ML20249C562: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_   _ _. . - _ - _                 -         .
{{#Wiki_filter:_
  y+
_ _. . - _ - _
                                                                                                                                l
-
    4
.
                                                                                                                                !
y+
                                                                    June 25, 1998
4
                                                                                                                                I
June 25, 1998
                                                                                                                                q
.
                          .
.
                                        .
q
                        Mr. Lew W. Myers                                                                                         '
Mr. Lew W. Myers
                        Vice President - Nuclear                                                                                 ,
'
                        Centerior Service Company
Vice President - Nuclear
                        P.O. Box 97, A200
,
                        Perry, OH 44081
Centerior Service Company
                        SUBJECT:         NRC ROUTINE RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION REPORT
P.O. Box 97, A200
                                          50-440/98012(DRS) AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Perry, OH 44081
                        Dear Mr. Myers:
SUBJECT:
                                                                                                                                I
NRC ROUTINE RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION REPORT
                      On June 5,1998, the NRC completed an inspection at your Perry Nuclear Power Plant.
50-440/98012(DRS) AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION
                      The enclosed report presents the results of this inspection.                                           .)
Dear Mr. Myers:
                                                                                                                                !
I
                      The inspection was an examination of activities conducted under your license as they relate to           i
On June 5,1998, the NRC completed an inspection at your Perry Nuclear Power Plant.
                        radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the             I
The enclosed report presents the results of this inspection.
                        conditions of your license. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective
.)
                      examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and
!
                      observation of activities in progress. Specifically, the inspection focussed on the control of           ;
The inspection was an examination of activities conducted under your license as they relate to
                        liquid and gaseous radioactive effluents and the testing of engineered safety feature ventilation       i
i
                        systerns. In addition, the inspection reviewed an incident concerning an individual who entered
radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the
                      the radiologically restricted area without the required dosimetry.                                       l
conditions of your license. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective
                                                                                                                                i
examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and
                      Your staff effectively controlled and monitored liquid and gaseous radioactive effluent releases
observation of activities in progress. Specifically, the inspection focussed on the control of
                                                                                                                                '
liquid and gaseous radioactive effluents and the testing of engineered safety feature ventilation
                      from your facility. We observed progress in the reduction of radioactive effluents released and
i
                      of radioactive waste produced. Process and effluent radiation monitors were properly                     j
systerns. In addition, the inspection reviewed an incident concerning an individual who entered
                      calibrated; however, your staff continued to be challenged by operability problems conceming             '
the radiologically restricted area without the required dosimetry.
                      the liquid discharge radiation monitor. Although we recognize that your goal is to limit the
i
                      number of liquid radioactive discharges from your facility, we understand that this monitor was
Your staff effectively controlled and monitored liquid and gaseous radioactive effluent releases
                      inoperable for significant periods of time in 1996 and 1997, which unnecessarily challenges
from your facility. We observed progress in the reduction of radioactive effluents released and
                      . your staffand reduces the barriers to an inadvertent release of radioactive material to the       j
'
                      environment.                                                                                       /
of radioactive waste produced. Process and effluent radiation monitors were properly
                                                                                                                                !
j
                                                                                                                            l
calibrated; however, your staff continued to be challenged by operability problems conceming
l                       Further, two violations of regulatory requirements were identified during this inspection. These         ;
'
                      violations concerned the inadequate posting of a radiation area within your facility and the             '
the liquid discharge radiation monitor. Although we recognize that your goal is to limit the
                      failure of an individual to adhere to the dosimetry requirements of a radiation work permit.
number of liquid radioactive discharges from your facility, we understand that this monitor was
                      Although your staff identified and corrected the latter violation, we are concerned that the
inoperable for significant periods of time in 1996 and 1997, which unnecessarily challenges
                      individual performed 13 entries into the radiologically restricted area without the required
ff
I                     dosimetry, including an entry into a high radiation area. Prior to each entry, the individual was
. your sta and reduces the barriers to an inadvertent release of radioactive material to the
l                       briefed by your radiation protection staff, who missed these opportunities to identify and to
j
                      correct the violation. We believe that wearing the correct dosimetry is a fundamental
environment.
                        requirement that should have been identified during these briefings. Consequently, we have
/
                      not exercised enforcement discretion and have cited this violation.
!
                                                                    e
l
                              9806300335 9eo625
l
                              gon ApocKo Q
Further, two violations of regulatory requirements were identified during this inspection. These
violations concerned the inadequate posting of a radiation area within your facility and the
'
failure of an individual to adhere to the dosimetry requirements of a radiation work permit.
Although your staff identified and corrected the latter violation, we are concerned that the
individual performed 13 entries into the radiologically restricted area without the required
I
dosimetry, including an entry into a high radiation area. Prior to each entry, the individual was
l
briefed by your radiation protection staff, who missed these opportunities to identify and to
correct the violation. We believe that wearing the correct dosimetry is a fundamental
requirement that should have been identified during these briefings. Consequently, we have
not exercised enforcement discretion and have cited this violation.
e
9806300335 9eo625
gon ApocKo Q
:
:
l'
l'
                            .
.


        . - _ - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .                                                           _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
. - _ - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
l t2
l t2
      *
*
  ..
..
l                           L. Myers                                                                     2
l
                          The violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice), and the circumstances
L. Myers
                          surrounding them are described in detail in the enclosed report. Please note that you are
2
                            required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed
The violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice), and the circumstances
                            Notice when preparing your response. The NRC will use your response, in part, to determine
surrounding them are described in detail in the enclosed report. Please note that you are
                          whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory
required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed
                            requirements.
Notice when preparing your response. The NRC will use your response, in part, to determine
                            In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commissions regulations, a copy of this letter, its
whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory
                          enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
requirements.
                          We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commissions regulations, a copy of this letter, its
                                                                                              Sincerely,
enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
                                                                                      Original Signed by John A. Grobe
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
                                                                                              John A. Grobe, Director
Sincerely,
                                                                                              Division of Reactor Safety
Original Signed by John A. Grobe
                          Docket No. 50-440
John A. Grobe, Director
                          License No. NPF-58
Division of Reactor Safety
                          Enclosures:                               1. Notice of Violation
Docket No. 50-440
                                                                    2. Inspection Report 50-440/98012(DRS)
License No. NPF-58
                          cc w/encls:                               H. L. Hegrat, Manager
Enclosures:
                                                                      Regulatory Affairs
1. Notice of Violation
                                                                    T. S. Rausch, Director, Quality
2. Inspection Report 50-440/98012(DRS)
                                                                      and Personnel Development.
cc w/encls:
                                                                    R. W. Schrauder, Director
H. L. Hegrat, Manager
                                                                      Nuclear Engineering Department
Regulatory Affairs
                                                                    W. R. Kanda, General Manager
T. S. Rausch, Director, Quality
                                                                      Nuclear Power Plant Department
and Personnel Development.
R. W. Schrauder, Director
Nuclear Engineering Department
W. R. Kanda, General Manager
Nuclear Power Plant Department
N. L. Bonner, Director, Nuclear
!
!
                                                                    N. L. Bonner, Director, Nuclear
Maintenance Department
                                                                      Maintenance Department
H. W. Bergendahl, Director
                                                                    H. W. Bergendahl, Director
. Nuclear Services Department
                                                                    . Nuclear Services Department
Ohio State Liaison Officer
                                                                    Ohio State Liaison Officer
Robert E. Owen, Ohio Department
                                                                    Robert E. Owen, Ohio Department
!
!
                                                                      of Health
of Health
                                                                    C. A. Glazer,' State of Ohio
C. A. Glazer,' State of Ohio
                                                                      Public Utilities Commission
Public Utilities Commission
                          DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRS\PER98012.DRS
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\DRS\\PER98012.DRS
                          To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" a Copy without attachme W/ enclosure           "E" e Copy with sLJ.J.-- A.a-ure "H" a No cogy
To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" a Copy without attachme W/ enclosure
                                  OFFICE                         Rlli               [_E. Rlli               l C, Rlli                           ,,    l6. Rlli           M         l
"E" e Copy with sLJ.J.-- A.a-ure
                                  NAME                           SOrth:)p @t/;Q           GShear Colh                 TKozak                         W           JGroM ~
"H" a No cogy
                                  DATE                           06/p/98                 06/$/98                     06/9 08 "                                 06/'l#98       i
OFFICE
                                                                                          OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Rlli
[_E. Rlli
l C, Rlli
l6.
Rlli
M
l
,,
NAME
SOrth:)p @t/;Q
GShear Colh
TKozak W
JGroM ~
DATE
06/p/98
06/$/98
06/9 08 "
06/'l#98
i
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY


      _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _       _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
                                                                                                ,
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ .
_
,
i:) '
i:) '
  e'
e'
                          L Myers                                                             3
L Myers
                          Distnbution:
3
                          Project Mgr., NRR w/encls
Distnbution:
                          C. Paperiello, Rif t w/encls
Project Mgr., NRR w/encls
                        _J. Caldwell, Rlll w/encis
C. Paperiello, Rif t w/encls
                          B. Clayton, Rlll w/encls
_J. Caldwell, Rlll w/encis
                          SRI Perry w/encls
B. Clayton, Rlll w/encls
                        ' DRP w/encls
SRI Perry w/encls
                          TSS w/encls
' DRP w/encls
                          DRS w/encls                                                           J
TSS w/encls
                          Rill PRR w/en                                                         {
DRS w/encls
                          PUBLIC IE;0 w/encls -
J
                          Docket File /'encls
Rill PRR w/en
                                                                                            h
{
                          GREENS-
h
                          IEO (E-Mail)
PUBLIC IE;0 w/encls -
                          DOCDESK (E-Mail)
Docket File /'encls
                            <
GREENS-
                                                                                                  l
IEO (E-Mail)
                                                                                                  l
DOCDESK (E-Mail)
                          .
<
                                                                                                  I
l
                                            C902G3
l
                                                                                                  .
.
                                                                                                  l
I
                                                                                                  l
C902G3
                                                                                                  I
l
                                                                                                i
.
l
I
i
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 13:51, 30 November 2024

Forwards Insp Rept 50-440/98-12 on 980601-05 & Notice of Violation.Insp Consisted of Selective Exams of Procedures & Representative Records,Interviews W/Personnel & Observation of Activities in Progress
ML20249C562
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/25/1998
From: Grobe J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Myers L
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
Shared Package
ML20249C563 List:
References
50-440-98-12, NUDOCS 9806300335
Download: ML20249C562 (3)


See also: IR 05000440/1998012

Text

_

_ _. . - _ - _

-

.

y+

4

June 25, 1998

.

.

q

Mr. Lew W. Myers

'

Vice President - Nuclear

,

Centerior Service Company

P.O. Box 97, A200

Perry, OH 44081

SUBJECT:

NRC ROUTINE RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION REPORT

50-440/98012(DRS) AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Dear Mr. Myers:

I

On June 5,1998, the NRC completed an inspection at your Perry Nuclear Power Plant.

The enclosed report presents the results of this inspection.

.)

!

The inspection was an examination of activities conducted under your license as they relate to

i

radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the

conditions of your license. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective

examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and

observation of activities in progress. Specifically, the inspection focussed on the control of

liquid and gaseous radioactive effluents and the testing of engineered safety feature ventilation

i

systerns. In addition, the inspection reviewed an incident concerning an individual who entered

the radiologically restricted area without the required dosimetry.

i

Your staff effectively controlled and monitored liquid and gaseous radioactive effluent releases

from your facility. We observed progress in the reduction of radioactive effluents released and

'

of radioactive waste produced. Process and effluent radiation monitors were properly

j

calibrated; however, your staff continued to be challenged by operability problems conceming

'

the liquid discharge radiation monitor. Although we recognize that your goal is to limit the

number of liquid radioactive discharges from your facility, we understand that this monitor was

inoperable for significant periods of time in 1996 and 1997, which unnecessarily challenges

ff

. your sta and reduces the barriers to an inadvertent release of radioactive material to the

j

environment.

/

!

l

l

Further, two violations of regulatory requirements were identified during this inspection. These

violations concerned the inadequate posting of a radiation area within your facility and the

'

failure of an individual to adhere to the dosimetry requirements of a radiation work permit.

Although your staff identified and corrected the latter violation, we are concerned that the

individual performed 13 entries into the radiologically restricted area without the required

I

dosimetry, including an entry into a high radiation area. Prior to each entry, the individual was

l

briefed by your radiation protection staff, who missed these opportunities to identify and to

correct the violation. We believe that wearing the correct dosimetry is a fundamental

requirement that should have been identified during these briefings. Consequently, we have

not exercised enforcement discretion and have cited this violation.

e

9806300335 9eo625

gon ApocKo Q

l'

.

. - _ - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

l t2

..

l

L. Myers

2

The violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice), and the circumstances

surrounding them are described in detail in the enclosed report. Please note that you are

required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed

Notice when preparing your response. The NRC will use your response, in part, to determine

whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory

requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commissions regulations, a copy of this letter, its

enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

Original Signed by John A. Grobe

John A. Grobe, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No. 50-440

License No. NPF-58

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Violation

2. Inspection Report 50-440/98012(DRS)

cc w/encls:

H. L. Hegrat, Manager

Regulatory Affairs

T. S. Rausch, Director, Quality

and Personnel Development.

R. W. Schrauder, Director

Nuclear Engineering Department

W. R. Kanda, General Manager

Nuclear Power Plant Department

N. L. Bonner, Director, Nuclear

!

Maintenance Department

H. W. Bergendahl, Director

. Nuclear Services Department

Ohio State Liaison Officer

Robert E. Owen, Ohio Department

!

of Health

C. A. Glazer,' State of Ohio

Public Utilities Commission

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\DRS\\PER98012.DRS

To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" a Copy without attachme W/ enclosure

"E" e Copy with sLJ.J.-- A.a-ure

"H" a No cogy

OFFICE

Rlli

[_E. Rlli

l C, Rlli

l6.

Rlli

M

l

,,

NAME

SOrth:)p @t/;Q

GShear Colh

TKozak W

JGroM ~

DATE

06/p/98

06/$/98

06/9 08 "

06/'l#98

i

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ .

_

,

i:) '

e'

L Myers

3

Distnbution:

Project Mgr., NRR w/encls

C. Paperiello, Rif t w/encls

_J. Caldwell, Rlll w/encis

B. Clayton, Rlll w/encls

SRI Perry w/encls

' DRP w/encls

TSS w/encls

DRS w/encls

J

Rill PRR w/en

{

h

PUBLIC IE;0 w/encls -

Docket File /'encls

GREENS-

IEO (E-Mail)

DOCDESK (E-Mail)

<

l

l

.

I

C902G3

l

.

l

I

i