Gravity F. /,7 MOLD SIZE 1/fo y,2 P

METHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY /~unne/

V/h. Amp [//ude - 0,O/75

(FUNNEL OR SCOOP)

METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Dru /QJef (DRY OR WET) 130 130 120 120 110 110 Dry tJet

'y e'

100 100 s-s l

/

h

/C/

w A9'~

90 i

f-90 a.

~

M

~

5 5

a o

y 80 80 m

E 3

70 70 60 60 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY Dd PERCENT

i RELATIVE DENSITY TEST

• DATE 7-31 84 Yd (max)(wet) /04.0 e (min)

JOB NAME p/oof yg y, Yd (""*)(dII) #07 3 * (Mi")

JOB NUMBER 74 20

~

Yd (min) 39,9 e (max)

BORING NUMBER Ba g s f Yd e

SAMPLE NUMBER 6

Dd DEPTH (FT.)

MOLD SIZE k f/.3 Specific Gravity P. 67 METHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY funne/

(FUNNEL 02 SCOOP)

N b A #88b/vde - d.0/73 METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY pru / Me/

(DRY OR WET) 130 130 120 120 110 110 Dry s

/

UY r

s' p

/"-s 100

[00

1. ~

X 4-D 90 #

90 a.

U g

hi 5*

o I

g 80 80 3

3 M

x E

f 70 70 60 60 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY ed PERCENT

RELATIVE DENSITY TEST DATE_

7 3/-84 Ya (max)(wet) //o.2 e (min)

JOB NAME P/an/ Voqi/c Yd (max)(dry) /os d e (min)

JOB NUMBER 74 E 9 Yd (min) 89.7 e (max)

BORING NUMBER Boo w /

Yd SAMPLE NUMBER 7

Dd DEPTH (FT.)

MOLD SIZE Ho U.3 Specific Gravity 2.44,

METHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY Funnel Vj6, Afy,g//ude - 0.022*

(FUNNEL OR SCOOP)

METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Dru i 4/e/

(DRY OR WET) 130 120 120 Wel lho 110 f

n s' /

//

100

. y' 100 f

/7 m

w M

N 90 90 i

i h

5 5

o a

g 80 80 g

E f

i

>=

a 70 60 60 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY Dd PERCENT

RELATIVE DENSITY TEST DATE 7-3/-84 Ya (max)(wet) /07.0 e (min) i JOB NAME plan / Voo//e Yd (max)(dry) 1o/.7 e (min)

JOB NUMBER 74 29 '

Yd (min) 87.9 e (max)

BORING NUMBER 8ae * /

Yd SAMPLE NUMBER 9

Da DEPTH (FT.)

S ecific Gravity 2.66 MOLD SIZE

/Ao f/.3 P

METHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY Funne/

(FUNNEL OR SCOOP) y/b A*P// /ude - 0.022*

METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Bru l(def (DRY OR VET) 130 130 120 120 110 110 blel

/

/

100 10

. l

/

/~/

/

-/

w 90

/ /

90 m

,v w

/

H E

//

j a

o h

y 80 80 E

5 i

70 70 60 60 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY Dd PERCENT

RELATIVE DENSITY TEST DATE 7-3/-84 Yd (max)(wet) 111. 3 e (min)

JOB NAME Plan / Voolle Yd (max)(dry) /o/o.B e (min)

JOB NUMBER 7429 Yd (min) 88.4 e (max)

BORING NUMBER Bag */

Yd e

SAMPLE NUMBER

/o Dd DEPTH (FT.)

S ecific Gravity

2. /o S MOLD SIZE

//so f/.3 P

HETHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY /~unnel Vib, Amp ;/ygg _ g,ggy+

j (FUNNEL OR SCOOP)

METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Det.t/ GJet (DRY OR WET) 130 130 120 120 (def 110

,/

110

/

O!!)

/

-/

_/

/

/

100 7

y' 100

-/,/

/s' Ine

/

90 90 n.

7 E

i:

us h

o I

i i

80 80 2

i

>=

70 70 60 60 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

[

RELATIVE DENSITY Dd PERCENT

e RELATIVE DENSITY TEST DATE 7-3/-84 Ya (max)(wet) /06.9 e (min)

JOB NAME Plan / Vea ele Yd (max)(dry) /o&.9 e (min)

JOB NUMBER 74 29 ~

Yd (min) 86.9 e (max)

BORING NUMBER Boe */

Yd e

SAMPLE NUMBER

//

Dd DEPTH (FT.)

S ecific Gravity F.67 MOLD SIZE Mo ff.3 P

METHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY Funne/

Vib. Amp ///ude - 0.026 *

(FUNNEL OR SCOOP)

METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Dru / tJe/

(DRY OR WET) 130 130 120 120 110 110 Dry j uje{

/

/

100 100 7

/

/

/

w 90 90 f

i b

s en 5

E o

u l

l g

80 80 M

X I

i S

E 70 70 60 60 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY Dd PERCENT

RELATIVE DENSITY TEST DATE 7 8 4 Yd (max)(wet) 99.5 e (min)

JOB NAME P/ane Vog He Yd (max)(dry)_ foo.7 e (min)

JOB NUMBER 7429 Yd (min)

B/. 4 e (max)

BORING NUMBER soo e t Yd 8

SAMPLE NUMBER

/2 Dd DEPTH (ET.)

S ecific Gravity 2./o?

MOLD SIZE 1/so G.J P

METHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY

/~uonet vi6. s,,,et//ude - o.oes

(FUNNEL OR SCOOP)

METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Dr9 4 a>es (DRY OR WET) 130 130 120 120 110 110 Dry fj lj,0f 100 77 8

77 4

w O

//

M 90 go f

e a

B f

B E

E a

/

a h

g 80 80 E

2 i

70 70 60 60 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY Dd PERCENT

3 l

RELATIVE DENSITY TEST i

DATE 7-3/-84 Yd (max)(wet) /07.3 e (min)

JOB NAME Plant Voo//c Yd (max)(dry) /02.6 e (min)

JOB NUMBER 74 29 Ya (min) 82.5 e (max)

BORING NUMBER Boe */

Yd e

i SAMPLE NUMBER.

/3 Dd DEPTH (FT.)

S ecific Gravity 2.68 MOLD SIZE

//to ff.s P

METHOD-MINIMUM DENSITY. l~unnel Vib. Amplifude - 0.025 *

(FUNNEL OR SCOOP)

METHOD-MAXIMUM DENSITY Dry / uel (DRY OR WET) 130 130 120 120 110 110 Wef

/

/

Ory

/

/

100 100 7

7

/

/

/

/

//

w 90

/

90 n.

//

n

./

E

//

l

=

I f

a E

y 80 80 E

5 i

>=

70 70 t

60 60 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RELATIVE DENSITY D d.. PERCENT

b..,09/05 12 19 P02 oSbuTHERN C0 SEkhiCES NUERh o

LAW aNepensRme vaSTWO SOe4P&My e

m

-a

_. me i

• T TA.oE N A M4 August 31, 1984 Southern Company Services, Inc.

P.O. Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 i

Attentions. Mr. J. A. Dailey

Subject:

Confirmatory Laboratory Testing Program For Category I Backrill Permeability Testing Vogtle Electrical Gensrating Plant j

LETCo Job Number 7429 Ge n tler.e n t

'~

This report presents the results of the permeability tests which were performed on two (2) 'oackfill materials for Plant Yogtle Project of Georgia Power Campany.

l I.

INTRODUCTION:

Sample No.

10 and No. 11 were selected representing L

different grain size ranges, (55 to 95 passing the No. 200 sieve and 95 to 125 passing the No.

200 sieve respectively), to evaluate the coefficient of permeability i

by f alling head atthod.

Sample No. 10 had 5.95 passing the j

No. 200 4Avve and Jaaple No. 11 contained 11.05 passing. the I

No. 200 sie ve.

I II.

Pat 0CEDURE:

A Modified Proctor Compaction Test (ASTM D1557-78, Method A) was performed on each sample to evaluate the maximum dry density of the soils, and permeability speoisons then were compacted at approxinately 100,97, 94, and 91 percent of the modified proctor density.

The samples were ocupacted in six layers using at moist taaping method utilizing a l

small height controlled tamper.

The permeability tests were performed in general accordance l

with the procedure described in Appendix VII of the Laboratory Testing Manual (EM 1110-2-1906, Permeability Tests with Back Pressure) published by the U. S.

Army Corps o f Engine e r s.-

The permeability tests wi6h back pressure were performed in a pressure chamber (Triaxial Coll), and

..,. _ _ _ _..... _,.. ~, _ -. _ _ _

.84.09/05 12:19 P03

• SOUTHERN CD SERVICE..S INVERN 1

by increasing too enaaber pressure and bnok prosauro at the same time, the saturation processes were completed.

A pressure transducer was used to measure the

• B' value, with the values ranging from 0 90 t o 1. 0 0.

Utilising a 2 ESF oonrining pressure, the sample shen was consolidated until.

• primary consolidation was completed.

The coefficient ~ of preseability by-talling' head mothed was calculated directly from computations using data obtained from a e

series of readings for each sample.

At the end of each test, the sample was removed from the pressure chamber and tne wet weignt was obtained in order to calculate the unit weight and noisture content.

Based on the final data, the actual density of each specimen was computed.

The results of mositure content, unit weights, void ratio, and permeability tests are shown on the tabulated laboratory test sheets which are attached to this report.

III.

DISCUSSION:

Results of the permeability tests show that for sample No.

10 with 5 95 passing the No. 200 sieve, the coefficient of permeability ranges from approximately 2.0 x 10-3 on/sec.

to 6.0 x 10-3 on/sec.

For sample No.11 with 11.05 passing the No. 200 sieve, the coef ficient of permeabilit ranged rros approximately 4.0 x 10" on/seo. to 4.0 x 10" on/s e o.

If you have any questions concerning this report or if we can be "of additional assistance to you, please contact us.

Very truly yours, LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY VmdLQ.

Khalil Dehghanian, EIT t

3 g-William Allen Lancaster Civil Enginner

/es l

l

)

.3 h5

84.09/05 12:19 PO4

• SOUTHERN CD SERVICES INVERN s

Jos No.

7d '! 9 swege

/ en

/

s.aw sweensammo Tsenne noenmmy gj,,/

V,.r, //,

m.-,.,_,

p g f G[QRotA 3C324 SY N b.

DATE 8 - / C ' & '/

,.or.r e Af r>

CHECKED BY h DATE 7Y Y Ta,ble of pien. maili/ej M/ re:u//.:, ias,1>p'e w /0

( fa //w<>

Heo/)

._._...,s.,....

. ; '. p */ ;.

92.9) af 13.9'fef3 95 7 h el 99.8 2 efi

' f.Y '

Co,,,pcIse' ti,,,ne be'n i 4.ntoehe'n Cor"toeb,;,,

Reinork:

n

,.....m...p.._,,.,.s PermeoIsilif,rj Ted, k l 3

3

-3 ',

lo.07 x 10 4 58 x la 3 l 4.4 I

• 10 8 la lo Troe. ls

2. 24 no o

C,r, /:<c.

..j......__._,

a w /c.r. - c,o to 9e ri;

,,, Vala e I.oc

0. 9 E l 0,91

. O,92

2. t. = St te es &

B I

1 I

Gef.9.s 14 ' Psi (a Mir) inessfure Beiere,or:'.

I4.9 I3 8 15.I 14 1 t'on ten f l

17. )

( ft, )

Aller kl ;

24 2 23.1 22.1

.w (Jef ildl befere %$ l

//S. /

ll$.?

ll8.8 l22 7 l g.

.....'. _'SO'I'.n, lIA l I2d' 0 I20 9 I

l24* 0 (Pc()

..._.',,,,,t.

1o1.s nt Cry Unil wf. > rr.

Brfoor i n(br 'I5:1 100 2 101.3

/03.2 107 6 p,,,;,, [ w,c,, 14,7 p, Vor'd Polib, e 0.65I o.433 o.403 0.532 s,q.,1.s g i

._...__.,I Doorneler of specin>rn 2.86 En.

=

HerfM of Specorhen e

S.40 Zn.

o Arts of Gp ec tn')e n

3. "I I0 $ 1* Ze>

a

%ldine 0( Speet 're n s

0. 0 2 lit Ca. Tn.

84.09/05 12:19 P05

• SOUTHERN CD SERVICES INVERN JOS NO.

IM O SHEET I

OF

/

Law spoossesastesse vesvisse comemuey JOB NAME D/on /

Yo e / /'*

s

~..:_=m.-

p E

OE04GiA3C124 SY

/. b.

DATE 8* 28* kY

..n.n.,

eATLAP67 h/29,!OY CHECKED BY N DATE-

% 4le of persans,'/*ly 7es f i'rser/s't, D*"tol e

• II I' P'a //sn.h lira c/ )

L, *U' I'

-)j.

, a

,. n,

.a.a.-r

'. 9I.t2 et 9 + y,

• C ;l

,v=: =,e::=

..98.81, ef

,: w w aa,.:

a. a ww.

97 7

• f

'l'i ).$,

' 4 t%peeioeos f t'enpeelo*h O '" * 'g '

M'.,;4.h. '

A. k,i.** '

- -. p et,e',,

c,,,,po e ;,,',,

c,,

1 -.- - -...w er

,,.r...

PerinarbiliIti 7&si.K g,,,g,",,

4 ll 1 Io I.82sIO

/*43 Y IO 4.33 510 00*

'O

~#

~

l".

W/c.P. s 45 40 to Psi "B " Value.

1.00 0.98 0.9 I 0.90 B.P.= 48 h 10,[A cont' press. e /4 pso h T

maisfure Before Tesl i2.7 12.9 I3.0 l

13. I I

I l

l

)

( y, y AHet it'f l Wi'.4 20.*

11.4 t1*

tae+ u,,tl Befour7eil

!!8.5 122.4 126.3 l

126.6 l

LH.

.1 I??*S li spe(

Aflet T*O 12 8.?

13/. l i

1%.S I

Dorj Uniljaf.,pcf l,,,y, fV,te//S.3/#!

Berere 4 Art.< Ted 10 5.2 10 8. 4 IH'8

"'9 r,*e+.e i sr. c. = !s.

• V.

i Void R'alta, c:

0.S86 0.S37 0.4 91 O 443 S.G.= 2.67 l

e Dro'in e ler-ef speciinen = 2.88 In.

t l

lietf ht of specom'en S.60 Zn.

e A rea of spe cirnen a

s. ??o sq. ris.

Volvate of Speconien 0.021//

Ca.En l

I l

pr O

4 APPENDIX 2 t

I i

i r

i L

Ger; ape 4+ 0:-77.

C,oag t a t.,* ".v.r t"- a*

ICS* O*10t 6:*"f!

Wa.* ert:" G*:'; : ; '

Te.oc : +.CJ *n

• U

$!!$fs '-

L Georgia Power vogii. si.einc cea.e t,n,,,.,,

r, #,., ~, r.,-. 3,..,

July 27, 1984 Mr. Jim Bailey Nuclear Safety and License Department Southern Company Services P.O.-Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202

Subject:

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Units 1 & 2 Bechtel Job 9510-001, Laboratory Testing Program for Category I Backfill

References:

1.

Letter BS-5032, dated May 18, 1984 2.

Letter BS-32159, dated May 25, 1984 3.

Letter BG-32220, dated June 8, 1984 File Not X2BE02, X2BA06, X2AP01 C2.2 Correspondence No:

C-4356 Security Code:

NC

Dear Mr. Bailey:

Attached are the results of the on site soil testing carried out as required ir. references 1, 2, and 3.

Also, attached is i

a summary sheet which shows the grain size and Modified Proctor results for each sample taken.

If you have any questions, please contact Winston Davis at extension 422 on site.

Mr. Jia tailcy Be:htol Jcb 9510-001 July 27, 1984 Page 2 Sinc /erly 1

e H. H. Gre

, III General Manager-Vogtle Nuclear Construction Department xc:

D. O. Foster w/a-1 W. T. Nickerson w/a-1

0. Batum w/a-1

c. Bockhold w/a-1 M. Malcom w/a-1 H. D. Burnum w/a-1 M. H. Googe w/a-1 D. M. Fiquett w/a-1 g B. C. Harbin w/a-1

1. D. Innes w/a-1 D. Kinnsch w/a-1 W. R. Ferris w/a-1 M. A. Perovich w/a-1 Document Control - Original w/a-1 CDC w/a-1 6

-~

~

Atta:hment 1 GPC LAB TEST RESULTS Grain size Modified Proctor Sample Max. Dry Optimum No.

60

1. 10 040

1. 200 Density Moisture 81 100 DNR**

49.3 3.7 103.9 12.0 32 100 DNR 62.1 4.0 101.9 11.3 53 100 DNR 52.4 3.7 103.4 11.7 34 100 DNR 41.5 4.4 104.7 13.5 55 100 DNR 60.9 2.9 103.4 13.2 86 100 DNR 52.5 3.2 104.7 15.0 57 99.6 DNR 69.6 7.4 108.6 13.8 88 samples in the range could not be obtained at this time.

39 99.9 DNR 78.9 9.4 100.0 14.0 810 99.5 DNR 64.7 5.6 106.L 10.4 511 99 DNR 67.9 9.7 114.2 14.3 512 100 DNR 80.9 9.3 110.1 13.5 513 99.9 DNR 76.9 9.5 109.5 13.5 0*DNR did not run r

m

... e Attachmsnt 2

~

Confirmatory lah Testing 1.- D. f Bag i 1 Bag i 2 Bag i 3 Bas i 4 Source 5-1 2.1%

2.9%

2.61 3.1%

Borrov S-2 3.3%

2.6%

2.9%

2.9%

nerrov S-3 3.01 3.3%

2.8%

2.5%

Borrov S-4 3.01 2.71 2.6%

2.7%

Borrow S-5 3.01 2.9%

2.9%

3.1%

Fill 5-6 2.5%

2.8%

3.11 2.9%

Fill S-7 6.8%

6.9%

7.01 7.11 Borrov S-8*

A rov S-9 9.61 6.7%

6.9%

8.7%

Fill S-10 5.1%

5.5%

6.3%

6.4%

F111 5-11 9.31 9.9%

9.31 10.01 Borros S-12 1C.21 9.51 9.91 9.9%

Borrow S-13 9.4%

9.11 9.4%

8.6%

Till fE1 Sc14*

• Samples it this rar.ge could ec: be obtained at thir tice.

. s e-a

-w-m

-m-g ww,e-. -

a-g

-g g-

---g

--w mr-g wa--*--wm+----

N1T--*-'eW'

-.~

Proct:r Shact D.t t e Sample Description b -/9-9 4

'E'e d Mr J - e :ws a

s:1, Y enspector OcDe dyel sap)

Pouno sca6e en:1 Gram scare usec s e 33 >l C 2 V07

-.. tor No.

Hammer Control No.

sI Bs C 1-C 1-Yso Mesnoo Mold Gwen

& /tJ"7 A t' 2 V e 9 C "J-9 2 -

4 l

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 A

Weignt Mold CDs.)

g 7

9 7

y7 g37 g, p gy Mota vagurne Factor 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 g

( veium.

c waar Aeaee (mu

,go

7,o goo 3,.o e.ont son anc lj' w~w~e.'om""o' sea

' " ~ " ' '

f c

Unsa(D - Al

3. Gr Sn3

3. g o 3.8V

3. 9 /

3.s 2-

]j, wet consty F

casatt.2 )(s E)

/ogg

/// 9

/ fy a

/ / 6. */

//7.3 ff 7 (,

G' Tem Nwneer 83

d. /

d 2-d3 0Y W

fg H

4y9 Afq, gs 49 Y Af9.o Atf. 7 493 n.~. ?.",'rur" s

s

-no aco.,

xo.c

.2co o aso mo 5

Tr*E$rnN'*

1 K

zzg.7 135 0 232.0 92-8f 2.1S.7 2 13.3 foes'dED)

L.

/90 9

/KP 191.7-

/ 79#

/ '/ 2 0

/74 0 "Us'$ %*'"~

M tr. 2.'

If. 0 18.0 2-l.S~

s't.3 Al 7 (u*n'*E'Nk""

n f.9 f.I

9. 9 1.2. 0 13 7 IK *%

Dry Density pos>ft8 )

9 WI(N

• too))

fo3 +

fo3f 103.7 loa 9 10.1.2-162.0 t

3 Maaimum Ory Density (Proctor Dersetyt ObsJft ) DetImum Moesture(%)-

l emm c wi 7== cw=)

4

\\A acceemo or Lauer a p o,.,.7,,. e c o a r, a r o b 7^ :.* d Ir' i o " 15

& "f' * * ^'

47.o

'/7 6

. M 9. I M9. 7

f 'l-j.f'f (,

g g4 Lc G2 41 go.o a.so. o 2co. o 2 50.o 2so.c ago.o y /. y 22g. o

,,3.f 2 23. o 13 f.Y 2-35~ 2-1ts3 Igo. 't i ~ygf I 15. +

l997

/85 5 IT. 2-2 *

.a4.C 2 7. 0 jj.2 14 Y 99

12. 3 '

,3. 7 15 3 v

rca 1i' 0-

40 T \\n M;isture D2nsity Tcst Data

\\ig D 'W-/9-ph.

Sample ND.

f g

\\

\\

\\

Son Descr6ptoon fg)

,4f,)

g g g,(,,

g g 's C //v 5-)

35

\\

ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor g

3

\\

\\

Maalmum Density - PCF i30 k

O*** "*. content w jy,p g g

g Curve Drawn By - Technician

\\

\\ \\

YM1 Yne

( (

Acceptro ey - Levei s g

/

25

~~~

g g 3 i

\\ \\

\\ \\

T

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\ \\

l T

(

\\

i

\\

\\

\\

l

\\ \\

\\

1

\\

\\

I

.15

\\

\\ \\

y g

g i

i

\\

T

\\

I

\\

\\

\\

i

\\

\\

(

l

'10 1

\\

\\

g y4(

\\

\\ \\

\\

\\ 't

(

\\ \\

05

\\

\\

\\ \\

e

- -m T

A \\

~%

\\ \\ \\

\\ \\ \\

\\

t\\

00 g

3 y N

\\ \\

\\ \\\\

\\ \\ T G5 N

\\ \\

x x x

\\ \\

N.

\\

\\ \\

2.80

\\ \\ \\

N

\\

\\ ' / 70 2

2 60

\\ O/

' k\\ \\

\\ \\ \\

h of N \\\\

85

\\ \\ \\-

47/

\\ \\

s 62 N N \\

4 g y M o.C N N N 239.7 10

\\ \\

1. #9'7 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

//.2 nms WATER CONTENT-PER CENT OF DRY WEIGHT rera

Wash 200 and Sieve Analysis D**

Tesi NE g.f 9 p g/

,/

Wasa 200 (ASTM D1140)

Scale No.

5. eve No-M[#t6.-

C '51@ 7 P'5#G lll2e%.70'..,

AT2.*n @a.>

AIC"*

5%. B

g. g Sieve Anasyses (ASTM D422)

Scal. No.

Ovon No.

laspector eo,s./_u J 0D3SC O' O9 %

c'ag' sie, sae com. wi. a.ien.e

• rois a.i.n

• Toi.i m.4n.

• • • As7/

o o

/60

• e eq4 0

0

'oo

C.sv 3 2.7 of"

'l F.f

• d379

/G43 31.0

&10

'* C 3ro 2 69./

50.7 49.3

• • cyto 3 61. I C C. I 33.9 C1tM 499f 74 1 59 c 3 91 C//. v 9C.3 37 NN C//.6

/

/

~

Wh f30. 7

/

/

,tfd. Accooiee er:

2)C TJ!/w/

4 8y m ss Dm 1

\\

MBh44

mosam As nasavos mc nad e

a a

a s

e e

8-8.

4 l

l l l l lL Iiill IilI

\\

l i l i i ! l l I I l' i l 6 iii!

M s

g i..

i,, i

, e i..

eq 9.,

=

x s

2 c

~

l 3

8

?

^

o b

i a

t R

n s

2 c m i

I IIl l l l l IIII!

I g

i i l i I

! I ii' ii e

f i I g

l l [ j i, i 6 e i i,.i i

e e

g si

,,/

I I2 l

i i i I Ii! I 1 lM ! i r *s V

I I 8 I I I I I I WI iI E

I I s,

.I g l

i, i

... i vi.,,

e 3

g es e

'1 s

s2 i.

3' i

3-

=s 4 1 IIII l l l ! IiIl 1ili

=

l j

i

- -i i iiiii i i i i i i i i;ii i

g_

i

,i,,,,,,,

...i.i, s

fe.

I l

l h

I !

3* -

l l

I i:

I i

l i

I s

a 3

1 I

I a

1 l'

l l

l h

l I

I f

~

i a

6 i 6 i

S I

i em g

i uma meu 3.

8 i

8 8*

l l

j I

l.e IIi i li i

i e

e t

i u

i l ! I i i i:

i i

i 9

i e i e i i i e e i.i...,i

-g l

e a

e a

e x

a s

1 Dectam As aaNed mD 33d w

... _ _.. -, _ - -,....., __.. _._...,..._,,.., _ ___.... _ _ __ __...._._ ~.__._ _, _.... _.. -.. _ _ _ _...,.. - _.

~.

s.

Proct r Shsct sEmo= Description Date

$ ~ 19-t '/

2. )):s t - B

.m HaJ-c -<

a,. _

snsoector

(% or lAwel Kh r Y s ad rouno scam e-me Gram seme useo e C 337/-

e, ye7 7,w. tor No.

Mammer Control No.

S.1 8 asi: 2-r 2-1/0

'Wetnoo Mold Cven n/ST7A C ~/ 5 2-C 2 9 >#

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 A

weegnt MoIQ (nos.)

q3, g9y 9, y y q, y y 9, y y g yy 9, p )

uom vagume Factor 3o 3o 3o 3o 3o 30 so

( vetume I c

water m mu

,,o

., 7, 3oo 3go Hoo O(

W*eignt soil and M '* U**-)

M 9 Z-

/2 77

/2.9 fa

/ L od'

13. Io

/3.1/

1323' j

wegni of sois ons.ito - A)

Lgf

3. (, o 3.49

p. 7p-3.RJ

3. 9 y

3. W

-3 Ij wm Density UDsJtt.* HE x D fo C 5"

/Ol'.o

// D. ~/

/13. 'l

//4. 9 1 I f. %

/17. V l

G Tem Numeer y,

.y 2, 73

,74 gg

.T C TT j

Tam weent (oramen si'/. y k ~/. t' sff.3 u '?. 3 u-7. 2-uf z s+ ?. 3 W*et Wergnt $ ample g

Tore (orams) sto o -

250.0 270.o

1s o. o 13o o 2 r o. o 270 0-g ory woont sampie l

8 K

+ Tare toremst z]Fa, 2 16'3 2s20 2 s 9. +

22,r. 3 22.2.2-220. P

]

(we.ont of ory so.:

eram*> (K - H)

/ 9o. 7 I #7.I

/ F3. 7

/92 i

/77 4

/ / */. o

/ */>.I.

I woont er uo+sture M

l

)

(omms) u - K)

//.g

///.7

/F o 2 v. (-

2 4. ~/

2 7. f-29 2.-

I Percent Moisture l

% x 100%

l. O

l. V

9. V

//. 3 11.9

/[. 0 l$ 9 ory Density pesaft.8 )-

- f

/o/.9 P

(F/(N + 1001 )

/OOA

/o0. 2-

/ta Y

/0/.9

/Co. 9 M*

/d sDtv

/o /. 9 uti.=>

ooi,,no.

sto,e m nom ory oe,,s,ty, to, oe,,,

//, J l-(Fm m curw (From c r=>

l-Q' l.

/

Maist. c.u r.> 7 ei rs:nej g, 7,,,,,,,,,o

~"

l 47.3 49

• 48 3 499 49,o w.*

u7r

/

Y8 f, /

Ek 15 3 sq sc gg, I

Lro.o 9$0 0

? 70 0

.2So,o 2fo. O y.go. O pge, o ZM* I*

2. s 2-. /

pt 9. o p.3gf 23f~ v 23l 9 12.1.7

'M 1%o 183.4

/ 77.Y

/>>.9 r 7 f.1.

/ 9t.1-17 9 3/.o M.V

/g.1 7 /, 3

,,,g

' Y l'l if1 ff.o

_ 9.cf

//.cf (g g w.

.-,-.........--..r.

m-.~,..,-r.

. - -,.,,,,,- -.,,,,,,....,_ +.-,-,.,,..._ m __ - 7,,

-,---,.--,,p_rm,-_.---#.

~

~

140

\\

\\

\\

M:istura DInsity Test D:tc g.g Sampl3 No.

Dats

( \\

\\

Soit Description gg g

ggg i

j g 'g f.r/y1J 135

\\

\\

Method of Test ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor

\\

\\ \\

Maximum Density - PCF 130 optimum uoisture content %

jj, y g

z g

}

\\

\\

Curve Drawn By - Technician

]

\\ \\ \\

L3 rm 7

)

\\

Accepted By - Level 11

/

125 g

g q

\\

\\

\\

I-

\\

\\

\\

l I

\\

\\

\\

iiI

\\

\\

\\

120 i, ;

g

(

g o

i i i

\\

\\

\\

i i

i I

\\ \\ N ig5 I

i i

(

\\

\\

o i

I i

i

\\

\\ \\

115 E

yg g

w i

i i

\\

\\

\\

l I

I

\\

\\ \\

o i

i I

'\\

\\

(

i i

i

\\

\\

\\

@110 g

\\ y l

t I

\\

\\l\\

y

\\ \\\\

o s

\\ \\

h105 l

\\\\

\\

g g b

\\

\\ \\

(

\\ \\ 1

(

g h/A

\\

\\ \\

i 100 1

17 i

\\ ih o

w i

g y3 l

I I

I

\\

\\ \\

l I

i

\\ \\ \\

t I

\\ \\ \\

i i

N

\\ \\

l 95 x x x i

i

\\ \\ N

\\ \\ \\

2.80 I

I

\\, / 70 l

\\ \\

2

\\ \\

2 60 90 g y v M

N

\\ \\ \\

\\ \\ \\

\\ \\ \\

85 y y x

\\ N \\

N N 's N N N 80 I

l 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

- 1y

• WAT@A CQNTMNT P$R CENT OF DRY W2iGHT

Wash 200 and Sieve Analysis Date Test No.

Wash 200(ASTM D1140)

Scale No.

In8 Doctor Sieve No. 4 c_,pe bud i /fl.$fg649.

c vY 7 6-/

b Owen Dry Weight

/

Owen Dry Wgnt

% Passing Before Wash (geerns)

After Wash (grams) 200 Sieve 472 #

f(7. T sV,4

5. eve Analysis (ASTM 0422)

Scale No.

Owen No.

Inspector h er /sul c2cro c z9p

/

"g' S, eve Size cum. wi. met.in.o

% Totas net.n.o

v. Tot.: p ing

" * * ' eni C

0

/c o

• es+

o O

/c0

'* s sH3

.2. V 5

99f i

c.7 v4

84. 2-

/4.3 RS. 7 c.1 to 221.7 37.9 42.I s0 c gg,

4f7, 7

70. /

29.9

'** c 1riy STf,7 93.9

{./

• • • c 3 7 4 54 't. 0 9d.O Jf. O A'lA c!ni(. 9

/

/

J')k 592f

/

/

l l

l l

4 Accootec sy-

[

/$

d'"20N

-n o.i.

L Ele d

r meimisim m me u l

e a

a e

2 e

a e

8-8 su l-1IliIIIIII Iil I I i lI a

l i i l i i l i i ! l i i I I ! l

,g y

g

=

z 1

N e

i 2

8 i k j E-i G

R %

i

'R s

W

> - ll IIiiii!II II I1 IiI ;

u Q

i i i i e i i ! # !

i e i i ii i

,g i

.g 8, -

j o'

E i

i

/

1

=

21

/

W.

i

(;

I i i lI l I III: II I ! V!i a

r-i i i i i i i wr i i

ii g

y%

3,

i i.

.x i i i

i

=

.l, t.

.}

a 92,

$2 /

df.T we-j f 4

$2W i

~M i

i

.:t r

~

I "4

=s.

1 11i! II III! l: I l l Ii is j

i

! i i i ii i i i i i i i i

g,,;

i i i i i-e i i i i.ii i

ii g

9 m e,-

5 v

s i s-3 i

gs l

l l

i l

I j

j g,

t i I III IIIiil 1 I'1I i

a g--

Es_i i i iii! I I I ili i i i

l i s

e i i i i

,e i i, i e-i i

i.

3M-e a

5-1 1,_

8 i

I 3

l l

i lr l

Il l l 1 I I

I l l l ! l l l l w

l i i ! I I i

i i i i I i i i i,,,,,,.'.

i

, i

• g

.I 8

2 2

R S

2 S

2 2

2 DeCIM At 3D*4d WD EN

,-w-.

-,.,. - -.,..-.~-,--

e--

-.rw.----~

. -. -.. -. -,, + - - = - - - + - - - - - -. + + - - - - - - - - - - ---- *-- -

N Proct:r Shast D.te 4 Pt LL xa K.

c..,

sample Description

' " " * ' ' ' 'G,LJ K.In

&Jh &J on.x...o or.m sc... u. 4 C,31 )/

C-Juo 7 erector No.

Hammer Control NC

.h l[f) f y

[

(-) h e - 7 5.t c

f N5 1

2 3

4 6

7 A

Weight MCid (lo.J

,]g h, )

]

,1

( ve.umeN"** )

g 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 C

water Accen tmt) jfg

}gg Q fo

}gh y[

}fg

ygg, OEIeY"""

12. 99 13.0'l 13J3 11.2 3 13.If IL29 13.33; d

f tYoiiE11?"

3. 6 I

3. 71 3.7[

19T ] 97 3.9) 3 95

• E tYe'.'E*???e e 10 2. 3 Ill.3 Il2. T

//TY 114.1

/)7 3

//93 y.6 V-/

y-1 V-3 4-f y-9 y-7 a

Tat. Nu==

I#.* *F'"'

49.2 49.2 49.3 4f.2 429 4 9,/

09.2i j

" **!="

2 50. o

.Uo.o 2 50.0 2ro.o arc.o 2roo 2 ro. '

2

1..

• "Er;'h"M*'*

239,0 23r3 2n.T 229.9 227.F.uco 2.22.5 I

k 199,2 124.1 193.2 120.7 1193 175.9 iyy. _1 We".'JJ"%"""

/ /,0

/4.7

/2T 2/. I 2.7.4 a.co 2 7.y j

=

gf3" [,' "

[h f,9 9,[,

//, "/

/[, [

/f,2 fgQ N

?v75*"*,'NY' '

l02.3 103.2

}02.6 fo3.lt lo].I 20 ?. 7 102.2.

s

/o39-gy,,, <,,., o,..,vi.

owe g,,;,,,.io,.i.x

/472 i

Accepted By:

4

/

6 4

G e

/

/

~~

gg,2 p,/

99./

4 9.Y kS.

4I'0 44 yy.3 g.1 M

X-3 V'

X4 M

1 TO.O A '0 O 1 go.c ggo.0 A D.D 2(00 1 70.0 2 J S,f 23I. I 2 3 j,y

).74.O 221.0 22g, i 222.0 179,6

/72.6 g 7 7, f f7),$

j90.3 124.0

'l 2 I.O.

22.9 23.9 19,o

\\

~

II' S h9 ll,]

l2 8

13. 1

/G.)

gn G.0 g.o

140

, i i it gi \\

Maisturo Dsnsity Tsst Data i-i i

\\

\\\\

gi g ig D8'8g. / f. p 9-Sample Nof,,J

, p_

l

( _\\ \\

Soil Description g gj,{ g, ' g /g {]

l l l\\l \\ \\

135

\\,

g g

\\

Method of Test ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor

j j j

j

\\ \\

Maximum Censity - PCF g

l 130 optimum uoisture content %

jL 7 g.g Curve Drawn By - Technician l

3

( (

Accepted By - Level 11

/

125 i g, yq I i t i i ! I i\\

\\

\\

i f-i i

i i i i

\\.

T T

i i ! ;

i i i i _\\

\\

i i i i i i\\l\\

\\

$ _120 i i i l i l \\' I\\

i i t O

I I '

' ' ' l

' ' ' '\\

\\

\\

u-i I i i i i\\

\\

\\

I i

1 i i :

4 1 I i i I ii

_\\

\\

1 o

i i i i I i i i i ! l

\\1 i h a 115 g ;g, g E

i ; i i ; i r i i i

!\\1 N i i i i i i I t ! I I \\ I\\ - \\

o i

i i i I I i !

I l\\l i s

li i i

i 6 i i ;\\

\\

i 110 5;,

0 i,,

, i ig, yg i

i i 1 i i i\\

\\i\\

1 i :,

j i i i ! i i

l i ii i

\\ \\\\

5 i i i i i i i

! iii ii i s

\\ \\

G i

i i

i I i i iii i

i

\\\\K g 105 g g, g b

i 4 m.

hi i

N

\\ \\

(

1 i i (ii W il'iV4 l\\

\\ \\

l iii ii i i1\\

\\

i ;

1 i ;

i E

i! i i i ; i i iii ii i l i l\\ ih 100

,,i, ij i

i x

3 y i e i,

~

i l

1

\\ \\

i i ii I i i i ii i

i

\\l \\ \\

i i i i i

iI i i

i

\\ '\\ \\

l i !

i ! !

! ii i

I

\\

\\ f\\

i

[

95 i

i i

i x x x i i i i t i i

i

\\ \\ \\

l i i i i ii i

I

\\ \\I\\

2 80 t i i i

i i ii

\\ \\ \\ /2.70 l

t i, i ii it i i

\\ \\ \\ /.60 2

t 90 i

i x ?w i i i i

ii M

\\

i i i i

iI

\\ \\ \\

l i i i

l l

\\ \\h l i i i ii i

i

\\ N\\

85 yy x i l I

I

\\ \\ \\

i

\\\\

's j

\\ \\

j l

NN 80 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

. WATER,CO.NTENT-DEC C ENT Of_D Ayy/Elr*T_._, _ ___ __ __

Wash 200 and Sleve Analysis Dme Test No.

C -/9-PY

.S 3 34 g 2 Wasn 200 (ASTM D114Q Scale No.

Inspector

$seve No. p 7*J

//

C,p o bd A77.Nl ass i

c no v 6 'l %

Owen Ory Weignt.

/

Owen Dry weight

% Passing Before Wash (grams)

After Wasn (grams) 200 Sieve Ste. t 6~C2.?

3. (o Sieve Anatysas(ASTM 0422)

Scale No.

Owen No.

Inspector Co pg lw)

(* 17 TO C 19 >

g[

Sieve Size Cum. M Realw

% TeW Rea:M Y Total Passing CJ 7/

6

'n

/no

• ew4 O

O

/00 C 343 3. 8' 7

99,3 C 3?9

/ HE.4 AN 9 75, l

• • c 3 7o A >f 3 M7 b 52.4

• • cna 3 go. 2-(L /

34.9

'** c u"M gy9 fa,

94. /

6", c) i l

t. 39 4 SC2.L 9t'.3

.i, 7

+'Is szg.o

/

/

fla EM. /

/

/

/a,

e.,e. Sr.

ER SD L /

d*/ cay A

-n D.ie l

l

=n.4 l

l

F u.e is ames m;:s au s

a a

e 2

a a

g 8-3 1

e t

I I I I I I I I I I I l~ l l I Iil I

)

l-i i i ii i i i i i i i r i i i i i _

\\,

. ;g j

e 4 3

-y c

w t

> w.

]

s 8

9 3

• I I

i G

t R 1 I

E

< x m

x q

IiilI I I Il l 1III I I! Ii i

t I ' I i l il I i! I I i i i iI 5

g g

j gg ;

1, s

/

=

l 83

,/

h*1 IiII I IIII! I IW!i f

y i i i i i i i i ixiiii i i g

ll 3,

,v o3 9 e s.,

say i

~3i 2

i I

=3

'4

-1 II !! II III! l: I : i Ii 1

i 2

l j

1! I i i ! t I I I I I I I !

I I '

l g,,,,,i,,,,,,,,.,.'

E l

3,,-

s-e 3js-I l

l gs r

3 y--I I

ll l l l l l l ! I I'

I o

as i i iiii! I iii i iii i

i 3

8

l l

'_ a 3,,.

(

8 3

i 5

a**

l l

?

I I

r

lilI iI l !

'iliI I!

II t i i i i : i iii i: iii,ii I

i e

i

,,, i,,,,,.

,,i g

1 a

e a

a e

U*Csh A8GNedWDIN m

Proctcr Shsct

~

Oate Sample Descr:stion d - /9-W

.z.,_.a. w a n J-c:ae

< n-inspector

/

/

de.>n loJ s: )-r Y < A n C' Pouno Scaee usec e /

Gram 5 case used a c 13 7/

C v4 0)

Proctor No.

Hammer Control No.

SH B A C ~z.-

C ' 'llo Metnoo Mold Cven D iff 7 4 c~?S2-.

C 19 1 -

i l

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 A

Wefgnt Mold 00s.)

y cp

,9

,9 g

cf gg cp y,9 Mo'c volume Factor 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 g

( veiume )

C Water Acoes (mt) ffg

,g g g ygg

.g g

,, g.g yoo weignt sosi and Mo'o (fDs-)

/2.8'1 sw ed

/1.07

/ 3.13 -

/ 3.1f 17.1 7 I

Wegnt of $osi 5f E

obs.iiD - Ai J. 4 o

3. (, 7 J. 7s' 3.V 3 3 96

3. M'

$-S F Wet Density ces>tt.2 )ca n e

/cp o

//g./

//3. 4

//./ 9

/ / f y'

//9 4 G

RI A1 Ay A3

/4 A c-Tate Weegnt H

(Grams)

J/f.y J/9. 9 4 "/ ff' MI.i 48.7 4.J,7, 'f Wet We gnt Sample j

d

• Tare (grarns)

,2ff.c gfg O ggo, p 1$~C. 0 2 f*f. D 2 [0 O Dry We,get Sample

}

• Tar

• ternms>

2 ggf 236.4 131.I 22.2S 2 2.(, o 2.12 f K

j (Weegnt of cry so.i oram *> (K - M)

/F9.7

/ft f

/ F//. 3

/.9/. 6

/77 3 r>+4

{

weient of moisture g

(ornmsi a - x)

//f' f3. 4

/79 J /. c-c v. o 2 '/. /

Percent uoisture i

N (ueu 100%

1. o 73

9. 7

//.fr

/J. f ff. V Dry Density 00sJtt.3 )

F (Fi(N + too) 1 10/.9 Jo2.6

/03 sf 102 V

/04.7

/ 03 /

(

Maaimum Dry Density (Proctor Densityt

/0S-8

/1*

(its>tt ) Optimum Woesture(%)-

(From Curves (From Curve) t.

Accepted By:

/

Ho;gr ce,u p iv 7 ol h;w / frI*"

7o*

Goesp c7;'oW Mf 4,, y yg.T H 8. 0 47,3

@A P

PG pt P>-

n pg go. o p c.o 2s0.0 270.0 250.0 g 3c_ o 23d 219.Y zM 137.Y

,,.,, s' i ry.C

g;t d

'?9'7 I>3 7 19 c. o iq.o 7.s' zo, y 2I Y

O t

'f #

7. >#

9[

//. /

• l l6 0

140 i

\\

\\j \\

M:isturo D;nsity Tcst Data Date g, p.g Sample No.

,g g

i i l i

( \\

\\

Soil Description g gj g

, j,

i g.

g 'g C//

1_)

135 7

Method of Test ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor l

l l\\

\\

g Maximum Der'sity - PCF i

i I

\\

\\ \\

optimum Moisture content %

gg 130 i

g g g j

g g

Curve Drawn By - Technician l

( \\

Accepted By - Levelli

/

125 g

g g I ; i i i iI

\\

\\ i\\

i i i !

I i i

\\T

\\

! r i i i i !

\\

\\ \\

i > i i

i i

i\\

\\

\\

120

; iy

\\ g i ii i I

'A

\\i \\

o i i i :

i i i ii i i i l\\ \\\\

i

! I I i i i I i\\i \\

g i i,

(

o I i i.

i i i i i i i i

\\' \\ A 115 E

, f g,3, g i

i i t i\\i N h w

i b

i i i i ! !

i i i i \\ ;\\ l) i i i !

i l\\i X t

i i i i i i g

iii i i \\ i\\

\\

, i i i 2

i '

O'110

,, ig, \\ g l

i i.

I i i

I ii\\

\\j\\

i i i i i i i

i iI

\\ \\\\

y i i i iii

!ii s

\\ \\

c i i i G

I

' I iI

\\\\h 105 f

!A i! i

\\ i\\i k I i i i

! I i

> I i J l IA 4 if i Ni i N

\\ \\

p i

o Iiil i/ l i's

! I III

_ {\\ \\ \\

g iiii

<iii i! i ii i t i\\

\\ \\

I ! I r i l I I I i i i i\\ \\h Q

6 i I i 100 g

g, y i

i i i i i i i

i i

l 1

\\ \\

i I I i i

i l

I

\\ \\\\

i i i i i i i

i i i i

\\ ;\\ \\

l ! i i i

i ! i i i

i

! l !

I i i

\\

\\ f\\

95 y yz i

I I I I i i i 1 i i

\\ \\ \\

l l 6 i i

! I i i i I i

I i

I

\\ \\l\\

2 80 i i ! I I I I I II I

i l

\\ \\\\

2.70 I I '

I I

90 A lVV.60 2

i i : i

! I i i i

e i !

I i i i

M

\\

i i i i l

i

\\ \\ \\

N NA i i i i

i I

I

\\ \\\\

85

, i i

i

\\i \\ \\

l l i i

i

\\ N\\

l I

'\\i\\ \\

'\\ '\\ )

i 80 O

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 yn. Tem rnNTcNT oco ecNT qe Dov wcicu-

9 Wash 200 and Sieve Analysis D"

Test No.

4._f cy gt,/

Wash 200(ASTM 01140)

Scale No.

Sieve No. C[

W

/)g C eMo 7 P-/ gyp Owen Ory Weignt Owen Dry Weight

% Passing Before Wash (grams)

-/

After Wenn (grams) 200 Sieve

!L

.O/. V N.3 Seeve Analysis (ASTM 0422)

Scale No.

Owen Nc.

Insoector

,,, u la 0-2550 C e2<13 C*"7 sieve size cum. m memnw

• Tota m ai m

% Totes P.ing u

ctri O

o

/00 t wo.

.3 o

i co

eav3 2.6 0,f 991 30 e 3 >$

/P2.4 33.4 66.6

'

• c 3ro 314, 1 SW Sl.f

• cno 401 9 73.9 24.1 cznY

- 5 12. 7 9'lo C.o ua

• • c 3r i S.11. 3 gG M &

V"'

• • a y/d S.2 /. 7 wi, secc

/

/

r f

N YAbv d 26 9V Acceptec 8y:

- i.

os,e Elda 9

C

meim a umes me au e

a a

a s

e e

8-

,8 1

l a

s 1

Il lliiliIliIIIIIilI 9

i I ; Ii i i i i 6 iI i iii: ii e

y t

,,i e

......., i i.,i,.

8 g

1, g%.

a x

y 4

. t.

e g

E

[

A

)

c (

5 O

E i

a e

t 9 %N o

M i

D V

Il i-1I IIIi IIIil i ! Ii 1

I i iit i i e iii i i it e

I "g

j j

g i

i e

r

.., i.

i 8

a-l x

i.

7.

}

l l

8 l

I l2 i

1 Ii1I I I II: I I I IV! i

^

i i iiiiiii4.i x i,i, y %r :

3 6

i i ii/

i.

=

.[]

g gi

=-

o r

(?,I 92-W

\\

1

-t 23 s

m I i Ii

!=

-1 Iii! IIl l l ! l;I j

g i i i : i i ! iiiiii. i.ii

,i i e

i

+ i i e ie i i., i e i

g,,

g

]

l a-is 3 =L js-I l

3 g

i i

i g

3 y -- l i I I

II II Ii l'il a

st_:

l iiii! i i i i i ii ii

!j

~

e e i ii6, i e i

i.

a-t e

4 a'h j

A S

I w-3

=**

l l

f g

e

Iiliii

'! I ii;I! Iili t i I i i ;ii! : : : iiiiii I

I i....,, i e i i ie

, i,,i j

'8 2

2 2

3 2

2 2

2 o.oi n

.e u i

W

.---,--,.,-.,nn..

_--,,-..n

Proct:r ShsGt o.i. 6 c) 9 h' 4 s.mai. ce.cr.ot.o, BR oto a Is H ~n a

/n e 0 -/~i ve' L),,P e n o,9 dn Y Mn in S illy sa n n pMo'5 cam usec

• Gram Scale usec s C. $.7 7 /

C. 2 y o 7 Proctor No. $ -T h g a fL

c. 2y/o Mammer Control No i

/4 5 f hv ~d i FS 'l /.}

"I,24o9 C c2. 9 ;;t

~ _ _

h 1

2 3

l 4

8 6

7 A

W8'Gnt Mold (105.)

-g g, 3 g g, } {

Q, } g Q, y g g, y (

g,}(

"C's vogume Factor 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 g

( ve.ume I c

water ^accums.)

,og lgo ygo

,g go ygO qS g 460 w., ant sea ana R$

• Mo'o vos.)

/2. 8'9

/2. 9 6, /3.03 lL //

/3. / 9

/s. a G, /3.37 j

w.,ont of sen

~1 E

uss.uo - As 3 53

3. lo a 3.47 L7f 3 83 3.9o 3.9/

i*

w. censity F

oe.m.s na x a los. 9 I of.o

//c./

//a.f hV.9

//7.0

//7. 3 a

ure num w

& -/

s; 2.

69 E-c)

E X~/

Y-2, h

la*r',*m*,*'"'

d9 2 4g'.3 q9.9 z.i 9. o

(-/ 9. 2 c./ 9. f a 9. /

n I

• • i,*.*Sa:;"*'*

x 9.;c age.3 2 a 9,9 ae9.c M?.a a u 9.1 an, /

a 8

o,y w.,ont samoi.

K

}

+ Tare ggramss yj;;, f JJ7,/ JJ+/9 J3/, / Jpf / SMf

,2,22 W 3

w gni et cry saa L

<erams>(n-m>

. is.6

/ G.S sf2

/D. /

/7f,9 176 7 175 3 3

w gne et weistur.

ii

<aramsi u - x) 7, t' 2

//. 2

/5,b

/ 7. f J//

1. 5. 3

1. 4. 7 g f.'g*x'thh'#'

y, f f(

f,/

if, [

fj, f

)), p pf;)

N gefty th

/(;,$,(s

/fy,f)

/g), f jfj,f

/Cj,[

f(*f,/ /0/l{

P Maximum Dry Density (Proctor Densityt

/o 3.V

/3.2.

2 on.x 3 ootimum u.,,tur.<v,e y-(From curw, (From Curvet

.p?

• • • • • '**W W

Ap-i eu

/A-3 l

-h i +'.2

.h' 3 - My

.,y,s-g4 y7

m. 's Q i,,lag y78 47.7 4' t'.f 47 4 V 7. 9 197.7 2933 J 7 9'3.;) 1 zz. a 6 7. 7 JWG pl./

M 9.+ ; vf. 9 2 3 7 3 N/.E 52- ?

. pot, z ff9.f' If./

N)

M.V 28 3

.s c. (

7rS 9,f lV

'Y'/

d'l

140 i i i

\\ j gi \\

Mnisturo D:nsity Test Dsta i i i l\\i V \\

j

,y,g Simple No. y 3-Date i i i j

(

\\ \\

soii Descnotion g,, _7 g gg i i t i

\\

T i y g'g (f/g f.)

135 i

\\

Method of Test ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor j i !

}

l\\

\\' \\

Maximum Density - PCF i 8 I i

l I

(

\\\\

130 i

g iq optimum Moisture content %

gg i ; t {

}

j g

g Curve Drawn By - Technician l I i l I

i

\\

h\\

/ C // fV

}-

l t 3

(

Accepted By - LevelII l

i\\ \\ \\

i i

i i i ! ! i i i ii i

\\1 ;

T I ! I i

X\\

\\

i l i i

< i i i i

i\\l\\

\\

120

! ; i g,

\\ gg

' i i

A

\\1 \\

O i

i i

i l i l\\

\\ f\\

j i : i

i i i i I

( t\\l \\

o i

i i i i i i i

\\1 \\ K o 115 g,y, g w

i i

i i i i i

i\\1 N K i t i \\ IT

\\

i i i i i l i

Q i i i i i i i ! i 1 i\\i \\

s i i i i, i i i \\ i\\

\\

i i

i 110 p

i i,

,g, \\ q l

1 i i j i i i i i ii\\

\\ \\

y i :

i i i i l I i i iI i\\ \\\\

e i i 1

i I i i i i i i i i l\\ \\

G i

4 i i i i i i i i i

\\i \\ K 3: 105

, g, g y

i i i i i i iA i i i N

\\ \\

o

In Mit W W iil iI i

\\\\\\

i t ! i F! l

\\ i\\ \\

g t

6-iwi i i i i I II i i i I1 l \\' \\h o

! I i 100

i,,

,, i y

gi y i ! i i i ! i I

i i I i

1

\\ \\

l

\\\\\\

I i i I !

I i i t i

I i

l i

I i

! 1 l i I i

i i

\\ \\ \\

i ; i i

i i !

I i

! I i

\\

\\ l\\

j 90 I

i i !

!I i !

I I

\\ \\\\

l i

i i i

i Il l

\\ \\ \\

l l

' I !

i I i i t 1 I i

\\ \\l\\

2.80 i ! I i !I l I

\\ \\ \\_, / 2.70 i i i i

! i i i I

i i

i V \\ Y /.60 2

90

(

,,, 3

, i g yy i i i i

i i i M

\\

i l

i i I i

i

\\ \\ \\

i l i i l I

\\ \\ h i

1

! ! i i

\\ \\h 85 q.y y i i i i ii

\\Nh t

i i i~

NiN \\

i NiN \\

l A\\ ?

t 80 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 WA..TER CONTENT-PEA CENT OF DRY WEIGHT..

-~ -w

Wash 200 and Slave Analysis D*'*

T*st No.

_pg l

l Wasn M MSTM 0114 53cale No.

Saeve No.

Inspector 0

j4f C-psso c nsyc, Owen Dry Weegnt

~ oven Dry weight

% Passing Before Wasa (grams) l A afterWash(grams) 200 Sieve 357. C, l

543 3 A C, Seeve Analysis (ASTM D422)

. S3cale No.

Owen No.

l Inspector f

$~~S$$O

$ ~~h # )

T s e sa.

co,n. m..e,.ne.

s r..

.ei

,,s.

v. r.l....seg

" * ' 37/

6 0

sev.c 8

3 Y@

/)

O

/ crz.. C

343

/. R 69 99 7-

.3 '."'1 fce e /

l$ O

$S O

• • 380 D / 2. D

39. /

& c. 9 Ste c 339./

(c c' 4 39.4 DSty 53'c. t.,

95.2.

48 394 3y/. 4 92/

29 30 6

/

/

Ss'7. L

/

/

??khd80s/ad 6 -M~-8 %

a.ae,,ea e, en o.ie MI48

mom As samos was au 2

2 2

S 2

S 2

3 g

8-8-

i I 1 l ll l l l l l l l l l l Il l D

i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

,a i i i,, e i i i i, i i i, i i i,

g

.g K

e e

e e

i i

j 8

3 I

i i

w i

g

=

3 e et n

Y, I

I II III!

IIiIiI! Ii i

I l

' i l il I i

! I i i i i ii e

g i i i i e e i e i i i 4

iFg j

gg j

. e,

S'_

n.

k m I

2$

h liIII IIIII: I WiIt i

\\.

y *% l l l I i I I Wi'I i i I I t 2

3 i i e

i

!. a i i ii i i

=

2' N

s e

sa,

J 1 s s24 l

3 i i

. :L i

3 1

=s

~l i IIiiiIII! IiI! Ii li 3

i

=

i i i i iiiiiiii i i i i i i j

g...

i i i iiiii,,,i e

i.

y,, _

]

W

] i 6

3, l

l I

ls

~

l l

I I

l j

a,.i g

y-I i

l 1 II I I! IiI'II a

g us_;

i u i

! I i i ii i i i i

6 i

t i e i

i I*-,',,i!

l 2

I a,-

I I

i 5

l l

4 1

.c I i i i It i i lil l ii!

e i i i: i i i iii i i i

ie i,,.,i i.,,,,

• g I

2 3

3 2

4 2

2 2

j is - me.u

- u

e s

Proct r Shoct Date Sample De criction c;- 2 l-24 A. AJ A e C...

inspector L t, G...

s./L 1.J

.ce t

Pouno 5 case usec e Gram Scale Usec 8 r-T h ?/ -

C-2 V O 2

==cr ao.

s m m er coni,oi so.

g jggy'j)

"*** C.2 9 09 C-29.2 a

c - pra Mi 2

3 4

5 6

7 A

Weign Moto (los.)

]g f,]4 h,}[,

f}f

,}f f,

f,}f'"

~

Woic veJume Factor 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 g

( ver me )

u C

water Accec (ms3

}OO jfo 2 CO Q $0 3 Ob 3 70

& 00 12.9%

13.o.z i3.09 13.)4 J3,23 13.3 3 13.3 5 gf a

((

2.13. ' ""

356 3.cc 3.23 3.90 3.97 3.92 4.03 c

[Ig"g, g

/gg, h

/p), g

///,f

//h,0

//[,/

//Q, /

))O,h F

3 E-2 E-3 b- 4 6f T- /

El G

Tate Number b

" I5'A>""'

44.9

't8.1 49.9 i+9.0 99.2 429 48.3:

g l

SE"U***'*

2 50.0

$50.0 2 (c.D 2[0.0 250.0 2Co.o a 50. 0

• "s;??m'****

n.t..z.

239.9 2 36.o 23.7.9.229.o 22xl.222.7 1

EWEN"A*"

1973 191 5 194.1 183 9 179.9 I72V 179.9 S

EEsfj"Af'""

29 10,2

/ 4,0 17./

J/.o 2 v. G 223 j

u 4.o 53 7,5 9,3 ll. )

/ Y.D tr. 2

~

lr'78'"*&'7""' '

/02 7 lov.3

/0 4./

/o43

/oJ.9

/09.J

/09f a

l Wasimum Dry Denstry (Practor Densitye

/O 3

(lesJft ) Optimum Worsture(%g (From Curves (From Cufve j

Accepted Sy:

i O

Q)

G I@ ~ l

1. 9' '

9 2. S 98 7 99.o 4 6.V 49.9 99.2 0

3.G fg.2 46-3 46-4 66-f B-6 AA*7 A A-l g go'o *

.1 rc.0 2700 1 10.0 1 10.0 2 50.0 2 S0.0 263*V 23fG 1320 228.&

225.9 222.I 232.1 2"* #

2 39.c 03N

/10.6

1. 82V

/63 6 179.4

/76.9 f'

/84.3 172,9 N-)-

to.y

!)5 21.4

.2 4. /

17 3I. 3 l

4.'9 i

• ). 6 9.f II.9 j3,f j 6,2.

,7 o g,g L

/.

. Proct::r Shact Date

- C R4 samese DescErip on Af<J n&~.~

n

' " " " ' ' ' An E.., /ce (so S/h S )

,oun u..e v.eo. -

.,.m sc.,e use.

c-3 3 7/

c-24o?

rocier uo.

2

" ' " ~ M /0 p.ggfj c pyo9

(-2 9.2 l

l 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

h, g ~

A wergnt Moto obs.)

Mota VoJume Factor 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 g

( veume I C

water Aeoea (mt.)

gg weignt sois anc gh D

Wona 00s.)

}, }, ]&

I S}I Weigns of soil I

(fos.l(D - Al h,hO

$f wet Density F

00:J1t.a )(B z El Q0.0 g-3 a

T.re uomoor l

Tate we gnt g

e (grams) 2h9,9 wet Weignt sample J

. Tare (grams) a Dry weignt samose

+ Tare tgrams) 2.2), )

3 K

E weight of Dry 5o.1 f 7f, h j

I-(grams:(K - N) h Wo.gnt of Woisture M

g (grams) W - K)

OTu*'n"$.""

/6,4

~

574'"*a"!' '

/03.I i

Wasimum Dry Density (Proctor Densityt

/

.)

ObsAt.3) Optimum Moesture(%t 0

(From Curve, (Ffem Cufwe)

-A3~

Ys

/

4 i

~.

140 i\\ ; \\; \\

M isture D:ncity Tcst Data

, i i i

\\t i \\

y yQ Date Qf. g y Sample No.g g 4

i

( \\ \\

soii oescription 4

4y

{

g.j4 i i l\\

)

,, i i i g g

g fs,)

135 I

I I

\\

\\

Meihod of Test ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor j i

)

\\ \\

Maximum Density - PCF 7

6 i i

(

\\

\\

130 optimum Moisture content v.

jfg j

g

(

(

j 6 i,

j

\\

\\

Curve Drawn By - Technician i i i

\\

\\\\

d 4/ev

.l l

l

\\\\

Accepted By - Level 11 125

,, i g

y y I i i i i i i

\\

\\

\\

i i i i i t i l\\ _ )

T i l i i i i i i I\\

\\

\\

i ' i t I i i i\\

\\

\\

i ! I i-l 1 !

I l i \\1

( I\\

o i

t '

I I I e I i l\\

\\l \\

u-

! I i i i t\\

\\

\\

! i i i I i i i

\\_\\

t i i i iiiI

\\ih a

i : ; i a 115 y,g, g w

i i i i i ;

i i i i

\\l N K i

I i

! i i i

\\ i\\ i\\

O j i i I I i !

I l\\l X 1 i

\\

\\

\\

' I 110 O

! 1 i i e i i i i

l\\l 3

\\

y

_.i i i i

i i

!\\

4 l

i

i i i i i

i i l i

\\'

L c

i i i i i i i it I i I (

\\i. \\

i i i i i i Ii i

\\i \\ K w

I i

g 105 b

_,gg, g, g, g m

mi A i NA

\\

if b

i l*.

I I i i ll I"I I

\\l \\ \\

I i i

! i i i i l i i

\\ !\\ \\

o

, i i i i j i i

! I ii ii i I \\i \\h 100 i

ii x yy I i i i i ii i

il i

i

\\ l\\ \\

l i

\\1 \\ \\

lI t i i l ii l

i i i t i

! i i i i I

i

\\ \\ \\

i i i i i

l ii t i i

\\

\\ I\\

95 3

j x x x l l 1 l l

-l

\\ \\ \\

i i i

+l i

i

\\ \\l\\

2 80 I i I

I I I

\\ \\ \\ / 2 70 i i i

i i I i

\\ '\\ K/ 2 60 90 x yv i i i i

i VN

\\

\\ \\ \\

i i i i

i i i i i t i i

\\ \\ tA i i i e i i i

t

\\ X\\

85 i

g, y x i

i N N \\

N N \\

NN N

NN' 80 O

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

• "a WATER CONTENT-PER CENT OF DRY WEIGHT

Proctu.Shnct D.te Sampi. D. -ription C-2/- 24 5.

Afe) K e G n..,

'"'*** 8..e e *Go:a L-lh

.C-)

~.a.u.

u ar.,, se.ie ur.e.

r o., ~.

2 2

G 2 Wo

• .maa gjg) g g3) c_y 9 nela c.a

• c - 2%9 M

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 A

W.ight Mold (In..)

}

(

)

M. vNume F.ctor 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 g

( vmume )

c we.1seomumu

gg

,gg g go ggn 3go 3 j~g ygg UD

/2.9f

/3,02

}]. /T }].,2Y

}].39 /1 y9

/J, VY u$

EIi"o*Si" 1 49 3,79 3 2C 3.97

4. br

4. /2 4./4 I

c 0

EIN="YL e

//t. 7 ll3. y ntg n R.7 l2lT j.23. G /299^

a a

~ ' " " ~ ~

sji is2 sn in Air f.z sj ?i IeE' 428

/ 79 4#,f 97.4 M29 98.3

$28 4

)

• '"5'Ne"N'~

• INSU"**

2 re.c 2 70.0 2 ro.o 2 r0.0 3 ro.o 2t9.3 2ro e 242.4 239. $ 21[l O 31, 9 229.2.

22F.O 221V I

ENEN "O*"

19V.6 190,9 194.7

)2 4.2.

/20 3 /2377 nr/

EUEEI N""

'). 6

//.2 19.9

/2. 2 2/9 2 V. 3 3?/

l (DE.""

3,9 d

~2 9 9.9 M./

/J B err (N("D'E Y '

/0C.5

/c 7,/

Jo ?. 3 102 9

/e 9.J.

/08.S /09.I l

/3'O 10 F. 6 on m*>

ooiimum e mu,.im uuimom o,y o

,ry <,, tor o.e..iye

(

<re m com, (From cw=>

-d *'

9 4

sy-A

- i

• E / 3 f t tr !

Xl X.2.

X3 XY XY 2 7o, o 2 50.0 2 50.0 2 70.o

'2 50.0 2 fo.o 2 f0.9 142.I 239.5 A3C9 2 32.0 22?.9 22 2.0 22T. V-49,1 99.1 !!N -])

,y 99.o 99.2 V9. 9

49. i I93. o 199. +

183.0 n87 n2.1

/7c.9 7,9 f.f ty, &

19.o 221 2 g.o 227 h

l A !- -

J, l -

XO.

U

k-

1 Wash 200 and Sleve Analysis Date Test No.

g_p,g s

Waan 200 (ASTM D11ac) inspector Scale No.

j j7 g

Sieve No( 7 'I J.7-

/jfx-C-25ro cisv t.

Oven Dry Wergnt Setore Wasa (grams)

Owen Dry weight

% Passing y, After Waan (Grams) 200 Sieve g, ;

ao t_f4'#.9 ML Seeve Analysis (ASTM D422) inspector Scale No.

Owen No,

1. 1. J

>$3O

/

Sieve Site Cum. Wt. Retained

% Total Retained

% Total Paasing

" r t,1 O

O

/00 o cwr C

e

/00.o

c 343 2.1 C.4 99.6

• CD9

/ 4 3. 'l IC 74.4

'* c 7w 2 CC 3 42f J.2.f

• c no 3 C C. 9 cf.1 34 y

'" c2nv

1. J /. 7

'7,4. F S,1

'* e3t4 5 + 3. I

%.7

3..e WlA S42. V yj; gc o. t

/

/

ras l

t i

'I

1. M II Acceptea er wn case I

i nama l

t l

. _. _ _ _ ~ _ _ _. _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _

I mesh As aanvos mc sk U

2 2

2 S

2 2

3 g

E-e 8-o e

l IIII IIl1i1 IIII IilI N

l I l l i I l l l l l l 1 l 1 i t i i yh a

t i i e

i > a i i. : i...

.g g

i o

a w

i l

3 9

I

=

3 q

l 4

i liliII Il l l l l l l l l l l 2

8-I ! I I i l i ! i ! l I i l i i j 5

g

~g gg i, e i i

e i

e e

i.,

i a

t-ST i

l

• t-i i

lR f

I e

i I

e i lilI ll l i l l 1 l_l IV! i g

l l l l i i i l i I

M l' I I

i l ' l l

,I 2

• i t

i.

i e a vi

+

i 3

.lt g g.

. =

a

'~

1 92',

j i 58f i

i 1

i q

g a-l l l l l l l l { l! I I !

l i t

E i

! I i l l l l l 1 l l

l l !

l i i i I

jo e i e i i I t

6 e 1

i

. i. i i

],_

l j

W

.i o

_o i

s l

l I

l

$ ~

i I

i g

p i

l r -- i i

i Iiii

! Iil l

l I a

EW_i i l i i! l l t i i l 8

l i

3 I

~

i e i e i e i i e i

S a.-

g S

=

1 3

l l

2 5

i l

l l

. l l r

l l l l l

!.l l l l I l l w

l l l l ! l l ! l l i l l l i l I E

ie e i e

i i i e i i i i.

g a

e a

e a

e a

a s

1 WCIM AG aspeed WC sk

!.N

- ~ - - - - -

140

, i i

\\ ;ij \\

M:Isturo D;nsity Tcst Data Date g', y g og Sample No.

-)

{

j l jj

(

\\

\\

Soil Description g g 4 g,,{

j 135

,f g,

g 'g

,j;/d, 1, )

' I I

\\

\\

Method cf Test ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor j j g

\\ \\

Maximum Density - PCF llli optimum Moisture content %

/ 3,p 130 i i,

j j j j j j i

(

\\

g Curve Drawn By - Technician iiii i i I

\\,\\\\

/ st a 4 g i j i j j g 3

g \\

Accepted By - Leveill g

Q iiii i i i

\\

\\\\

XJc-7 125 i gi y q

/

/

{ + 1 i i i i i \\\\

\\

/

i i ! i i i i I

\\i )

T i i i i i i i i

\\

\\ \\

i i I

\\ \\

\\

vi,

e g120

, ; i iiiy

\\

g i

i i A

\\

\\

o i

i

! I i i I j\\

\\

\\

y i

i >

i i i i i

< !\\

\\

0115 llll ll

.l'll h 5

i6 i i i ii i\\i N K iii i.I iii i \\ i\\ i \\

> i i i ii\\i\\

(

i o

i i i i o 110 i

l i i i i i ! i\\i 1 \\

iii i ; i

!_ J-wii\\

\\i\\

i i i i l ii Ti i l\\ \\\\

g i i AW e

i e-~,ii

i ; !

i i ! i s

\\ \\

G i i e i t i i i i i i i i i i

\\\\K g 105 g j g, g b

iii>

1 i ii i i i N \\ \\

j ! i; i i i l I Ill

\\; \\ \\

, ii i e i i

, i i i i

\\ i\\ \\

i E

i i ii i i i i

! i i i i i l i IN i h.

100

,i i

i i

i x yy l

t I

\\ l\\ \\

i ii i i ii i i I

I I I i l I }

l l

l

\\I \\\\

i,,

i ; i i

i i

s \\ \\

i i i i

I i

\\

\\ I\\

iiii 95 x xx

, i

\\ \\ \\

+ l l l i l l

l i i i

i

\\ \\l\\

2 80 6 ;i t

i i i i i i l I

\\ \\ \\

2 70 i i i

\\'\\

/2 60 i ii 90 x TV I

iiil i

b

\\

l l l l

\\ \\ \\

I i i }

i l i

\\ \\ h l

ii i i i

\\ \\h 85 Nix x i i N N \\

\\\\ \\

l c

j

\\ \\

\\

l X X 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

_ WATE A; CONTENT-PE A CENT Oc D AY WEIG$._,_

_a

Wash 200 and Sieve Analysis dew Test No.

Wasn 200 (ASTM D1140)

Scale No.

Sieve No inspector P57 4.y Alu:s earco ir44 Oven Dry weignt Oven Dry Weignt

% Passing &

Sofore Wash (grams)

After Wasa (Orems) 200 Sieve 68-

((0.O

~d / P. P D7 sieve analysis (AStu D422) scale No.

Owen No.

Inspector cup lud c zrro c '9 v

'"7 sieve size cum. wt. htaim

% ntas netaim

% htai Passing g

" * *

• c 3 >l r.

C

/C 6. o cut

.2. I 4

99.6

c3+3

/ o '. Y

/.9

92. /

• c3 > 4 f t. 2-W.4 94.6

• • C380'

/20 d 30.4 f.16

• • ces o D g.2. 4 fo. 4 496

'** c aciV J+ 93. 4 W./

// 9

• • • e :r 99 El 2C 92.6

7. 4

"lb'l#

& 2. 7

/

/

ylA Sto.c

/

/

Y*

i.

\\

/,

i

^$

l

~

i

-e l

s'

.e g

(

Dat.

t' d.

74BM4A

u.a = a a m es m e au s

a a

e a

s e

e 8-I IIi ll I

IIIIi l

N l

i l t ! l I I i! il l l i i1

, k g

s

, i i, i, i i,. i,i...

q w

=

I e

t

)p

[

s 8

N x

$ 7 E

i l l l l l l l l !lIlillI! Ii g

i i i l I i i l I i ! I I i l i i I e

9 g

j j

g

?.

P i i.... i i...

i i

8-8r.

i i

/

a l

l s/

I

"\\$

^

I

'! Iil I l 1 i i l MI i !i c.

\\

a g

i i i i i i m iiiiiiie ii g

3 2

, i, if, e i i :.,,

i

.,l,i!.

o.

9a 7

3l-ia f

-.j 32 j

i 5

i I

=s.i i

i

• l I ! I IIIII! I'I ! i : I i 3i y

- -: i i i i i i i i iii:

i i i g,..

,,i,i,iii,i...,

e '

E ha-g I i l

3 s- -

ls l

l I

a i

I i

i l

l

,i_

j g,_'iI-lIII a

g -- t Iil I l l l I

I I us_; e i iii! i i i iiiiii ei g "a j

i i e iiie i i i

e i

i.

t s "-

I 8

i l

i a

=-

l l

i Iili

.I

.f

IiIiiii!I i i: I e

I i i I i.I I ii! ; i i iiii I

i i i i i i.,ii..

..e i

g l

e a

e a

a s

1

~

AMOllM At 34N6d WD 33d i

1 Proct:r Shr,ct 6 h/-Ft Date Sample DesengAtJ E, r,~..

S /A L

inspector WA, A.,,

L a

' i Pouno sca>e useo e Gram s:aie usec a c-332/

C

.2 Vo >

Proctor No-Hammer Control NC.

p-tryf g "c1a c., y og c'",.p.2 l

1 2

3 a

5 6

7 A

Weight Mold (lbs.)

[

f

[

[

[

( veiume' H"** 'I 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 B

b c

water nooec imo jfo 200 7 70

'3 00 3 $~O y00 4Lf0 '

NUcYY'"*

13.I9

/3 2T 13 3G I3 M

)3,52

/ 3 56

/3,79 gf *

?u $N'N 3,93 3.h 4.C 4.08

4. lb 4 20 4.23' L

N

?a's'N'"$ti = e)

//4.9

//f.)

I10.0

/22.4

/2 4. R /2s.o

/2 f. 9 G

Tate Numeer -

{,

y,/

y.]

)},/

[.f fj,7 jf_ g h

Ia=*="*'*"'

49,9 49.2-48.2 4R'5 49.9 49.3 4 9. $

h

"'ia*r.*?a%,W*

2 50.0 150.0 2 50.0 2 ro.o 2 50.0 2To.a 2[0. a

)

• "rN?a"kE*'*

232.6 23%f 23(.3 2222 229.& R22,o 2/9,9 i

f Er'.TENDi

/B'/,B

/97 3 /93I

/79.4

/)v. 7

/ 72. 7 /Nf k

EWh0"E*""

l2. 4 l55 IQ.7 22.3 259 2 R. 0 36.2 Ilb'."'E)."""

G. (,

((,4 10.1 JR.y

/%,5 /&.2 (24

~

NS*"'E'i""' '

l0 7,8 l07. )

10 8,0 l09.9

/09,0

/094 /029 P

i

/C 9 0 onutt.')

/4 O E u mumy oeesay cer ctor o., snre ggsturewir h

e Accootey-423 49.0 49,3 48 47.7 9,7. 2 n49.9 T3 C-3 Y-2 f7 FF fg jyn 2 50.O 2C0.0 2 10.0 2 70.0 2 70.0 a go.o a co.o

,237,2 234.1 2 31, 5 222f 22%I 22).i at: 0 7 q9'9 Jg 5,/

Ig2.2 119*5 1 76.6 173.7 is 9.6

,y, g jg.9

> $.i 22f

.25,9 29.i 3/. O g,]

g, g lo. 2 12 5

/Y. 7 16.Y 18.3 i

-140

, i it

\\j \\

M:Istura DInsity Tcst Dita i 1

\\

) \\

(

y y,y g-2)- gy sampie no. y 9 g y

D*'*

i !

( \\ \\

soo oescription 7-m 4 g,,,,7 i i

\\

)

g, \\

s L //

I.

]

135

, i f

I I

I

\\ \\

Method of Test ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor

[

h

\\ \\

Maximum Density - PCF gg

ll3, l

\\ \\

Optimum Moisture content %

130 g

goy j

j l

\\

\\

Curve Drawn By - Technician

( \\

Accepted By - Levelli 125

,,i

, gi 3 g

/

I I i i iii i \\ j\\

\\

l ! i !

i -l t

I l\\i ;

T

! i t l-

! li i I\\

\\ \\

r t

i*t I i i\\

\\

\\

120 g

;, i

i i gi g

O

! ' I i i i

i I ' '\\

\\\\

I i: ! i i l I

\\ \\A j-i i i i i I

i i

\\i \\

1

,i

\\iK iii i,

o i ; i C

i i

\\i\\

\\

t i i e

i E

I 6

i i\\l T

\\

i i

1 i i i i'I i : I ;

l\\

\\

\\

c i : !

i i ;

i i i\\

\\

t I

i i

t i\\

\\

\\

i i i

110 O

, w

,g, gg n

i i i i

.j wv*

Wi 1

\\ \\

g

!;ii iW!

i I Pi i\\ \\ 'k e

iiii i e i i

1 i I I

(

\\i\\

G t-i i i i i i

iil i I i

\\i 1 K S

l I i t i l i i l1

> l I f

\\ l \\l \\

b 1

i i i i i i i i NA

\\

i i !

~ $

Fi i-1 I I i i i ll

\\l \\ \\

g i

i i i i i i i I iii t \\ l\\ \\

i i i i i t i i i l i i i l i \\l \\ )s c

.lil 100 A g, x i i i

! i i i

i i

i

\\ i\\l\\

i ! i

! ! I i i

i I

\\t \\ \\

l i i t 1 1 i

l 1

\\ \\ \\

l t

i i

i t !

l l

I

\\

\\ l\\

95 x xx iii;

! i I

i i

\\ \\ \\

i i i

\\ \\ \\

2 80 i -; ;

i I

i i i i l i i I i

\\ \\ \\

2 i i i i i i i t I i

\\ \\ ' /.70 2 60 90 x yv i i i i i

'wN \\

j l l i

I i

\\ \\ \\

l 1 1 1

I i

\\ \\A i i i i

i i i

i i

\\ Xh 85 q;y x

j j i A N 's i

\\\\

's

\\ \\

'N

\\\\

80 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 e e r. - e.,- e e n e v..e. c u-

.....,c= c n..,e..,

l i

Wash 200 and Sieve Analysis 0**

TutNo.

g, 7 g, g 4 g_

200 (ASTM 1140)

Sc.f. No.

Sieve No.

Mwrl Y C26so C 154 (-,

27."<.LWe'

.)

M&7.W.L sfi'.*4" S C 2-

+ 94/ c/

9 gn.sy.is eSm o422)

ScW. No.

Owen No.

L c2660 d 29E V

c"'

sier. size cu m. wi. a.ts n.o

% rois n.t.in.o

% Totai p.ing O 32I D

0

/00 cw d,7

./

99,9 K

0 3%

7(

.5 99,S 0379 K0.2 9,1 90,1

'O C 3to

// 6,7 f),'

M,$

so e5to 24,7, 3 f.,j c}, j gg,j L ') Q,4 7 '), )

l},~)

'* Cis\\4 f

'" e m 4%7 ME//"

9, <-/

aA 4 %.9

/

/

a s%2

/

/

~

Acc.ot.c By-

,8 o...

O W144

u.a = a a m os m e au s

s

-s a

s e

s a

s-8-

1 i

i i ll I I

I I I 'l i I

W t

i i i i i i i

iiiiic i y

E 8

6 f

2

?

t s a s

I D

h 3(

i l i III IIi!IIIIIIIiii 1

iiii I i i i i ! I i i i i i i e

y i Fg j

j g

g i.i,

.. i,, i

,=

a i

• h l8 I

2 1

i liiiliI :- 1 i M i!i r.

5 I i-i I wi i I i i i i i i ' i i 3 %

i t ip... i i,

. !{

ci,

gg j7 i;- I f 18 e As4 l

j W

t i r

I

=2 2

I~

• I l l l I l l l l l ! l l ! Ii l i l

y i e i : i i i i i i i i i

i i a

=

w i

l l

l l

I l

l l

l l

8 5

I i

)

9m h n-h.

g g

l f

i w

a i

l i

l I

t._

=

so, r -- ; I i l III I.il Ii!-l I I i

a st_i I e i i i ! I i iiie i i

i i

8 g

i a i e i i e i

8-l 4

la 3,_

g i

l 3

=.

l t

4 i

. /'

l i l l I { !I i l l l

'i l i ll i i i i i i ii: i i,ii i

i, 1

i i i e i i i i ii

, i...,i g_

a e

a a

e I~

u*onne am me su

n

- Procter Shcst

~20- $f e$t Ain J fe)

Gr. -

L kffeeb k.'~s ke).'s.so n

. NNv $-

powna scaee useo e Gram scaie useo e C-33 7l C-2 VO l Proctor No.

Hammer coniros o umnoo

_7./

y Mold coen

• C-2po9 M

+

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 9,3 o 9,30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.34 9.Jc a

w., ant uo:a m.>

Mosc vofume Factor 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 water 5=a mu

\\

/FO 200 2 50 300 3[0 V00 V50 c

OUcY" *"*

J3. 06 13./ 3 /3.23 /3.29 /3.3f / 3. 50 1 3 5.:

5l g

1

%*'.G 'it" 3.74 3,93 3,9J 3.9s 9.or 4./s 4.a 5

4

• .'E1*"3=n

//29 ll4.9 117,9

//9.J' 121. 5 12 9. 2 124.e X-2.

f.3 y'- Y X-5 C-l B-T P-2 a w "u=~r IE.* *?'"'

ll9.I y9.#

y 9.o 99.2 99.2 99.7 ye.o

}

• • I.*isLY

250 2To 2ro 2 to 2.ro an aro NEUmY"'

217.6 11V.1/ 2310 227.3 22K3 22/7 2 19.9 i

k Er*&"I M "

/92.f 1Rio 192.o

/2R,/

I74.I I7/. B

/J/,9 E2"l01%"""

/2. 9

/s &

l9,o 22.7

29. ?

28.T 30. /

}

(NES=~N'$'"~

d,&

Wo9

/0* 9

/2.)

J4.0

/6.6

/ 7,4

?v7("D *1 N Y ' '

/OT. 8

/06.0 loc.t lof.9 IOC. G l06.4

/Or,.I 9

/O A b owe <.')

/O-maymy o.nwy emctor o.nsitre

,ogm mginum(m y-r

,,., d 9

Y'2.

Y3 V'If aoo.

C-3 ti-p / Q "

/

2 50,o 2 50.0 2 50.0 2500 2 70.o aro.o p.gao 237,2 233.3 23 'E 227'0 32I R ' 8'. 3 I 9,3 42,2.

99-l qq,2 M.o M.V 47 f

/87,9

/BT./

/6/ 7 M'0

,, g, 3

,.,2, 7

pp. y G.9

9. O jo.C

/2,9 jy,7 jg,2 jg, 3

140 i

i\\

\\

M:;istura D;nsity Tcst Data gjg 4g ll

\\ \\p\\

ig Date 4_g g simple Nof g y j

[

\\

\\,

soii oescription gg g4g y,

x 'y (L,,,

f;).),

fu J 135

.f Mein d i Test ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor g

\\

\\ \\

Maximum Density - PCF

\\

optimum Moisture content %

jg y 130 l l l

\\

\\

Curve Drawn By - Technician grd.4 b v

.i i

I

\\

\\\\

j j

j j

( (

Accepted By - Levelli A

f i i i i

\\

\\

\\

u TM llll l

l

\\ \\\\

/

/

i i i !

I I ii l

\\j \\

T t ! ! I I !

i

\\

\\ \\

i i

! i i\\

\\

\\

120 i g,

\\

g o

i : '

> ;ii i

i N

\\_\\

t i

iii i t I

\\ \\h 5

i i

+

i i

i i i

\\1 \\

(

\\\\h U115

. i )

\\!\\l\\

I i f '

t gy i i i i

i I * ! t l\\i N \\

i i !

l l i

i i i \\ IT. \\

m 1 i i i i i i\\l i s

' ' \\ '\\

\\

a

@110 i i e i i i i I i i i l\\1 1 \\

i i i i ;

i i\\

\\i\\

l i i i i i i

t i it i

\\ \\\\

y i

I i

i I/Ni _ LJi>-%t sl\\_\\

o I

h105 P'

I

\\' I h I

i i I i!

i i

i N!\\ \\

r i i i i)

\\h g

I i a

! i 1 I I i I

I i

\\ N1

+

s i i i i i i

! i i i

i

\\ t\\ \\

'I 100 I ! I l I I i l l I I

l i\\

\\' \\

l ! i i i i !

t i i i

l 1 l\\ \\

l ! lI i i i i i i i I

j

\\i N N I i l i i s i 1 6 i -

I.

I

\\ \\ \\

i i i ii i i

\\

\\ [\\

i i i !

I i

95 g \\\\

i i !

t ! I I

i l

I

\\ \\ \\

6 i I

i i I I

i i

\\ \\!\\

2.80 l i I I i i i I i

'\\ \\ \\

2 70 i ' '

' I I I I

I

\\ '\\

2 60 90 l I i i i

1 i

\\ O/

I i M

\\

I I I i i i i i

i i

\\ \\ \\

i ! l N NA I

\\ N\\

' i i 85 I ! !

i i

\\l \\ \\

l i i i i I

\\ N \\

l t

i

\\N

\\

l

\\\\

N I

U 80 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 W ** m T c!

• =*

• F O! CP Y "'c'* " ~

1 1

Wash 200 and Sieve Analysis Date Test No.

b-2 Y SY

$, - / D k!

Wash 200(ASTM D1140)

Scale No.

Sieve No inspector c37P k

( 2d b

(/f/6 Oven Dry Weight Oven Dry Weight

% Passmg Jd' Before Wash (grams) g After Wash (grams) 200 Sieve 60 5 0/.l

,b b~

Sieve Analysis (ASTM D422)

Scale No.

Owen Nc.

Inspector Co c o l4 &l C. v 1 07 (2I

/

Sieve sue cum. Wt. Retainee w Total Retained

% Total Passing n

a

" * *

• c3 7/

O :t-fr~e.1r-s4 0

/oo n

• c r +<t A. 6 d

9 ct.f

ca+3

/2*N 2.3 97.7

• C3>9 9HA 17, Y 82.2 C3 Po

/9 7, /

M.3 64.7 8

dF4 o J o/. /

I4.7 4J,2 carn Mes. 9 91.3

9. 7 ease

,ses. C 5%c 4 g (,

4 e4/

/

/

f plA

[30 3 f

f NN* $l buy S*25EY Acceptea er:

t.v., n Dai.

mma

l:-

i I

l mam As assavos mc au s

a a

a e

8

=

q lill l l 1ilIilIlI p

i l

l J l I il i i i

'I I i il iiiI g

8,

., i i i i, i i i,iiii, i

=

g-O a 6

N g i

.I g

b M

I u

l Il l l l ililIl! li 9

I ! l ! l I i l I ! I I I i i ii c

,g j

j s.

a-s' 38 1

l8' lIi i l I l 11: WI Ii

' I I y

y I i 1 I I i i LJ61 I I f i

,g!,

u s s2 r! il f

sa-

$ 2 7-I i

El 1

i l

l 3

ns 1 IIIiIiilI! l;I! Ii i i

!=

i

. -i i i i i i i i iiiiii.i: i i 5

g,.

,,i,,,,,,,,.,,,

{

w g,,L I i b

js-l l

1 a

I I

j j

i t

I g, _i y--I I

I II i

lit I'II a

3,_

il i

iii i

I i iii, i

i iii

, i.

s E

~~

l 5.-

8 i

1 i

5

• =.

l l

l j

1.7 I

iI i lii! IiiI e

ii! ii: i i i iiiiii I

,,,,,,,,,,,,.,, *a l

g 2

a e

s a

e a

a s

mm se am ma nu

4

^

Proctrr Sh:ct Date -

Sample Desenation 6 ~.2 o - 9 0 -

/?rmir/ rwinia

.n.o.esor E & /W/M

/nr.% m to fr%Es n.w

~

e Pounc scaee usec s Gram Scale used a Proctor No.

Hammer Control No Metnoo Mold )//09 G-D 92 Cven

/> /357#

. ec i

a 4

s a

7 x

we,cnf uota (sos.>

9.D 937 9.37 937 937 9.37 9 37 uoic volume Factor e

30 30 30 30 30 30 30

( veiume I C

water Aeoen tml.)

fgc

/30 i,1 o O yJO 3CC 35C 9/00 weight So:Iand MCIC UDs-)

/$.k

/b. &

/h.llgf l8.W

/3.59 (3.70

/3.72

@k Weignt o' Soil E

o n.uo - n>

S.90 3 97 y.cy

y. r 2.

<f.22-9.35 W/

Ig om.t cons,tysnt.s ta = e //70

//9.7

/?/.p.

/23. &

/26.4 Go.C G2. 3 w

u a

a Tate Numsme L9-.I

p. 2.

p-3

)? tj f-5 L -/

E -2.

j Tare we,gnt H

gg7ams; qg f gjf f' tjy, G yq, }

fj 7,y qq, g yf'}

l O a*rei O I"#'

Dso c 3 S*o.O Dse o D.sc.o D 50.o 250.o DSe o J

• "r*r;?g"r'.**s***

24/ 2.- FL s't. G 2 3'A G 2 soi 9 Ns,c) 1.1.M 2&$.a i

n i

j weight of ory Son L

torsmsun - n)

/ 9.? '7

/9c t

/PC,A

/r/3 4

/?o G

/vf 7

/ ~?3. ~7 d

weignt of Moisture g

(gramsi J - x)

p. 7

-/ J. 7_

/$ 1

/4/

,21.0 Ji/

.2fr o

?t.)Y15A'~'

N

(

yC fy

9. /

/(> y

/21

/Y3 ff. /

orY oenstty obsnt.3 )

//1.O AW

//Yll F

(FI(N + 100) )

/// f

//)_ f ff 2. /

QWl ' //). [

//Y Z

&,f waaimum cry Density (Proctor Densityt

//E 2 (Inset.8) optimum Worsture(%r #

(From curw (From curve) t A

4 t

.y.

(

7- !

7=2 T-3 7-V r-s-E-3 s - 4i 250.o D co.i oss.o n o.s Dso o D50 0

• { 50 6

'lM nS2 234 9 93/1O w/iB nd B Wr&

'n.s YB.3

'n.3 97.6 92 2 99 9 n.o

/931

/VT 1

/g?/

/ 8 3 2-

/296

/ *? Y 9

/ '?! G u

iv v s c. Y in u r ~

~ -

140 g

\\; \\

M:isturo DInsity Tcst D:ta

- \\

I

\\

oate Sample No.

g., g, g g.fj

.i i

\\ \\ \\

soii oescription p,gg,w ppou mg,,,

i i

\\

T 135

\\

\\ \\

7o Fsul Gpsa in 7 / fnug

\\

\\

\\,

Method of Test ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor Ii

\\

(

(

)

\\

\\

Maximum Density - PCF ilI optimum uoisture content a4 jy y 130 g

j g g

g Curve Drawn By - Technician i

\\

\\ \\

2<) C $$$

a

( (

Accepted By - Level 11 125 g

y q f

I i i i

i

\\

\\ \\

/

I i i l

\\:

T T

i !I i l

i

\\

\\

i i i i-i i

i i\\

\\

\\

120 ig

(

g o

I i i

• 'I

\\

\\\\

lI i i

! it i

\\ \\N i

i ! i i iI l\\ i \\

i i i o

i i i !

I i i iii

\\1 i h i

i i i <

_ h Ai i \\ i\\ l \\

o i t i M i i 71

% i i!

i

\\ i \\

f

\\\\

\\

j 110 O

i ! ;

ii i

i i

l\\

\\ \\

l e i r i i I I

i I \\

\\ \\

y i I t i l i

i I

.\\

\\ \\

e i

i i i i

I i

\\ \\

G i

i i i i

ii i

\\\\K 5

t i t i l l 8 6

I I I

\\

\\l\\

b i i i e i i i

i i

\\

\\ \\

b I I i i l i I

l l

\\ \\ \\

i i i i i i

\\ \\ \\

g t i i i i i i i i

l i

t\\ ih o 00 1

j x

3y

~

i i !

e I!

t 1

\\ \\

I i i i i i i i

\\\\\\

i i i

. Ii!

\\\\

\\

i i

\\

\\ \\

i i i i

i 95 i

x xx i ! $

i i i

\\ \\ \\

i ; i i i i i

\\ \\l\\

2.80

\\ \\ \\ /2.70 liii t i !

l

\\/2 60 iiii i i i i

\\ '\\

90 g yv i i l l WN N

i i'

\\ \\ \\

i i i

\\ \\ h I i i

\\ \\\\

85 gy x i i i

\\ N \\

'\\\\ \\

i NN Ni M

80 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

..,..ee -...e..-

e e e - e... r e - ev...e., u-

Wash 200 and Steve Analysis D*

G H S - /

gm(AsTu ouso) scW. No.

si.v. No.

M,dhrb d2Sso e /sg c, 8;i"lC%.,

512.

MWW.L LTC' 9G2.9'

9. %

,pgp..<*sm==

se ~

o..a uo.

g)M L e2.sgo c 29 2_

cag' com. m. a.i.e

• r v, roi.i g....no si... sa.

es,1 O

O lo o cm 4.9 f.o 91.0 c343 23M S. 0, 94.4

" c 3,9 dfo 7 nf 9 3. /

c3su

/ C,4. G 32.'

G7. h

= est.o 303.I 59.?

43,9 d584 437.3 85.4 M.G

" C%

4 /o d. '$

90. $

7. 7 M1

1. ( 2, ~)

/

'/

a s 1,\\

/

/

r-

_,, 7 fWP144

l

>1 u.aw is mves e.e m 8

e a

a e

a s

e s

8 W

i l l 1l l l l l l lil lill i I i i i i i i i 6 I I I il I i i i, ;g

?

... i, i,,,,., i,,

i i

C D

!s a q

+ ?'

E i w

} >

d 4 7 Il l l l l l l l I IIII l ! Ii V

1 i i ! i i i t i i I ! i ii iiii e

,r g

j g

R-

=

~

y i IiliII l i I! _ l IM i ! i c

,S i iiiii-i i i iii.,,

s 3

i i+e pi e e ii..*

i

.N s a:

s a-z'

!!'il s

q 32 1 i 1

a

=s II I 'I iIi

!=

I IIII IIilI!

s-!

, i i i i ie iiii:

i: i i j

l ga s i

,,,iiiiie 1.-

i 4

I 3

I ls l

l l

l

~

8 -

j_

3 i

i l

gs

', I I y--I Ie i IIIIili1-l I

a i

ss_i i iiii i i i i i i i

i e ie i 6 e i i 6 '

i i

S M-

.,, i f

fil% -

)

E,1 S

w I

i 3

I i

j i i Iii>IiiI e

I III e

I i l !

.t i i i I i ! i i

E i e i e i e e e e

, i,

i..,

• I

~

}

8 2

2 2

S 2

4 2

2 2

l N' M

Proctor Sheet.

Date Samo6e Description 6 8 Y

/WV l'fb hl 4dN

.n ci.,0)/c,ll stfast <

Ddi& S&b roung aca e West s Gram Scaie unee e ll C-33 7/

6 M'?

n Proctor No.

Hammer Contros No Metnoa Mold Cven I

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 A

Weight Mole (ids.)

][)

},JC f), j C 89, 3 O 7,30 h.30 hM Mois volume Factor 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 I vamme I C

water **ses tmi.)

foo ego

.;l o c OSO Soo Sfo 4/dC U.3"<IoYs" ***

/2.c8

/3.20

/3,38

/5 32.

13.4 3

/3.4/C

/3. <S' 0

Emi.i"o*1$i" 3.78 3.9b 3 'lf

//.C2.

't 13 V//

'h 25" E

?ot*t, "itL e

//3. //

//70

// 't. 'I

/20 4

/WI

/GS. 'f'

/d X5 F

G i=* " m ue i?A-/

AA.2 4A-3 RA-y AAS nru

1. A 'I qpfem l}~j g 4/~) Q y$,[

f/]. (o ll]*f Yh $

$l7h H

YTue $'

0$0 0 l).CO o c)SC O ll$0 0 0$#0 h500 SE O J

• r**?,",*.W**

y/a 9 2 37,9 0W6,2 30.[ d)74 A2 TAN AE/r 'l 2

l n

Nis'>N **?'

/G3, /

/89,7 /71M /5s.9

/24 5

/ '? 2 V'

/7'/, /._

n.

<r7EiU"E*'"

9,/

/A,6

/6,o

/6, S-J J,6, J 6~ 4/

J &, /

u

$9

$.l, }

8,&

/(), )

/h,/,p

/Yl 3 lb f N

g

%**,'NY '

jo7,3 ??,'? /09,9 /02.9

/IO,0

/09.9 /O9'?

l e

/

I (its/ft.8) Optimum Woesture(%r Mastmum Ofy Certetty (Pr9e*0r Densetys:

8 From C,,

From Cow 7

e 7

(

Accepted S :

Y 88-/

8 8 2-88-3 88-f BB-s

'BB-b 69'7

\\

0506 D sc o 250 0 950 0

.3 50 o 4geo g ']c 5 237 3

? M. &

230 3 226 7 W,.T.'

3 0 0

.te/ip yn, z 49 o 48 4

</t 9 99 2.

19.o

</s. r g,, $

/ ? ?, 3

/16, L

/Flo 'l i 2 ),5 l ')f,7

/ 76, /

/2, 7

/r,'/

/ 9. 7 23,3 2 r,r L A '/

9',{

6.,7 t', 3

/0,9

/3,/

/ 4,5~

/Go /

y

\\

gi \\

M;istura D:nsity Tcst D:ta

'140 D: tag g g pp Simpl2 No.

-)] _

s ii

(

\\

\\

soii cesenpiion U

fli, B M M / A

.,4, 3;

ga af 135 i g,

\\

g f

M" d

"'5' ASTM D 1557 A Modified Proctor

,j h

\\

\\

Maximum Density - PCF fp /

\\

\\

\\

ii',

optimum MoiS'u'e content w j3g 130 g

g g

ji g

\\

Curve Drawn By - Technic i

3

( (

Accepted By - Levelli 125 g

gq

! iii i l i i i l\\ \\

i I 6 i j i l l\\l h h

i i:i i i i

\\

\\ \\

i i\\

\\

i i i g, \\

s i i i i i 120

\\

g i

, i i i I N

\\

\\

o I

i i i '

i i I i

i

\\

\\

\\

I

\\

\\

it i i i i i i i

(

\\\\h o

e i i >

> i i i i i o 115 g,g, g w

i i i i t

i t i ! i l\\i N h i ! i !

i t

i i i i \\ iV \\

o i i i

! i i i i i i !\\ i i

$ 110

' ' \\ '\\

\\

2

! ' t JO l% ;# C C w \\1 1 \\

+ i v i !

I I \\

\\ \\

l t ! tof, i tf iI i i I i i

i

\\ \\\\

y e

i i i i i i i i i iii i

\\ \\

i i i i i i iii

\\\\K G

i i i i g 105 g g; 3 i i i

i i i i

i !

i N

N \\

5 l t I {

i i t i

t i Ii _

f\\ \\ \\

i i s

i i

+

i i iii

!\\

\\ \\

g I i i i i i i ! I t iI i i l\\ i h o

i 100 g gg i i i i i i

\\

\\ l\\

i i i i t i i

i

\\\\\\

l i

' i i i

I I

\\ \\ \\

i i

i

\\

\\ f\\

i i i-95 i

y yz i i i

\\ \\ N i!

i I

\\ \\l\\

2 80 i i i i i !I l

\\ \\ \\ /2.70 i ii i

i i

Xi \\ T/2 60 90

},

4 yy i ii i

M N

I i ii i

\\ \\ \\

liii i

i

\\ \\ f\\

\\ X 's I i i; i

i U

\\l \\ 'N i i

\\ N 's i i

'\\ \\ 's

\\\\

\\

I 80 O

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

---

...n.--.

w.sn 2ao.no sin. An.iy.i.

o.

g,fy _ g g./2 T..i u..

gm <*sm ou<n se.i. u..

s,. u..

& 9( k e2650 C JG 4L

% C ?"'.i ECU.OJ."'.i AIs'A'"'

54 S, 4 49/s,7 9,3 ggp..<*sm m su o..

u Llw AG 02S50 c281 cag' si... sa.

c o, m.

.in

% r.,..,.

y, r...,.,,,

03,1 O

O

/00 e su n.

D O

/CC2 K

ews O.9

.Z 99,8 c379 31 5

6. /

93,9 es%c

/02.8

19. I 60,9 nco DOD, G M. $

(n 5. 7 _

1s w 472.2 15 L. (-

13,4 c

" e so 4 74.S 9C 7 7, 3 DA

'I94,J

/

/

a 64s.4

/

/

~.'

Ym 6~Ob?Y p_,,

j o...

_4 m

,m ma.

e

,f.

4

._.A-4 a

4 m

A a.,_

4as M

S 1HClam A0 535VvC3 AND a3d i

e a

a e

a s

e e

8-8.

I I liIIIIi1 IIIIIIil I N

4 I i i iiiil i l 1 I i iii: 1 I d

2

~

j

', i..

i e i.

,, iii i,

1-3 4 3

y d 5

5 8

N I

i i i i i i IiiiiiiI; 1

i i i i I i t i l ! i i i'i.I s

g j

g g

P i

e i e i i e i,

i. i i

i g'_

e I

I 3

i l

l l l l l l lI I '

,Ml !i l

i i i i m iiiiiiiii.,i 2

,S 3

i/.,..

i.,i i

,,EI e a; 7 i a: '

3'ij g

s s+ j i

~5 1

1 a

i l

2

[

as "I i! !l l l l l ! l i I ! l.Ii ls

~

--i i i! ii! i i i i i -

i: i.

3

l g,,,iii!

, i i, !

it i

.i f

W j n-i i

1 24 i

n 1

l l

l I

1 s -

i I

(

l I

f gs 3

3 I

y -- i I

IIiIi I

I I l

I I st_:

i i

! I i i

I i i i !

ii I

4

. i i i i t i

e i.

- ?.

g e

N' m i

E,1 3

I l

3 2

l l

2 j i

• • =

l i

e 1Ii i

l

! II i il I

,. r i

=

iI ii!

l i i i i i i 4

I

... i, i e i,,

,, *I I.

s.

a s

e e

a e

a a

a 1MClam A8 sapeed ANC sad

• • ae4

. -,,, -. - -, - -, -,, -, - - - - - -. -. ~, ~..., _, - - - _ ~. _ _

... ~

Proct r Sh00t Date -

Sample Description ens ctor /A snin5 R oc & <<. a :>;I % s o b

.n. u... v.,.

a,.m sc.ie u..

~

c-337/

C. c2yc 7 f0cter'30.

Hammer Control Nc h/S

$~SYlO jy,5g7jy

• • • 6 -Mc 9

• • &p92.

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 A

we,gnt Mote aos.)

$.j]

QJy 9,37

$87 987 73 ~7 hS7 uoia vagume Factor 3o 3o 30 30 30 30 30 ymume c

weer anoen tms.)

,g g

,39 yo go 3cc 35g-gg N"(IuYn#

/3. /3 f.,R23

/330

/3. 3 //- /3.M

/3.5p

/3,6&

.I D

we, ant e sois n

ou.uo - n>

3.76 5,64-3 93 3.97

% 2.

9./9 4.23 y

mg we o.n.av oasrt.* s en = a

//D. 9 Its8 ti 2. 9

// 9. t 03.h Q57 Ufe. 9 M-/

if-p.

A-3 A-4 G.T R-0 47e I?'A?'*"'

W1 49.6 4&<Of Q{W 4'7,9 48LC lib$'5 I

T O,0 wet w.egnt Samps, E

• Ta!.19 tams)

()$6 0 Q[p.6 p$p.O

$$0 0

)[d C

,)fC.6 p[QC

• "TNte$N'"

$Yalo 756,[

913,0

)$0<0 M t.1 22 3,5 2 00, 4 R

K j

w ont et ory seu (emmu in - ")

/90,9

/18, *)

/PG, /

/ P/,8~ / 27, l'

/7s,o

/)li9 5

w =ont e u...tur.

'/, 4

/3 5*

/ ~). O ac),o

? 3. 3

%, 5~ 29.6 h

(e " M - ")

N5*""

L/. 9 7,2 9,)

//,0 13.0

/ b~ /

/2,1 h ****,' $ " * '

lo ? 3~

/08,0 /08. /

/0?>3l/09,'l /09, D-10 E' ?

/09. f

/ J.f 2

..,n o,y o

.,ty t

,-t., o.n.,,,,

o.,1 ; emmo co,.tw (From Curw.,

(From Curv.)

-}~

&l

/3 8-3 8-4 13-s g-c g.y 25c 15 0 as' o are

.pgo o go psc 9 4/ [ f f/t [

2'3 ), f f 70, O 2,7(4,/

);y,[

gyo,o C

V6.3 49 i

/A5 W4 49 7 99 9 793

/4 2,.2

/ t 7, '/

/P '/, p.

.2 ci, o

/ L t/

f 73,c, f 7c,7 9, $

t 3, T

/ 2,7

/b &

L3.9

,%Z 30

'l, C) 7,A-9,7

//,0

/3,5~

/3r 3 17,(s

.140

\\

\\i \\

Moistura Density Tcst Data i

\\

T \\

3 3

gg orta g _ja_ g9 S;mple No.

g,,f]

{

7l l

(.\\

\\

soir oescription g,g 4 L g 4 135 l

\\

G r#

S//h id

\\ t b

\\

,l M'th d *'T**'

ASTM D 1557A Modified Proctor g

g l

)

\\

\\

Mulmum censity - PCF

,f i

\\ \\

Optimum Moisture content %

jy3-130 g

j i q

g g

curve orawn ey - Tecnnician l

i

\\\\\\

h a,

l l

)

( \\

Accepted By - Leveill 125 g

g 3

/

.I i;

ii-

\\

\\

\\

/

i ! ! i i !l

!\\

\\

T i l t l\\

\\

\\

i i ! i i i 1

. i i i i i\\

\\

\\

120

, i,

,,ig

\\

g o

e i i i i 8 i! '

\\

\\

\\

i i I i i ! I I I I i

\\

\\

\\

i i i-

! i i iii

(

\\

\\

i.i i i !

\\\\h o

i i i.

115 8

g ;g, g w

i i i i i i i i i i\\i N \\

6 i i i i i i i I j \\ i\\

\\

i i I 6 I I I I i t\\1 \\ )

o j i i

\\

@110 i i i ! I t i Ihei I l\\ ' \\ K l

i i i i i i

! /i

' Ni \\

\\l\\

i i IAM lY !

\\

\\ 't y

e i i e i i i i i i l I

i

\\ \\

G i i i I i i i I 6 i

\\\\\\

g 105 g g 3 b

6 i i i i i l

\\

\\ \\

i i i 4

b l

l i i

\\ \\ \\

I i I i I g

i i

\\ l\\, \\

i i i i i i j i i i i I ei i i i

N o

i 100 g

i !

il t i

i 1

\\ \\

l i j i I l l.

\\ \\\\

i 6 i I

i

\\ \\ \\

l i i 4

6 i

i l 6 i

i

\\

\\ f\\

, i 95 x xx i

j i i i i

i i

\\ \\

\\

i i i !

I i

I

\\ \\ \\

2 80 i iii l

i T \\ \\ /2.70 i

i i

I

\\ '\\ 't /2 60 i i,

90 s yv i i i

i

1. N \\

i i i i

\\ \\ \\

\\ \\h li

\\ X\\

j i

85 Ny x i

i

\\ N 's

~

~

\\) '4 N 5-80 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 wem muen. eco cror ne noviceir:u-

SaS4 Wash 200 and Sieve Analysis Da*

T..t No.

g g m asTu osian see. No.

sem No.

M //L~s C2R50 C / M le, L'?."JC'$'..>531 i ZPE.%

AIC"'

44 'a,1 9.4 gyap..asru o.m No.

o... u..

bk k C2RSo C29L caad;$

si... sa.

com. wi. a.. n

• roi. a.

v.roi.in

.n, cs,,

e n

/oD a*

uw o,S

./

49,9 ms 3.1

,G 99.4-

1. 03 %

SS.3 l

/O,4

1. 9,(,,

• • ?3%D I23.3

,qs,

1 7(,, 9

??3.9 O.4 46,6

'" :35.1+

<% G,5 57, $

0%$-7, I25 L f f, ;

90,L 5 9,5

'" C354 i

NA

'1 1 3 I laV

/

~

N4 5 3 s,i

/

/

r.'=

d 71 7-6-24W I'

/

_]

r mom is moos me su s

a a

e a

s 2

s e

8-8.

uiiiL i i i i i i i i i iiii n

Q i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i iiii 10 4

e 3

M Q v

N s

g D

I S p

h N 8

III IIIIi IIIII i! Ii i ie iiiii ! i,iie i, ii e

e g

j jj j

~

i.

.e i,,. i i

i i

3-S f

l

~

as l8' lIi i ii l I : M ii!i

,=S s

3 i,

is,

,,,i,.

.f g%

[

in:'

f i s

A2 [

t I

i n

1 i a,

l i

~

l

[

Ii li Is l l l l l l l l l l l II i

• F y

i: ii i ! ! iiii! i i i l i i n,_,,,,....,,,

s f

n-i

~ *

-2 1

3 is,_

i 3

g l

l f

l

'I 3

3 y--I i

i I

I i i j

6 i i i i, i

a s-_i e

i i a - l S

?

h

• ,2 8

s a

I i

5 a.

l l

g g

i e

1 I

i i

I i i i : Iii1 i

! i iiii ii! ! 6 ii ii 9

,, i,

g

]

a a

a wo,w s.

- wa.u

,.