ML23269A097: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:MC&A Planning for a Molten Fuel Reactor
{{#Wiki_filter:MC&A Planning for a Molten Fuel Reactor Dr. Steven Biegalski, Georgia Institute of Technology Benjamin, Beasley, Abilene Christian University September 18, 2023


Dr. Steven Biegalski, Georgia Institute of Technology Benjamin, Beasley, Abilene Christian University September 18, 2023 Natura Resources Research Alliance:
Abilene Christian University NEXT Lab home of the Molten Salt Research Reactor Natura Resources Research Alliance:
2


Abilene Christian University NEXT Lab home of the Molten Salt Research Reactor
3


2 3
Molten Salt Reactor
Molten Salt Reactor
* Safe
* Safe
Line 29: Line 29:
* Scalable
* Scalable
* Carbon-free
* Carbon-free
* Reliable
* Reliable 4


4 Experimental Systems
The MSRR is itself an experiment Included experiments:
 
The MSRR is itself an experiment
 
Included experiments:
* Corrosion coupons
* Corrosion coupons
* Salt sampling
* Salt sampling
* Fuel salt chemistry
* Fuel salt chemistry
* Bubbling system
* Bubbling system
* Off-gas cleanup
* Off-gas cleanup Experimental Systems 5


5 MSRR Reactor Layout
Experiments Off Gas Handling Drain Tank Pump Fuel Receiving Fuel Purification Concrete Radiator MSRR Reactor Layout 6
 
Experiments Off Gas Handling
 
Radiator
 
Pump
 
Fuel Fuel Receiving Purification
 
Drain Tank
 
Concrete 6
MC&A of Liquid Fuel


Recommended Method in ORNL Report*
Recommended Method in ORNL Report*


Material balance of inputs and outputs to the reactor
Material balance of inputs and outputs to the reactor Most similar to existing LWR MC&A approaches May have large inventory difference Performance based approach MC&A of Liquid Fuel
* Most similar to existing LWR MC&A approaches
* ORNL/SPR/150504, Domestic Safeguards Material Control and Accountancy Considerations for Molten Salt Reactors, February 2021 7
* May have large inventory difference
* Performance based approach
* ORNL/SPR/150504, Domestic Safeguards Material Control and Accountancy Considerations for Molten Salt Reactors, February 2021
 
7 Discussion


© 2023 Abilene Christian University8}}
Discussion 8
© 2023 Abilene Christian University}}

Latest revision as of 08:34, 25 November 2024

Abilene Christian University, Slides for Partially Closed September 18, 2023, Meeting on MC&A
ML23269A097
Person / Time
Site: Abilene Christian University
Issue date: 09/18/2023
From: Benjamin Beasley, Biegalski S
Abilene Christian University, Neely Research Reactor
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML23269A097 (1)


Text

MC&A Planning for a Molten Fuel Reactor Dr. Steven Biegalski, Georgia Institute of Technology Benjamin, Beasley, Abilene Christian University September 18, 2023

Abilene Christian University NEXT Lab home of the Molten Salt Research Reactor Natura Resources Research Alliance:

2

3

Molten Salt Reactor

  • Safe
  • Clean
  • Efficient
  • Multi-functional
  • Scalable
  • Carbon-free
  • Reliable 4

The MSRR is itself an experiment Included experiments:

  • Corrosion coupons
  • Salt sampling
  • Fuel salt chemistry
  • Bubbling system
  • Off-gas cleanup Experimental Systems 5

Experiments Off Gas Handling Drain Tank Pump Fuel Receiving Fuel Purification Concrete Radiator MSRR Reactor Layout 6

Recommended Method in ORNL Report*

Material balance of inputs and outputs to the reactor Most similar to existing LWR MC&A approaches May have large inventory difference Performance based approach MC&A of Liquid Fuel

  • ORNL/SPR/150504, Domestic Safeguards Material Control and Accountancy Considerations for Molten Salt Reactors, February 2021 7

Discussion 8

© 2023 Abilene Christian University