ML20127K645: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:;594 | {{#Wiki_filter:;594 | ||
Suffolk County Attorney | .m 4p h | ||
Hauppauge, New York 11788 | UNITED STATES 000KETED 8 | ||
i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIMilON USNRC 5 | |||
j ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL PANEL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 June 26, 1985 0FFICE OF SECntiAr 7 | |||
00CKETING & SEPVlf1 BRANCH Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq. | |||
Herbert H. Brown, Esq. | |||
Suffolk County Attorney Kirkpatrick & Lockhart H. Lee Dennison Building 8th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway 1900 M Street, N.W. | |||
Hauppauge, New York 11788 Washington, D.C. | |||
20036 Re: | |||
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1) | |||
Docket No. 50-322 OL | Docket No. 50-322 OL | ||
==Dear Messrs. Ashare and Brown:== | ==Dear Messrs. Ashare and Brown:== | ||
As you are aware, the Appeal Board has recorded its expectation that a definitive resolution of the current representation controversy will be obtained from a competent authority prior to August 12, 1985. | |||
As you are aware, the Appeal Board has recorded its expectation that a definitive resolution of the current representation controversy will be obtained from a competent authority prior to August 12, 1985. | (See the Board's June 18, 1985 order.) | ||
It appears that that controversy is being treated as wholly independent of the issue of the validity of Suffolk County Executive Order No. 1-1985 and, thus, will not be resolved in the current proceeding in the New York courts involving the executive order. | |||
(See June 20, 1985 order of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court, appended to the Long Island Lighting Company's June 24, 1985 filing with the Licensing Board in the emergency planning phase of this proceeding.) | |||
Presumably, therefore, other steps have been instituted to procure an expeditious and controlling determination on the representation matter. | Presumably, therefore, other steps have been instituted to procure an expeditious and controlling determination on the representation matter. | ||
In the event that, by August 12, the representation matter has not received a definitive resolution, the Appeal Board will require all attorneys purporting to represent Suffolk County before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to l | In the event that, by August 12, the representation matter has not received a definitive resolution, the Appeal Board will require all attorneys purporting to represent Suffolk County before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to l | ||
Sincerely, C. | provide it with a detailed statement respecting (1) what measures were taken to obtain such a resolution; and (2) when those measures were instituted. | ||
Sincerely, C. | |||
l | %M 8506270522 850626 C. | ||
6 | ean Shoemaker PDR ADOCK 05000322 Secretary to the O | ||
7 S}} | PDR Appeal Board l | ||
cc: | |||
Donald P. | |||
Irwin, Esq. | |||
Robert G. | |||
Perlis, Esq. | |||
l Docketing and Service Branch ff/ | |||
6 r | |||
7 S | |||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:03, 12 December 2024
| ML20127K645 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/26/1985 |
| From: | Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | Ashare M, Brown H KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY |
| References | |
| CON-#285-594 OL, NUDOCS 8506270522 | |
| Download: ML20127K645 (1) | |
Text
- 594
.m 4p h
UNITED STATES 000KETED 8
i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIMilON USNRC 5
j ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL PANEL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 June 26, 1985 0FFICE OF SECntiAr 7
00CKETING & SEPVlf1 BRANCH Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq.
Herbert H. Brown, Esq.
Suffolk County Attorney Kirkpatrick & Lockhart H. Lee Dennison Building 8th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway 1900 M Street, N.W.
Hauppauge, New York 11788 Washington, D.C.
20036 Re:
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1)
Docket No. 50-322 OL
As you are aware, the Appeal Board has recorded its expectation that a definitive resolution of the current representation controversy will be obtained from a competent authority prior to August 12, 1985.
(See the Board's June 18, 1985 order.)
It appears that that controversy is being treated as wholly independent of the issue of the validity of Suffolk County Executive Order No. 1-1985 and, thus, will not be resolved in the current proceeding in the New York courts involving the executive order.
(See June 20, 1985 order of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court, appended to the Long Island Lighting Company's June 24, 1985 filing with the Licensing Board in the emergency planning phase of this proceeding.)
Presumably, therefore, other steps have been instituted to procure an expeditious and controlling determination on the representation matter.
In the event that, by August 12, the representation matter has not received a definitive resolution, the Appeal Board will require all attorneys purporting to represent Suffolk County before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to l
provide it with a detailed statement respecting (1) what measures were taken to obtain such a resolution; and (2) when those measures were instituted.
Sincerely, C.
%M 8506270522 850626 C.
ean Shoemaker PDR ADOCK 05000322 Secretary to the O
PDR Appeal Board l
cc:
Donald P.
Irwin, Esq.
Robert G.
Perlis, Esq.
l Docketing and Service Branch ff/
6 r
7 S
-