ML20235J814: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:METSYS AT A | ||
g 6 | |||
n 8 | n 8 | ||
D | D 9 | ||
E | i f | ||
E | E S) e 1 | ||
i E | |||
D r | |||
.E | 5 Y | ||
E B | |||
E | 2 O | ||
N h | |||
L | |||
( | |||
C c | |||
P R | |||
ar M | |||
N M | |||
.E R | |||
A E | |||
L C | L C | ||
UN andse! | |||
andse! | m* !es | ||
m* | ? | ||
mt Dy % y9 t | |||
Dy % y9 | II i.' | ||
5 | |||
d NEDS EMPLOYEE SYSTEM PRESENTATION i | d NEDS EMPLOYEE SYSTEM PRESENTATION i | ||
: 1. HISTORY TASK FORCE PILOT UTILITY GROUP SUBCOMMITTEES | : 1. HISTORY TASK FORCE PILOT UTILITY GROUP SUBCOMMITTEES | ||
) | |||
l | l | ||
: 2. OBJECTIVES CONCEPT OF OPERAT10N INFORMATION | : 2. OBJECTIVES CONCEPT OF OPERAT10N INFORMATION | ||
: 3. SECURITY | ) | ||
ADVANTAGES ELEENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA | : 3. SECURITY ADVANTAGES ELEENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA | ||
: 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE / AUDITS | : 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE / AUDITS l | ||
PARTICIPANT INTER-UTIL ITY NON-EDS PARTICIPANT | |||
: 5. IMPLEMENTATION | : 5. IMPLEMENTATION | ||
: 6. QUEST 10N AND ANSWER I | : 6. QUEST 10N AND ANSWER I | ||
I | I | ||
~ | |||
SE Y | |||
V | |||
'l I | |||
h I | |||
T E | |||
O L | |||
A Y C I | |||
I L T l | |||
h h | |||
I P | I P | ||
A A 1' | |||
A 1 | |||
G A U b G E L R I | |||
h G E S A U S | |||
I R | |||
L E U S l | |||
I | E D G O | ||
k O S D k L | |||
P A | |||
O I | |||
O | E O | ||
P R | |||
Y 2 | C i | ||
E E | |||
I'I A h T k T O I | |||
L | |||
'I' h O A | |||
E | I I | ||
Y | l T R E | ||
O | D T 1 | ||
L | h C E M | ||
P | C'I A | ||
'L h | |||
E G L S P A L R O | |||
J A A D O 0 O l | |||
T C | |||
M | O N E E L l k P II O | ||
L | R A 1 | ||
h E h I | |||
R L | |||
S | G P h V O h O I | ||
h | h E C O C N | ||
L T | P l | ||
Y | D C | ||
O k | |||
I S | |||
E T | |||
D E | |||
A E | |||
I G | |||
Y 2 | |||
h S' | |||
L S | |||
h T | |||
I A | |||
h C l | |||
I h | |||
C T | |||
I h | |||
R A | |||
A I | |||
L S l | |||
U T | |||
G D | |||
A Y A | |||
C A | |||
H E | |||
E H R | |||
E D | |||
G N | |||
h P | |||
'I S | |||
E T | |||
E h | |||
Y E | |||
O M | |||
L P | |||
P O | |||
S M | |||
L L E E | |||
E A V V | |||
h I | |||
k E | |||
h O | |||
'I A | |||
D O | |||
I A | |||
E I | |||
'l I | |||
L A | |||
'h | |||
) | |||
l C | |||
S A | |||
E Z E U | |||
D l | |||
C I | |||
S A | |||
E h | |||
H h E A | |||
E 0 | |||
A H d. | |||
F G P | |||
( | |||
t k E M | |||
L K | |||
O h E | |||
l' S | |||
*1 h | |||
A S | |||
I I | |||
Y S | |||
S S | |||
D E | |||
E V | |||
h I | |||
L T Y A A I | |||
h " | |||
l I | |||
O h L | |||
I E | |||
1 G S 1 E E U h k P Ek | |||
NEDS OBJECTIVES 0 | NEDS OBJECTIVES 0 | ||
TO ESTABLISH A COMPUTER BASED INFORMT10N SYSTEM THAT WILL PROVIDE TRANSIENT WORKER IN-PROCESSING INFORmTION FOR UNESCORTED ACCESS TO NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES BY: | |||
EXPEDITING INPROCESSING OF TRANSlENT WORKERS MINIMlZING IMPACT OF CHANGE AND CURRENT l | |||
OPERATIONS EFFECTING SIGNIFICANT COST SAVINGS | |||
\\ | |||
9 i | 9 i | ||
i | i | ||
a E | a ECNARAE G | ||
C N | L N | ||
C I | |||
N D | |||
I N | |||
Y A, | |||
A R | |||
R G | |||
O T | |||
N N | |||
Y T | |||
I O | |||
R S | |||
N N | |||
I O | |||
I O | |||
I D | |||
T T | |||
S I | |||
A I | |||
I E | |||
A S | |||
N T | |||
R R | |||
C I | |||
E O | |||
C T | |||
I I | |||
I R | |||
I E | |||
I U | |||
F U | |||
T T | |||
E Q | |||
I S | |||
S A | |||
O E | |||
E T | |||
S O | |||
N R | |||
Y S | |||
R N | |||
E P | |||
I P | |||
O D | |||
E C | |||
X M | |||
L E | |||
A D | |||
C E | |||
A Y | |||
P N | |||
T I | |||
A X | |||
R N | |||
A N | |||
E O | |||
E D | |||
L Y | |||
O T | |||
A T | |||
I L | |||
A L | |||
S N | |||
I T | |||
A R | A R | ||
A | A O | ||
O R | |||
A C | |||
I R | |||
E S | |||
U I | |||
I P | |||
E N | |||
R C | |||
D D | |||
S N | |||
E E | |||
A E | |||
E E | |||
P S | |||
R M | |||
R G | |||
E | |||
P | |||
ii> | ii> | ||
e e S | e e | ||
E S | |||
TN M | |||
ER E | |||
I Y | |||
C U | |||
T R | |||
O I | |||
O E | |||
L F | |||
R I | |||
B K | |||
Y F | |||
A R | |||
T O | |||
E O | |||
T I | |||
C W | |||
N R | |||
N A | |||
E U | |||
O R | |||
F M | |||
C I | |||
T O | |||
E E | |||
T G | |||
S A | |||
N Y | |||
A Z | |||
O T | |||
N I | |||
I I | |||
A D | |||
T L | |||
M R | |||
A I | |||
A M | |||
B D | |||
D R | |||
A R | |||
N O | |||
I O | |||
A F | |||
L C | |||
T N | |||
E E | |||
S I | |||
R R | |||
N T | |||
O h | |||
I E | |||
T M | |||
N A | |||
S O | |||
T S | |||
I Y | |||
U E | |||
T S | |||
R Y | |||
P S | |||
A T | |||
O R | |||
Y E | |||
E S | |||
V N | |||
T O | |||
R C | |||
R A | |||
R E | |||
S T | |||
O I | |||
E M | |||
I S | |||
T V | |||
D L | |||
S E | |||
l I | |||
S R | |||
N A | |||
B l | |||
L l | |||
I E | |||
A C | |||
O l | |||
E T | E T | ||
S I | |||
l l | |||
N N | |||
R G | |||
L G | |||
E O | |||
L Y | |||
E O | |||
l | A N | ||
N I | |||
A R | |||
T L | |||
U I | |||
Y T | |||
N A | |||
C 0 | |||
N N | |||
O A | |||
I T | |||
A I | |||
l i | |||
E L | |||
C M | |||
I R | |||
C T | |||
E P | |||
U I | |||
L A | |||
Y N | |||
R M | |||
D R | |||
I S | |||
O l | |||
i C | |||
E E | |||
C M | |||
C P | |||
C S | |||
9 O | 9 O | ||
| Line 145: | Line 408: | ||
r l | r l | ||
QUALITY ASSURANCE / AUDITS l | QUALITY ASSURANCE / AUDITS l | ||
NEDS PARTICIPANTS AUDITS 0 PERFORED ANNUALLY BY EACH NEDS PARTICIPANTS l | NEDS PARTICIPANTS AUDITS 0 | ||
PROCEDURES 0 CHECH_lSTS NEDS INTER-UTILITY AUDIT 0 PERFORNED BY AUDIT TEANS CONSISTING OF PROGRAM MANAGER AND UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES 0 ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PARTICIPANT'S l | PERFORED ANNUALLY BY EACH NEDS PARTICIPANTS l | ||
NEDS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM O CHECH_lSTS NON-NEDS AUDITS O VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH NEDS STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES | 0 VERIFY COMPLl ANCE WITH NEDS STANDARDS AND l | ||
PROCEDURES 0 | |||
CHECH_lSTS NEDS INTER-UTILITY AUDIT 0 | |||
PERFORNED BY AUDIT TEANS CONSISTING OF PROGRAM MANAGER AND UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES 0 | |||
ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PARTICIPANT'S l | |||
NEDS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM O | |||
CHECH_lSTS NON-NEDS AUDITS O | |||
VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH NEDS STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES j | |||
O PERFORMED BY UTILITY PERSONNEL 0 | |||
AT LEAST EVERY THREE YEARS O | |||
SHARED EFFORTS AND RESULTS 1 | |||
i | |||
R IMPLEMENTATION O | R IMPLEMENTATION O | ||
AT TIE OF IMPLEMENTATION, NEDS PARTlCIPANTS WILL: | |||
l O | - EXCHANGE ON_Y DATA WHICH WETS OR EXCEEDS NEDS STANDARDS 0 | ||
0 | NEDS STANDARDS WET OR EXCEED ANSI 18.17 I | ||
l O | |||
EXCHANGE OF INFORMAT10N CURRENTLY ALLOWED IN MDST NEDS UTILITIES BASED ON W ETING ANSI 18.17 THEREFORE: | |||
0 50.54(P) PLAN CHANGES WILL BE MINIWL 0 | |||
NEDS CAN BE ABSORBED INTO EXlSTING PROGRAMS GENERALLY O | |||
PREVIOUS 50.54(P) SUBMITTALS WILL BE WITHDRAWN | PREVIOUS 50.54(P) SUBMITTALS WILL BE WITHDRAWN | ||
| Line 160: | Line 436: | ||
FUTURE REGULATIONS 1 | FUTURE REGULATIONS 1 | ||
l l | l l | ||
l | l 0 | ||
NEDS STANDARDS WILL BE CHANGED TO EET FUTURE RULES OR GUIDELINES 1 | |||
j l | j l | ||
l i | l i | ||
h l | h l | ||
) | |||
i}} | i}} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:11, 3 December 2024
| ML20235J814 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/25/1986 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235J809 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-87-249 NUDOCS 8707160009 | |
| Download: ML20235J814 (11) | |
Text
METSYS AT A
g 6
n 8
D 9
i f
E S) e 1
i E
D r
5 Y
E B
2 O
N h
L
(
C c
P R
ar M
N M
.E R
A E
L C
UN andse!
m* !es
?
mt Dy % y9 t
II i.'
5
d NEDS EMPLOYEE SYSTEM PRESENTATION i
- 1. HISTORY TASK FORCE PILOT UTILITY GROUP SUBCOMMITTEES
)
l
- 2. OBJECTIVES CONCEPT OF OPERAT10N INFORMATION
)
- 3. SECURITY ADVANTAGES ELEENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA
- 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE / AUDITS l
PARTICIPANT INTER-UTIL ITY NON-EDS PARTICIPANT
- 5. IMPLEMENTATION
- 6. QUEST 10N AND ANSWER I
I
~
SE Y
V
'l I
h I
T E
O L
A Y C I
I L T l
h h
I P
A A 1'
A 1
G A U b G E L R I
h G E S A U S
I R
L E U S l
E D G O
k O S D k L
P A
O I
E O
P R
C i
E E
I'I A h T k T O I
L
'I' h O A
I I
l T R E
D T 1
h C E M
C'I A
'L h
E G L S P A L R O
J A A D O 0 O l
T C
O N E E L l k P II O
R A 1
h E h I
R L
G P h V O h O I
h E C O C N
P l
D C
O k
I S
E T
D E
A E
I G
Y 2
h S'
L S
h T
I A
h C l
I h
C T
I h
R A
A I
L S l
U T
G D
A Y A
C A
H E
E H R
E D
G N
h P
'I S
E T
E h
Y E
O M
L P
P O
S M
L L E E
E A V V
h I
k E
h O
'I A
D O
I A
E I
'l I
L A
'h
)
l C
S A
E Z E U
D l
C I
S A
E h
H h E A
E 0
A H d.
F G P
(
t k E M
L K
O h E
l' S
- 1 h
A S
I I
Y S
S S
D E
E V
h I
L T Y A A I
h "
l I
O h L
I E
1 G S 1 E E U h k P Ek
NEDS OBJECTIVES 0
TO ESTABLISH A COMPUTER BASED INFORMT10N SYSTEM THAT WILL PROVIDE TRANSIENT WORKER IN-PROCESSING INFORmTION FOR UNESCORTED ACCESS TO NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES BY:
EXPEDITING INPROCESSING OF TRANSlENT WORKERS MINIMlZING IMPACT OF CHANGE AND CURRENT l
OPERATIONS EFFECTING SIGNIFICANT COST SAVINGS
\\
9 i
i
a ECNARAE G
L N
C I
N D
I N
Y A,
A R
R G
O T
N N
Y T
I O
R S
N N
I O
I O
I D
T T
S I
A I
I E
A S
N T
R R
C I
E O
C T
I I
I R
I E
I U
F U
T T
E Q
I S
S A
O E
E T
S O
N R
Y S
R N
E P
I P
O D
E C
X M
L E
A D
C E
A Y
P N
T I
A X
R N
A N
E O
E D
L Y
O T
A T
I L
A L
S N
I T
A R
A O
O R
A C
I R
E S
U I
I P
E N
R C
D D
S N
E E
A E
E E
P S
R M
R G
ii>
e e
E S
TN M
ER E
I Y
C U
T R
O I
O E
L F
R I
B K
Y F
A R
T O
E O
T I
C W
N R
N A
E U
O R
F M
C I
T O
E E
T G
S A
N Y
A Z
O T
N I
I I
A D
T L
M R
A I
A M
B D
D R
A R
N O
I O
A F
L C
T N
E E
S I
R R
N T
O h
I E
T M
N A
S O
T S
I Y
U E
T S
R Y
P S
A T
O R
Y E
E S
V N
T O
R C
R A
R E
S T
O I
E M
I S
T V
D L
S E
l I
S R
N A
B l
L l
I E
A C
O l
E T
S I
l l
N N
R G
L G
E O
L Y
E O
A N
N I
A R
T L
U I
Y T
N A
C 0
N N
O A
I T
A I
l i
E L
C M
I R
C T
E P
U I
L A
Y N
R M
D R
I S
O l
i C
E E
C M
C P
C S
9 O
SCREENING EVALUATION CRITERIA OMISSION / FALSIFICATION OF INFORMATION USE OR POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED /
DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES PERTINENT CRIMINAL HISTORY MENTAL ILLNESS / EMOTIONAL INSTABILITY EVIDENCE OF COERCION. ADVERSE INFLUENCEIPRESSURE OTHER DEROGATORY RELIABILITY OR TRUSTWORTHINESS INFORMATION NEGATIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT EACH UTILITY REQUIRED TO MAKE INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION
r l
QUALITY ASSURANCE / AUDITS l
NEDS PARTICIPANTS AUDITS 0
PERFORED ANNUALLY BY EACH NEDS PARTICIPANTS l
0 VERIFY COMPLl ANCE WITH NEDS STANDARDS AND l
PROCEDURES 0
CHECH_lSTS NEDS INTER-UTILITY AUDIT 0
PERFORNED BY AUDIT TEANS CONSISTING OF PROGRAM MANAGER AND UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES 0
ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PARTICIPANT'S l
NEDS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM O
CHECH_lSTS NON-NEDS AUDITS O
VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH NEDS STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES j
O PERFORMED BY UTILITY PERSONNEL 0
AT LEAST EVERY THREE YEARS O
SHARED EFFORTS AND RESULTS 1
i
R IMPLEMENTATION O
AT TIE OF IMPLEMENTATION, NEDS PARTlCIPANTS WILL:
- EXCHANGE ON_Y DATA WHICH WETS OR EXCEEDS NEDS STANDARDS 0
NEDS STANDARDS WET OR EXCEED ANSI 18.17 I
l O
EXCHANGE OF INFORMAT10N CURRENTLY ALLOWED IN MDST NEDS UTILITIES BASED ON W ETING ANSI 18.17 THEREFORE:
0 50.54(P) PLAN CHANGES WILL BE MINIWL 0
NEDS CAN BE ABSORBED INTO EXlSTING PROGRAMS GENERALLY O
PREVIOUS 50.54(P) SUBMITTALS WILL BE WITHDRAWN
R 1
FUTURE REGULATIONS 1
l l
l 0
NEDS STANDARDS WILL BE CHANGED TO EET FUTURE RULES OR GUIDELINES 1
j l
l i
h l
)
i