ML20199L550: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | {{#Wiki_filter:.. | ||
DEC-10-1998 12:56 | DEC-10-1998 12:56 NRC 727 363 1339 P.22/04 A F F i R M_ A T I O N VOTE I | ||
RESPONSE SHEET TO: | |||
Jchn C. Hoyle, Secretary FROM: | |||
COMMISSIONER DIAZ | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
SECY-98-279 PARTIAL GRANTING OF PETITION FOR RULEMAKING SUBMITTED BY THE NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE (PRM-60-82) | SECY-98-279 PARTIAL GRANTING OF PETITION FOR RULEMAKING SUBMITTED BY THE NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE (PRM-60-82) | ||
Approved | X Approved Disapproved Abstain Not Participating l | ||
Abstain | l COMMENTS: | ||
Not Participating | |||
l | |||
l See attached comments. | l See attached comments. | ||
hY SIGNATURQ | hY SIGNATURQ | ||
) | |||
~ | |||
\\0,W DATE Entered on "AS" Yes No | |||
;;82"!82 M 38a" CORRESPONDENCE PDR q q oj > b DO | |||
DEC-10-1998 12*56 | DEC-10-1998 12*56 NRC 727 353 1339 P.03./04 1 | ||
CQMMISSIONER DIA2' COMMENTS ON SECY-98._279 I approve the staff's i=--- =4= den to publish the proposed Direct Final Rule and a companion Proposed Rule in the Federal Register Notice. I note that the permitted QA program changes are programmatic in nature and do not encourage the staff and the industry to be more risk-informed l | CQMMISSIONER DIA2' COMMENTS ON SECY-98._279 I approve the staff's i=--- =4= den to publish the proposed Direct Final Rule and a companion Proposed Rule in the Federal Register Notice. I note that the permitted QA program changes are programmatic in nature and do not encourage the staff and the industry to be more risk-informed l | ||
I also approve the staffs proposal to work with stakeholders and yid with a second l | in decision making which is what would permit giving reliefin a variety of day-to-day in-plant l | ||
new risk-informed threshold for QA program 4;; without prior NRC approval. I believe that the decision threshold should be # 3.s the cMi = would result in little or no adverse unpact on the overs!1 plant safety. As I have stated beibre, the fimdamental gwi.a should be for the equipment to have "the T !ity | activities such a maintenance, surveillance, and testing, as wcIl as licensee's QA program 4es. | ||
l | I also approve the staffs proposal to work with stakeholders and yid with a second l | ||
l | rd==": to develop a voluntary alternative to 50.54(a). The staff should strive to establish a 1 | ||
: 1. " . Safety Analysis Report without prior NRC approval, provided the change does not reduce the comunitments..." | new risk-informed threshold for QA program 4;; without prior NRC approval. I believe that the decision threshold should be # 3.s the cMi = would result in little or no adverse unpact on the overs!1 plant safety. As I have stated beibre, the fimdamental gwi.a should be for the equipment to have "the T !ity to perform the intended safety functions.'' Upon W | ||
l | e +;W of the current effort to unake ths 50.59 process more risk-informed, ennaderation should be given to whether the revised 50.59 process could be used by licensees to change their QA programs. | ||
and clar*=d==, spelling corrections..." | l I tecommend the following additions (in bold) to the proposed 50.54(aX3) language: | ||
J I 'c-l J | l | ||
: 1. ". Safety Analysis Report without prior NRC approval, provided the change does not reduce the comunitments..." | |||
l | |||
: 2. 'In addition to quality assurance program Mes involving adminiserettva impnsvements and clar*=d==, spelling corrections..." J I 'c-l J | |||
1 | |||
? | ? | ||
t i | |||
l l | l l | ||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 03:50, 8 December 2024
| ML20199L550 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/10/1998 |
| From: | Diaz N NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Hoyle J NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20199L527 | List: |
| References | |
| SECY-98-279-C, NUDOCS 9901280049 | |
| Download: ML20199L550 (2) | |
Text
..
DEC-10-1998 12:56 NRC 727 363 1339 P.22/04 A F F i R M_ A T I O N VOTE I
RESPONSE SHEET TO:
Jchn C. Hoyle, Secretary FROM:
COMMISSIONER DIAZ
SUBJECT:
SECY-98-279 PARTIAL GRANTING OF PETITION FOR RULEMAKING SUBMITTED BY THE NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE (PRM-60-82)
X Approved Disapproved Abstain Not Participating l
l COMMENTS:
l See attached comments.
hY SIGNATURQ
)
~
\\0,W DATE Entered on "AS" Yes No
- 82"!82 M 38a" CORRESPONDENCE PDR q q oj > b DO
DEC-10-1998 12*56 NRC 727 353 1339 P.03./04 1
CQMMISSIONER DIA2' COMMENTS ON SECY-98._279 I approve the staff's i=--- =4= den to publish the proposed Direct Final Rule and a companion Proposed Rule in the Federal Register Notice. I note that the permitted QA program changes are programmatic in nature and do not encourage the staff and the industry to be more risk-informed l
in decision making which is what would permit giving reliefin a variety of day-to-day in-plant l
activities such a maintenance, surveillance, and testing, as wcIl as licensee's QA program 4es.
I also approve the staffs proposal to work with stakeholders and yid with a second l
rd==": to develop a voluntary alternative to 50.54(a). The staff should strive to establish a 1
new risk-informed threshold for QA program 4;; without prior NRC approval. I believe that the decision threshold should be # 3.s the cMi = would result in little or no adverse unpact on the overs!1 plant safety. As I have stated beibre, the fimdamental gwi.a should be for the equipment to have "the T !ity to perform the intended safety functions. Upon W
e +;W of the current effort to unake ths 50.59 process more risk-informed, ennaderation should be given to whether the revised 50.59 process could be used by licensees to change their QA programs.
l I tecommend the following additions (in bold) to the proposed 50.54(aX3) language:
l
- 1. ". Safety Analysis Report without prior NRC approval, provided the change does not reduce the comunitments..."
l
- 2. 'In addition to quality assurance program Mes involving adminiserettva impnsvements and clar*=d==, spelling corrections..." J I 'c-l J
1
?
t i
l l
-