ML20148E984: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IA-78-250, Responds to 780920 FOIA Request for Documents Re Evaluation of Operator Reactor Licensees.Since NRC Cannot Respond within Statutory Time Limit,Lack of Response Can Be Considered Denial.Opportunity to Appeal Will Be Granted]]
{{Adams
| number = ML20148E984
| issue date = 10/27/1978
| title = Responds to 780920 FOIA Request for Documents Re Evaluation of Operator Reactor Licensees.Since NRC Cannot Respond within Statutory Time Limit,Lack of Response Can Be Considered Denial.Opportunity to Appeal Will Be Granted
| author name = Felton J
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
| addressee name = Cubie J
| addressee affiliation = UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS
| docket =
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = FOIA-78-250
| document report number = NUDOCS 7811070212
| package number = ML20148E990
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 1
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. . _
                                            ~
A                        UNITED STATES 3 '(                4                NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION d                h                  WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
      $+\; vl]               ,
OCT 2 71978 Mr. James M. Cubie Union of Concerned Scientists 1025 15th Street, N.W.                                IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, D.C. 20005                                TO F01A-78-250
 
==Dear Mr. Cubie:==
 
This is in further response to your {{letter dated|date=September 20, 1978|text=letter dated September 20, 1978}} in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, two
        .          documents relating to the evaluation of operating reactor licensees.
We will continue to make every effort to expedite the processing of your request. However, since NRC has not been able to respond to your request within the statutory response time, you may wish to consider this a denial of your request. You should be aware, however, that when f    i            NRC does respond to your request, you will be given the opportunity to appeal the denial of any documents that are actually withheld from disclosure.
If you consider this a denial of your request, you may, as provided in 10 CFR 9.11, file a written appeal to the Executive Director for Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555.          Your appeal should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an
                    " Appeal from an Initial FOIA Decision."
Sincerely,
                                                      /
!                                                          J. M. Felton, Director l
Division of Rules & Records Office of Administration i
7811070al1                  ggrQ2453VD -
                                                                      -          _. .-.      . - . .}}

Latest revision as of 23:19, 11 December 2021

Responds to 780920 FOIA Request for Documents Re Evaluation of Operator Reactor Licensees.Since NRC Cannot Respond within Statutory Time Limit,Lack of Response Can Be Considered Denial.Opportunity to Appeal Will Be Granted
ML20148E984
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/27/1978
From: Felton J
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Cubie J
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS
Shared Package
ML20148E990 List:
References
FOIA-78-250 NUDOCS 7811070212
Download: ML20148E984 (1)


Text

. . _

~

A UNITED STATES 3 '( 4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION d h WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

$+\; vl] ,

OCT 2 71978 Mr. James M. Cubie Union of Concerned Scientists 1025 15th Street, N.W. IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, D.C. 20005 TO F01A-78-250

Dear Mr. Cubie:

This is in further response to your letter dated September 20, 1978 in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, two

. documents relating to the evaluation of operating reactor licensees.

We will continue to make every effort to expedite the processing of your request. However, since NRC has not been able to respond to your request within the statutory response time, you may wish to consider this a denial of your request. You should be aware, however, that when f i NRC does respond to your request, you will be given the opportunity to appeal the denial of any documents that are actually withheld from disclosure.

If you consider this a denial of your request, you may, as provided in 10 CFR 9.11, file a written appeal to the Executive Director for Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. Your appeal should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an

" Appeal from an Initial FOIA Decision."

Sincerely,

/

! J. M. Felton, Director l

Division of Rules & Records Office of Administration i

7811070al1 ggrQ2453VD -

- _. .-. . - . .