ML20215K882: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:, | {{#Wiki_filter:, | ||
bMM | bMM May 4, 1987 catxE n e U3NHC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 87 tiAY -5 P3 :34 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOAgicE u nat ur y HEliNJ 4 SEavfCf. | ||
BRANCH In the Matter of | BRANCH In the Matter of | ||
) | |||
LONG ISLAND LIGIITING COMPANY | ) | ||
LONG ISLAND LIGIITING COMPANY | |||
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, | ) | ||
Unit 1) | Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 | ||
) | |||
(Emergency Planning) | |||
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, | |||
) | |||
Unit 1) | |||
) | |||
NRC STAFF RESPONSE TO LILCO MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF EDWARD P. RADFORD, ET AL. | NRC STAFF RESPONSE TO LILCO MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF EDWARD P. RADFORD, ET AL. | ||
On April 18, 1987 LILCO filed its " Motion to Strike Testimony of Radford et al." (" Motion"). | On April 18, 1987 LILCO filed its " Motion to Strike Testimony of Radford et al." | ||
(" Motion"). | |||
The Motion seeks to strike portions of the Radford testimony filed by Suffolk County pn April 13,1987 II on the grounds it is outside the scope of the instant proceeding because it has been litigated previously in this proceeding. | |||
The Staff supports LILCO's Motion in this regard as clearly the | The Staff supports LILCO's Motion in this regard as clearly the | ||
-issue regarding hostile or agressive behavior by the public has been been examined in detail during the previous litigation of this proceeding. 2,/ | |||
Further, Intervenors have not sought to to reopen this issue, nor is this an issue which has been defined as one of the issues in this | Further, Intervenors have not sought to to reopen this issue, nor is this an issue which has been defined as one of the issues in this | ||
'-1/ | |||
Saegert , James H. Johnson, David Harris and Martin Mayer on Behalf of Suffolk County Concerning LILCO's Reception Centers | " Testimony of Edward P. | ||
(Monitoring and Decontamination Procedures)" ("Radford testimony"). | Radford, Gregory C. | ||
Minor, Susan C. | |||
2_/ | Saegert, James H. | ||
e70512o022 870504 PDR | Johnson, David Harris and Martin Mayer on Behalf of Suffolk County Concerning LILCO's Reception Centers (Monitoring and Decontamination Procedures)" ("Radford testimony"). | ||
] | |||
2_/ | |||
LBP-85-12, 21 NRC 644, 793-794, 800-801. | |||
e70512o022 870504 PDR ADOCK 05000322 PDR g | |||
g i | |||
? | |||
proceeding. EI Therefore, the Staff agrees that the portions of the Radford testimony cited in LILCO's Motion should be stricken. | |||
proceeding. EI | Respectfully submitted, 9 | ||
Respectfully submitted, 9 | |||
Richard G. Bachmann Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 4th day of May,1987 l | Richard G. Bachmann Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 4th day of May,1987 l | ||
-3/ | |||
See Memorandum and Order (Rulings on LILCO Motion to Reopen Record and Remand of Coliseum Issue), dated December 11, 1986. | See Memorandum and Order (Rulings on LILCO Motion to Reopen Record and Remand of Coliseum Issue), dated December 11, 1986. | ||
l l | l l | ||
r | r | ||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 21:46, 3 December 2024
| ML20215K882 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/04/1987 |
| From: | Bachmann R NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215K885 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#287-3384 OL-3, NUDOCS 8705120022 | |
| Download: ML20215K882 (2) | |
Text
,
bMM May 4, 1987 catxE n e U3NHC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 87 tiAY -5 P3 :34 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOAgicE u nat ur y HEliNJ 4 SEavfCf.
BRANCH In the Matter of
)
)
LONG ISLAND LIGIITING COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-322-OL-3
)
(Emergency Planning)
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,
)
Unit 1)
)
NRC STAFF RESPONSE TO LILCO MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF EDWARD P. RADFORD, ET AL.
On April 18, 1987 LILCO filed its " Motion to Strike Testimony of Radford et al."
(" Motion").
The Motion seeks to strike portions of the Radford testimony filed by Suffolk County pn April 13,1987 II on the grounds it is outside the scope of the instant proceeding because it has been litigated previously in this proceeding.
The Staff supports LILCO's Motion in this regard as clearly the
-issue regarding hostile or agressive behavior by the public has been been examined in detail during the previous litigation of this proceeding. 2,/
Further, Intervenors have not sought to to reopen this issue, nor is this an issue which has been defined as one of the issues in this
'-1/
" Testimony of Edward P.
Radford, Gregory C.
Minor, Susan C.
Saegert, James H.
Johnson, David Harris and Martin Mayer on Behalf of Suffolk County Concerning LILCO's Reception Centers (Monitoring and Decontamination Procedures)" ("Radford testimony").
]
2_/
LBP-85-12, 21 NRC 644, 793-794, 800-801.
e70512o022 870504 PDR ADOCK 05000322 PDR g
g i
?
proceeding. EI Therefore, the Staff agrees that the portions of the Radford testimony cited in LILCO's Motion should be stricken.
Respectfully submitted, 9
Richard G. Bachmann Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 4th day of May,1987 l
-3/
See Memorandum and Order (Rulings on LILCO Motion to Reopen Record and Remand of Coliseum Issue), dated December 11, 1986.
l l
r
-