ML20196J328: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
l March 9, 1988 | l March 9, 1988 Docket No. 50-2 i | ||
Docket No. 50-2 | DISTRIBUTION: | ||
;ippetetfUe.m NRC & Local PDRs PDSNP Reading Dr. William F. Xerr, Director EHylton Phoenix Memorial Laboratory TMichaels Ford Nuclear Reactor LRubenstein University of Michigan EJordan 2301 Bonisteel Boulevard JPartlow l | |||
Dr. William F. Xerr, Director | Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2100 OGC-Rockville i | ||
University of Michigan | ACRS (10) 1 | ||
==Dear Dr. Kerr:== | ==Dear Dr. Kerr:== | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN | UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN The staff has reviewed the revised emergency plan, subnitted by your letter of l | ||
January 15, 1988, against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(q). The staff finds that one proposed change decreases the effectiveness of the currently approved emergency plan. | l January 15, 1988, against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(q). The staff finds that one proposed change decreases the effectiveness of the currently approved emergency plan. | ||
In the currently approved plan, notification of an incident will be promptly reported to the NRC. The proposed revision would specify a reporting time of two hours after arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility (Section 3.2.1). The proposed time frame of two hours to notify the NRC does not provide for a timely response by the NRC to an unusual event or an alert. Further, the time period for notification begins with the arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility which allows for an additional undetermined delay in notification of the NRC. A time frame of one hour after classification of the event to notify the LRC would be an appropriate change to the emergency plan. Therefore, Section 3.2.1 should be redified to read "...within one hour after the event is classified as an unusual event or an alert," instead of "...within two hours after arrival of the Energency Director at the facility." | In the currently approved plan, notification of an incident will be promptly reported to the NRC. The proposed revision would specify a reporting time of two hours after arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility (Section 3.2.1). The proposed time frame of two hours to notify the NRC does not provide for a timely response by the NRC to an unusual event or an alert. Further, the time period for notification begins with the arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility which allows for an additional undetermined delay in notification of the NRC. A time frame of one hour after classification of the event to notify the LRC would be an appropriate change to the emergency plan. Therefore, Section 3.2.1 should be redified to read "...within one hour after the event is classified as an unusual event or an alert," instead of "...within two hours after arrival of the Energency Director at the facility." | ||
l | l You are requested to provide a response to this request within 30 days of the l | ||
contact me at (301) 492-1102, 1 | date of this letter. | ||
Sincerely, original signed by Theodore S. Michaels, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, l | If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (301) 492-1102, 1 | ||
Sincerely, original signed by Theodore S. Michaels, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, l | |||
V and Special Projects l | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page pg PDSNP[h PDSk P | |||
E on THichaeIs:cw LRubenstein 0 | |||
/88 03/ 6/88 03///88 | |||
!!kN00[K 0 | |||
$2 F | |||
/ | |||
'o UNITED STATES P | |||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e | |||
{. | {. | ||
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g | |||
,/ | |||
March 9, 1c98 Docket No. 50-2 Dr. William F. Kerr, Director Phoenix Memorial Laboratory Ford Nuclear Reactor University of Michigan 2301 Bonisteel Boulevard Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2100 | |||
==Dear Dr. Kerr:== | ==Dear Dr. Kerr:== | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN The staff has reviewed the revised energency plan, submitted by your letter of January 15, 1988, against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(q). The staff finds that one proposed change decreases the effectiveness of the currently approved emergency plan. | UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN The staff has reviewed the revised energency plan, submitted by your letter of January 15, 1988, against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(q). The staff finds that one proposed change decreases the effectiveness of the currently approved emergency plan. | ||
In the currently approved plan, notification of an incident will be promptly reported to the NRC. The proposed revision would specify a reporting time of two hours after arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility (Section 3.2.1). The prnrased time frame of two hours to notify the NRC does not provide for a timely response by the NRC to an unusual event or an alert. Further, the time period for notification begins with the arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility which allows for an additional undetermined delay in notification of the NRC. A time frame of one hour aflei classification of the event to notify the NRC would be an appropriate change to the emergency plan. Therefore, Section 3.2.1 should be rodified to read "...within one hour after the event is classified as an unusual event or an alert," instead of "...within two hours | In the currently approved plan, notification of an incident will be promptly reported to the NRC. The proposed revision would specify a reporting time of two hours after arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility (Section 3.2.1). The prnrased time frame of two hours to notify the NRC does not provide for a timely response by the NRC to an unusual event or an alert. Further, the time period for notification begins with the arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility which allows for an additional undetermined delay in notification of the NRC. A time frame of one hour aflei classification of the event to notify the NRC would be an appropriate change to the emergency plan. Therefore, Section 3.2.1 should be rodified to read "...within one hour after the event is classified as an unusual event or an alert," instead of "...within two hours after arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility." | ||
after arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility." | You are requested to provide a response to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter. | ||
You are requested to provide a response to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (301) 492-1102. | If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (301) 492-1102. | ||
Sincerely, fl.ja s.dU | Sincerely, fl.ja s.dU Theodore S. Michaels Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ec: See next page | ||
Theodore S. Michaels Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ec: See next page | |||
e | e j | ||
s The University of Michigan Docket No. 50-2 cc: Chief i | |||
Environmental and Occupational Health Services Administration i | |||
Services Administration | Michigan Department of Health 3500 N. Logan Street P. O. Box 30035 i | ||
Lansing, Michigan 48909 i | Lansing, Michigan 48909 Special Assistant to the Governor Office of the Governor r | ||
Chief, Division of Radiological Health Department of Public Health P. O. Box 30035 | Room 1 - State Capitol Lansing, Michigan 48909 i | ||
Chief, Division of Radiological Health Department of Public Health P. O. Box 30035 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Mr. R. R. Burn Phoenix Memorial Laboratory University of Michigan - North Campus Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 F | |||
t 7 | |||
i | |||
) | ) | ||
l a | l a | ||
i | i 4 | ||
4 | i t | ||
I i | |||
i | |||
_ _ _. __.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:00, 10 December 2024
| ML20196J328 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Michigan |
| Issue date: | 03/09/1988 |
| From: | Michaels T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Kerr W MICHIGAN, UNIV. OF, ANN ARBOR, MI |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8803140268 | |
| Download: ML20196J328 (3) | |
Text
.
l March 9, 1988 Docket No. 50-2 i
DISTRIBUTION:
- ippetetfUe.m NRC & Local PDRs PDSNP Reading Dr. William F. Xerr, Director EHylton Phoenix Memorial Laboratory TMichaels Ford Nuclear Reactor LRubenstein University of Michigan EJordan 2301 Bonisteel Boulevard JPartlow l
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2100 OGC-Rockville i
ACRS (10) 1
Dear Dr. Kerr:
i
SUBJECT:
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN The staff has reviewed the revised emergency plan, subnitted by your letter of l
l January 15, 1988, against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(q). The staff finds that one proposed change decreases the effectiveness of the currently approved emergency plan.
In the currently approved plan, notification of an incident will be promptly reported to the NRC. The proposed revision would specify a reporting time of two hours after arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility (Section 3.2.1). The proposed time frame of two hours to notify the NRC does not provide for a timely response by the NRC to an unusual event or an alert. Further, the time period for notification begins with the arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility which allows for an additional undetermined delay in notification of the NRC. A time frame of one hour after classification of the event to notify the LRC would be an appropriate change to the emergency plan. Therefore, Section 3.2.1 should be redified to read "...within one hour after the event is classified as an unusual event or an alert," instead of "...within two hours after arrival of the Energency Director at the facility."
l You are requested to provide a response to this request within 30 days of the l
date of this letter.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (301) 492-1102, 1
Sincerely, original signed by Theodore S. Michaels, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, l
V and Special Projects l
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page pg PDSNP[h PDSk P
E on THichaeIs:cw LRubenstein 0
/88 03/ 6/88 03///88
!!kN00[K 0
$2 F
/
'o UNITED STATES P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e
{.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g
,/
March 9, 1c98 Docket No. 50-2 Dr. William F. Kerr, Director Phoenix Memorial Laboratory Ford Nuclear Reactor University of Michigan 2301 Bonisteel Boulevard Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2100
Dear Dr. Kerr:
SUBJECT:
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN The staff has reviewed the revised energency plan, submitted by your letter of January 15, 1988, against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(q). The staff finds that one proposed change decreases the effectiveness of the currently approved emergency plan.
In the currently approved plan, notification of an incident will be promptly reported to the NRC. The proposed revision would specify a reporting time of two hours after arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility (Section 3.2.1). The prnrased time frame of two hours to notify the NRC does not provide for a timely response by the NRC to an unusual event or an alert. Further, the time period for notification begins with the arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility which allows for an additional undetermined delay in notification of the NRC. A time frame of one hour aflei classification of the event to notify the NRC would be an appropriate change to the emergency plan. Therefore, Section 3.2.1 should be rodified to read "...within one hour after the event is classified as an unusual event or an alert," instead of "...within two hours after arrival of the Emergency Director at the facility."
You are requested to provide a response to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (301) 492-1102.
Sincerely, fl.ja s.dU Theodore S. Michaels Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ec: See next page
e j
s The University of Michigan Docket No. 50-2 cc: Chief i
Environmental and Occupational Health Services Administration i
Michigan Department of Health 3500 N. Logan Street P. O. Box 30035 i
Lansing, Michigan 48909 Special Assistant to the Governor Office of the Governor r
Room 1 - State Capitol Lansing, Michigan 48909 i
Chief, Division of Radiological Health Department of Public Health P. O. Box 30035 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Mr. R. R. Burn Phoenix Memorial Laboratory University of Michigan - North Campus Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 F
t 7
i
)
l a
i 4
i t
I i
i
_ _ _. __.