ML20126H265

Statement on Util Proposed Hearing Agenda.Disagrees That Oral Arguments on Motions Should Be First Agenda Item in Prehearing Conference Established to Determine Issue & Objects to Being Left Out of Conference

ML20126H265
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	03/28/1981
From:	Stamiris B AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
Shared Package
ML20126H269	List: ML20126H265 ML20126H273
References
ISSUANCES-OL, ISSUANCES-OM, NUDOCS 8104080391
Download: ML20126H265 (1)

Text

44

.k t

I a

U.S. NUCLEAR REOUIATORY CotAiISSION in the matter of Deeket Nee. 50-339 C.P. Midland Plant 60-330 Units 1 & 2 CII & OL -

BEFORE THE AftELIC SAFETY & LICENSING 50MED i

INTERVE50R 3/28/81 CottiENT ON C.P.Co. P90 POSED AGEEEE I..I disagree,that eral' arguments en motions should be the first agenda t

j itaan in a prehearing eenforence established to determine issess as the motions themselves have already set f rth essential arguments. 'If the Beard eheuld cheese to entertain such arguments sooerding to regulation 2730(d)

Dbelieve they should be heard only if the NBC aise weats such arguments new and after other issues have been sensidered.

II.B I object to being left out of a cenference "of counsel" if suoi is the intent of this agenda item.

Respeetfully substitted l

Copies sent all partins

\\\\,Il1 e

rW' coana

(

RQl f 1

amne r

e APR 21981 * :?

(.6 ;p" O I 1981 m.Eel C-

%ggsu,ihcep) sah(

um en,s m c

\\g

%s) DJ. "= '

• 5"

=*

P%,6 h?f p

~

6#

1 81040 8 0 W.

THIS DOCUMENT CONTNNS g

P00R QUALITY PAGES y

Ca

.