ML21356A578: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Appellate Case: 21-9593     Document: 010110621418       Date Filed: 12/20/2021   Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel.                   )
{{#Wiki_filter:Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 1
HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney                   )
 
General and the NEW MEXICO                     )
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT,                         )
 
Petitioners,                             )
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. )
: v.                                             )
HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney )
                                                )     No. 21-9593 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR                           )
General and the NEW MEXICO )
REGULATORY COMMISSION and                       )
ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       )
Petitioners, )
Respondents.                             )
: v. )
RESPONDENTS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS Respondents Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the United States of America respectfully request an extension of 12 days, up to and including January 11, 2022, to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss this Petition for Review for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Counsel for Respondents have conferred with counsel for Petitioners and counsel for Intervenor, and all counsel consent to this request.
) No. 21-9593 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR )
REGULATORY COMMISSION and )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Respondents. )
 
RESPONDENTS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
 
Respondents Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the United
 
States of America respectfully request an extension of 12 days, up to and including
 
January 11, 2022, to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss this Petition
 
for Review for lack of subject -matter jurisdiction. Counsel for Respondents have
 
conferred with counsel for Petitioners and counsel for Intervenor, and all counsel
 
consent to this request.
 
In support of their motion, Respondents state:
In support of their motion, Respondents state:
: 1.     This case concerns the issuance of a license by NRC to Interim Storage Partners, L.L.C., to construct and operate a consolidated interim storage facility for the storage of spent nuclear fuel in Andrews County, Texas. NRC issued the license on September 13, 2021.
: 1. This case concerns the issuance of a license by NRC to Interim
 
Storage Partners, L.L.C., to construct and operate a consolidated interim storage
 
facility for the storage of spent nuclear fuel in Andrews County, Texas. NRC
 
issued the license on September 13, 2021.
Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 2
: 2. On December 8, 2021, Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the
 
Petition for Review for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Petitioners response is
 
due on December 23, 2021.
: 3. Preparing a reply in support of the motion to dismiss will require
 
coordination between NRC and the Department of Justice, which represents
 
Respondent United States of America, and will require approvals within both
 
agencies. This process is made more difficult as a consequence of the holidays and
 
the number of emp loyees at both agencies taking time off.
: 4. If Petitioners file their response on December 23, 2021, Respondents
 
reply would be due on December 30. A twelve -day extension would enable
 
Respondents to avoid disrupting their plans over the holidays and would not
 
unreasonably delay resolution of the proceedings.


Appellate Case: 21-9593    Document: 010110621418      Date Filed: 12/20/2021  Page: 2
Accordingly, Respondents respectfully request that t his Court grant their
: 2. On December 8, 2021, Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the Petition for Review for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Petitioners response is due on December 23, 2021.
: 3. Preparing a reply in support of the motion to dismiss will require coordination between NRC and the Department of Justice, which represents Respondent United States of America, and will require approvals within both agencies. This process is made more difficult as a consequence of the holidays and the number of employees at both agencies taking time off.
: 4. If Petitioners file their response on December 23, 2021, Respondents reply would be due on December 30. A twelve-day extension would enable Respondents to avoid disrupting their plans over the holidays and would not unreasonably delay resolution of the proceedings.
Accordingly, Respondents respectfully request that this Court grant their unopposed request for an extension of 12 days, up to and including January 11, 2022, to file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss.
2


Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418     Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 3 Respectfully submitted,
unopposed request for an extension of 12 days, up to and including January 11,
/s/ Justin D. Heminger                 /s/ Andrew P. Averbach TODD KIM                               ANDREW P. AVERBACH Assistant Attorney General             Solicitor JUSTIN D. HEMINGER                     Office of the General Counsel Attorney                               U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environment and Natural Resources     11555 Rockville Pike Division                           Rockville, MD 20852 U.S. Department of Justice             andrew.averbach@nrc.gov Post Office Box 7415                   (301) 415-1956 Washington, D.C. 20044 justin.heminger@usdoj.gov (202) 514-5442 December 20, 2021 3
 
2022, to file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss.
 
2 Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 3
 
Respectfully submitted,
 
/s/ Justin D. Heminger /s/ Andrew P. Averbach TODD KIM ANDREW P. AVERBACH Assistant Attorney General Solicitor JUSTIN D. HEMINGER Office of the General Counsel Attorney U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environment and Natural Resources 11555 Rockville Pike Division Rockville, MD 20852 U.S. Department of Justice andrew.averbach@nrc.gov Post Office Box 7415 (301) 415-1956 Washington, D.C. 20044 justin.heminger@usdoj.gov (202) 514-5442
 
December 20, 2021
 
3 Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 4
 
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 27(D)


Appellate Case: 21-9593      Document: 010110621418      Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 4 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 27(D)
I certify that this filing complies with the requirements of Fed. R. App. P.
I certify that this filing complies with the requirements of Fed. R. App. P.
27(d)(1)(E) because it has been prepared in 14-point Times New Roman, a proportionally spaced font.
I further certify that this filing complies with the type-volume limitation of Fed. R. App. P. 27(d)(2)(A) because it contains 278 words, excluding the parts of the of the filing exempted under Fed. R. App. P. 32(f), according to the count of Microsoft Word.
                                                  /s/ Andrew P. Averbach Andrew P. Averbach Counsel for Respondent U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission


Appellate Case: 21-9593     Document: 010110621418     Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on December, 20, 2021, I served a copy of RESPONDENTS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS upon counsel for the parties in this action by filing the document electronically through the CM/ECF system. This method of service is calculated to serve counsel at the following e-mail addresses:
27(d)(1)(E) because it has been prepared in 14-point Times New Roman, a
Bruce C. Baizel bruce.baizel@state.nm.us William Gregory Grantham wgrantham@nmag.gov, swright@nmag.gov Justin Heminger justin.heminger@usdoj.gov; efile_app.enrd@usdoj.gov P. Cholla Khoury ckhoury@nmag.gov Zachary E. Ogaz zogaz@nmag.gov, swright@nmag.gov Arnold Bradley Fagg brad.fagg@morganlewis.com Ryan Kennedy Lighty ryan.lighty@morganlewis.com
 
                                                /s/ Andrew P. Averbach Andrew P. Averbach Counsel for Respondent U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission}}
proportionally spa ced font.
 
I further certify that this filing complies with the type -volume limitation of
 
Fed. R. App. P. 27(d)(2)(A) because it contains 278 words, excluding the parts of
 
the of the filing exempted under Fed. R. App. P. 32(f), according to the count of
 
Microsoft Word.
 
/s/ Andrew P. Averbach Andrew P. Averbach
 
Counsel for Respondent U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
 
Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 5
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
 
I certify that on December, 20, 2021, I served a copy of RESPONDENTS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS upon counsel for the parties in this action by filing the document electronically through the CM/ECF system. This method of service is calculated to serve counsel at the following e -mail addresses:
 
Bruce C. Baizel bruce.baizel@state.nm.us
 
William Gregory Grantham wgrantham@nmag.gov, swright@nmag.gov
 
Justin Heminger justin.heminger@usdoj.gov; efile_app.enrd@usdoj.gov
 
P. Cholla Khoury ckhoury@nmag.gov
 
Zachary E. Ogaz zogaz@nmag.gov, swright@nmag.gov
 
Arnold Bradley Fagg brad.fagg@morganlewis.c om
 
Ryan Kennedy Lighty ryan.lighty@morganlewis.com
/s/ Andrew P. Averbach Andrew P. Averbach
 
Counsel for Respondent U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission}}

Latest revision as of 03:07, 19 November 2024

12-20-21 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply (10th Cir.)(Case No. 21-9593)
ML21356A578
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/20/2021
From: Andrew Averbach, Heminger J, Kim T
NRC/OGC, US Dept of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Div
To:
US Federal Judiciary, Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit
References
010110621418, 21-9593
Download: ML21356A578 (5)


Text

Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. )

HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney )

General and the NEW MEXICO )

ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, )

Petitioners, )

v. )

) No. 21-9593 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR )

REGULATORY COMMISSION and )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Respondents. )

RESPONDENTS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

Respondents Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the United

States of America respectfully request an extension of 12 days, up to and including

January 11, 2022, to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss this Petition

for Review for lack of subject -matter jurisdiction. Counsel for Respondents have

conferred with counsel for Petitioners and counsel for Intervenor, and all counsel

consent to this request.

In support of their motion, Respondents state:

1. This case concerns the issuance of a license by NRC to Interim

Storage Partners, L.L.C., to construct and operate a consolidated interim storage

facility for the storage of spent nuclear fuel in Andrews County, Texas. NRC

issued the license on September 13, 2021.

Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 2

2. On December 8, 2021, Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the

Petition for Review for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Petitioners response is

due on December 23, 2021.

3. Preparing a reply in support of the motion to dismiss will require

coordination between NRC and the Department of Justice, which represents

Respondent United States of America, and will require approvals within both

agencies. This process is made more difficult as a consequence of the holidays and

the number of emp loyees at both agencies taking time off.

4. If Petitioners file their response on December 23, 2021, Respondents

reply would be due on December 30. A twelve -day extension would enable

Respondents to avoid disrupting their plans over the holidays and would not

unreasonably delay resolution of the proceedings.

Accordingly, Respondents respectfully request that t his Court grant their

unopposed request for an extension of 12 days, up to and including January 11,

2022, to file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss.

2 Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 3

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Justin D. Heminger /s/ Andrew P. Averbach TODD KIM ANDREW P. AVERBACH Assistant Attorney General Solicitor JUSTIN D. HEMINGER Office of the General Counsel Attorney U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environment and Natural Resources 11555 Rockville Pike Division Rockville, MD 20852 U.S. Department of Justice andrew.averbach@nrc.gov Post Office Box 7415 (301) 415-1956 Washington, D.C. 20044 justin.heminger@usdoj.gov (202) 514-5442

December 20, 2021

3 Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 4

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 27(D)

I certify that this filing complies with the requirements of Fed. R. App. P.

27(d)(1)(E) because it has been prepared in 14-point Times New Roman, a

proportionally spa ced font.

I further certify that this filing complies with the type -volume limitation of

Fed. R. App. P. 27(d)(2)(A) because it contains 278 words, excluding the parts of

the of the filing exempted under Fed. R. App. P. 32(f), according to the count of

Microsoft Word.

/s/ Andrew P. Averbach Andrew P. Averbach

Counsel for Respondent U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Appellate Case: 21-9593 Document: 010110621418 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on December, 20, 2021, I served a copy of RESPONDENTS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS upon counsel for the parties in this action by filing the document electronically through the CM/ECF system. This method of service is calculated to serve counsel at the following e -mail addresses:

Bruce C. Baizel bruce.baizel@state.nm.us

William Gregory Grantham wgrantham@nmag.gov, swright@nmag.gov

Justin Heminger justin.heminger@usdoj.gov; efile_app.enrd@usdoj.gov

P. Cholla Khoury ckhoury@nmag.gov

Zachary E. Ogaz zogaz@nmag.gov, swright@nmag.gov

Arnold Bradley Fagg brad.fagg@morganlewis.c om

Ryan Kennedy Lighty ryan.lighty@morganlewis.com

/s/ Andrew P. Averbach Andrew P. Averbach

Counsel for Respondent U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission