ML20197G116: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 20: Line 20:
DOCKET NUMBER DD PROP SED RULE FAML S3 FA /HWJ tov;uu.
DOCKET NUMBER DD PROP SED RULE FAML S3 FA /HWJ tov;uu.
J W. C 8GO
J W. C 8GO
                                                                                      '88 JJi -6 R2 :19 0Fit u a         . Tan .
'88 JJi -6 R2 :19 0Fi u a
60CKElt% 5 nimCF.
. Tan.
BRANCH Hay 21, 1988 Samuel J. Chilk Secretary of the Commission
t 60CKElt% 5 nimCF.
[                                    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Docketing and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.
BRANCH Hay 21, 1988 Samuel J. Chilk
Washington, D.C.       20555 Dear Sir On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel leading and low power operation of nuclear power plants.
[
Secretary of the Commission Attention: Docketing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20555 Dear Sir On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel leading and low power operation of nuclear power plants.
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including C e followings offsite emergency response plans, any public notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including C e followings offsite emergency response plans, any public notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
(                                   As a resident,of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
(
Wu The proposed' rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at. risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low power license, even though its ability to be:
As a resident,of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
Wu The proposed' rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind.
The NRC is once again moving to place the public at. risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low power license, even though its ability to be:
granted a~ full power license is seriously in doubt.
granted a~ full power license is seriously in doubt.
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation..
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.
Sincerely,                     ,
All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation..
d        JW       l               '
Sincerely, d
JW l
Name and Address:
Name and Address:
g g ,_               , M18 o M G                         =   t-8806150017 000521                                    ,
g g,_
                                                                                              , _. , , , ,,. , g /.
M18 o M G
s, , .
=
16435     PDR.
t-
53 u}}
_,,,,,., g /.
8806150017 000521 s,,.
53 16435 PDR.
u}}

Latest revision as of 14:03, 10 December 2024

Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.All Offsite Emergency Response Planning Requirements Needed Before Operation
ML20197G116
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 05/21/1988
From: Hildt B
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00360, 53FR16435-360, NUDOCS 8806150017
Download: ML20197G116 (1)
v • d • e


Text

. _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

DOCKET NUMBER DD PROP SED RULE FAML S3 FA /HWJ tov;uu.

J W. C 8GO

'88 JJi -6 R2 :19 0Fi u a

. Tan.

t 60CKElt% 5 nimCF.

BRANCH Hay 21, 1988 Samuel J. Chilk

[

Secretary of the Commission Attention: Docketing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20555 Dear Sir On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel leading and low power operation of nuclear power plants.

The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including C e followings offsite emergency response plans, any public notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.

(

As a resident,of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.

Wu The proposed' rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind.

The NRC is once again moving to place the public at. risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low power license, even though its ability to be:

granted a~ full power license is seriously in doubt.

In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.

All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation..

Sincerely, d

JW l

Name and Address:

g g,_

M18 o M G

=

t-

_,,,,,., g /.

8806150017 000521 s,,.

53 16435 PDR.

u

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20197G116&oldid=4105808"