ML20128M936: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:... | {{#Wiki_filter:I.... | ||
...q., | |||
N0TATI0N | ......N1 N0TATI0N V 0 T E; RELEASED TO THE PDR 5 AW93 ct i | ||
T0: | RESPONSF SHEET | ||
:,,,,tay,',,,,,,,,gt;33 T0: | |||
SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION FROM: | |||
C0bHISSIONER DE PLANQUE | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
SECY-92-415 - REVIEW 0F THE C0bHISSION'S REGULATIONS AND PRACTICE GOVERNING ClTIZEN PETITIONS UNDER 10 CFR 2.206 FOR INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS AGAINST LICENSEES APPROVED | SECY-92-415 - REVIEW 0F THE C0bHISSION'S REGULATIONS AND PRACTICE GOVERNING ClTIZEN PETITIONS UNDER 10 CFR 2.206 FOR INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS AGAINST LICENSEES A | ||
NOT PARTICIPATING | APPROVED yx (in DISAPPROVED xx (inpart) 'BSTAIN part) | ||
While I do not object to initiating an evaluation of the NRC 2.206 process, I believe it would be more appropriate for the Commission to have the opportunity to-review OGC's proposed | NOT PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION ip COMMENTS: | ||
While I do not object to initiating an evaluation of the NRC 2.206 process, I believe it would be more appropriate for the Commission to have the opportunity to-review OGC's proposed | |||
~ | |||
background paper before concurring with the proposal to have a public workshop. | background paper before concurring with the proposal to have a public workshop. | ||
Mgg, pg-~ | |||
i | ggg22gggggggggo, i | ||
CORRESPONDENCE PJR | CORRESPONDENCE PJR SIGNATUlli RELEASE VOTE | ||
ENTERED ON "AS" | /xx / | ||
January 4, 1993 DATE WITHHOLD VOTE | |||
/ | |||
/ | |||
ENTERED ON "AS" YES xx NO D | |||
} UY ! | |||
_}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:07, 12 December 2024
| ML20128M936 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/04/1993 |
| From: | De Planque E NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| 2.206, NUDOCS 9302220400 | |
| Download: ML20128M936 (1) | |
Text
I....
...q.,
......N1 N0TATI0N V 0 T E; RELEASED TO THE PDR 5 AW93 ct i
RESPONSF SHEET
- ,,,,tay,',,,,,,,,gt;33 T0:
SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION FROM:
C0bHISSIONER DE PLANQUE
SUBJECT:
SECY-92-415 - REVIEW 0F THE C0bHISSION'S REGULATIONS AND PRACTICE GOVERNING ClTIZEN PETITIONS UNDER 10 CFR 2.206 FOR INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS AGAINST LICENSEES A
APPROVED yx (in DISAPPROVED xx (inpart) 'BSTAIN part)
NOT PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION ip COMMENTS:
While I do not object to initiating an evaluation of the NRC 2.206 process, I believe it would be more appropriate for the Commission to have the opportunity to-review OGC's proposed
~
background paper before concurring with the proposal to have a public workshop.
Mgg, pg-~
ggg22gggggggggo, i
CORRESPONDENCE PJR SIGNATUlli RELEASE VOTE
/xx /
January 4, 1993 DATE WITHHOLD VOTE
/
/
ENTERED ON "AS" YES xx NO D
} UY !
_