L-99-006, Forwards Fitness for Duty Performance Data for six-month Period July 1998 Through Dec 1998,IAW 10CFR26.71(d): Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[L-99-006, LARs 220 & 88 to Licenses DPR-66 & NPF-73,revising Limiting Safety Sys Settings 2.2.1 & Associated Table 2.2-1,including Revising Nonconservative Trip Setpoints & Allowable Values]]
| number = ML20207D714
| issue date = 02/22/1999
| title = Forwards Fitness for Duty Performance Data for six-month Period July 1998 Through Dec 1998,IAW 10CFR26.71(d)
| author name = Morey D
| author affiliation = SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO.
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
| docket = 05000348, 05000364
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = NEL-99-0065, NEL-99-65, NUDOCS 9903100056
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 4
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-....
Dave Morey Southem Nuclear Vice President Operating Company Farley Projett P0. Box 1295 Birmingham, Alatwma 35201 Tel 205.992.5131 SOUTHERN February 22, 1999 COMPANY Energyto Serve YourWorld" Docket Nos. 50-348 NEL-99-0065 50-364 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
ATTN: DocumentControlDesk Washington,DC 20555 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant j
Fitness For Duty Performance Data Ladies and Gentlemen:
Scuthern Nuclear Operating Company (Southern Nuclear) hereby submits Fitness For
)
Duty Performance Data for the six-month reporting period, July 1998 through
)
December 1998, as required by 10 CFR 26.71(d). The data reflected in this report covers employees at the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant and the Southem Nuclear Corporate Headquarters. The data is summarized in the attached enclosures.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Respectfully submitted, fN D. N. Morey DNM/JMG : FFD Performance Data Sheets
; : Farley and Corporate FFD Program Summary cc: Southern Nuclear Operating Company A
Mr. L. M. Stinson, General Manager - Plant Farley cy U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. L. A. Reyes, Regional Administrator Mr. J. I. Zimmerman, Licensing Project Manager - Farley i
Mr. T. P. Johnson, Senior Resident Inspector - Farley j
9903100056 990222 7 PDR ADOCK 05000348 R
PDR s i
1
 
page 1 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Rnn+ horn Nuclear Onuratinn rnmnany 12/31/1998
: comw, e u sn n, Joseph Farley Nuclear Plant - Ashford, AL; Corporate Office - Birmingham, AL to n
Elizabeth A. McDougal (205)992-5707 Contact Name Phone (moues ares code)
Cutoffs: ScreervConfirmation (ng/mt)
X3 Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50i 15 Amphetamines
/
/
Cocaine
/
Phencyclidine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
/
Long-Term Short-Term Testing P.esults Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number witt Unescorted Access 1196 190 280 Categories Tested Poskive Tested Poshive Tested Postive Pre Access 45 0
50 0
888 5
[
Post accident 5
0 1
0 6
0 o
Obsernd behavior 7
0 0
0 0
0 Random 317 1
68 0
74 0
Folbw-up 14 0
2 0
16 0
return to work Other retest, Safety & Healtt 23 0
3 0
0 0
Total 411 1
124 0
.984 5
REv.1/92~
i
 
page 2 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Amphe-Phency-Flefusal Marikanas Cocaine Opiates tarmnes cidne Alcohol to Test 1
2 3
4 5,
Ucensee Eiis,xs 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
Long. Term Contracsors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Short-Term Contractors A
1 3
0 1
0 1
0 7
Total 1
3 0
1 0
2 0
7 i
i l
I I
i t
 
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant and Southern Nuclear Operating Company Corporate Headquarters Fitness For Duty Program Summary
)
f The data' generated under the Fitness For Duty (FFD) program from July 1998 through December 1998 has been reviewed and analyzed. The data reflected in this report covers workers, including contract personnel, at the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant and at the Southem Nuclear Operating Company Corporate Headquarters in Birmingham, Alabama.
i The random pool contains not only those badged for unescorted access, but also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and
)
may require unescorted access. Contractors without approved programs are included in the testing pool while on site. Testing during this time period was performed on a 1
nominal weekly basis to include swing shifts, weekends, and holidays. During this 1
testing period, the rate of testing was equal to 50% yearly of the total population.
In summarizing management actions associated with the FFD program, it should be emphasized that the incidents of confirming positive tests were very low. Consequently, management actions relative to determination of FFD have been limited. Contractor employees screened as positive are denied access and no further action is taken. Five short-term contractors at Plant Farley tested positive and were denied access.
Management actions taken on licensee employees during this six-month period included one Corporate Headquarters employee who tested positive for alcohol on a random screen and is currently undergoing rehabilitation.
Weekly quality control checks of the Fitness for Duty random pool revealed an error that occurred in late October during a single weekly computer run for the random pool. The i
error resulted in 46 contractors not being in the pool that should have been included and 19 contractors being included in the pool that should not have been. Those individuals that were not in the pool during the single run of the random pool contin'ad to be subject to the Continual Behavioral Observation Program and were unaware that they were not subject to that week's random drug screens. The process was revised to prevent recurrence. Subsequent pool checks confirmed that the process was performing as expected and only minor errors were detected thereafter.
Since 1996, employees who report a substance abuse related arrest submit to for-cause fitner: for duty testing and are referred for Employee Assistance evaluation by a mental health professional to determine if there is a substance abuse or other problem. For this reporting period, three licensee employees at Plant Farley were referred for evaluation,
)
underwent appropriate rehabilitation and were entered into the follow up pool for monitoring purposes.
i
,}}

Revision as of 07:33, 10 December 2024

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=L-99-006,_Forwards_Fitness_for_Duty_Performance_Data_for_six-month_Period_July_1998_Through_Dec_1998,IAW_10CFR26.71(d)&oldid=4087593"