ML20198D548: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:,   ..           _             -   -   _
{{#Wiki_filter:,
                                                                                            _ . ~.- - .-           .
..
                                                          UNITED STATES
_
  #ptp Ettoq%                               NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-
$                 o                                           REGloN lil
-
M                 j                                   801 WARRENvlLLE ROAD
_
_ . ~.- - .-
.
#ptp Ettoq%
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$
o
REGloN lil
M
j
801 WARRENvlLLE ROAD
"
"
                  *                                 LISLE, ILLINOIS 60532-4351
*
  '+,
LISLE, ILLINOIS 60532-4351
      *****,o '
'+, *****,o
                                                      December 7, 1998
'
          ..
December 7, 1998
    .
..
        Mr. D. R. Gipson
.
        Senior Vice President
Mr. D. R. Gipson
        Nuclear Generation
Senior Vice President
        The Detroit Edison Company
Nuclear Generation
        6400 North Dixie Highway
The Detroit Edison Company
        Newport, MI 48166                                                                                           ,
6400 North Dixie Highway
        SUBJECT:         FERMI INSPECTION REPORT 50-341/98015(DRP)
Newport, MI 48166
          Dear Mr. Gipson:
,
        On November 9,1998, the NRC completed an inspection at your Fermi 2 reactor facility. The
SUBJECT:
        enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. During the 7-week period covered by
FERMI INSPECTION REPORT 50-341/98015(DRP)
        this inspection period, your conduct of activities was generally characterized by
Dear Mr. Gipson:
        safety-conscious operations, sound engineering, and good maintenance practices.
On November 9,1998, the NRC completed an inspection at your Fermi 2 reactor facility. The
          During the inspection, a number of personnel errors occurred during the refueling outage.
enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. During the 7-week period covered by
        Consequently, the station error free clock was reset 11 times during the outage due to -
this inspection period, your conduct of activities was generally characterized by
          personnel errors. An example of a personnel error resulted in the issuance of a non-cited
safety-conscious operations, sound engineering, and good maintenance practices.
        violation for the failure to follow an operating procedure and the deenergizing of an engineored
During the inspection, a number of personnel errors occurred during the refueling outage.
          safety features bus. The inspection also identified a concern regarding the failure to correctly
Consequently, the station error free clock was reset 11 times during the outage due to -
        schedule a surveillance test on the primary containment radiation monitoring system. Your
personnel errors. An example of a personnel error resulted in the issuance of a non-cited
          identification of a failure to perform the surveillance test within the surveillance interval was
violation for the failure to follow an operating procedure and the deenergizing of an engineored
        determined to be a non-cited violation of the Technical Specifications for the failure to adhere to
safety features bus. The inspection also identified a concern regarding the failure to correctly
        the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual requirements. Finally, concerns were identified regarding
schedule a surveillance test on the primary containment radiation monitoring system. Your
        the quality of the ma'atenance procedures for the high pressure turbine control valves.
identification of a failure to perform the surveillance test within the surveillance interval was
        Although these are nasafety-related pieces of equipment, insufficient torque applied to
determined to be a non-cited violation of the Technical Specifications for the failure to adhere to
        . portions of the valve linkage resulted in unanticipated cycling of the valve internals during valve
the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual requirements. Finally, concerns were identified regarding
          manipulation. The valve cycling caused significant fluctuations in reactor power level and
the quality of the ma'atenance procedures for the high pressure turbine control valves.
          caused operators to insert manual scrams on two occasions. These concerns indicate that
Although these are nasafety-related pieces of equipment, insufficient torque applied to
          continued attention is needed to reduce personnel errors and to control maintenance activities.
. portions of the valve linkage resulted in unanticipated cycling of the valve internals during valve
                                                                                                              \ T
manipulation. The valve cycling caused significant fluctuations in reactor power level and
              9812230118 981207
caused operators to insert manual scrams on two occasions. These concerns indicate that
              PDR     ADOCK 05000341
continued attention is needed to reduce personnel errors and to control maintenance activities.
              G                       PDR
\\
                                                                                                                  .
T
9812230118 981207
PDR
ADOCK 05000341
G
PDR
.


      .
.
  .
.
          D.'. Gipson                                       -2-
D.'. Gipson
        ~
-2-
    *
~
          In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the
          enclosure, and your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
enclosure, and your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
                                                  Sincerely,
*
                                                  /s/ C. Phillips for
Sincerely,
                                                Anton Vogel, Chief
/s/ C. Phillips for
                                                Reactor Projects Branch 6
Anton Vogel, Chief
          Docket No.: 50-341
Reactor Projects Branch 6
          License No.: NPF-43
Docket No.: 50-341
          Enclosure:     Inspection Report 50-341/98015(DRP)
License No.: NPF-43
          cc w/ encl:     N. Peterson, Director, Nuclear Licensing
Enclosure:
                          P. Marquardt, Corporate Legal Department
Inspection Report 50-341/98015(DRP)
                        R. Gaston, Compliance Supervisor
cc w/ encl:
                        R. Whale, Michigan Public Service Commission
N. Peterson, Director, Nuclear Licensing
                        Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
P. Marquardt, Corporate Legal Department
                        Monroe County, Emergency Management Division
R. Gaston, Compliance Supervisor
                        Emergency Management Division, Ml Department
R. Whale, Michigan Public Service Commission
                          of State Police                                                                                 '
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
        Document Name: G:\FERM\FER98015.DRP
Monroe County, Emergency Management Division
        r - . um - - w e.co m - .r.co                                 - .v.ma.
Emergency Management Division, Ml Department
          OFFICE Rlli                   l Rlli -           l Rlll         l                       l
of State Police
          NAME       Phillips/ml /4       Burgess Il           Vegel tff
'
                                  'V                    ''
Document Name: G:\\FERM\\FER98015.DRP
          DATE        12/1/98             12/1/98             12M/98 I
r - .
                                            OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
um - - w e.co m - .r.co
1,                                                                                                                       ,
- .v.ma.
                                                                                                          __ _ _ _ _ . .
OFFICE
Rlli
l
Rlli -
l
Rlll
l
l
NAME
Phillips/ml /4
Burgess Il
Vegel tff
DATE
12/1/98
'V
12/1/98
12M/98 I
''
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
1,
,
__
_ _ _ _ . .


'               -
'
  ,-. .                                                                    1
-
          D. Gipson                   -2-
1
        ,
.
          Distribution:
, - .
          CAC (E Mail)
D. Gipson
          RPC (E-Mail)
-2-
          Project Mgr., NRR w/enci
,
        J. Caldwell, Rill w/enci             .
Distribution:
        C. Pederson, Ril' w/enci
CAC (E Mail)
        B. Clayton, Rill w/ encl
RPC (E-Mail)
        SRI Fermi w/enct
Project Mgr., NRR w/enci
        DRP w/ encl
J. Caldwell, Rill w/enci
        TSS w/enci
.
        DRS (2) w/enci
C. Pederson, Ril' w/enci
        Rlli PRR w/enct
B. Clayton, Rill w/ encl
        PUBLIC IE-01 w/enci
SRI Fermi w/enct
        Docket File w/ encl
DRP w/ encl
        GREENS
TSS w/enci
        LEO (E-Mail)
DRS (2) w/enci
        DOCDESK (E-Mail)
Rlli PRR w/enct
                                                                        '
PUBLIC IE-01 w/enci
                              210102
Docket File w/ encl
                                          .. .   - _ - _ - - - - - - - -   A
GREENS
LEO (E-Mail)
DOCDESK (E-Mail)
210102
'
..
.
- _ - _ - - - - - - - -
A
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:37, 10 December 2024

Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/98-15 on 980922-1109.Noncited Violation Re Failure to Follow Operating Procedure & Deenergizing of Engineered Safety Features Bus Was Identified
ML20198D548
Person / Time
Site: Fermi 
Issue date: 12/07/1998
From: Anton Vegel
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Gipson D
DETROIT EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20198D551 List:
References
50-341-98-15, NUDOCS 9812230118
Download: ML20198D548 (3)


See also: IR 05000341/1998015

Text

,

..

_

-

-

_

_ . ~.- - .-

.

  1. ptp Ettoq%

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$

o

REGloN lil

M

j

801 WARRENvlLLE ROAD

"

LISLE, ILLINOIS 60532-4351

'+, *****,o

'

December 7, 1998

..

.

Mr. D. R. Gipson

Senior Vice President

Nuclear Generation

The Detroit Edison Company

6400 North Dixie Highway

Newport, MI 48166

,

SUBJECT:

FERMI INSPECTION REPORT 50-341/98015(DRP)

Dear Mr. Gipson:

On November 9,1998, the NRC completed an inspection at your Fermi 2 reactor facility. The

enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. During the 7-week period covered by

this inspection period, your conduct of activities was generally characterized by

safety-conscious operations, sound engineering, and good maintenance practices.

During the inspection, a number of personnel errors occurred during the refueling outage.

Consequently, the station error free clock was reset 11 times during the outage due to -

personnel errors. An example of a personnel error resulted in the issuance of a non-cited

violation for the failure to follow an operating procedure and the deenergizing of an engineored

safety features bus. The inspection also identified a concern regarding the failure to correctly

schedule a surveillance test on the primary containment radiation monitoring system. Your

identification of a failure to perform the surveillance test within the surveillance interval was

determined to be a non-cited violation of the Technical Specifications for the failure to adhere to

the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual requirements. Finally, concerns were identified regarding

the quality of the ma'atenance procedures for the high pressure turbine control valves.

Although these are nasafety-related pieces of equipment, insufficient torque applied to

. portions of the valve linkage resulted in unanticipated cycling of the valve internals during valve

manipulation. The valve cycling caused significant fluctuations in reactor power level and

caused operators to insert manual scrams on two occasions. These concerns indicate that

continued attention is needed to reduce personnel errors and to control maintenance activities.

\\

T

9812230118 981207

PDR

ADOCK 05000341

G

PDR

.

.

.

D.'. Gipson

-2-

~

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the

enclosure, and your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Sincerely,

/s/ C. Phillips for

Anton Vogel, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 6

Docket No.: 50-341

License No.: NPF-43

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 50-341/98015(DRP)

cc w/ encl:

N. Peterson, Director, Nuclear Licensing

P. Marquardt, Corporate Legal Department

R. Gaston, Compliance Supervisor

R. Whale, Michigan Public Service Commission

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Monroe County, Emergency Management Division

Emergency Management Division, Ml Department

of State Police

'

Document Name: G:\\FERM\\FER98015.DRP

r - .

um - - w e.co m - .r.co

- .v.ma.

OFFICE

Rlli

l

Rlli -

l

Rlll

l

l

NAME

Phillips/ml /4

Burgess Il

Vegel tff

DATE

12/1/98

'V

12/1/98

12M/98 I

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

1,

,

__

_ _ _ _ . .

'

-

1

.

, - .

D. Gipson

-2-

,

Distribution:

CAC (E Mail)

RPC (E-Mail)

Project Mgr., NRR w/enci

J. Caldwell, Rill w/enci

.

C. Pederson, Ril' w/enci

B. Clayton, Rill w/ encl

SRI Fermi w/enct

DRP w/ encl

TSS w/enci

DRS (2) w/enci

Rlli PRR w/enct

PUBLIC IE-01 w/enci

Docket File w/ encl

GREENS

LEO (E-Mail)

DOCDESK (E-Mail)

210102

'

..

.

- _ - _ - - - - - - - -

A