ML20196D178: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:i | {{#Wiki_filter:i Dov'E NUMBER p' g g PROPOSED ROLE | ||
Dov'E NUMBER p' g g | = | ||
3 0 I N 43 b) | |||
D'C E ii.F | D'C E ii.F Mh | ||
:U | :U | ||
* C | * C N M bre 1988 IC Samuel J. Chilk FFKi. Ui 5i.x%ket ing t!'e'u iefti and{Or"viceBranch Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street, N.W. | ||
Washington, D.C. | |||
Washington, D.C. | 20555 | ||
==Dear Sir:== | ==Dear Sir:== | ||
On Hay 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants. | On Hay 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants. | ||
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including of fsite emergency response | The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including of fsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel. | ||
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements. | As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements. | ||
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt. | The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. | ||
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any deg:ee of risk to the public, ineluding risks from low power operation. | The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt. | ||
Sincerely, | In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. | ||
All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any deg:ee of risk to the public, ineluding risks from low power operation. | |||
hwJwa M H . o 3 r 2. V | Sincerely, 7 | ||
T s. J | h0A+t S nD cum | ||
[ v *aw e'n M | |||
o Name and Address: | |||
A < Ic>ss % tm. | L3 3s ca u _. | ||
ca. M 16 | hwJwa M H. o 3 r 2. V T s. J t%enPlag ase g p A ealN g-as~ w-{& Waan G G tL. eveM | ||
f6 | : a. sk QL u | ||
U PDR | A.T. | ||
L are_? (b W %u w no Such w Q 'N C.L.utt-st.k fl.C d.ht. | |||
O | |||
$ e VYi P_ m% | |||
w A < Ic>ss % tm. | |||
~ m o sty w> capdak % W w'w & | |||
1 | |||
< 8' ca. M 16 L t% h LLAM $^f)Q YW%t 5 O D s-- f6 LL l | |||
U 8807010326 880606 | |||
[$-/6 PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR | |||
,}} | |||
Latest revision as of 17:04, 10 December 2024
| ML20196D178 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1988 |
| From: | Bingham V AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00829, 53FR16435-829, NUDOCS 8807010326 | |
| Download: ML20196D178 (1) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:i Dov'E NUMBER p' g g PROPOSED ROLE = 3 0 I N 43 b) D'C E ii.F Mh
- U
- C N M bre 1988 IC Samuel J. Chilk FFKi. Ui 5i.x%ket ing t!'e'u iefti and{Or"viceBranch Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Sir:
On Hay 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants. The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including of fsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel. As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements. The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt. In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any deg:ee of risk to the public, ineluding risks from low power operation. Sincerely, 7 h0A+t S nD cum [ v *aw e'n M o Name and Address: L3 3s ca u _. hwJwa M H. o 3 r 2. V T s. J t%enPlag ase g p A ealN g-as~ w-{& Waan G G tL. eveM
- a. sk QL u
A.T. L are_? (b W %u w no Such w Q 'N C.L.utt-st.k fl.C d.ht. O $ e VYi P_ m% w A < Ic>ss % tm. ~ m o sty w> capdak % W w'w & 1 < 8' ca. M 16 L t% h LLAM $^f)Q YW%t 5 O D s-- f6 LL l U 8807010326 880606 [$-/6 PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR ,}}