ML23030B638: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NEI FORCE-ON-FORCE FORUM 2023 Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response Division of Security Operations Security Performance Evaluation Branch
{{#Wiki_filter:NEI FORCE-ON -FORCE FORUM 2023


Panel Members
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response Division of Security Operations Security Performance Evaluation Branch Panel Members
* Jefferson Clark - Branch Chief
* Jefferson Clark - Branch Chief
* Joshua Berry - Team Leader
* Joshua Berry - Team Leader
* David Bradfield - Team Leader
* David Bradfield - Team Leader
* Cliff Roundtree - Team Leader 2
* Cliff Roundtree - Team Leader


Team Observations
2 Team Observations
* The information presented by the panel is observations conducted during NRC-evaluated force-on-force and IP 92707 inspections.
* The information presented by the panel is observations conducted during NRC-evaluated force-on-force and IP 92707 inspections.
* The items presented by the panel members are observations only and do not require any commitments by licensees.
* The items presented by the panel members are observations only and do not require any commitments by licensees.
3


Lessons Learned IP 92707
3 Lessons Learned IP 92707
* The staff concluded that continuing to utilize the IP 92707 does not provide a sufficient evaluation of the overall protective strategy but is useful in testing defense-in-depth capabilities.
* The staff concluded that continuing to utilize the IP 92707 does not provide a sufficient evaluation of the overall protective strategy but is useful in testing defense-in-depth capabilities.
* Positives:
* Positives:
* Minimal controller issues
* Minimal controller issues
* Evaluation of internal response positions
* Evaluation of internal response positions
* Efficiencies gained with briefings 4
* Efficiencies gained with briefings


Lessons Learned IP 92707
4 Lessons Learned IP 92707
* Areas for improvement:
* Areas for improvement:
* Does not provide a holistic evaluation of the overall protective strategy
* Does not provide a holistic evaluation of the overall protective strategy
Line 41: Line 40:
* Ability to evaluate command & control
* Ability to evaluate command & control
* MILES equipment varied
* MILES equipment varied
* Performance and training of adversaries varied 5
* Performance and training of adversaries varied


Lessons Learned Addendum 5
5 Lessons Learned Addendum 5
* Positives
* Positives
* Exercise outcome determination
* Exercise outcome determination
Line 51: Line 50:
* Multiple attack vectors
* Multiple attack vectors
* Resetting individuals from outside to inside
* Resetting individuals from outside to inside
* Knowledge gap/unearned information 6
* Knowledge gap/unearned information


Best Practice IP 71130.03
6 Best Practice IP 71130.03
* MAF directors attending tabletops, protective strategy briefs
* MAF directors attending tabletops, protective strategy briefs
* Conducting MAF tours on Wednesday afternoon after NRC inspection team provides the general parameters of likely exercises to MAF director
* Conducting MAF tours on Wednesday afternoon after NRC inspection team provides the general parameters of likely exercises to MAF director
Line 59: Line 58:
* Conducting OCA/PA/VA tours simultaneously
* Conducting OCA/PA/VA tours simultaneously
* Submitting the MAF package with the NRC submittal so the NRC inspection can review it in the office versus on-site
* Submitting the MAF package with the NRC submittal so the NRC inspection can review it in the office versus on-site
* Consider limiting the use of SGI matrices to those that absolutely need them 7
* Consider limiting the use of SGI matrices to those that absolutely need them


Best Practice IP 71130.03
7 Best Practice IP 71130.03
* Placing responders in positions necessary to expedite exercise(s)
* Placing responders in positions necessary to expedite exercise(s)
* Conference call/bridge line for controller calls
* Conference call/bridge line for controller calls
Line 67: Line 66:
* Adding realism to the exercise(s)
* Adding realism to the exercise(s)
* Radio checks conducted at MILES trailer
* Radio checks conducted at MILES trailer
* Provide videos of no play areas in which radiation levels may preclude play 8
* Provide videos of no play areas in which radiation levels may preclude play


Areas for Consideration
8 Areas for Consideration
* Play and control of no play" areas
* Play and control of n o play" areas
* Suppression calls (ties up radios)
* Suppression calls (ties up radios)
* Matrices: hearing an explosion
* Matrices: hearing an explosion
* Day and night exercises
* Day and night exercises
* Use of additional response personnel in licensee conducted FOF exercises
* Use of additional response personnel in licensee conducted FOF exercises
    - e.g., vehicle search personnel for sally port operations
- e.g., vehicle search personnel for sally port operations
* Vehicle speed limits versus responder engagements
* Vehicle speed limits versus responder engagements
* Use of gas masks in exercises
* Use of gas masks in exercises
* Understanding of how long equipment last upon LOOP
* Understanding of how long equipment last upon LOOP
* Understanding of equipment that supplies back-up power (what/where/how)
* Understanding of equipment that supplies back-up power (what/where/how)
Questions?


Questions?
10}}
10}}

Latest revision as of 10:20, 15 November 2024

Speb Presentation for NEI FOF Forum 2023
ML23030B638
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/30/2023
From:
Security Performance Evaluation Branch
To:
References
Download: ML23030B638 (1)


Text

NEI FORCE-ON -FORCE FORUM 2023

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response Division of Security Operations Security Performance Evaluation Branch Panel Members

2 Team Observations

  • The information presented by the panel is observations conducted during NRC-evaluated force-on-force and IP 92707 inspections.
  • The items presented by the panel members are observations only and do not require any commitments by licensees.

3 Lessons Learned IP 92707

  • The staff concluded that continuing to utilize the IP 92707 does not provide a sufficient evaluation of the overall protective strategy but is useful in testing defense-in-depth capabilities.
  • Positives:
  • Minimal controller issues
  • Evaluation of internal response positions
  • Efficiencies gained with briefings

4 Lessons Learned IP 92707

  • Areas for improvement:
  • Does not provide a holistic evaluation of the overall protective strategy
  • Not able to utilize all possible responders during each LSTRD
  • Ability to evaluate command & control
  • MILES equipment varied
  • Performance and training of adversaries varied

5 Lessons Learned Addendum 5

  • Positives
  • Exercise outcome determination
  • Reduced number of personnel
  • Challenges:
  • Element of surprise
  • Multiple attack vectors
  • Resetting individuals from outside to inside
  • Knowledge gap/unearned information

6 Best Practice IP 71130.03

  • MAF directors attending tabletops, protective strategy briefs
  • Conducting MAF tours on Wednesday afternoon after NRC inspection team provides the general parameters of likely exercises to MAF director
  • Locating MAF director team room and NRC team room near each other during Planning Week
  • Conducting OCA/PA/VA tours simultaneously
  • Submitting the MAF package with the NRC submittal so the NRC inspection can review it in the office versus on-site
  • Consider limiting the use of SGI matrices to those that absolutely need them

7 Best Practice IP 71130.03

  • Placing responders in positions necessary to expedite exercise(s)
  • Conference call/bridge line for controller calls
  • Open line between the lead control cell and lead adversary controller
  • Adding realism to the exercise(s)
  • Radio checks conducted at MILES trailer
  • Provide videos of no play areas in which radiation levels may preclude play

8 Areas for Consideration

  • Play and control of n o play" areas
  • Suppression calls (ties up radios)
  • Matrices: hearing an explosion
  • Day and night exercises
  • Use of additional response personnel in licensee conducted FOF exercises

- e.g., vehicle search personnel for sally port operations

  • Vehicle speed limits versus responder engagements
  • Use of gas masks in exercises
  • Understanding of how long equipment last upon LOOP
  • Understanding of equipment that supplies back-up power (what/where/how)

Questions?

10