|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Adams
| | #REDIRECT [[IR 05000424/1989013]] |
| | number = ML20246N562
| |
| | issue date = 07/10/1989
| |
| | title = Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-424/89-13.Example Two of Violation 50-424/89-13-01 Still Considered Valid
| |
| | author name = Gibson A
| |
| | author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| |
| | addressee name = Hairston W
| |
| | addressee affiliation = GEORGIA POWER CO.
| |
| | docket = 05000424
| |
| | license number =
| |
| | contact person =
| |
| | document report number = NUDOCS 8907190397
| |
| | title reference date = 06-14-1989
| |
| | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| |
| | page count = 2
| |
| }}
| |
| See also: [[see also::IR 05000424/1989013]]
| |
| | |
| =Text=
| |
| {{#Wiki_filter:_
| |
| +
| |
| ;T.
| |
| ,
| |
| ' '
| |
| July 10, 1989
| |
| i
| |
| G=rs'a Fow.:- Company
| |
| ATTN: Mr. W. G. Hairston, III
| |
| Senior Vice President -
| |
| Nuclear Operations
| |
| P. O. Box 1295
| |
| Birmingham, AL 35201
| |
| Gentlemen:
| |
| SUBJECT: REPORT N0. 50-424/89-13
| |
| Thank you for your response of June 14, 1989, to our Notice of Violation, issued
| |
| on May 15, 1989, concerning activities conducted at your Vogtle facility. We
| |
| have evaluated your response and found that it meets the requirements of
| |
| 10 CFR 2.201.
| |
| However, we disagree with your reasoning for denial of example two of violation
| |
| 50-424/89-13-01. Specifically, the basis of our disagreement is your statement
| |
| that "the training was provided during Licensed Operator Requalification
| |
| Training during 1988 Requal Segment 88-07. 'his training used LO-LP-35205
| |
| Revision 2, which was in effect from 9/30/8e through 2/21/89. This ;esson plan
| |
| included information relating to the use of the Technical Specification (TS)
| |
| cooldown curves (including instruments used)." Lesson plan LO-LP-35205
| |
| Revision 2 did have hand written information which addressed the new changes
| |
| to the TS cooldown curve, but the TS graphs in the training material depicting
| |
| the cooldown limits did not contain the current TS cooldown curve information,
| |
| i.e., which instrument /s were to be used during cooldown. Furthermore, your
| |
| contention that "once training is complete and changes are incorporated into
| |
| plant documents or the plant, training on that particular item is no longer
| |
| needed", is not acceptable. In this particular situation, subsequent training
| |
| would have been conducted using lesson plan LO-LP-35205 Revision 3. This lesson
| |
| plan contained the same cooldown curves as revision 2, hence incorrect TS
| |
| cooldown graphs would have been utilized. These graphs did not contain
| |
| information as to which instruments were to be used. Therefore, the second
| |
| examole of the above violation is still considered valid. However, during
| |
| the inspection adequate corrective act:ons were implemented and issued in
| |
| requalification lesson plan, LO-LP-35205-04. This item is considered closed
| |
| and no further response is necessary.
| |
| Additionally, Georgia Fower Company GPC offered information in mitigation of the
| |
| conclusion drawn with regard to example one and three of Violation 424/89-13-01,
| |
| which was that the Corrective Action Program is ineffective. Your presentation
| |
| explained that while 100 percent compliance has not been achieved with the
| |
| required reading program, the reading program has undergone several evolutions
| |
| since its original conception and many weaknesses noted by both the NRC and
| |
| the licensee have been addressed and corrected. This explanation, though
| |
| reasonable, is not sufficient reason for mitigation. In addition, the
| |
| repetitiveness of missed reviews of the required reading book coupled with the
| |
| fact that the responsible supervisors were unaware that some individuals were
| |
| repeat offenders causes concern about the adequacy of your corrective action
| |
| program to prevent recurrence.
| |
| 8907190397 g90710
| |
| DR
| |
| ADOCK 05000424
| |
| PNU ggo) 00
| |
| __ -_ L
| |
| | |
| n.- . , =, . a-gy
| |
| ' !5
| |
| '
| |
| .,s,. (
| |
| '
| |
| -
| |
| , g.
| |
| ,y ,
| |
| ,.
| |
| ,
| |
| h.hSO! Q: e
| |
| p7*,. t
| |
| -
| |
| - -8 >
| |
| (.
| |
| _[, <
| |
| , lGeor,giai Powers Comp'any_ 2 July 10,;1989l
| |
| ~_p
| |
| . -
| |
| l
| |
| L lWelwillLexamine <theDimplementation.-of your corrective: actions during future
| |
| '
| |
| Inspections. We . appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
| |
| Sincerely,
| |
| ,
| |
| ; -(ORIGINAL SIGNED BY E. W. MERSCHOFF FOR)-
| |
| .
| |
| Albert F. Gibson', Director
| |
| Division of Reactor Safety
| |
| -cc: 'R. P. Mcdonald, Executive Vice
| |
| "
| |
| . President-Nuclear' Operations
| |
| . C. ' K. - McCoy, .Vice President-Nuclear
| |
| G. R. Fredrick, Quality Assurance
| |
| Site Manager.:
| |
| G. Rockhold,, Jr. , General Manager.-.
| |
| . _ Nu lear Operations
| |
| J. A.., Bailey, Manager-Licensing
| |
| B. W. Churchill, Esquire, Shaw,
| |
| ,
| |
| -Pittman, Potts, and Trowbridge
| |
| _
| |
| J. E. Joiner, Esquire, Trotman,
| |
| Sanders, Lockerman, and
| |
| '
| |
| Ashmore
| |
| ;D.: Kirkland, III, Counsel,
| |
| Office of the Consumer's Utility
| |
| Council
| |
| . _
| |
| -State of Georgia
| |
| m
| |
| bec: E. Reis, OGC
| |
| ~J.'Hopkins, NRR
| |
| M. Sinkule, RII
| |
| '''
| |
| .NRC Resident Inspector
| |
| bM!tfc"ument Control Desk
| |
| u
| |
| 4
| |
| RII RII l R
| |
| 3 RI!h.
| |
| BBreslau:obw
| |
| 06/gi/89
| |
| PKelj og'g
| |
| 06/7p/89
| |
| .nh'eales
| |
| The Gibson
| |
| 06/ /89 Of/w/89
| |
| .
| |
| _N_YN-__-_-'__.__.,_L___._ ___L____,_,_______ _ , _ _ _ _ _
| |
| }}
| |