ML20137S788: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:T q e, .
{{#Wiki_filter:T 44,i Sa nseg'o q e,.
Sa nseg'o                          UNITED STATES 44,i j   f               ,g             NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES j
: r.                                    wAsHWGTON,0.C. 20665-0001 kg*..../p                                                               IN RESPONSE, PLEASE April 11, 1997                   REFER TO: M970310B
f
            ' SECRETARY MEMORANDUM TO:         L. Joseph Callan Executive Director for O erations FROM:
,g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION wAsHWGTON,0.C. 20665-0001 r.
                                              -wE5 \):.ar:
g*..../p k
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE April 11, 1997 REFER TO:
M970310B
' SECRETARY MEMORANDUM TO:
L. Joseph Callan Executive Director for O erations
-wE5 \\):.ar:
FROM:
te L. Vietti-Cook, Acting Secretary
te L. Vietti-Cook, Acting Secretary


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
STAFF REQUIREMENTS - BRIEFING ON                                 ,
STAFF REQUIREMENTS - BRIEFING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF MAINTENANCE RULE, REVISED REGULATORY GUIDE, AND CONSEQUENCES (SECY-97-055), 2:30 P.M.,
IMPLEMENTATION OF MAINTENANCE RULE, REVISED                     !
MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1997, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)
REGULATORY GUIDE, AND CONSEQUENCES (SECY-97-055), 2:30 P.M., MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1997, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)
The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff on' implementation of the maintenance rule, revised regulatory guide, and consequences of these revisions on future rule implementation.
The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff on' implementation of                         )
The Commission
the maintenance rule, revised regulatory guide, and consequences                         ,
of these revisions on future rule implementation. The Commission
{
{
encouraged the staff to continue to strive for consistency in implementing the maintenance rule across the industry.                                   l The staff should consider whether the rule language regarding the                         .
encouraged the staff to continue to strive for consistency in implementing the maintenance rule across the industry.
performance of 50.65 (a) (3) safety assessments needs to be                               '
The staff should consider whether the rule language regarding the performance of 50.65 (a) (3) safety assessments needs to be clarified and inform the Commission of the results.
clarified and inform the Commission of the results. In                                   ,
In particular, where the baseline inspection results suggest that i
particular, where the baseline inspection results suggest that                           i some licensees are not performing assessments that meet the npectation of (a) (3) when removing equipment from service, the staff should provide a discussion using specific examples of programs or assessments that were considered weak, including the staff's basis for its finding. The Commission is interested in how the staff is planning to monitor the quality of licensee assessments when removing equipment from service through the regular inspection program once the baseline inspections are completed.     The staff should ensure that the maintenance rule                   /O inspection guidance is consistent with the requirements of 50.65 (a) (3) .
some licensees are not performing assessments that meet the npectation of (a) (3) when removing equipment from service, the staff should provide a discussion using specific examples of programs or assessments that were considered weak, including the staff's basis for its finding.
(EDO)                         (SECY Suspense:                   6/27/97)     #
The Commission is interested in how the staff is planning to monitor the quality of licensee assessments when removing equipment from service through the regular inspection program once the baseline inspections are
3 The staff should consider how to assess the effect of the rule on the overall quality of maintenance, and ultimately the effect on equipment performance, in order to determine the efficacy of the rule.
/ O completed.
(EDO)-                       (SECY Suspense:                   6/27/97) t j..pg q 150065                    gg gg 9704150245 970411                                     III,0!!OI!l!!lkUlI,lI,l3E PDR 10CFR         PDR PT9.7
The staff should ensure that the maintenance rule inspection guidance is consistent with the requirements of 50.65 (a) (3).
3 (EDO)
(SECY Suspense:
6/27/97)
The staff should consider how to assess the effect of the rule on the overall quality of maintenance, and ultimately the effect on equipment performance, in order to determine the efficacy of the rule.
(EDO)-
(SECY Suspense:
6/27/97) gg gg 150065 t j. g q
.p 9704150245 970411 III,0!!OI!l!!lkUlI,lI,l3E PDR 10CFR PDR PT9.7


                                                                                .3 1
.3 1
i i T9                                                                               ;
i i T9 fr,
fr                                                                         ,
cc s.. Chairman Jackson
cc s . . Chairman Jackson                                                 {
{
Commissioner Rogers                                     l Commissioner Dicus                                     .i Commissioner Diaz                                       i Commissioner McGaffigan                                 l OGC '                                                   t CIO'                                                     i
Commissioner Rogers l
                      -CFO                                                       l OCA OIG-                                                   {
Commissioner Dicus
                      -Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP-(via E-Mail)   .
. i Commissioner Diaz i
PDR'- Advance-                                         i DCS: 'P1-24                                             i i
Commissioner McGaffigan l
t i
OGC '
t CIO' i
-CFO l
OCA
{
OIG-
-Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP-(via E-Mail)
PDR'- Advance-i DCS: 'P1-24 i
i t
i i
i i
i t
i i
I A
t I
                                                                                  )
A
)
1 4
1 4
1 i
1 i
h l
h l
                                                                                    ?
?
i i
i i
3 I
3 I
l b
l b
                                    -              -}}
.}}

Latest revision as of 21:26, 11 December 2024

Staff Requirements Memo Re 970310 Briefing on Implementation of Maint Rule,Revised RG & Consequences (SECY-97-055)
ML20137S788
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/11/1997
From: Vietticook A
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Callan L
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
REF-10CFR9.7 M970310B, SECY-97-055-C, SECY-97-55-C, NUDOCS 9704150245
Download: ML20137S788 (2)


Text

T 44,i Sa nseg'o q e,.

UNITED STATES j

f

,g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION wAsHWGTON,0.C. 20665-0001 r.

g*..../p k

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE April 11, 1997 REFER TO:

M970310B

' SECRETARY MEMORANDUM TO:

L. Joseph Callan Executive Director for O erations

-wE5 \\):.ar:

FROM:

te L. Vietti-Cook, Acting Secretary

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - BRIEFING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF MAINTENANCE RULE, REVISED REGULATORY GUIDE, AND CONSEQUENCES (SECY-97-055), 2:30 P.M.,

MONDAY, MARCH 10, 1997, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)

The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff on' implementation of the maintenance rule, revised regulatory guide, and consequences of these revisions on future rule implementation.

The Commission

{

encouraged the staff to continue to strive for consistency in implementing the maintenance rule across the industry.

The staff should consider whether the rule language regarding the performance of 50.65 (a) (3) safety assessments needs to be clarified and inform the Commission of the results.

In particular, where the baseline inspection results suggest that i

some licensees are not performing assessments that meet the npectation of (a) (3) when removing equipment from service, the staff should provide a discussion using specific examples of programs or assessments that were considered weak, including the staff's basis for its finding.

The Commission is interested in how the staff is planning to monitor the quality of licensee assessments when removing equipment from service through the regular inspection program once the baseline inspections are

/ O completed.

The staff should ensure that the maintenance rule inspection guidance is consistent with the requirements of 50.65 (a) (3).

3 (EDO)

(SECY Suspense:

6/27/97)

The staff should consider how to assess the effect of the rule on the overall quality of maintenance, and ultimately the effect on equipment performance, in order to determine the efficacy of the rule.

(EDO)-

(SECY Suspense:

6/27/97) gg gg 150065 t j. g q

.p 9704150245 970411 III,0!!OI!l!!lkUlI,lI,l3E PDR 10CFR PDR PT9.7

.3 1

i i T9 fr,

cc s.. Chairman Jackson

{

Commissioner Rogers l

Commissioner Dicus

. i Commissioner Diaz i

Commissioner McGaffigan l

OGC '

t CIO' i

-CFO l

OCA

{

OIG-

-Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP-(via E-Mail)

PDR'- Advance-i DCS: 'P1-24 i

i t

i i

i i

t I

A

)

1 4

1 i

h l

?

i i

3 I

l b

.