ML20236C496: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000482/1989012]]
| number = ML20236C496
| issue date = 03/02/1989
| title = Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-482/89-12 on 890130-0203 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Physical Security Program,Including Mgt Support,Ler Followup,Security Program Plan & Audits & Physical Barriers
| author name = Everett R, Kelly J
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation =
| docket = 05000482
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 50-482-89-12, NUDOCS 8903220185
| package number = ML20236C488
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 1
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000482/1989012]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:--
  .      ....
    .      ,
                      *
                                                                                                            \
                -
                                                    APPENDIX B
                                                                                                          1
                                      U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                  j
                                                    REGION IV--
                                                                                                            l
              NRC Inspection Report:    50-482/89-12                  . Operating License: NPF-42
              Docket: 'STN 50-482
              Licensee: Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC)
                          P.O. Box 411
                          Burlington, Kansas 66839
                                                                                                            l
              Facility Name: Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS)                                          I
              Inspection'At: WCGS, Burlington, Kansas
              Inspection Conducted: January 30 through- February 3,1989                                    j
                                                                                                          l
              Inspector:
                                  A. F. Kelly, Senior Security Inspector
                                                                                                        '
                              'J.  .
                                                                                          Date'
                        M Security and Emergency Preparedness Section
              Approved:                  8
                                R. J. Everett, Chief, g urity and Emergency              Date'
                                  Preparedness SectioV
                                                                                                            l
              Inspection Summary                                                                          )
              Inspection Conducted January 30 through February 3,1989 (Report 50-482/89-12)
              Areas Inspected:    Routine, unannounced inspection of certain areas of the
              physical security program. The areas inspected within the' physical security
              program included: management support, licensee event report followup, security
              program plan, and audits; protected and vital area physical barriers, detection
              and assessment aids; protected and vital area access. control of personnel,
              packages, and vehicles; alarm stations and communications; power supply;
              testing, maintenance, and compensatory measures; and security training and
              qualifications.
              Results: Within the areas inspected, one apparent violation was identified
              (inadequate assessment aids, paragraph 4).
              A clear understanding of technical issues continues to be demonstrated.
              Approaches are usually viable, but the timeliness of implementation'tends to be-
              slow. The administrative activities associated with'the fitness for duty
                                                                    .
              program continue to be very good' The licensee recognizes the need to include
                                                  .
              testing for alcohol abuse into their program, but have not yet settled on an
              appropriate technique.
,
        e90322o185 s90309                        ENCLOSURE CONTAINS
!      PDR  ADOCK 05000482                      SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
        G                  PNU                  UPON SEPARATION THIS
                                                  PAGE IS DECONTROLLED -
                                                                                            _-- --__ _ -
}}

Revision as of 18:53, 25 January 2022

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20236C496&oldid=3420287"