TXX-6963, Final Deficiency Rept CP-87-01,re Error in Finite Element Computer Model for Safeguards Bldg.Initially Reported on 870114.Analysis Concludes Designs Acceptable.Issue Not Reportable Under 10CFR50.55(e): Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ | {{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ | ||
== | |||
Log # TXX-6963~ | Log # TXX-6963~ | ||
File # 10110 | ~ | ||
File # 10110 E | |||
mmam c. counsa | 3 909.2 4 | ||
"'' # A0"" * * | |||
('} | |||
1UELECTRIC November 13, 1987 mmam c. counsa batstow Vice President V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: | |||
Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. | |||
20555 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES) | COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES) | ||
DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 STATIC COMPUTER MODEL FOR THE SAFEGUARDS BUILDING SDAR: | DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 STATIC COMPUTER MODEL FOR THE SAFEGUARDS BUILDING SDAR: | ||
CP-87-01 (FINAL REPORT) | |||
Gentlemen: | Gentlemen: | ||
On January 14, 1987, we verbally notified your Mr. I. Barnes of a deficiency | On January 14, 1987, we verbally notified your Mr. I. Barnes of a deficiency j | ||
In order to assess these conditions, a series of calculations have been prepared for the portions of the Safeguards Building which could have been affected by the error. This analysis has concluded the design of these areas is acceptable. Our review of other analyses has indicated no other building analysis contained similar errors. | involving an error in the finite element computer model for the Safeguards Building. Our most recent report, logged TXX-6914, was submitted November 3, 1987. | ||
We have concluded in the event this issue had ren'ained uncorrected, no condition adverse to safety would have existed. This issue is not reportable under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e). Records supporting this conclusion are available for your inspectors review at the CPSES Project Site. | In order to assess these conditions, a series of calculations have been prepared for the portions of the Safeguards Building which could have been affected by the error. | ||
Very truly yours, W7 W. G. Counsil MCP/mgt c - Mr. R. D. Martin, Region IV Pesident Inspectors, CPSES (3) 8711170283 871113 PDR | This analysis has concluded the design of these areas is acceptable. Our review of other analyses has indicated no other building analysis contained similar errors. | ||
ADOCK 05000445 PDR | We have concluded in the event this issue had ren'ained uncorrected, no condition adverse to safety would have existed. | ||
4/ | This issue is not reportable under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e). Records supporting this conclusion are available for your inspectors review at the CPSES Project Site. | ||
400 North Olhe Street | Very truly yours, W7 W. G. Counsil MCP/mgt c - Mr. R. D. Martin, Region IV Pesident Inspectors, CPSES (3) 8711170283 871113 PDR ADOCK 05000445 q | ||
S PDR 7 | |||
f/ | |||
4 | |||
/ | |||
\\ | |||
400 North Olhe Street LB lil Dall.n. Texas 75201}} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:35, 3 December 2024
| ML20236P394 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 11/13/1987 |
| From: | Counsil W TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| CP-87-01, CP-87-1, TXX-6963, NUDOCS 8711170283 | |
| Download: ML20236P394 (1) | |
Text
_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
==
Log # TXX-6963~
~
File # 10110 E
3 909.2 4
" # A0"" * *
('}
1UELECTRIC November 13, 1987 mmam c. counsa batstow Vice President V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:
Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555
SUBJECT:
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)
DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 STATIC COMPUTER MODEL FOR THE SAFEGUARDS BUILDING SDAR:
CP-87-01 (FINAL REPORT)
Gentlemen:
On January 14, 1987, we verbally notified your Mr. I. Barnes of a deficiency j
involving an error in the finite element computer model for the Safeguards Building. Our most recent report, logged TXX-6914, was submitted November 3, 1987.
In order to assess these conditions, a series of calculations have been prepared for the portions of the Safeguards Building which could have been affected by the error.
This analysis has concluded the design of these areas is acceptable. Our review of other analyses has indicated no other building analysis contained similar errors.
We have concluded in the event this issue had ren'ained uncorrected, no condition adverse to safety would have existed.
This issue is not reportable under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e). Records supporting this conclusion are available for your inspectors review at the CPSES Project Site.
Very truly yours, W7 W. G. Counsil MCP/mgt c - Mr. R. D. Martin, Region IV Pesident Inspectors, CPSES (3) 8711170283 871113 PDR ADOCK 05000445 q
S PDR 7
f/
4
/
\\