ML20198E452: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:--                 _ _ -  _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:--
                        ''N) oneCommonwealth          Edison First National Plarm, Chicago, Illinois 1  ..
''N Commonwealth Edison 1
          .-      l t              (         l Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 (j Chicago,lilinois 60690 November 4, 1985 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
l
              -Washington, DC 20555
) one First National Plarm, Chicago, Illinois t
(
l Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 (j Chicago,lilinois 60690 November 4, 1985 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
-Washington, DC 20555


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Quad Cities Station Units 1 and 2 Emergency Response Facility Regulatory Guide 1.97 Review NRC-Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265 References (a):         H. L. Massin letter to H. R. Denton dated October 30, 1985.
Quad Cities Station Units 1 and 2 Emergency Response Facility Regulatory Guide 1.97 Review NRC-Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265 References (a):
(b): D. B. Vassallo letter to D. L. Farrar dated June 12, 1984.
H. L. Massin letter to H. R. Denton dated October 30, 1985.
(b):
D. B. Vassallo letter to D. L. Farrar dated June 12, 1984.


==Dear Mr. Denton:==
==Dear Mr. Denton:==
The reference (a) transmittal provided a modification schedule resulting from a human factors review of our Emergency Response Facilities (EFF) as required by the reference (b) Confirmatory Order. The results of our review of the ERFs with respect to Regulatory Guide 1.97 was inadvertently omitted from this transmittal. Our report summarizing this review is enclosed herein.
The reference (a) transmittal provided a modification schedule resulting from a human factors review of our Emergency Response Facilities (EFF) as required by the reference (b) Confirmatory Order. The results of our review of the ERFs with respect to Regulatory Guide 1.97 was inadvertently omitted from this transmittal. Our report summarizing this review is enclosed herein.
The enclosed report summarizes our evaluation of whether any additional Regulatory Guide 1.97 variables should be added to the ERFs (most variables are already available). Since the results of our Human Factors Review of the Regulatory Guide 1.97 variables did not recommend the adding of variables to our ERFs, we do not intend to initiate any modifications.
The enclosed report summarizes our evaluation of whether any additional Regulatory Guide 1.97 variables should be added to the ERFs (most variables are already available). Since the results of our Human Factors Review of the Regulatory Guide 1.97 variables did not recommend the adding of variables to our ERFs, we do not intend to initiate any modifications.
Line 33: Line 37:
One signed original and seven (7) copies of this letter and its attachment are enclosed.
One signed original and seven (7) copies of this letter and its attachment are enclosed.
Very truly yours, i
Very truly yours, i
J. R. Wojnarowski Nuclear Licensing Administrator 1m Attachment                             s
J. R. Wojnarowski Nuclear Licensing Administrator 1m Attachment s
!'            cc:     R. Bevan - NRR                                                                                                   80 Quad Cities Resident Inspector
cc:
                                                                                                                                          'f/
R. Bevan - NRR 80 Quad Cities Resident Inspector
4 0850K                      e5 lij Q $                       4 r       . ..  .     .
'f/
F  s
4 e5 lij Q $
4 0850K F
r s
 
EVALUATION OF THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL REG. GUIDE 1.97 INFORMATION AT THE DRESDEN AND QUAD CITIES ERFS Although the general function of the personnel in the Emergency


EVALUATION OF THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL REG. GUIDE 1.97 INFORMATION AT THE DRESDEN AND QUAD CITIES ERFS Although the general function of the personnel in the Emergency Response Facilities (ERF) is to support the control room operators in bringing the plant into a safe condition, it is recognized that the information needs in the ERF are somewhat different than those in the control room.       The staff of the Technical   Support   Center   (TSC) and   Emergency   Operations Facility (EOF) typically are concerned with information that provides an overview of plant status, rather than the values of specific parameters, and are usually under less time pressure in acquiring such specific information than their counterparts in the control room. A question arose, therefore, as to the need for additional Reg. Guide 1.97 information in the ERFs for the Dresden and Quad cities stations. In particular, are the thirteen instruments f rom Reg. Guide 1.97 which are listed in Table 1 needed by staff members in the Dresden and Quad Cities TSC and/or EOF when performing their assigned functions and tasks?   All of these indications are available in the control room or elsewhere on-site,     but, with one exception at one station, these indications are not presently available on the displays in the ERFs.                                               ,
===Response===
Facilities (ERF) is to support the control room operators in bringing the plant into a safe condition, it is recognized that the information needs in the ERF are somewhat different than those in the control room.
The staff of the Technical Support Center (TSC) and Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) typically are concerned with information that provides an overview of plant status, rather than the values of specific parameters, and are usually under less time pressure in acquiring such specific information than their counterparts in the control room.
A question arose, therefore, as to the need for additional Reg. Guide 1.97 information in the ERFs for the Dresden and Quad cities stations.
In particular, are the thirteen instruments f rom Reg. Guide 1.97 which are listed in Table 1 needed by staff members in the Dresden and Quad Cities TSC and/or EOF when performing their assigned functions and tasks?
All of these indications are available in the control room or elsewhere on-site, but, with one exception at one station, these indications are not presently available on the displays in the ERFs.
Approach to the Review i
Approach to the Review i
j                                                               .
j Human factors specialists from ARD Corporation evaluated the need for this instrumentation as part of a broader review of the Commonwealth Edison ERFs at the Dresden and Quad Cities stations.
Human factors specialists from ARD Corporation evaluated the need for this instrumentation as part of a broader review of the Commonwealth Edison ERFs at the Dresden and Quad Cities stations. Several task   analytic techniques were used to determine the need for this instrumentation in the context of l             ERF staff members' duties and responsibilities.         First, the human factors personnel attended several Generating Station
Several task analytic techniques were used to determine the need for this instrumentation in the context of l
!            Emergency Plan (GSEP) exercises and debriefings and noted t
ERF staff members' duties and responsibilities.
I             information deficiencies in the TSC and EOF. Second, as part of a structured interview with key ERF personnel, open-ended 1
: First, the human factors personnel attended several Generating Station Emergency Plan (GSEP) exercises and debriefings and noted t
I information deficiencies in the TSC and EOF.
Second, as part of a structured interview with key ERF personnel, open-ended 1
k
k


questions were asked regarding information needs.           Third, a sample.of these key personnel were queried directly as to their need for the Reg. Guide 1.97           instruments.     Finally,   a comprehensive   review of   the   following GSEP   procedures   was conducted by a human factors specialist and subject matter expert from CECO to determine whether or not information from these Reg. Guide 1.97 instruments. were needed in the ERFs in order to effectively perform these procedures:
questions were asked regarding information needs.
GSEP Environmental   Director   Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure ED-1 to ED-31:       Duties and Responsibilities of the GSEP Environmental Director, Document- #8289A, August, 1985.
: Third, a
sample.of these key personnel were queried directly as to their need for the Reg.
Guide 1.97 instruments.
: Finally, a
comprehensive review of the following GSEP procedures was conducted by a human factors specialist and subject matter expert from CECO to determine whether or not information from these Reg. Guide 1.97 instruments. were needed in the ERFs in order to effectively perform these procedures:
GSEP Environmental Director Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure ED-1 to ED-31:
Duties and Responsibilities of the GSEP Environmental Director, Document- #8289A, August, 1985.
GSEP Environs Group Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures EG-1 to EG-19, Document 18389A, August, 1985.
GSEP Environs Group Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures EG-1 to EG-19, Document 18389A, August, 1985.
Generating   Stations   Emergency   Plan (GSEP),   Revision   4, July, 1984.
Generating Stations Emergency Plan (GSEP),
Revision 4,
July, 1984.
Commonwealth Edison Company Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), Revision 11, March, 1985.
Commonwealth Edison Company Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), Revision 11, March, 1985.
Methods and Results                             -
Methods and Results Human factors personnel attended the 1985 GSEP exercises at LaSalle, and Quad Cities.
Human factors personnel attended the 1985 GSEP exercises at LaSalle, and Quad Cities.     The LaSalle station - uses the same EOF facility (Mazon) as does the Dresden station.           Observers C
The LaSalle station - uses the same EOF facility (Mazon) as does the Dresden station.
were stationed in both the TSC and EOF during the exercises and attended the debriefing session afterwards. In addition, human factors personnel   reviewed CECO's   files containing comments from the NRC and CECO GSEP controllers for other GSEP exercises in recent years. No deficiencies were noted during these GSEP exercises regarding the availability of         Reg. Guide 1.97 instrumentation in the ERFs.
Observers C
were stationed in both the TSC and EOF during the exercises and attended the debriefing session afterwards.
In addition, human factors personnel reviewed CECO's files containing comments from the NRC and CECO GSEP controllers for other GSEP exercises in recent years.
No deficiencies were noted during these GSEP exercises regarding the availability of Reg.
Guide 1.97 instrumentation in the ERFs.
The structured interview that was administered to key ERF 2
The structured interview that was administered to key ERF 2


personnel as part of the human factors review of the ERFs contained a number of open-ended questLons addressing information needs and the extent to which thest needs are met by the existing facilities.         A job analysis was performed on the   responses   to   this   Personnel Survey.       Staff   members' responses were specifically examined for references to the Reg.
personnel as part of the human factors review of the ERFs contained a
Guide 1.97 instrumentation.             In   the   responses   to   these open-ended questions there was no mention of deficiencies in this area.
number of open-ended questLons addressing information needs and the extent to which thest needs are met by the existing facilities.
To further investigate the adequacy of the ERF's access to this Reg. Guide 1.97 instrumentation, a telephone interview was conducted with a selected sample of ERF staff members, to ask them specifically about their need for this information, given the tasks they perform.       Because these parameters are available in the control room or elsewhere on-site,             readings can be obtained by ERF personnel with a phone call to the appropriate location.     The question     posed was whether         or   not   the information was needed frequently enough or in a time-critical manner. that would warrant making these parameters available on the ERF CRTs.
A job analysis was performed on the responses to this Personnel Survey.
Ten   individuals     in   Commonwealth   Edison   Company   who   have responsibilities in the ERFs at Dresden and Quad Cities               --
Staff members' responses were specifically examined for references to the Reg.
seven in the TSC and three in the EOF -- were interviewed.           The staff positions that these individuals filled during recent
Guide 1.97 instrumentation.
* GSEP exercises are listed in Table 2. It is ' clear that the people queried were sufficiently well placed that if anyone in the ERFs needed the Reg.         Guide 1.97, instrumentation, these people should have been aware             of   it. The   individuals interviewed     were     assured     that   their   responses     were confidential, and they were all very cooperative.
In the responses to these open-ended questions there was no mention of deficiencies in this area.
Responses derived from the telephone interviews are summarized in Table 3 and associated comments are compiled in Table               4.
To further investigate the adequacy of the ERF's access to this Guide 1.97 instrumentation, a telephone interview was Reg.
conducted with a selected sample of ERF staff members, to ask them specifically about their need for this information, given the tasks they perform.
Because these parameters are available in the control room or elsewhere on-site, readings can be obtained by ERF personnel with a phone call to the appropriate location.
The question posed was whether or not the information was needed frequently enough or in a time-critical manner. that would warrant making these parameters available on the ERF CRTs.
Ten individuals in Commonwealth Edison Company who have responsibilities in the ERFs at Dresden and Quad Cities seven in the TSC and three in the EOF -- were interviewed.
The staff positions that these individuals filled during recent GSEP exercises are listed in Table 2.
It is ' clear that the people queried were sufficiently well placed that if anyone in the ERFs needed the Reg.
Guide 1.97, instrumentation, these people should have been aware of it.
The individuals interviewed were assured that their responses were confidential, and they were all very cooperative.
Responses derived from the telephone interviews are summarized in Table 3 and associated comments are compiled in Table 4.
There were only four responses in favor of including any of these parameters in the TSC and none for including them in the 3
There were only four responses in favor of including any of these parameters in the TSC and none for including them in the 3
i
i


EOF. There was one person who recommended having Suppression Pool Temperature available on the computer in the TSC; however, five others thought that having it available in the control room was sufficient. One TSC-assigned person indicated a need for information about Radioactivity Concentration _or Level in the Circulating Primary Coolant in order to know what event the station is in;. however, nine others felt that having the information available elsewhere in the plant was adequate.     One individual indicated a need in the TSC for display of the Isolation Condenser System shell-side water level, but seven indicated no such need. One staff member of a TSC indicated a need for SLCS storage tank level, but nine others felt it was not needed since it is available elsewhere in the station.
EOF.
Finally,   the   comprehensive review of the GSEP procedures produced no additional requirements for the Reg. Guide 1.97 instrumentation in the TSC or EOF.
There was one person who recommended having Suppression Pool Temperature available on the computer in the TSC; however, five others thought that having it available in the control room was sufficient.
Conclusions The results of this evaluation provide evidence that there is no compelling need to make these Reg. Guide 1.97 variables more readily available in the Dresden and Quad Cities ERFs.           No information deficiencies were found with respect to Reg. Guide     .
One TSC-assigned person indicated a need for information about Radioactivity Concentration _or Level in the Circulating Primary Coolant in order to know what event the station is in;. however, nine others felt that having the information available elsewhere in the plant was adequate.
1.97 instrumentation as a result of observing GSEP exercises and in responses to an open-ended questionnaire.         Interviews with key ERF personnel resulted in'no significant need for Reg.
One individual indicated a need in the TSC for display of the Isolation Condenser System shell-side water level, but seven indicated no such need.
                                                                ~
One staff member of a TSC indicated a need for SLCS storage tank level, but nine others felt it was not needed since it is available elsewhere in the station.
Guide 1.97 type indications       in the TSC that would warrant making the parameters available on the ERF computer, and no stated need for     the indication   in the EOF. For the   four responses that indicated such a need in the TSC, in no case did more than one person express this need for a particular instrument. Finally, in the comprehensive review of the GSEP procedures, the human factors and subject matter expert found I           no requirements for additional Reg. Guide 1.97 instrumentation in the TSC or EOF.
: Finally, the comprehensive review of the GSEP procedures produced no additional requirements for the Reg. Guide 1.97 instrumentation in the TSC or EOF.
Conclusions The results of this evaluation provide evidence that there is no compelling need to make these Reg. Guide 1.97 variables more readily available in the Dresden and Quad Cities ERFs.
No information deficiencies were found with respect to Reg. Guide 1.97 instrumentation as a result of observing GSEP exercises and in responses to an open-ended questionnaire.
Interviews with key ERF personnel resulted in'no significant need for Reg.
~
Guide 1.97 type indications in the TSC that would warrant making the parameters available on the ERF computer, and no stated need for the indication in the EOF.
For the four responses that indicated such a need in the TSC, in no case did more than one person express this need for a
particular instrument.
Finally, in the comprehensive review of the GSEP procedures, the human factors and subject matter expert found I
no requirements for additional Reg. Guide 1.97 instrumentation in the TSC or EOF.
{
{
4605c                                                                   I l                                             4
4605c l
(                                                                                   >
4
(


                                                . Table 1
. Table 1 I have filled the following ERF positions during drills at Dresden or Quad Cities during 1984 or 1985:
* I have filled the following ERF positions during drills at Dresden or Quad Cities during 1984 or 1985:
Position TSC or EOF (Check one) u Rec. Guide 1.97 instrument Plant Needed?
Position                                                   TSC or EOF (Check one) u Rec. Guide 1.97 instrument           Plant       Needed?   Comment .
Comment Quad Dresden (Yes or No)
    .                                          Quad   Dresden (Yes or No)
Suppression Pool Water Temp X
Suppression Pool Water Temp       X   Available
Available
[         Radioactivity Concentration         X       X or Level in Circulating 1
[
Primary Coolant Analysis of Primary Coolant         X     X (Gamma Spectrum)
Radioactivity Concentration X
Isolation Condenser System       N/A     X Shell-Side Water Level         *
X or Level in Circulating Primary Coolant 1
:          Isolation Condenser System       N/A     X l       ,JValve Position SLCS Storage Tank Level           X       X
Analysis of Primary Coolant X
  !          Cooling Water Temperature         X       X to ESF System Components Cooling Water Flow to ESF           X       X System Components High Radioactivity Liquid.         X       X
X (Gamma Spectrum)
* Tank Level Emergency Ventilation               X       X                                         C Damper Position Status of Standby Power and         X       X Other Emergency Sources Important to Safety All Other Identified Release     N/A       X Points Particulates and Balogens-All     X       X Identified Plant Release Points
Isolation Condenser System N/A X
            --Sampling with On-Site Analysis Capability 6
Shell-Side Water Level Isolation Condenser System N/A X
l
,JValve Position SLCS Storage Tank Level X
X Cooling Water Temperature X
X to ESF System Components Cooling Water Flow to ESF X
X System Components High Radioactivity Liquid.
X X
Tank Level Emergency Ventilation X
X C
Damper Position Status of Standby Power and X
X Other Emergency Sources Important to Safety All Other Identified Release N/A X
Points Particulates and Balogens-All X
X Identified Plant Release Points
--Sampling with On-Site Analysis Capability 6


Table 2 Staff Positions Occupied Bv Interviewees TSC                     EOF Station Director         Recovery Manager Operations Director     Emergency Environmental
Table 2 Staff Positions Occupied Bv Interviewees TSC EOF Station Director Recovery Manager Operations Director Emergency Environmental
                                ~
~
Technical Director           Coordinator                 .
Technical Director Coordinator Environ's Director Assistant Emergency ODCS Operator Environmental Coordinator Communicator o
Environ's Director       Assistant Emergency ODCS Operator                 Environmental Coordinator Communicator o
A h
A l
e 6
h 1
L i
i e
6 L                                                                               i


Table 3 Reg. Guide 1.97 Instrument                                 ,
Table 3 Reg. Guide 1.97 Instrument Responses Yes No, Blank i
Responses Yes       No,     Blank Suppression Pool Water Temp             1         5*                 i Radioactivity Concentration             1         9 or Level in Circulating Primary Coolant Analysis of Primary Coolant                       10 (Gamma Spectrum)
Suppression Pool Water Temp 1
Isolation condenser System             1         7         2 Shell-Side Water Level Isolation Condenser System                         9         1 Valte Position
5*
        . SLCS Storage Tank Level                 1         9 Cooling Water Temperature                         10 to ESF System Components Cooling Water Flow to ESF                         10 System Components High Radioactivity Liquid                         9         1 Tank. Level                                                       -
Radioactivity Concentration 1
Emergency Ventilation                             10 Damper Position
9 or Level in Circulating Primary Coolant Analysis of Primary Coolant 10 (Gamma Spectrum)
                                                              ~
Isolation condenser System 1
Status of Standby Power and                       10 Other Emergency Sources Important to Safety                                                   C l             All Other Identified Release                       8         2 Points Particulates and Halogens-All                     8         2 Identified Plant Release Points
7 2
              --Sampling with On-Site Analysis capability
Shell-Side Water Level Isolation Condenser System 9
* In addition,   4 people stated that this   indication   is presently available in the Dresden TSC.
1 Valte Position SLCS Storage Tank Level 1
9 Cooling Water Temperature 10 to ESF System Components Cooling Water Flow to ESF 10 System Components High Radioactivity Liquid 9
1 Tank. Level Emergency Ventilation 10 Damper Position
~
Status of Standby Power and 10 Other Emergency Sources Important to Safety C
l All Other Identified Release 8
2 Points Particulates and Halogens-All 8
2 Identified Plant Release Points
--Sampling with On-Site Analysis capability In
: addition, 4
people stated that this indication is presently available in the Dresden TSC.
7 k-
7 k-


        'a Table 4 Comments on Rec. Guide 1.97 Instrumentation by Ten Interviewees Suppression Pool Water Temp No; Available in CR.
'a Table 4 Comments on Rec. Guide 1.97 Instrumentation by Ten Interviewees Suppression Pool Water Temp No; Available in CR.
No; Available in CR.
No; Available in CR.
Already available.                                                                     -
Already available.
We have it.
We have it.
TSC has this.
TSC has this.
Line 118: Line 185:
No; But not very familiar with this parameter.
No; But not very familiar with this parameter.
No; Available in CR.
No; Available in CR.
Yes; Critica1 T in accident. It.is available in CR on back panel. However, easiest thing to do is to put it on computer where it would be available in CR and TSC No; No comment.
Yes; Critica1 T in accident.
Radioactivity Concentration or Level       in Circulating Primary coolant No; Available in high-radiation building.
It.is available in CR on back panel.
However, easiest thing to do is to put it on computer where it would be available in CR and TSC No; No comment.
Radioactivity Concentration or Level in Circulating Primary coolant No; Available in high-radiation building.
Yes; Need "alve to determine what event we are in.
Yes; Need "alve to determine what event we are in.
No; We cai get it from station.
No; We cai get it from station.
No; Not needed at EOF.
No; Not needed at EOF.
No; Drywell radiation containment levels available. Do not need.
No; Drywell radiation containment levels available.
No;.Available elsewhere. We need to know condition of   core.
Do not need.
No;.Available elsewhere.
We need to know condition of core.
No; But not very familiar with this parameter.
No; But not very familiar with this parameter.
No; Radiation chemistry has it.
No; Radiation chemistry has it.
No; Available through high-radia. tion sampling system.                   _
No; Available through high-radia. tion sampling system.
                . No; Radiation Chemistry might need it.
No; Radiation Chemistry might need it.
Analysis of Primary Coolant (Gamma Spectrum)                                               ,
Analysis of Primary Coolant (Gamma Spectrum)
No; Available in high-radiation building.
No; Available in high-radiation building.
No; Defer to director of Radiation Chemistr.y.                                         c No; We can get it from graph.
No; Defer to director of Radiation Chemistr.y.
No; Station does this. It works with EOF on the problem.
c No; We can get it from graph.
No; On-line instrument may not be available. Emergency action levels based on other factors are available.
No; Station does this.
No; Available at station.
It works with EOF on the problem.
No; Not very familiar with this.
No; On-line instrument may not be available.
:                  No; Radiation chemistry director has this.
Emergency action levels based on other factors are available.
No; Available through high-radiation sampling system.
No; Available at station.
No; Radiation chemistry might need it.
No; Not very familiar with this.
j             Ns h
No; Radiation chemistry director has this.
8 Y                                                                     __
No; Available through high-radiation sampling system.
No; Radiation chemistry might need it.
N j
s h
8 Y


              =
=
l 1
Table 4 (continued)
  .                                                                                    l Table 4 (continued)                           l l
Isolation Condenser System Shell-Side Water Level No; Available in control room.
Isolation Condenser System Shell-Side Water Level No; Available in control room.
No; Nice to know, but can get it from control room.
No; Nice to know, but can get it from control room.
Line 150: Line 224:
No; Do not need it at EOF.
No; Do not need it at EOF.
No; This is'not a piece of safety equipment.
No; This is'not a piece of safety equipment.
No; This is part of cooling system. Ask station for it.
No; This is part of cooling system.
Ask station for it.
Cannot answer.
Cannot answer.
No; Do not have or need.
No; Do not have or need.
Line 160: Line 235:
No; Do not need it at EOF.
No; Do not need it at EOF.
No; Not piece of safety equipment.
No; Not piece of safety equipment.
No; Only need to know system is running. Control room has this.
No; Only need to know system is running.
Control room has this.
No; No comment.
No; No comment.
No; Do not have or need.
No; Do not have or need.
Line 166: Line 242:
SLCS Storage Tank Level No; Available in the control room.
SLCS Storage Tank Level No; Available in the control room.
No; Nice to know, but can get it from control room.
No; Nice to know, but can get it from control room.
No; We can get it from station.                           -
No; We can get it from station.
No; Do not need at EOF.
No; Do not need at EOF.
No; Other parameters indirectly indicate performance of system.
No; Other parameters indirectly indicate performance of system.
No; It gets injected into system or it is still there. Do
No; It gets injected into system or it is still there.
* not need this.
Do not need this.
No; No comment.
No; No comment.
No; Available in control room.                                 <
No; Available in control room.
No; Available in control room.
No; Available in control room.
Yes; Trend this in TSC for planning.
Yes; Trend this in TSC for planning.
Line 184: Line 260:
Table 4 (continued)
Table 4 (continued)
Cooling Water Temperature to ESF System Components (continued)
Cooling Water Temperature to ESF System Components (continued)
No; Eomebody in EOF needs to know this. Engineering evaluation can get it.
No; Eomebody in EOF needs to know this.
Engineering evaluation can get it.
No; No comment.
No; No comment.
No; Available in control rcom.
No; Available in control rcom.
No; Available in control room.
No; Available in control room.
No; Control room has it.
No; Control room has it.
Cooling Water Flow to ESF System Components No; Available in the high-radiation sample building.
Cooling Water Flow to ESF System Components No; Available in the high-radiation sample building.
No; Nice to know, but can get elsewhere.
No; Nice to know, but can get elsewhere.
No; Not needed.
No; Not needed.
                .No; Do not need at EOF.
.No; Do not need at EOF.
No; Available in CR.
No; Available in CR.
No; If I have temperature I know if I have flow.
No; If I have temperature I know if I have flow.
No; No comment.
No; No comment.
No; Do not need.
No; Do not need.
No; No comment.
No; No comment.
No; If component's in control room, do not need.
No; If component's in control room, do not need.
High Radioactivity Liquid Tank Level No; Readily available from radiation waste.
High Radioactivity Liquid Tank Level No; Readily available from radiation waste.
No; Get this from Radiation Chemistry.
No; Get this from Radiation Chemistry.
Line 204: Line 281:
No; Station has it.
No; Station has it.
No; Not necessary for safe operation.
No; Not necessary for safe operation.
No; Plant can get from radwaste system.                     ~
No; Plant can get from radwaste system.
~
Cannot answer.
Cannot answer.
No; Available from Radiation Chemistry sample survey.
No; Available from Radiation Chemistry sample survey.
No; Available from radiation waste.
No; Available from radiation waste.
No; Radwaste tanks not needed.                                 ,
No; Radwaste tanks not needed.
Emergency Ventilation Damper Position C
Emergency Ventilation Damper Position C
No; Available in control room.
No; Available in control room.
No; Nice to know, but can get elsewhere.
No; Nice to know, but can get elsewhere.
No; Available at station.
No; Available at station.
No; Station has it.
No; Station has it.
No; Pick up from other data.
No; Pick up from other data.
No; Do not need information.
No; Do not need information.
No; If information is available fairly readily in plant, do not need displays in TSC.
No; If information is available fairly readily in plant, do not need displays in TSC.
No; Available in control room.
No; Available in control room.
No; Available in control room.
No; Available in control room.
Line 222: Line 300:
10 L
10 L


                                                                                    \
\\
w   '.'  ,
w
  .,~   .-
., ~
Table 4 (continued)                               j l
Table 4 (continued) j Status of Standby Power and Other Emergency Sources Important to Safety No; Available in control room.
Status of Standby Power and Other Emergency Sources Important to Safety No; Available in control room.                               "
No; Nice to,know, but can get from control room.
No; Nice to,know, but can get from control room.                   ]
]
No; Available on computer in EOF.
No; Available on computer in EOF.
No; Station has it.                                               J No; Pick up from other data. Not necessary to have displays.
No; Station has it.
No; Do not need information. Can get from TSC.
J No; Pick up from other data.
Not necessary to have displays.
No; Do not need information.
Can get from TSC.
No; If information is available fairly readily in plant, do not need displays in TSC.
No; If information is available fairly readily in plant, do not need displays in TSC.
                                          ~
~
No; Available in control room.
No; Available in control room.
No; Available in control room.
No; Available in control room.
Line 247: Line 328:
No; Radiation Chemistry might need this but I don't.
No; Radiation Chemistry might need this but I don't.
Particulates and Halogens-All Identified Plant Release Points--
Particulates and Halogens-All Identified Plant Release Points--
Sampling with On-site Analysis capability cannot answer.                               -
Sampling with On-site Analysis capability cannot answer.
No; Defer tJ Radiation Chemistry director.
No; Defer tJ Radiation Chemistry director.
No; Available at station.
No; Available at station.
No; Site has this capability. Station's responsibility.           C No; Can get already.
C No; Site has this capability.
Station's responsibility.
No; Can get already.
No; Available from on-site.
No; Available from on-site.
No; If information is available fairly readily in plant, do not need displays in TSC.
No; If information is available fairly readily in plant, do not need displays in TSC.

Latest revision as of 12:28, 10 December 2024

Forwards Evaluation of Need for Addl Reg Guide 1.97 Info at Dresden & Quad Cities Emergency Response Facilities. Info Inadvertently Omitted from 851030 Transmittal.Addl Variables Not Recommended for Quad Cities
ML20198E452
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  
Issue date: 11/04/1985
From: Wojnarowski J
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RTR-REGGD-01.097, RTR-REGGD-1.097 0850K, 850K, NUDOCS 8511140031
Download: ML20198E452 (12)
v • d • e


Text

--

N Commonwealth Edison 1

l

) one First National Plarm, Chicago, Illinois t

(

l Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 (j Chicago,lilinois 60690 November 4, 1985 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

-Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Quad Cities Station Units 1 and 2 Emergency Response Facility Regulatory Guide 1.97 Review NRC-Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265 References (a):

H. L. Massin letter to H. R. Denton dated October 30, 1985.

(b):

D. B. Vassallo letter to D. L. Farrar dated June 12, 1984.

Dear Mr. Denton:

The reference (a) transmittal provided a modification schedule resulting from a human factors review of our Emergency Response Facilities (EFF) as required by the reference (b) Confirmatory Order. The results of our review of the ERFs with respect to Regulatory Guide 1.97 was inadvertently omitted from this transmittal. Our report summarizing this review is enclosed herein.

The enclosed report summarizes our evaluation of whether any additional Regulatory Guide 1.97 variables should be added to the ERFs (most variables are already available). Since the results of our Human Factors Review of the Regulatory Guide 1.97 variables did not recommend the adding of variables to our ERFs, we do not intend to initiate any modifications.

If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please contact this offica.

One signed original and seven (7) copies of this letter and its attachment are enclosed.

Very truly yours, i

J. R. Wojnarowski Nuclear Licensing Administrator 1m Attachment s

cc:

R. Bevan - NRR 80 Quad Cities Resident Inspector

'f/

4 e5 lij Q $

4 0850K F

r s

EVALUATION OF THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL REG. GUIDE 1.97 INFORMATION AT THE DRESDEN AND QUAD CITIES ERFS Although the general function of the personnel in the Emergency

Response

Facilities (ERF) is to support the control room operators in bringing the plant into a safe condition, it is recognized that the information needs in the ERF are somewhat different than those in the control room.

The staff of the Technical Support Center (TSC) and Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) typically are concerned with information that provides an overview of plant status, rather than the values of specific parameters, and are usually under less time pressure in acquiring such specific information than their counterparts in the control room.

A question arose, therefore, as to the need for additional Reg. Guide 1.97 information in the ERFs for the Dresden and Quad cities stations.

In particular, are the thirteen instruments f rom Reg. Guide 1.97 which are listed in Table 1 needed by staff members in the Dresden and Quad Cities TSC and/or EOF when performing their assigned functions and tasks?

All of these indications are available in the control room or elsewhere on-site, but, with one exception at one station, these indications are not presently available on the displays in the ERFs.

Approach to the Review i

j Human factors specialists from ARD Corporation evaluated the need for this instrumentation as part of a broader review of the Commonwealth Edison ERFs at the Dresden and Quad Cities stations.

Several task analytic techniques were used to determine the need for this instrumentation in the context of l

ERF staff members' duties and responsibilities.

First, the human factors personnel attended several Generating Station Emergency Plan (GSEP) exercises and debriefings and noted t

I information deficiencies in the TSC and EOF.

Second, as part of a structured interview with key ERF personnel, open-ended 1

k

questions were asked regarding information needs.

Third, a

sample.of these key personnel were queried directly as to their need for the Reg.

Guide 1.97 instruments.

Finally, a

comprehensive review of the following GSEP procedures was conducted by a human factors specialist and subject matter expert from CECO to determine whether or not information from these Reg. Guide 1.97 instruments. were needed in the ERFs in order to effectively perform these procedures:

GSEP Environmental Director Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure ED-1 to ED-31:

Duties and Responsibilities of the GSEP Environmental Director, Document- #8289A, August, 1985.

GSEP Environs Group Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures EG-1 to EG-19, Document 18389A, August, 1985.

Generating Stations Emergency Plan (GSEP),

Revision 4,

July, 1984.

Commonwealth Edison Company Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), Revision 11, March, 1985.

Methods and Results Human factors personnel attended the 1985 GSEP exercises at LaSalle, and Quad Cities.

The LaSalle station - uses the same EOF facility (Mazon) as does the Dresden station.

Observers C

were stationed in both the TSC and EOF during the exercises and attended the debriefing session afterwards.

In addition, human factors personnel reviewed CECO's files containing comments from the NRC and CECO GSEP controllers for other GSEP exercises in recent years.

No deficiencies were noted during these GSEP exercises regarding the availability of Reg.

Guide 1.97 instrumentation in the ERFs.

The structured interview that was administered to key ERF 2

personnel as part of the human factors review of the ERFs contained a

number of open-ended questLons addressing information needs and the extent to which thest needs are met by the existing facilities.

A job analysis was performed on the responses to this Personnel Survey.

Staff members' responses were specifically examined for references to the Reg.

Guide 1.97 instrumentation.

In the responses to these open-ended questions there was no mention of deficiencies in this area.

To further investigate the adequacy of the ERF's access to this Guide 1.97 instrumentation, a telephone interview was Reg.

conducted with a selected sample of ERF staff members, to ask them specifically about their need for this information, given the tasks they perform.

Because these parameters are available in the control room or elsewhere on-site, readings can be obtained by ERF personnel with a phone call to the appropriate location.

The question posed was whether or not the information was needed frequently enough or in a time-critical manner. that would warrant making these parameters available on the ERF CRTs.

Ten individuals in Commonwealth Edison Company who have responsibilities in the ERFs at Dresden and Quad Cities seven in the TSC and three in the EOF -- were interviewed.

The staff positions that these individuals filled during recent GSEP exercises are listed in Table 2.

It is ' clear that the people queried were sufficiently well placed that if anyone in the ERFs needed the Reg.

Guide 1.97, instrumentation, these people should have been aware of it.

The individuals interviewed were assured that their responses were confidential, and they were all very cooperative.

Responses derived from the telephone interviews are summarized in Table 3 and associated comments are compiled in Table 4.

There were only four responses in favor of including any of these parameters in the TSC and none for including them in the 3

i

EOF.

There was one person who recommended having Suppression Pool Temperature available on the computer in the TSC; however, five others thought that having it available in the control room was sufficient.

One TSC-assigned person indicated a need for information about Radioactivity Concentration _or Level in the Circulating Primary Coolant in order to know what event the station is in;. however, nine others felt that having the information available elsewhere in the plant was adequate.

One individual indicated a need in the TSC for display of the Isolation Condenser System shell-side water level, but seven indicated no such need.

One staff member of a TSC indicated a need for SLCS storage tank level, but nine others felt it was not needed since it is available elsewhere in the station.

Finally, the comprehensive review of the GSEP procedures produced no additional requirements for the Reg. Guide 1.97 instrumentation in the TSC or EOF.

Conclusions The results of this evaluation provide evidence that there is no compelling need to make these Reg. Guide 1.97 variables more readily available in the Dresden and Quad Cities ERFs.

No information deficiencies were found with respect to Reg. Guide 1.97 instrumentation as a result of observing GSEP exercises and in responses to an open-ended questionnaire.

Interviews with key ERF personnel resulted in'no significant need for Reg.

~

Guide 1.97 type indications in the TSC that would warrant making the parameters available on the ERF computer, and no stated need for the indication in the EOF.

For the four responses that indicated such a need in the TSC, in no case did more than one person express this need for a

particular instrument.

Finally, in the comprehensive review of the GSEP procedures, the human factors and subject matter expert found I

no requirements for additional Reg. Guide 1.97 instrumentation in the TSC or EOF.

{

4605c l

4

(

. Table 1 I have filled the following ERF positions during drills at Dresden or Quad Cities during 1984 or 1985:

Position TSC or EOF (Check one) u Rec. Guide 1.97 instrument Plant Needed?

Comment Quad Dresden (Yes or No)

Suppression Pool Water Temp X

Available

[

Radioactivity Concentration X

X or Level in Circulating Primary Coolant 1

Analysis of Primary Coolant X

X (Gamma Spectrum)

Isolation Condenser System N/A X

Shell-Side Water Level Isolation Condenser System N/A X

l

,JValve Position SLCS Storage Tank Level X

X Cooling Water Temperature X

X to ESF System Components Cooling Water Flow to ESF X

X System Components High Radioactivity Liquid.

X X

Tank Level Emergency Ventilation X

X C

Damper Position Status of Standby Power and X

X Other Emergency Sources Important to Safety All Other Identified Release N/A X

Points Particulates and Balogens-All X

X Identified Plant Release Points

--Sampling with On-Site Analysis Capability 6

Table 2 Staff Positions Occupied Bv Interviewees TSC EOF Station Director Recovery Manager Operations Director Emergency Environmental

~

Technical Director Coordinator Environ's Director Assistant Emergency ODCS Operator Environmental Coordinator Communicator o

A h

e 6

L i

Table 3 Reg. Guide 1.97 Instrument Responses Yes No, Blank i

Suppression Pool Water Temp 1

5*

Radioactivity Concentration 1

9 or Level in Circulating Primary Coolant Analysis of Primary Coolant 10 (Gamma Spectrum)

Isolation condenser System 1

7 2

Shell-Side Water Level Isolation Condenser System 9

1 Valte Position SLCS Storage Tank Level 1

9 Cooling Water Temperature 10 to ESF System Components Cooling Water Flow to ESF 10 System Components High Radioactivity Liquid 9

1 Tank. Level Emergency Ventilation 10 Damper Position

~

Status of Standby Power and 10 Other Emergency Sources Important to Safety C

l All Other Identified Release 8

2 Points Particulates and Halogens-All 8

2 Identified Plant Release Points

--Sampling with On-Site Analysis capability In

addition, 4

people stated that this indication is presently available in the Dresden TSC.

7 k-

'a Table 4 Comments on Rec. Guide 1.97 Instrumentation by Ten Interviewees Suppression Pool Water Temp No; Available in CR.

No; Available in CR.

Already available.

We have it.

TSC has this.

Would be useful, but can get from TSC.

No; But not very familiar with this parameter.

No; Available in CR.

Yes; Critica1 T in accident.

It.is available in CR on back panel.

However, easiest thing to do is to put it on computer where it would be available in CR and TSC No; No comment.

Radioactivity Concentration or Level in Circulating Primary coolant No; Available in high-radiation building.

Yes; Need "alve to determine what event we are in.

No; We cai get it from station.

No; Not needed at EOF.

No; Drywell radiation containment levels available.

Do not need.

No;.Available elsewhere.

We need to know condition of core.

No; But not very familiar with this parameter.

No; Radiation chemistry has it.

No; Available through high-radia. tion sampling system.

No; Radiation Chemistry might need it.

Analysis of Primary Coolant (Gamma Spectrum)

No; Available in high-radiation building.

No; Defer to director of Radiation Chemistr.y.

c No; We can get it from graph.

No; Station does this.

It works with EOF on the problem.

No; On-line instrument may not be available.

Emergency action levels based on other factors are available.

No; Available at station.

No; Not very familiar with this.

No; Radiation chemistry director has this.

No; Available through high-radiation sampling system.

No; Radiation chemistry might need it.

N j

s h

8 Y

=

Table 4 (continued)

Isolation Condenser System Shell-Side Water Level No; Available in control room.

No; Nice to know, but can get it from control room.

No; We can get it from graph.

No; Do not need it at EOF.

No; This is'not a piece of safety equipment.

No; This is part of cooling system.

Ask station for it.

Cannot answer.

No; Do not have or need.

Cannot answer.

Yes; Important and might want to trend in TSC.

Isolation Conden'ser System Valve Position No; Available in control room.

No; Nice to know, but can get it from control room.

No; We can get it from station.

No; Do not need it at EOF.

No; Not piece of safety equipment.

No; Only need to know system is running.

Control room has this.

No; No comment.

No; Do not have or need.

Cannot answer.

SLCS Storage Tank Level No; Available in the control room.

No; Nice to know, but can get it from control room.

No; We can get it from station.

No; Do not need at EOF.

No; Other parameters indirectly indicate performance of system.

No; It gets injected into system or it is still there.

Do not need this.

No; No comment.

No; Available in control room.

No; Available in control room.

Yes; Trend this in TSC for planning.

Cooling Water Temperature to ESF System Components No; Not needed.

No; Nice to know, but can get from control room.

No; Available at EOF on computer now.

No; Do not need at EOF.

No; We have suppression pool temperature.

9 L

Table 4 (continued)

Cooling Water Temperature to ESF System Components (continued)

No; Eomebody in EOF needs to know this.

Engineering evaluation can get it.

No; No comment.

No; Available in control rcom.

No; Available in control room.

No; Control room has it.

Cooling Water Flow to ESF System Components No; Available in the high-radiation sample building.

No; Nice to know, but can get elsewhere.

No; Not needed.

.No; Do not need at EOF.

No; Available in CR.

No; If I have temperature I know if I have flow.

No; No comment.

No; Do not need.

No; No comment.

No; If component's in control room, do not need.

High Radioactivity Liquid Tank Level No; Readily available from radiation waste.

No; Get this from Radiation Chemistry.

No; No comment.

No; Station has it.

No; Not necessary for safe operation.

No; Plant can get from radwaste system.

~

Cannot answer.

No; Available from Radiation Chemistry sample survey.

No; Available from radiation waste.

No; Radwaste tanks not needed.

Emergency Ventilation Damper Position C

No; Available in control room.

No; Nice to know, but can get elsewhere.

No; Available at station.

No; Station has it.

No; Pick up from other data.

No; Do not need information.

No; If information is available fairly readily in plant, do not need displays in TSC.

No; Available in control room.

No; Available in control room.

Mo; No comment.

10 L

\\

w

., ~

Table 4 (continued) j Status of Standby Power and Other Emergency Sources Important to Safety No; Available in control room.

No; Nice to,know, but can get from control room.

]

No; Available on computer in EOF.

No; Station has it.

J No; Pick up from other data.

Not necessary to have displays.

No; Do not need information.

Can get from TSC.

No; If information is available fairly readily in plant, do not need displays in TSC.

~

No; Available in control room.

No; Available in control room.

No; No comment.

All Other Identified Release Points Cannot answer.

No; Nice to know, but can get elsewhere.

No; Available on computer.

No; EOF has stack release.

No; Available in CR.

No; Available from TSC.

No; If information is available fairly readily in plant, do not need displays in TSC.

No; Available in control room.

Cannot answer.

No; Radiation Chemistry might need this but I don't.

Particulates and Halogens-All Identified Plant Release Points--

Sampling with On-site Analysis capability cannot answer.

No; Defer tJ Radiation Chemistry director.

No; Available at station.

C No; Site has this capability.

Station's responsibility.

No; Can get already.

No; Available from on-site.

No; If information is available fairly readily in plant, do not need displays in TSC.

No; Radiation Chemistry.

Cannot answer.

No; Radiation Chemistry might need this but I don't.

11 l-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20198E452&oldid=4100765"