ML20234B123

Final Response to FOIA Request.App C Documents Re Evaluation of RESAR-SP/90 Completely Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5)

ML20234B123
Person / Time
Site:	05000601
Issue date:	06/29/1987
From:	Grimsley D NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
To:	Gorman K AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
FOIA-87-309 NUDOCS 8707020239
Download: ML20234B123 (4)

Text

U.S. NUCLEA3 CEGULATORY C:MMISS11N

=ac 500 REOVt51 NUMBE4Si g

F01A-87-309

• p "'%A A

s.E54 0ASE f v, E

/,

y-X I "^'

l I ""

. i, RESPONSE TD FREEDOM OF k}4 -

/

INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST Of O JUN 2 91997

\\e e

ox. n ~m..E.

i i, e_e_

REQUESTER Ms. Kay L. Gorman PART 4.-RECORDS RELEASED OR NOT LOCATED (See checked bones)

No agency records subsect to the request have been located.

N;i additonal agency records subsect to the request have been located Agency records subject to the request that are identifeed in Appendix are already avaeiable for public inspection and copying in the NRC Public Documer't Room, 1717 H Street, N W., Washington, DC.

Agency records subsect to the request that are adentified m Appendix.

are being made available for public inspection and copying in the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N W., Washington, DC in a folder under ths FOIA number and requester name The nonproprotary verseon of the proposaH4) that you agreed to accept m a telephone conversation with a member of my f ta*f a now being made available for public inspection and coying at the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street. N W, Washington, DC, in a folder under this FOIA number and requester name.

Enclosed is information on how you may obtain access to ar the charges for copying records placed in the NRC Public Document Room.1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC.

Agency records subject to tne request are enclosed. Any esplicable charge for copies of the records prowded and payment pr.adures are noted in the comments secton.

Records subject to the request have been referred to another Federal agency (es) for review and direct response to you in view of NRC's response to this request, no further action is being taken on appealletter dated PART ll.A-INFORMATION WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Certain informaton in the requested records e being withheld from pubke disclosure pursuant to the FOlA exemptions described in and for the reasons stated in Part fl. sec-tons B, C, and D. Any released portions of the documents for which only part of the record is being withheld are being made available for public inspection and copyirg in X

the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington. DC, in a folder under ths FOIA number and requester name.

Comments 8707020239 870629 PDR FOM PDR GORMAN87-309 A

A UR$, DIRfCTO41. DIV' l'

Of RVL(5

' ECORDS W

Q NRC FIRM 464 iPan h is 36i l

I..

FZEEDOM OF INFOIMATION ACT CESPONSE FotA NUMBER!S)87-309 ouE 399 2 9 m, PAMT 11 B-APPLICABLE FOIA EXEMPTIONS Records subject to the request that are desenbed in the enclosed Appendsces C

are being withheld in their entirety or en part under FOIA Ex:mptions and for the reasons set forth below pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and 10 CFR 9 5(al of NRC Regulations.

l L The withheld information is properly classif.ed pursuant to Esecutive Order 12356 (EXEMPTION tl 2 The withheld information relates solely to the mternal personriel rules and procedures of NRC. (EXEMPTION 21 3 The withheld mformatson is specifcally esempted from public disclosure by statute Indicated. (EXEMPTION 3)

Secten 141145 of the Atomic Energy Act which prohibits the declosure of Restricted Data or Formetty Resticted Data (42 U.S C. 21612165L

$"4 Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act whch prohibits the disclosure of Unclassifed Safeguards information 142 U.S C. 2167L 9

4. The withheld information is a trade secret or commercial or financial information that is being withheld for the reason (s) andcated. (EXEMPTION di The information is considered to be confidential business (propretary) information.

)

The information as considesed to be propnetary informaton pursuant to to CFR 2.790(dH1h The informaton was submitted and received in confidence from a foreign source pursuant to 10 CFR 2 790(d)(2L X

5. The withheld information consets of interagency or intraagency records that are not available through discovery during litigatiot D$closu'e of predecisenal information would tend to inhibit the open and frank enchange of ideas essential to the deliberative process. Where records e 4 withheld m their endrety, the facts are inestrcabt; intertwmed with the predecisional information. There also are no reasonably segregable f actual portions because the release of the facts wced permit en indirect inquiry mto the predecisenal process of the egency. IEXEMPilON b)

6. The withheld information is exempted from public declosure because its disclosure would result in a clearly unwarranted invassor. of persorial privacy. (EXEMPTION 6i

7. The withheld informaton conessts of investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes and is being withheld for the reasonis) mdicated (EXEMPTION 7)

Disclosure would interiore with en enforcement proceeding because it could reveal the scope, direction. end focus of enforcement eHorts. and thus could possibly allow them to take action to sheid potentral wrongdoing or a violaten of NRC requirements from investigators IEXEMP%ON 71 An Disclosure would const1ute en unwar' anted invasion of pe'sonal privacy (EXEMPTION hcl)

The informaton consets of names of iridividuals and other information the disclosure of whsch would reveal identitses of confidential sources (EXEMPTION 7(D0 P ART ll.C-DENYING OFFICIALS Pursuant to 10 CFR 9 9 and 'or 915 of the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Comme.sion regulations. it has been determined that the information withheld a enempt from production or disclosve.

and th:1 its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest. The persons respotisible for the denial are those offic.als identifed below as denying officials and the ' sector.

Divbon of Rules and Records. Offee of Adminstration. for any cemals that tr.my be appealed to the Executive Director for Operatens iEcoi DENYING OFFICIAL TIT LE /OF FICE l

RECORDS DENIED APPELLATE OFFICI. L l

Directer Office of

="^av

'm s

{. Thomas E. Murley Nuclear Reactor Regulat ion Appendix C l

l I

l f

t PAFtT 11 D-APPEAL RIGHTS The denial by each denying officia' identified in Part li.C may be appealed to the Appellate Official identified iri that section. Any such appeal must be in wnting and must be made within 30 days of receipt of this response. Appeals must be addressed as appropriate to the Executive Director for Operations or to the Secretary of the Commission. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter th t it is an Appeal from an initial FOIA Decision."

enac poaM ese IPert 2)

U.6. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION isam FOIA RESPONSE CONTINUATION I

i

F01A-87-309 APPENDIX C 1.

7/11/83 Memo to Brian W. Shercn, Chief, Reactor Systems Branch, DS:

from Walter R. Butler, Chief, Containnent Systems Branch,DSI

Subject:

CSB Evaluatior. of Westinghouse APWR Primary Side Safeguards Systems Modules (5 pages) 2.

7/24/84 Memo to Dennis Crutchfield, AD for Safety Assessment, Divi-sion of Licensing from R. Wayne Houston, AD for Reactor Safety, Division of Systems Integration,

Subject:

SER Input for RESAR-50/90, Module 2, Regulatory Conformance (9 pages) 3.

7/31/84 Memo to D. Crutchfield, AD for Safety Assessment, Division of Licensing from R. Wayne Houston, AS for Reactor Safety, Divi-sion of Systems Integration,

Subject:

CSB SER Input on Module 2, " Regulatory Conformance".(6pages) 4.

2/6/85 Memo to D. M. Crutchfield, AD for Safety Assessment, DL from L. S. Rubenstein, AD for Core and Plant Systems, DSI

Subject:

Review of Module 5 of RESAR-SP/90 (WAPWR)

(42 pt.ges) 5.

2/8/85 Memo to Dennis M. Crutchfield, AD for Safety Assessment, DL from Daniel R. Muller, AD for Radiation Protection, DSI

Subject:

RESAR-SP/90, APWR Module 6 and 8 Review (1 page) 6.

3/5/85 Memo for Dennis M. Crutchfield, AD for Safety Assessment, DL from Robert J. Bosnak, Acting AD for Components and Struc-tures Engineering, DE

Subject:

Review of RESAR-SP/90, Ad-vanced Pressurized Water Reactor, Standard Plant Design, Module 3, Introduction / Site, March 1984 (2 pages) 7.

3/11/85 Memo for Dennis M. Crutchfield, AD for Safety Assessment DL from William V. Johnston, AD, Materials, Chemical & Environ-mental Technology, DE

Subject:

RESAR-SP/90 Review (2 pages) 8.

3/28/85 Memo to Dennis M. Crutchfield, AD for Safety Assessment, DL from Daniel R. Muller, AD for Radiation Protection, DSI

Subject:

SER Input from the Accident Evaluation Branch for Module 1 of RESAR-SP/90 (2 pages) 9.

4/12/85 Memo to Cecil 0. Thomas, Standardization & Special Projects Branch, from B. D. Liaw, Chief, Materials Engineering Branch,

Subject:

Draft SER for Westinghouse Advanced Pres-surized Water Reactor 4.5.1, 4.5.2, 5.2.3, 5.3.1 (Materials

& Fabrication) 5.4.2.1, 6.1.1, and 10.3.6 (21 pages)

10. 5/20/85 Memo to D. M. Crutchfield, AD for Safety Assessment, DL from L. S. Rubenstein, AD for Core & Plant Systems, DSI, Subject Review of Module 5 RESAR-SP/90 (WAPWR), Section 4.2 (4 pages)

11. 7/12/85 Memo to Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief, Standardization & Special Projects Branch, Division of Licensing from B. D. Liaw, Chief l

Materials Engineering Branch, Division of Engineering,

Subject:

Draft SER for Westinghouse Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor Module 1 (Section 6.1.1)

(5 pages)

F0iA-87-309 APPENDIX C

'12.

8/19/85 Memo to Dernis M. Crutchfield, Assistart Director fcr Safety Assessment, Division of Licensing frcn William V. Jchnston, Assistant Director, Materials, Chemical & Envircemental Technology, Division of Engineering,

Subject:

RESAR-SP/90 Review (22 pages) l

13. 8/23/85 Meno to Dennis M. Crutchfield,- AD for Safety Assessment.

l Division of Licensing from Robert J. B:snak, Acting AD Com-

~

ponents & Structures Engineering, Division of Engineering, i

Subject:

Westinghouse Advanced PWR (WAPWR) SER Input on Ref-erence Safety Evaluation Report (RESAR-SP/90) Module # 7 on Equipment Qualification -(8 pages) i

14. 8/28/85 Memo to Dennis M. Crutchfield, AD Safety Assessment, Division of Licensing from William V. Johnston, AD Materials, Chemic al

& Environmental Technology, Division of Engineering,

Subject:

Safety Evaluation for RESAR-SP/90 (9pages)

15. 4/4/86 Memo to Vincent Noonan, Director, PWR Project Directorate No.5, Division of PWR Licensing-A from Charles E. Rossi, /D PWR-A, Division of PWR Licensing-A,

Subject:

Westinghouse Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (RESAR-SP/90)

(4 pages)

16. 4/10/87 Memo to Victor Nerses, Acting Director, PWR Project Director-acte 5, Division of PWR Licensing-A from Charles E. Rossi, AD, Division of PWR Licensing-A,

Subject:

Westinghouse RESAR-SP/90 (WAPWR) Draf t Safety Evaluation Report Input, Module 11 (15 pages)

17. 4/30/87 Letter to Mr. W. J. Johnson, Manager, Nuclear Safety Depart-ment, Westinghouse Electric Corporation f rom Thomas J. Kenyon, Project Manager, NRR,

Subject:

Draft Reports Regarding ) Prob-abilistic Safety Study for the RESAR-SP/90 (312 pages

18. Undated 7.0 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS (37pages)

19. Undated Draft Enclosure 1, Safety Evaluation by the Reactor Systems Branch PWR-A for RESAR-SP/90 Module 3. " Introduction and Site" (23pages)

I l

l l

l 4

)

I

1 i

.~.

k. G0rmall 9 !.

i rv.,r :. ~.a : a k c:/,, ".v../vc D1aol

\\

I Teintv c n Ey.,7070 June 1, 1987 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION b N6CT EQUEST Chief Division of Rules and Records

@ %"[)W 7"

Office of Administration US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dear Sirs Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act will you please make available in the Public Document Room a momo dated March 19, 1987 which details the status of the RESAR-SP/90 review? I would also appreciate having available the Safety Evaluations which are referred to in that memo.

I thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,.

i, s> n %

Kay Lk Gorman 1

. r. _-

v,r n y

y.

l