ML20210K884: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:July 31.1997
{{#Wiki_filter:July 31.1997
  '7.C
'7.C EN 97-065 cc 0FFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
  . cc 0FFICE OF ENFORCEMENT EN 97-065
-NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT ENFORCEMENT ACTION (icensee:
                                  -NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT ENFORCEMENT ACTION (icensee:     PECO Energy Company -(EAs 97-050: 97-115)
PECO Energy Company -(EAs 97-050: 97-115)
Limerick Generating Station. Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. 50-352: 50-353 PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY - $80,000-fub.iect:-
Limerick Generating Station. Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. 50-352: 50-353 fub.iect:-
This is to inform the Commission that a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of $80,000 will be issued on or L             about August 5. 1997. to PECO Energy Company. The action includes two violations inv31ving-instances of record falsification at the Limerick -
PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY - $80,000-This is to inform the Commission that a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of $80,000 will be issued on or L
r           -Generating-Station. In the first violation, a chemistry technician and a l
about August 5. 1997. to PECO Energy Company. The action includes two violations inv31ving-instances of record falsification at the Limerick -
former chemist, at the direction of the former chemistry manager, deliberately falsified a record of the time a grab sample was taken from the Reactor Enclosure Cooling Water system. The former chemistry manager also pressured the-technician and chemist to lie about their actions to licensee security personnel investigating.the matter. .In the second violation, a fire protection technical assistant deliberately failed to perform a fire hose station visual inspection surveillance test, yet falsified the surveillance test document to indicate the test was performed. The violations were categorized in the aggregate as a Severity Level 11 problem.
r
In accordance with the. Enforcement Policy, a base civil penalty in the amount of $80.000 is considered for a Severity Level II. PEC0 was given credit for both identifying the violations and corrective actions, the latter being considered prompt and comprehensive.         However, the Enforcement Policy provides that civil penalties are normally proposed for willful violations. Therefore a civil penalty is being proposed at the base level of $80,000. In addition to this action, orders are being issued against the former chemistry manager and chemistry: technician, that prohibits their involvement in licensed activities for a period of 5 years and 3 years, respectively.
-Generating-Station.
In the first violation, a chemistry technician and a l
former chemist, at the direction of the former chemistry manager, deliberately falsified a record of the time a grab sample was taken from the Reactor Enclosure Cooling Water system. The former chemistry manager also pressured the-technician and chemist to lie about their actions to licensee security personnel investigating.the matter..In the second violation, a fire protection technical assistant deliberately failed to perform a fire hose station visual inspection surveillance test, yet falsified the surveillance test document to indicate the test was performed. The violations were categorized in the aggregate as a Severity Level 11 problem.
In accordance with the. Enforcement Policy, a base civil penalty in the amount of $80.000 is considered for a Severity Level II.
PEC0 was given credit for both identifying the violations and corrective actions, the latter being considered prompt and comprehensive.
However, the Enforcement Policy provides that civil penalties are normally proposed for willful violations. Therefore a civil penalty is being proposed at the base level of $80,000.
In addition to this action, orders are being issued against the former chemistry manager and chemistry: technician, that prohibits their involvement in licensed activities for a period of 5 years and 3 years, respectively.
It should be noted that the licensee has not been specifically informed of the enforcement action. The-schedule of issuance and notification is:
It should be noted that the licensee has not been specifically informed of the enforcement action. The-schedule of issuance and notification is:
Mailing of Notice                               August 5.-1997 Telephone Notification of Licensee               August 5. 1997
Mailing of Notice August 5.-1997 Telephone Notification of Licensee August 5. 1997
            - The State of Pennsylvania will be notified.
- The State of Pennsylvania will be notified.
The licensee has thirty days from the date of the Notice in which to respond.
The licensee has thirty days from the date of the Notice in which to respond.
Following NRC evaluation of the response, the civil penalty may be remitted,
Following NRC evaluation of the response, the civil penalty may be remitted,
        ,  _-mitigated. or imposed by Order.
_-mitigated. or imposed by Order.
      -{ Contacts: M. Satorius, OE. (301)-415-2741 J. Lieberman, OE, (301) 415-2741 n
-{ Contacts: M. Satorius, OE. (301)-415-2741 J. Lieberman, OE, (301) 415-2741 n
    -9       Distribution I       -OWFN                   0WFN         TWFN-             Regional Offices Chairman Jackson EDO                 OC                 RI           RIV 4n       Comm.=Dicus             DEDE.       AE00               RII         WCF0-
-9 Distribution I
      *oW 8 Comm. Diaz               OE           OP CTR             RIII q    Comm.= McGaffigan OGC               NMSS
-OWFN 0WFN TWFN-Regional Offices Chairman Jackson EDO OC RI RIV 4n Comm.=Dicus DEDE.
      @to o SECY                     NRR         IRM               Mall R$1     OCA                     01         -OIG               NUDOCS
AE00 RII WCF0-
:S u - GPA                       SP           RES-               PUBLIC ACRS                                               S
* W 8 Comm. Diaz OE OP CTR RIII o
                                                                                                      \
@to o Comm.= McGaffigan OGC NMSS q
n, m , ,       PRELIMINARY INFORMATION-- NOT FOR-PUBLIC DISCLOSURE UNTIL                 \
SECY NRR IRM Mall R$1 OCA 01
x               VERIFICATION THAT LICENSEE HAS RECEIVED ACTION}}
-OIG NUDOCS
:S u - GPA SP RES-PUBLIC S
ACRS
\\
n, m,,
PRELIMINARY INFORMATION-- NOT FOR-PUBLIC DISCLOSURE UNTIL
\\
x VERIFICATION THAT LICENSEE HAS RECEIVED ACTION
*}}

Latest revision as of 02:18, 6 December 2024

EN-97-065:on 970805,notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $80,000 Issued to Licensee.Action Includes Two Violations Involving Instances of Record Falsification at Limerick Generating Station
ML20210K884
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  
Issue date: 07/31/1997
From: Lieberman J, Satorius M
NRC OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT (OE)
To:
References
EA-97-050, EA-97-115, EA-97-50, EN-97-065, EN-97-65, NUDOCS 9708200148
Download: ML20210K884 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:July 31.1997 '7.C EN 97-065 cc 0FFICE OF ENFORCEMENT -NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT ENFORCEMENT ACTION (icensee: PECO Energy Company -(EAs 97-050: 97-115) Limerick Generating Station. Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. 50-352: 50-353 fub.iect:- PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY - $80,000-This is to inform the Commission that a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of $80,000 will be issued on or L about August 5. 1997. to PECO Energy Company. The action includes two violations inv31ving-instances of record falsification at the Limerick - r -Generating-Station. In the first violation, a chemistry technician and a l former chemist, at the direction of the former chemistry manager, deliberately falsified a record of the time a grab sample was taken from the Reactor Enclosure Cooling Water system. The former chemistry manager also pressured the-technician and chemist to lie about their actions to licensee security personnel investigating.the matter..In the second violation, a fire protection technical assistant deliberately failed to perform a fire hose station visual inspection surveillance test, yet falsified the surveillance test document to indicate the test was performed. The violations were categorized in the aggregate as a Severity Level 11 problem. In accordance with the. Enforcement Policy, a base civil penalty in the amount of $80.000 is considered for a Severity Level II. PEC0 was given credit for both identifying the violations and corrective actions, the latter being considered prompt and comprehensive. However, the Enforcement Policy provides that civil penalties are normally proposed for willful violations. Therefore a civil penalty is being proposed at the base level of $80,000. In addition to this action, orders are being issued against the former chemistry manager and chemistry: technician, that prohibits their involvement in licensed activities for a period of 5 years and 3 years, respectively. It should be noted that the licensee has not been specifically informed of the enforcement action. The-schedule of issuance and notification is: Mailing of Notice August 5.-1997 Telephone Notification of Licensee August 5. 1997 - The State of Pennsylvania will be notified. The licensee has thirty days from the date of the Notice in which to respond. Following NRC evaluation of the response, the civil penalty may be remitted, _-mitigated. or imposed by Order. -{ Contacts: M. Satorius, OE. (301)-415-2741 J. Lieberman, OE, (301) 415-2741 n -9 Distribution I -OWFN 0WFN TWFN-Regional Offices Chairman Jackson EDO OC RI RIV 4n Comm.=Dicus DEDE. AE00 RII WCF0-

  • W 8 Comm. Diaz OE OP CTR RIII o

@to o Comm.= McGaffigan OGC NMSS q SECY NRR IRM Mall R$1 OCA 01 -OIG NUDOCS

S u - GPA SP RES-PUBLIC S

ACRS \\ n, m,, PRELIMINARY INFORMATION-- NOT FOR-PUBLIC DISCLOSURE UNTIL \\ x VERIFICATION THAT LICENSEE HAS RECEIVED ACTION

  • }}