ML20195F039: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
DOCKET NUMBER g $
DOCKET NUMBER g $
~                                                 eR0 POSED RULE -                                   h96
~
                                                        / 53 DCLKEiLD V          FA 164 35)                     .
eR0 POSED RULE -
UiNFC                           '
h96
                                                        '88 JR -9June    PS:426,   1988 Samuel J. Chilk                                  OCMYIN[Ik$/[bbcketing Secretary of the Commission                      At t dWtt kop s U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                   and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.
/ 53 FA 164 35)
Washington, D.C.       20555 Dear Sirs On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
V DCLKEiLD UiNFC
        ' The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power
'88 JR -9 PS:42 June 6, 1988 OCMYIN[Ik$/[bbcketing Samuel J. Chilk At t dWtt kop s Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.
    .:    licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
Washington, D.C.
20555 Dear Sirs On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's                                       _ .
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind.
interests in mind. The NRC is once again raoving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.
The NRC is once again raoving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, ineluding r1sks from low power operation.
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.
All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, ineluding r1sks from low power operation.
Sincerely, i
Sincerely, i
RClru                                                                 , , , , , ;s'
RClru
                                                              ,, g         ,
,,,,, ;s e '' '
e '' '
,, g Name and Address:
Name and Address:                                                       c.i #
,e ' 7:. +. L c.i #
                                                                ,e ' 7: . + . L..,,..t' O A t OhsKy og,                                                             ,    ,,,,,,,,,
..,,..t' O A t OhsKy og, 0%Lv.~k wb Mcx
0%Lv.~kt wb Mcx                                                         . ', .a J-
. ',.a J-t
                                                                                                      ,iw O M ro                   -
,iw O M ro
                                                                                            . - ] ,,y.
. - ],,y.
3ne 8806240196 880606                                                     '
3ne 8806240196 880606 PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR 65/0}}
PDR PR 50 53FR16435   PDR                             .-
65/0}}

Latest revision as of 19:48, 10 December 2024

Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20195F039
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 06/06/1988
From:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00496, 53FR16435-496, NUDOCS 8806240196
Download: ML20195F039 (1)
v • d • e


Text

.

DOCKET NUMBER g $

~

eR0 POSED RULE -

h96

/ 53 FA 164 35)

V DCLKEiLD UiNFC

'88 JR -9 PS:42 June 6, 1988 OCMYIN[Ik$/[bbcketing Samuel J. Chilk At t dWtt kop s Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20555 Dear Sirs On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.

The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.

As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.

The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind.

The NRC is once again raoving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.

In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.

All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, ineluding r1sks from low power operation.

Sincerely, i

RClru

,,,,, ;s e '

,, g Name and Address:

,e ' 7:. +. L c.i #

..,,..t' O A t OhsKy og, 0%Lv.~k wb Mcx

. ',.a J-t

,iw O M ro

. - ],,y.

3ne 8806240196 880606 PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR 65/0

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20195F039&oldid=4120610"